:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:融入21世紀就業技能的通識教育--以科學素養為例
書刊名:全人教育學報
作者:黃明輝
作者(外文):Huang, A. Ming-huey
出版日期:2015
卷期:13
頁次:頁35-56
主題關鍵詞:通識教育就業能力科學素養課程設計Liberal educationProfessional skillsScience literacyCourse design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:90
通識教育的目的是經由培養學生廣博的知識與雅緻的生活能力,以達成完整人格的教育;有別於為培養特殊職業技能的專職教育。教育部一方面大力推廣通識教育提高通識學分數,又要求大學降低畢業總學分數,因此許多系被逼得減少專業科目。學生的專業訓練不足,輿論批評學生缺乏就業能力,導致大學生畢業薪資過低的窘境。甚至將經濟不振的責任指向錯誤的教育方向。因此教育部又再推動提升學生就業能力的構想!專業科目與通識課程的角力,讓各學校無所適從!本文嘗試跳脫通識與專業的競爭關係,試圖將就業能力融入通識教育之中。首先從基礎就業技能談起,接著援引美國的21 世紀夥伴聯盟 (The Partnership for 21st Century Skills) 的架構,轉換到臺灣的大學教育中,如何培育出21 世紀的公民所需的就業技能。接著以科學素養為例,談論科學素養課程如何融合通識教育與就業職能。
The main purpose of liberal education is whole-person education through cultivating students with broad knowledge and elegant life. This is quite different from the tranning for specific professional skills. The Minister of Education (MoE) had promoted liberal education by increasing the credit hours of liberal education courses, while reducing the total number of credit hours for graduation. Many departments were forced to reduce their required courses. It is generally believed that most college graduate are lack of the professional skills so employers are reluctant to pay high wages for those who are not ready for the job market. Some even attribute the responsibility of economic recess to the mis-led educational policy. Now, the MOE were forced to promote professional skills again, such ambiguity make many educators confuse again! This article tries to resolve the contradictions between liberal education and professional education by infusion of professional skills into liberal education courses. I first starts with fundamental question of professional skills, and then I will mention how to transform liberal education courses based on some conclusions from The Partnership for 21st Century Skills forum. Finally, I will use a specific course of science literacy to illustrate the infusion of professional skills into a a libral education courses.
期刊論文
1.李哲迪(2009)。臺灣國中學生在TIMSS及PISA的科學學習成果表現及其啟示。研習資訊,26(6),73-88。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃能堂(20090900)。職場核心能力對臺灣技職教育課程與教學的啟示。教育資料集刊,43,19-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳政宏(20100900)。大學課程之重新分類:擺脫通識與專業課程二分法的問題。教育研究與發展期刊,6(3),257-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃茂在、陳文典(20120600)。科學素養的內涵。教師天地,178,11-16。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃明輝(2013)。從末日流言談科學素養。科技報導,2013(4),14-16。  延伸查詢new window
6.Poplo, R.(1999)。Scientinc literacy for all citizens: different concepts and contents。Public Understand. Sei.,8,123-137。  new window
7.Turner, S.(2008)。School science and its controversies; or, whatever happened to scientific literacy?。Public Understanding of Science,17,55-72。  new window
8.Miller, Jon D.(1998)。The measurement of civic scientific literacy。Public Understanding of Science,7(3),203-223。  new window
9.靳知勤(20071200)。科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養--臺灣學術精英的看法。科學教育學刊,15(6),627-646。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.黃明輝(2013)。從21世紀技能與PISA看通識教育。2013聯合大學通識教育硏討會。國立聯合大學:奇真企業。1-7。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃明輝(2014)。通識學生學習成效檢核方法分享。2014桃竹苗通識教育論壇,(會議日期: 2014/01/15)。中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.賴明豐、王宣智、黃仟文(2013)。全球與臺灣人才培育發展現況、問題與趨勢。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王貞懿(2011)。從新聞中的偽科學報導看大學生的科學素養與媒體識讀能力(碩士論文)。政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Machlup, F.(1973)。The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Miller, J. D.(1983)。The American people and science policy。New York:Pergamon Press。  new window
其他
1.天下雜誌(2013)。四成教授:臺灣教育制度無助提升學生素質,http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5043846, 2013/01/19。  延伸查詢new window
2.IEET(2010)。工程教育認證規範(EAC2010),http://www.ieet.org.tw/InfoT.aspx?n=stdEAC, 2014/10/11。  new window
3.PISA(2014)。PISA科學素養,http://pisa2015.nctu.edu.tw/pisa/index.php/tw/about-oisa-tw/pisa-test-tw/scientific-literacv-tw。  new window
4.主計總處國勢普查處(2013)。各業受僱員工薪資調査統計表,http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/24248301671.pdf, 2013/05/22。  延伸查詢new window
5.李大華(2013)。倒退15年-大學生起薪比國中畢只多300,http://news.tvbs.com.tw/old-news.html?nid=211438, 2013/05/22。  延伸查詢new window
6.彭淮南(2004)。低薪不是國恥教育出了問題,http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NATS5/8529565.shtml, 2014/03/06。  延伸查詢new window
7.華視新聞(2012)。東港基地台拆光手機訊號爛,http://news.cts.com.tw/cts/life/201206/201206281036336.html, 2013/08/06。  延伸查詢new window
8.蕭儒棠(2013)。二十一世紀能力與新世代科學教育標準下的論證評量槪念,文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.P2(2014)。The Partnership for 21st Century Skills,http://www.p21.org/。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sjoberg, S.(1997)。Scientific literacy and school science。Science, Technology and Citizenship。Oslo。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE