:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:永明延寿と「教禅一致」--調停者としての延寿像の変遷
書刊名:佛光學報
作者:柳幹康
作者(外文):Yanagi, Mikiyasu
出版日期:2015
卷期:新1:1
頁次:頁225-252
主題關鍵詞:永明延壽宗鏡錄教禪一致禪教一致覺範慧洪中峰明本憨山徳清雍正皇帝永明延寿宗鏡録教禅一致禅教一致覚範慧洪雍正帝Yongming YanshouZongjing LuThe unity of Doctrinal and Meditative approachesThe unity of Meditative and Doctrinal approachesJuefan HuihongZhongfeng MingbenHanshan DeqingYongzheng Emperor
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:45
本文通過追溯作為調和者的永明延壽( 904-976)形象之變遷來釐清延壽究竟是如何漸漸被賦予「教禪一致」這種看法。略分以下四個階段: (1)從認識延壽的贊寧(919-1002)和道原(生歿年不詳)各自所編的延壽傳乃至百餘年後北宋禪僧慧洪(1071-1128)所撰的延壽傳記,都看不到所謂「教禪一致」這種提法。(2)到了元代,皇帝決定把教宗(天臺、慈恩、賢首等)列於禪宗之上,當時著名禪僧中峰明本(12631323)提出延壽調和了教與禪這一見解,但他並沒有用「教禪一致」一詞。(3)到了明末佛教復興時期,四大高僧之一憨山德清(1546-1623)明確提出,延壽的代表作《宗鏡錄》是融合教禪之書。不過,德清認為《宗鏡錄》不僅僅體現了「教禪一致」思想,也是一部融合了佛教內部一切所說的中興之書。(4)到了清代,掌握國家最高權力的雍正皇帝(1722-1735在位)讚歎延壽是「震旦第一導師」,《宗鏡錄》是一部「震旦宗師著述中第一妙典」。雍正高度評價延壽的思想利於帝國的統一與安定。從此,延壽的這種形象被確立而不可動搖。 綜上所述,延壽在各個時代的形象變遷中反映了各時代佛教界的動向。本文闡明延壽「教禪一致」的形象萌生於元代,確立於明末。
In this paper I will clarify how the image of “unifier of doctrinal and meditative approaches” was bestowed upon Yongming Yanshou (904-976) and how it changed throughout history. There are four stages in brief, as follows: First, I will examine two biographies of Yanshou written by the figures Zanning (919-1002) and Daoyuan (dates unknown) who knew Yanshou directly and another biography written a little over a century after his death by Huihong (1071-1128). In none of these three early biographies is Yanshou regarded as a unifier of meditative and doctrinal approaches. Secondly, moving on to the Yuan dynasty, where the emperors were in support of placing doctrinal traditions (such as the Tiantai, Consciousness-Only, or Huayan traditions) as superior to the Chan (or meditation) tradition, the famous Chan monk Zhongfeng Mingben (1263-1323) put forth the idea that Yanshou had harmonized doctrinal and meditative approaches but did not use the term “unity of doctrinal and meditative approaches.” Third, in the late Ming dynasty, during the revival period of Buddhism, one of the four most eminent monks of that time Hanshan Deqing (1546-1623) put forth the idea that Yanshou’s representative work, Zongjing Lu (Record of the Axiom Mirror), is a work that unifies doctrinal and meditative approaches. However, Hanshan believed that the Zongjing Lu not only reflected the ideology of the “unity of doctrinal and meditative approaches,” but was also a work which syncretized all Buddhist teachings in a revival. Fourth, by the Qing dynasty the most powerful figure the nation, the Yongzheng emperor (who reigned from 1722-1735), praised Yanshou as the “greatest master in China,” and the Zongjing Lu as the “greatest work ever written by a Chinese master.” The Yongzheng emperor’s high evaluation of Yanshou was beneficial to the peace and unification of the empire and at that time definitively solidified Yanshou’s status. In conclusion, the image of Yanshou in each era is deeply reflective of the background of the Buddhist communities throughout history as Yanshou’s image as a unifier of doctrinal and meditation approaches was born in the Yuan and fully established by the end of the Ming
期刊論文
1.金東淑(2011)。小考《宗鏡錄》中的"禪教一致"思想。五台山研究,107,19-24。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊文斌(2009)。延壽、宗密"禪教合一"論的差異。安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版),33(2),37-43。  延伸查詢new window
3.千葉正(1994)。『宗鏡録』と『釈摩訶衍論』--教禅一致想についての一考察。駒沢大学大学院仏教学研究会年報,27,45-55。  延伸查詢new window
4.方立天(2005)。永明延壽與禪教一致思潮。哲學研究,2005(3),53-57。  延伸查詢new window
5.石井修道(1969)。『宗鏡録』におよぼした澄観の著作の影響について--永明延寿の教禅一致説成立過程の疑問。印度学仏教学研究,17(2),130-131。  延伸查詢new window
6.仙石景章(1997)。延寿における唯心と唯識。印度哲学仏教学,12,196-206。  延伸查詢new window
7.池田英淳(1939)。永明延寿の思想。浄土學,14,68-85。  延伸查詢new window
8.池田魯参(1983)。永明延寿の天台学。印度学仏教学研究,32(1),97-102。  延伸查詢new window
9.伊吹敦(2013)。モンゴルの中国支配と禅(下之下)--要説・中国禅思想史37。禅文化,230,62-69。  延伸查詢new window
10.果波(2012)。永明延壽大師的禪教一致思想初探。靈山海會,37,92-96。  延伸查詢new window
11.柳幹康(2013)。永明延寿と「禅浄一致」--蓮宗祖師としての延寿像の形成と変遷。仏教学,55,115-143。  延伸查詢new window
12.柳幹康(2014)。永明延寿と中国仏教。東アジア仏教研究,12,147-170。  延伸查詢new window
13.荻須純道(1966)。永明延寿の思想と実践。禅文化,40,74-80。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃公元(2006)。雍正皇帝與永明延壽禪師。杭州師範學院學報(社會科學版),2006(3),89-94。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃公元(2010)。從明末四大高僧看永明延壽對晩明佛教的深刻影響。世界宗教研究,2010(5),15-25。  延伸查詢new window
16.黃誠(2012)。永明延壽禪師的著述及思想略論。貴州大學學報(社會科學版),30(4),16-20。  延伸查詢new window
17.森江俊孝(1980)。永明延寿の教学と実践。日本仏教学会年報,45,193-211。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊曾文(2003)。延壽的禪、教會通思想。佛學研究,12,237-248。  延伸查詢new window
19.潘桂明(1994)。永明延壽的融合思想及其影響。佛學研究,3,117-124。  延伸查詢new window
20.蔡惠明(1996)。延壽禪師與靈隱、淨慈兩寺。浙江佛教,1996(3),114-116。  延伸查詢new window
21.韓京洙(1989)。永明延寿の思想。大正大学大学院研究論集,13,95-108。  延伸查詢new window
22.荒木見悟(2005)。明末における永明延寿の影像。東洋古典学研究,19,39-54。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王翠玲(2000)。永明延壽の研究:『宗鏡錄』を中心として(博士論文)。東京大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.孔維勤(1983)。永明延壽宗教論。臺北:新文豐出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Welter, Albert(1993)。The Meaning of Myriad Good Deeds: A Study of Yung-ming Yen-shou and the Wan-shan t'ung-kuei chi。New York:Peter Lang。  new window
3.蔡運辰(1983)。二十五種藏經目錄對照考釋。臺北:新文豐出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.延壽、劉澤亮(2008)。永明延壽禪師全書。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.荒木見悟(1985)。雲棲袾宏の研究。東京:大蔵。  延伸查詢new window
6.平野聰(2004)。清帝國とチベット問題。名古屋:名古屋大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
7.Welter, Albert(2011)。Yongming Yanshou's Conception of Chan in the Zongjing lu: A Special Transmission with in the Scriptures。Oxford University Press。  new window
8.胡順萍(2004)。永明延壽「一心」思想之內涵要義與理論建構。臺北:萬卷樓。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃公元(2009)。一代巨匠 兩宗祖師--永明延壽大師及其影響研究。北京:宗教文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.趙翼(1957)。陔余叢考。上海:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.杭州佛學院(2005)。永明延壽大師研究。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.田青青(2010)。永明延壽心學研究。成都:巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
13.柳幹康(2015)。永明延寿と『宗鏡録』の研究--一心による中国仏教の再編。京都:法藏館。  延伸查詢new window
14.Huang, Yi-hsuan(2005)。Integrating Chinese Buddhism: A Study of Yongming Yanshou's Guanxin Xnansh。Taipei:Dharma Drum Publishing Corporation。  new window
15.孫勁松(2013)。心史:永明延壽佛學思想研究。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.野口善敬(2005)。元代禪宗史研究。京都:禪文化研究所。  延伸查詢new window
17.伊吹敦(2001)。禅の歴史。京都:法藏館。  延伸查詢new window
18.天目中峰、野口善敬(1985)。中峯廣錄。京都:中文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.智覺禪師(1994)。宗鏡錄。台北:新文豐出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.(1990)。景徳伝灯錄。京都:禪文化研究所。  延伸查詢new window
21.王翠玲(2007)。永明延壽與中國佛教。台南:妙心出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.王鳳珠(2007)。永明禪師禪淨融合思想研究。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
23.平川彰(1977)。インド・中国・日本 仏教通史。東京:春秋社。  延伸查詢new window
24.胡建明(2012)。圭峯宗密思想の綜合的研究。東京:春秋社。  延伸查詢new window
25.郭延成(2012)。永明延壽"一心"與中觀思想的交涉。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
26.陳全新(2012)。永明延壽圓融觀研究。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.楊文斌(2011)。一心與圓教--永明延壽思想研究。成都:巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
28.冉雲華(1999)。永明延壽。台北:東大圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
29.江燦騰(19900000)。晚明佛教叢林改革與佛學諍辯之研究:以憨山德清的改革生涯為中心。臺北:新文豐。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.宋道發(2005)。從宗密的禪教一致論到延壽的禪教融合論:禪教合一思想源流述略。永明延壽大師研究。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.金東淑(2009)。《宗鏡錄》的"禪教一致"思想。佛學與國學:樓宇烈教授七秩晉五頌壽文集。北京:九州出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.董群(2005)。延壽對宗密禪教融合論思想的繼承和發展。永明延壽大師研究。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.方立天(2005)。永明延壽與禪教一致思潮。永明延壽大師研究。北京:宗教文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.野口善敬(2010)。元・明の仏教。中国文化としての仏教。東京:佼成出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE