五○年代在香港的第三勢力運動，藉由刊物出版，進行文宣闡述理念，一直是他們表達訴求與推展運動的重要方式與管道。因此，無論是顛峰時期的《自由陣線》或走向調整時期的《聯合評論》（以下簡稱《聯評》），都反映了第三勢力運動，在不同時空環境下，倡導者的理念訴求。作為第三勢力運動殿軍的《聯評》，若從言論分析的內容來看，大體呈現三個面向：一是第三勢力相關理念之闡述；二為對國內、外局勢的評論；三係第三勢力路線之修正，要言之，即有關台灣民主化訴求諸議題。基本上，前二項在《自由陣線》時期，已有相當完整的論述，筆者過去也有文章述及，故本文暫且不談。本文重點是放在《聯評》上，探討該刊對第三勢力重新定調之說法；及針對台灣「雷案」、「違憲連任」等重大議題之批判。

The Third Force Movement in Hong Kong in the 1950s, published by the publication and carried out the concept of propaganda, has always been an important way and means of expressing their demands and promoting the movement. Therefore, whether it is the peak of the ＂Freedom Front Weekly＂ or to the adjustment period of ＂United Voice Weekly＂, the concept and demands of advocates are all reflected in the Third Force Movement in different time and space environment. ＂United Voice Weekly＂, as the runner-up of the Third Force Movement, from the contents of its analysis, showing three aspects: one is the elaboration of the concept of the Third Force Movement, another is the comments on domestic and international political situations, and the other is the amendment of the Third Force Movement, that is, the issues of Taiwan's democratization. Basically, the first two aspects are clearly discoursed in the ＂Freedom Front Weekly＂ period. I have also mentioned in my researches previously, therefore, have been omitted. This research focuses on the ＂United Voice Weekly＂, to explore the redefinition of the Third Force Movement by the journal; and criticize the major issues, such as the ＂Lei-che'n Case＂ and ＂Unconstitutional Reelection＂ in Taiwan.