:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從聯合國《兒童權利公約》反思我國學生參與課綱審查之重要課題
書刊名:當代教育研究季刊
作者:陳玟樺劉美慧
作者(外文):Chen, Wen-huaLiu, Mei-hui
出版日期:2018
卷期:26:4
頁次:頁1-45
主題關鍵詞:兒童權利公約兒童權利公約施行法高級中等教育法課程綱要Convention on the Rights of the ChildImplementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the ChildSenior High School Education ActCurriculum guidelines
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:351
研究目的:2016年,立法院通過《高級中等教育法》修法,課程審議會正式納入「學生代表」引起不小爭議。事實上,為保障兒童權利,臺灣在2014年已通過《兒童權利公約施行法》並於同年11月20日施行,《兒童權利公約》是聯合國目前獲得最迅速和廣泛批准的國際人權公約,多數國家對公約的空前接受度清楚地表明了全球對促進兒童權利的廣泛承諾。有鑑於此波爭議較少從「兒童權利」觀點出發,且為具體呼應我國自願將公約國內法化、與國際人權制度接軌之初衷,於此,本研究旨從聯合國《兒童權利公約》反思我國學生參與課綱審查之重要卻較受忽略的課題。研究設計/方法/取徑:本研究先就我國自解嚴以來學生參與國家層級課程修訂之背景脈絡進行理解,主要運用法律史的研究方法;其次,就聯合國《兒童權利公約》相關內涵進行簡要分析;最後,再從聯合國《兒童權利公約》反思我國學生參與課程審議的幾個重要課題並提出幾點建議供參。研究發現或結論:依據《兒童權利公約》的主要概念,兒童與成人具有相同人權,他們並非父母的財產,亦非等待救援的客體,兒童為自己權利的主體,此對學生參與公共事務具正面意涵。公約所闡述的精神和原則要能實現,要有賴家庭、學校,以及為兒童提供服務的機構和其他所有行政單位等能對兒童權利有所認知並予以尊重方有可能,此亟需國人之共同努力。研究原創性/價值:這項研究在教育領域是初步的,期望為學生參與公共事務提供一個新的詮釋視角。它突顯了將孩子視為個人、家庭和社區成員一份子的眼光,指出兒童具有相宜於其年齡和發展階段的權利和責任。
Purpose: In 2016, the Legislative Yuan passed amendments to the Senior High School Education Act to overhaul the review process for the curriculum guidelines, and Curriculum Deliberation Council (CDC) members formally incorporated into the students' representatives, which caused controversy among the people of the country. In fact, Taiwan passed the "Implementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child" in 2014, promulgated the Act that year and implemented it on Nov. 20 the same year. The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) is the most rapidly and widely ratified international human rights treaty in history. The unprecedented acceptance of the Convention clearly shows a wide global commitment to advancing children's rights. With this wave of controversy rarely inspected from the perspective of "children's rights", coupled with the response to the domestication of the CRC, this study focuses on exploring important but suspended lessons on students' participation in CDC from the rights of the child recognized in the CRC. Design/methodology/approach: The study applied the research method of law history to trace Taiwan students' participation in national-level curriculum decision-making after the termination of martial law. It also briefly reviewed the context and content of the CRC, followed by some reflections on Taiwan students' participation in CDC from the rights of the child recognized in the CRC. Findings: According to the main concept of CRC, children have the same general human rights as adults; they are not the property of their parents nor the objects of waiting for the rescue, but the subject of their own rights. These big ideas have positive implications for students' participation in public affairs. The spirit and principles articulated in the CRC can only become a reality when they are respected by everyone-within the family, in schools and other institutions that provide services for children, in communities and at all levels of administration. Based on that, the most urgent response of our people now is to recognize and clarify the concept of human rights and take further wise action. Originality/value: This study is preliminary in the field of education and looks forward to providing a new perspective on students' participation in public affairs. It offers a vision of the child as an individual and as a member of a family and community, with rights and responsibilities appropriate to his or her age and stage of development.
期刊論文
1.卯靜儒、甄曉蘭、林永豐(20120700)。高中課程改革之政策形塑與實施的歷程分析:以95課程暫綱為例。課程與教學,15(3),181-205。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.施慧玲(19990700)。論我國兒童少年性剝削防治立法--以兒童少年福利保護為中心理念之法律社會學觀點。國立中正大學法學集刊,2,45-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.程晏鈴(20160727)。學生審課綱成笑話?潘文忠:年輕世代的公民教育。天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
4.溫明麗(19980400)。自由主義的貧困--教育改革總諮議報告書中「鬆綁」理念的省思。中等教育,49(2),61-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Turk, Austin T.(1976)。Law as a weapon in social conflict。Social Problems,23(3),276-291。  new window
圖書
1.UNICIF(2007)。A Human rights-based approach to Education for All: a framework for the realization of children's right to education and rights within education。UNESCO Publishing。  new window
2.教育部國民及學前教育署(2013)。普通高級中學國文及社會領域課程綱要微調公聽會手冊。臺北市:教育部國民及學前教育署。  延伸查詢new window
3.Parton, Nigel(1985)。The Politics of Child Abuse。Macmillan Education。  new window
4.李園會(2000)。兒童權利公約。臺北:內政部兒童文化局。  延伸查詢new window
5.監察院國際事務小組(2007)。法國監察制度。臺北市:監察院。  延伸查詢new window
6.Pollard, A.、Thiessen, D.、Filer, A.(1997)。Children and their curriculum: The perspectives of primary and elementary school children。London, UK:Famer。  new window
7.黃政傑(1999)。課程改革。漢文。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.李侑珊(20160728)。學生課審教部被批政治不中立,http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20160728000861-260301。  延伸查詢new window
2.林志成,林后駿(20150717)。6生闖教育部噴漆4分鐘被逮,http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20150717005479-260405。  延伸查詢new window
3.林近(20150604)。反課綱遊行?武陵校長:參加社運就不需努力進武陵了?,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1338792。  延伸查詢new window
4.林曉雲(20150729)。吳密察:微調課綱完全不合法學生是自力救濟,http://news.ltn.com.tw/index.php/news/life/breakingnews/1394811。  延伸查詢new window
5.林曉雲(20160521)。中小學校長協會發聲明反對學生任課審會代表,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/1703807。  延伸查詢new window
6.周威同(20151229)。課綱的定位與性質,https://twstreetcorner.org/2015/12/29/reimaginingtextbookguidlines/。  延伸查詢new window
7.張錦弘(20160624)。美國不讓學生審課綱學者批臺灣教育弱智化,https://video.udn.com/news/514347。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳長文(20090420)。多邊公約國內法化不能只能只靠馬總統。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃揚明(20150731)。周大觀弟反課綱遭攔阻打父嗆母:你走開,http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20150731/659223/。  延伸查詢new window
10.潘慧玲(2004)。普通高級中學課程綱要修訂第二階段行政工作小組報告,臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
11.簡立欣,蔡浩祥(20150725)。反課綱學生夜闖教育部遭控告,http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20150725000936-260309。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.高玉泉、施慧玲(2016)。兒童權利公約之歷史發展與臺灣參與。兒童權利公約。臺北市:新學林。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE