資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.135.195.204)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
半總統制民主國家的總理選擇
書刊名:
臺灣民主季刊
作者:
顏煌庭
作者(外文):
Yan, Huang-ting
出版日期:
2020
卷期:
17:1
頁次:
頁1-44
主題關鍵詞:
代理損失
;
政治生涯
;
總理
;
半總統制
;
Agency loss
;
Political career
;
Prime minister
;
Semi-presidentialism
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:
66
點閱:3
本文探討什麼因素決定半總統制民主國家的總理選擇,並提出憲法異質性和策略環境決定政治(或官僚)型總理是否被任命。首先,本文提出一種區別總理類型的二分法:政治和官僚型總理,而總理的政治生涯與可以獲得的政治資源有關,因而反映代理損失範圍。其次,憲法異質性決定總理主要的委託人是總統或國會。最後,四個策略環境(單一政黨主導、聯盟主導、雙極對抗和多極分裂)影響總統或國會是否願意承擔代理損失風險,以換取其政黨選舉前景的改善。總結來說,本文認為無論誰負責總理任命,比起雙極對抗,官僚型總理很可能在單一政黨主導下被任命。此外,多極分裂下,當總統而不是國會有權任命總理時,官僚型總理很可能被任命。本文蒐集385個半總統制民主國家內閣的資料,並採用邏輯回歸來檢驗這些論點。
以文找文
This article examines the factors structuring prime ministerial selection in semi-presidential democracies, and proposes that constitutional heterogeneity and strategic environments determine whether a political (or bureaucratic) prime minister is chosen. First, political and bureaucratic prime ministers are identified based on their political careers, which relate to political resources they can acquire and, thus, mirror the scope of agency loss. Second, constitutional heterogeneity determines the primary principal, that is, a president or a parliament. Finally, four strategic environments-single party dominance, coalition dominance, bipolar antagonism, and multipolar fragmentation-are differentiated, and influence if principals are willing to run the risk of agency loss in exchange for improved electoral prospects. In combination, this paper argues that a political prime minister is less likely to emerge under single party dominance than under bipolar antagonism, regardless of who is in charge of naming prime ministers. Further, under multipolar fragmentation, a bureaucratic prime minister is chosen when presidents, instead of parliaments, have the power to appoint prime ministers. This article tests these arguments using data from 385 cabinets of semi-presidential democracies and employing logistic regression.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Gamson, William A.(1961)。A theory of coalition formation。American sociological review,26(3),373-382。
2.
Huber, John D.、Martinez-Gallardo, Cecilia(2008)。Replacing Cabinet Ministers: Patterns of Ministerial Stability in Parliamentary Democracies。American Political Science Review,102(2),169-180。
3.
Kang, Shin-Goo(2009)。The influence of presidential heads of state on government formation in European democracies: Empirical evidence。European Journal of Political Research,48(4),543-572。
4.
Amorim Neto, Octavio、Strøm, Kaare(2006)。Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Non-Partisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies。British Journal of Political Science,36(4),619-643。
5.
Protsyk, Oleh(2005)。Prime ministers' identity in semi-presidential regimes: Constitutional norms and cabinet formation outcomes。European Journal of Political Research,44(5),721-748。
6.
Kasapović, Mirjana(2003)。Coalition Governments in Croatia: First Experience 2000-2003。Politička misao: Croatian Political Science Review,40(5),52-67。
7.
Protsyk, Oleh(2006)。Intra-Executive Competition between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of Institutional Conflict and Cooperation under Semi-Presidentialism。Political Studies,54(2),219-244。
8.
Sedelius, Thomas、Ekman, Joakim(2010)。Intra-executive Conflict and Cabinet Instability: Effects of Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe。Government and Opposition,45(4),505-530。
9.
Martin, Lanny W.、Stevenson, Randolph T.(2001)。Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies。American Journal of Political Science,45(1),33-50。
10.
Schleiter, Petra、Morgan-Jones, Edward(2009)。Party Government in Europe? Parliamentary and Semi-presidential Democracies Compared。European Journal of Political Research,48(5),665-693。
11.
Mueller, Wolfgang C.(2000)。Political Parties in Parliamentary Democracies: Making Delegation and Accountability Work。European Journal of Political Research,37(3),309-333。
12.
Metcalf, Lee Kendall(2000)。Measuring Presidential Power。Comparative Political Studies,33(5),660-685。
13.
李宜芳、石鵬翔(20141200)。半總統制的總統任命權與免除權對於總理任期的影響。東吳政治學報,32(4),1-55。
延伸查詢
14.
Schleiter, Petra、Morgan-Jones, Edward(2010)。Who's in Charge? Presidents, Assemblies, and the Political Control of Semipresidential Cabinets。Comparative Political Studies,43(11),1415-1441。
15.
Siaroff, Alan(2003)。Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and Parliamentary Distinction。European Journal of Political Research,42(3),287-312。
16.
Amorim Neto, Octavio、Lobo, Marina Costa(2009)。Portugal's Semi-Presidentialism: (Re)considered an Assessment of the President's Role in the Policy Process, 1976-2006。European Journal of Political Research,48(2),234-255。
17.
Schleiter, Petra、Morgan-Jones, Edward(2009)。Constitutional Power and Competing Risks: Monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and the Termination of East and West European Cabinets。American Political Science Review,103(3),496-512。
18.
Strøm, Kaare、Swindle, Stephen M.(2002)。Strategic Parliamentary Dissolution。American Political Science Review,96(3),575-591。
19.
Leiserson, Michael(1968)。Factions and Coalitions in One-Party Japan: An Interpretation Based on the theory of Games。American Political Science Review,62(3),770-787。
20.
陳宏銘(20161200)。半總統制下總統是否兼任黨主席與其黨政關係型態--比較視野下的馬英九總統任期經驗。臺灣民主季刊,13(4),1-42。
延伸查詢
21.
張芳華(20151200)。制度因素與非制度因素對民主崩潰的影響:46個半總統制國家的經驗研究。政治科學論叢,66,111-146。
延伸查詢
22.
蔡榮祥(20181200)。總統和國會的權力平衡與憲政衝突:以總統國會制國家祕魯、俄羅斯、喬治亞和葡萄牙為例。政治學報,66,65-101。
延伸查詢
23.
沈有忠(20160900)。政黨菁英或官僚菁英?--臺灣半總統制下的行政院院長類型與立法影響。政治科學論叢,69,75-102。
延伸查詢
24.
李鳳玉(20180600)。政黨實力、政治制度以及半總統制下政黨投入總統大選的決定。政治學報,65,81-107。
延伸查詢
25.
李鳳玉(20181200)。半總統制次類型、府會關係與族群抗議。東吳政治學報,36(3),1-58。
延伸查詢
26.
蘇子喬、王業立(20180500)。選舉制度與憲政體制的制度組合:半總統制民主國家的跨國分析。選舉研究,25(1),1-36。
延伸查詢
27.
Bajruši, Robert(2010)。Premier Opens War against Ivo Josipović。Nacional,745。
28.
Ecker, Alejandro、Meyer, Thomas M.、Müller, Wolfgang C.(2015)。The Distribution of Individual Cabinet Positions in Coalition Governments: A Sequential Approach。European Journal of Political Research,54(4),802-818。
29.
Doyle, David、Elgie, Robert(2016)。Maximizing the Reliability of Cross-national Measures of Presidential Power。British Journal of Political Science,46(4),731-741。
30.
Debus, Marc(2009)。Pre-electoral Commitments and Government Formation。Public Choice,138(1/2),45-64。
31.
Bucur, Cristina、Cheibub, José A.(2017)。Presidential Partisanship in Government Formation: Do Presidents Favor Their Parties When They Appoint the Prime Minister?。Political Research Quarterly,70(4),803-817。
32.
Fernandes, Jorge M.、Magalhães, Pedro C.(2016)。Government Survival in Semi-presidential Regimes。European Journal of Political Research,55(1),61-80。
33.
Goplerud, Max、Schleiter, Petra(2016)。An Index of Assembly Dissolution Powers。Comparative Political Studies,49(4),427-456。
34.
Ibenskas, Raimondas(2016)。Understanding Pre-electoral Coalitions in Central and Eastern Europe。British Journal of Political Science,46(4),743-761。
35.
Indridason, Indridi H.、Bowler, Shaun(2014)。Determinants of Cabinet Size。European Journal of Political Research,53(2),381-403。
36.
Kam, Christopher、Bianco, William T.、Sened, Itai、Smith, Regina(2010)。Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament。American Political Science Review,104(2),289-306。
37.
Kim, Young Hun(2015)。A Troubled Marriage? Divided Minority Government, Cohabitation, Presidential Powers, President-parliamentarism and Semi-presidentialism。Government and Opposition,50(4),652-681。
38.
Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia、Schleiter, Petra(2015)。Choosing Whom to Trust: Agency Risks and Cabinet Partisanship in Presidential Democracies。Comparative Political Studies,48(2),231-264。
39.
Morgan-Jones, Edward、Schleiter, Petra(2004)。Governmental Change in a President-Parliamentary Regime: The Case of Russia 1994-2003。Post-Soviet Affairs,20(2),132-163。
40.
Schleiter, Petra、Morgan-Jones, Edward(2018)。Presidents, Assembly Dissolution, and the Electoral Performance of Prime Ministers。Comparative Political Studies,51(6),730-758。
41.
Somer-Topcu, Zeynep、Williams, Laron K.(2008)。Survival of the Fittest? Cabinet Duration in Postcommunist Europe。Comparative Politics,40(3),313-329。
42.
Warwick, Paul V.(1992)。Economic Trends and Government Survival in West European Parliamentary Democracies。American Political Science Review,86(4),875-887。
43.
吳玉山(20110300)。半總統制:全球發展與研究議程。政治科學論叢,47,1-32。
延伸查詢
會議論文
1.
Yan, Huang-Ting(2018)。The Survival of Minority Government under Semi-presidentialism: A Perilous Combination of Powerful President and Parliament。46th European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops,(會議日期: April 10-14)。Nicosia。
圖書
1.
Laver, Michael、Shepsle, Kenneth A.(1996)。Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies。Cambridge University Press。
2.
Laver, Michael、Schofield, Norman(1990)。Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
3.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick、McCubbins, Mathew D.(1991)。The Logic of Delegation。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。
4.
Strøm, Kaare(1990)。Minority Government and Majority Rule。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
5.
Warwick, Paul V.(1994)。Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
6.
Skach, Cindy(2005)。Borrowing Constitutional Designs: Constitutional Law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic。Princeton University Press。
7.
Elgie, Robert(1999)。Semi-Presidentialism in Europe。Oxford University Press。
8.
Shugart, Matthew Søberg、Carey, John M.(1992)。Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics。Cambridge University Press。
9.
Elgie, Robert(2011)。Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-types and Democratic Performance。Oxford University Press。
其他
1.
(2010)。Bulgarian PM, President Tangled in Angry Conflict Fanned by 'Economist' Article,http://www.novinite.com/articies/116685。
圖書論文
1.
Jalali, Carlos(2011)。The President is Not a Passenger: Portugal's Evolving Semi- Presidentialism。Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy。New York:Palgrave Macmillan。
2.
Gallagher, Tom、Andrievici, Viorel(2008)。Romania: Political Irresponsibility without Constitutional Safeguards。Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe。Manchester University Press。
3.
Frison-Roche, François(2008)。Semi-presidentialism in the Republic of Macedonia (former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia)。Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe。Manchester University Press。
4.
Lupia, Arthur、Strøm, Kaare(2008)。Bargaining, Transaction Costs, and Coalition Governance。Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
5.
Müller, Wolfgang C.、Strøm, Kaare(2000)。Coalition Governance in Western Europe: An Introduction。Coalition Governments in Western Europe。Oxford:Oxford University Press。
6.
Saalfeld, Thomas(2013)。Economic Performance, Political Institutions and Cabinet Durability in 28 European Parliamentary Democracies, 1945-2011。Party Governance and Party Democracy。New York:Springer。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
總統非立法權與總理總統制國家的憲政運作:以法國、芬蘭、斯洛伐克、羅馬尼亞為例
2.
蒙古國2020年國家大呼拉爾選舉:選制改變之影響
3.
半總統制之「擺盪」描述概念的再思考--從物理特徵、字詞使用及次類型轉換的困難談起
4.
國會選制與憲政體制對國會選舉投票率的影響--內閣制與總統制民主國家的跨國分析
5.
半總統制下憲政運作類型的再思考--從換軌制、擺盪制到羽翼式
6.
總統執政抑或責任內閣?--國民政府時期立憲中的行政權之定位
7.
政治制度與政府首長年齡關聯性之探討
8.
政府體制、選舉制度和選舉時程--政治制度如何影響國會大選中的策略投票
9.
臺灣很難脫離半總統制
10.
再訪憲改框架:議會制、總統制、半總統制
11.
半總統制下的無黨籍閣員:任命與立法行為
12.
半總統制總統化和議會化的權力平衡、路徑依賴與憲政運作
13.
從直選總統與民主化談政黨體系變遷:歐洲國家的比較研究
14.
半總統制下的總理任命權與政府穩定之研究
15.
權力的衝突或制衡?羅馬尼亞、斯洛維尼亞、保加利亞共治期間難民政策運作之研究
1.
具台灣特色的總統制理論與實際之研究─以李登輝(1991-2000)、陳水扁、馬英九、蔡英文(2016-2018)四任總統職權行使狀況之分析
2.
我國憲政體制總統集權化之研究(1991-2016)
3.
美國總統否決權之研究
4.
半總統制中準內閣制與內閣制政治運作比較
5.
我國半總統制的形成與少數政府憲政困境—歷史制度主義的觀點
6.
半總統制下不同政府型態之成因─台灣、蒙古、波蘭及其他後列寧民主國家
1.
臺、日、韓憲政體制與選舉制度
2.
半總統制「總統化」之發展:政黨體系與政府組成
3.
總統直選與半總統制憲政運作
4.
半總統制中總統的角色與憲政運作:臺灣與波蘭之比較
5.
左右共治vs.藍綠共治--法國與臺灣共治與否的賽局分析
6.
半總統制下總統的法案推動與立法影響力:馬英九總統執政時期的研究
7.
前言:行政與立法的互動
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code