:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國大學實施教師績效評估制度之初探:以元智工學院為例
書刊名:空大行政學報
作者:馮明德
出版日期:1995
卷期:4
頁次:頁307-334
主題關鍵詞:績效評估組織文化激勵控制Performance appraisalOrganization cultureMotivationControl
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:26
     我國現有公立大學院校二十八所,私立大學院校二十二所,大學在我國高等教育中,佔有重要地位。在大學法修訂後,增加了大學自立性的空間,也擴大了校園民主化的範圍,教師法的公佈,更加強了對教師權益的保障!在傳統文化系絡與轉變中的教育環境下,要推動教師績效評估制度,有其實質上的困難,但在確保教學品質的各種努力中,教師實扮演著關鍵性的角色。本文以元智工學院為個案,說明如何成功地整合各項優勢條件,率先實施以激勵為主的教師績效評估制度,推行四年多來,已見到初步成果,尤其以研究領域的進步,最為明顯,雖然在實踐的過程中,難免引發一些爭議或副作用;但整體而言,此一實驗性的經驗是寶貴的,也極具參考價值。
     At present, there are totally 28 public universities and 22 private universities existing in our country. They are dominating in the higher education of our nation. After the amendment of University Law, the self-determination of each university is accordingly expanded and the campus democratization also extended. Further, the rights of teachers is more secured upon the publication of Teacher's Law. However, in the context of traditional culture as well as the changing circumstance of future education development, there will be essential problems in moving the Faculty Performance Appraisal System. Whereas teachers play a critical role in the processof teaching quality assurance. This paper will focus on analyzing how Yuan-Ze Institute of Technology, underthe adventageous conditions and ahead of all schools, first launched the Faculty Performance Appraisal System based on motivation four year ago and so far has worked out some preliminary results, especially in the research field which is most remarkable. Although disputes or epiphenomena would be sometimes arising in the course of realization, the experimental experience is still precious and of highreferential value.
會議論文
1.王國明、謝玲芬(1989)。多目標評估技術之研討及其在組織績效評估之應用。中華民國工業工程學會年會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bryson, J. M.(1988)。Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Substaining Organizational Achievement。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
2.郭為藩(19950000)。教育改革的省思。臺北:天下文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.江岷欽(1993)。組織分析。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bradley, Leo H.(1993)。Total quality management for schools。Lancaster, Pennsylvania:Technomic。  new window
5.Davis, G. A.、Thomas, M. A.(1989)。Effective schools and effective teachers。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
6.Patton, Michael Quinn(1990)。Qualitative evaluation and research method。Sage。  new window
圖書論文
1.王國明、顧志遠(1987)。教育單位效率評估與資源分配之研究--DEA技術之應用與推廣。中國工業工程學會論文集。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE