:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣高中生參加補習之效益分析
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:林大森 引用關係陳憶芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Da-senChen, Yi-fen
出版日期:2006
卷期:52:4
頁次:頁35-70
主題關鍵詞:補習班大學多元入學方案教育改革Cram schoolingMultiple-college-entrance projectEducational reform
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(53) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:52
  • 共同引用共同引用:609
  • 點閱點閱:301
本研究乃是在大學多元入學制度脈絡下,探討高中生的補習問題。補習是近年來教育改革希望減緩的現象,但許多研究顯示,教改方案施行後補習班不減反增。學生投入補習對於考好大學真有效果嗎?多元入學方案對補習產業的發展是阻力還是助力?這是本研究關懷的問題。 本文以「臺灣高等教育資料庫」的資料進行量化分析。研究結果有二:一、社經背景對學生參與補習雖有正向關聯,但影響力並不大。二、補習對大考學測成績未必完全有助益,視補習的科目與年級而定。本文發現,高中生參與補習對考試不一定有實質幫助,考生與家長應當三思。
In the context of the vastly increased percentage of high school graduates in Taiwan now entering colleges and universities, this paper explores the phenomenon of senior high school students attending cram schools. The purpose of educational reform has been to reduce the need for “cram schooling,” yet numerous studies reveal that many students still attend cram schools. In this paper, we are concerned with the relationship between cram school attendance and students’ scores on College Entrance Exams. Furthermore, we want to determine whether the much greater number of colleges/universities and of students entering them, or “Multiple-College-Entrance” system, has contributed to the increasing number of cram schools. The study used data retrieved from “Taiwan Higher Education Data System” to conduct a quantitative analysis. The findings were as follows. Firstly, students’ socio-economic background was a negligible factor with regard to their attending cram schools. Secondly, “cramming” did not necessarily improve students’ scores on the College Entrance Exams; these scores had a much clearer correlation with students’ high school and intended university majors (e.g. high scores for medical-science majors) as well as with their high school grades. Given the unclear impact of studying in cram schools on College Entrance Exam scores, students and their parents should consider whether cram school attendance was worth the time and money.
期刊論文
1.謝如山(20010900)。The Effect of Cramming Schools on Students' Mathematics Achievement。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,313+315-337。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Blake, J.(1985)。Number of siblings and education mobility。American Sociological Association,50(1),84-94。  new window
3.徐明珠(20020300)。從生涯發展觀點談大學多元入學方案。國家政策論壇,2(3),115-118。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳麗芬(19930100)。國小學生補習狀況問卷分析。人本教育札記,43,12-18。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃光明(19930400)。談補習。現代教育,8(2)=30,145-151。  延伸查詢new window
6.Gerber, T. P.、Hout, M.(1995)。Educational Stratification in Russia during the Soviet Period。American Journal of Sociology,101(3),611-660。  new window
7.張新堂(20020700)。大學多元入學方案的挑戰及因應途徑。教育資料與研究,47,126-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.董銘惠、黃燕飛(20020300)。臺北科技大學四技多元入學學生學業成就之比較研究。臺北科技大學學報,35(1),351-362。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.張鈿富、葉連祺、張奕華(20050800)。大學多元入學方案對入學機會之影響。教育政策論壇,8(2),1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.孫國華(1993)。高雄縣市國民中小學之課外補習實況調查與成因調查研究。教育資料文摘,31(1),135-153。  延伸查詢new window
11.林大森(20011000)。家庭教育資源對教育分流、教育取得之影響。國立政治大學社會學報,31,45-75。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊朝祥(20010900)。高中職多元入學變革六面向總檢討。國家政策論壇,1(7),147-152。  延伸查詢new window
13.Mare, Robert D.(1981)。Change and stability in educational stratification。American Sociological Review,46(1),72-87。  new window
14.Zhou, Xueguang、Moen, Phyllis、Tuma, Nancy Brandon(1998)。Educational Stratification in Urban China: 1949-94。Sociology of Education,71(3),199-222。  new window
15.黃毅志(20051200)。教育研究中的「職業調查封閉式問卷」之信效度分析。教育研究集刊,51(4),43-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Collins, Randall(1971)。Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification。American Sociological Review,36(6),1002-1019。  new window
17.孫清山、黃毅志(19960300)。補習教育、文化資本與教育取得。臺灣社會學刊,19,95-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.陳建州、劉正(20041200)。論多元入學方案之教育機會均等性。教育研究集刊,50(4),115-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Teachman, Jay D.(1987)。Family Background, Educational Resources, and Educational Attainment。American Sociological Review,52(4),548-557。  new window
20.Stevenson, David Lee、Baker, David P.(1992)。Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in Japan。American Journal of Sociology,97(6),1639-1657。  new window
21.李文益(20040600)。文化資本、多元入學管道與學生學習表現--以臺東師院為例。臺東大學教育學報,15(1),1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.秦夢群(20040800)。大學多元入學制度實施與改革之研究。教育政策論壇,7(2),59-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳怡靖、鄭燿男(20000700)。臺灣地區教育階層化之變遷--檢證社會資本論、文化資本論及財務資本論在臺灣的適用性。國家科學委員會研究彙刊.人文及社會科學,10(3),416-434。  延伸查詢new window
24.黃毅志(20031200)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.周文賢、江文雄、鄭增財、江義平、陳瑞榮、陳淑均(2003)。技專校院考招分離制度實施之成效追蹤研究。中國技術學院學報,25,1-17。  延伸查詢new window
26.孫建行、鄭增財(2004)。技專校院考招分離入學制度現況調查研究。中華技術學院學報,31,39-50。  延伸查詢new window
27.許聰鑫(2005)。專科學校採行推薦甄選制對學生來源與學習成效的影響-以南開技術學院為例。師大學報:教育類,50(1),139-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.陳錦瑤、韓楷聖(2002)。兒童英語教師專業訓練之研究。臺中師院學報,16,643-676。  延伸查詢new window
29.游福生(1995)。漫談補習問題。教師之友,36(3),23-24。  延伸查詢new window
30.黃永結(1995)。孩子一定要補習嗎?。教師之友,36(4),32-34。  延伸查詢new window
31.楊國樞(1978)。惡補與平等。教育資料文摘,1(1),84-85。  延伸查詢new window
32.楊雅芩(2004)。從教育社會學觀點檢視臺灣兒童英語補習教育。教育社會學通訊,51,18-24。  延伸查詢new window
33.Mare, R. D.、Chen, M. D.(1986)。Further Evidence on Sibship Size and Educational Stratification。American Sociological Review,51(3),403-412。  new window
34.Shavit, Y.、Westerbeek, K.(1998)。Educational Stratification in Italy: Reforms, Expansion, and Equality of Opportunity。European Sociological Review,14(1),33-47。  new window
圖書
1.王震武、林文瑛(1994)。教育的困境與改革的困境。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
2.周祝瑛(20030000)。誰捉弄了臺灣教改?。臺北:心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.郭為藩(1997)。教育改革的省思。臺北市:天下文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.黃政傑(1994)。課程教材改革與中小學教學正常化。臺灣的教育改革。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.史英(1994)。教育改革的策略與方法。臺灣的教育改革。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.周金城(2004)。學生的課後輔導、補習與家教情況調查,0。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2002)。臺灣地區中等以下各級學校學生學習及生活概況調查,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.謝雨生、鄭宜仲(1995)。多元迴歸分析的假定與實例檢討:多元線性重合現象的診斷與處理。社會調查與分析:社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE