:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生個人特質、生活型態、休閒偏好及消費行為之關係研究
書刊名:中山管理評論
作者:吳萬益 引用關係陳淑惠
出版日期:1995
卷期:3:3
頁次:頁30-54
主題關鍵詞:自信心獨立性風險承擔生活型態休閒偏好消費習慣Personal traitsLifestylesLeisure preferenceConsuming behaviors
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:45
  • 點閱點閱:188
  近年來,隨著教育政策之改變及社會各界對於高等人材之殷切需求,國內大學生及研究生人數也跟著急速膨脹,同時每年更有成千上萬的同學前往各國留學,以追求其他的進修機會。然而,過去對於大學生生活與休閒問題之研究,大部份均以國內大學生為調查研究對象,對於人數激增之研究生及留學生則極少注意。因此,國內大學生及研究生在個人特質、生活型態、休閒偏好及消費習慣等方面是否與國外留學生及世界其他國家之大學生及研究生有所不同,實為亟待探討之主題。   本研究擬以中美日韓的大學生為研究群體,來從事個人特質、生活型態、休閒偏好與消費行為之關係研究,而研究之主要目的如下:  1.暸解並比較中美日韓大學生在個人特質、生活型態、休閒偏好與消費習慣等各主要構面因素間之差異性。  2. 探討以上各構面因素間之相關性與互動關係。  3. 提供實務界研究之結果,以暸解個人特質對購買行為之影響,並作為市場區隔及擬定行銷組合策略之參考;亦可提供學術界更進一步研究之依據。   透過1310份開卷調查及資料分析結果,本研究發現美國大學生之自信心與獨立性較強,且敢於承擔風險,日本之大學生較為依賴、任性及多疑。美國大學生亦比較重視追求時髦,益重視高品牌、高價位及顯異性產品。大陸及日本之大學生較重視經濟實在及中低價位產品之消費。   本研究同時顯示自信心較高、外向上進、追求時毫且重視品牌品質之消費者,花在社交類、藝文類及賭博性娛樂活動之時問明顯較多。而比較依賴、成熟穩重且以經濟實在為消費傾向之消費者,花在戶外活動之時間明顯較多。
  Recently, with the change of governmental requlations and the urgent demand of hgher level professionals from various institutions, the quantity of demestic college and graduate students has increased tremendously. In addition, tens of thousands of students have chosen to study abroad to experience alternative higher educational environments and opportunities. Nevertheless, most of previous studies has neglected these facts and still focused only on the living and consuming issues of the domestic college students. Specifically, whether the personal characters, social values, lifestyles, leisure preferences, and consuming behaviors of the domestic college students are different from those students studying abroad, and students in other countries is subject to further validations.   This study focuses on identifying the interrelationships between personal traits, lifestyles, leisure preferences, and consuming behaviors. Through a questionnaire survey of college students from Taiwan, Mainland China, United States, Japan, and Korea, the purposes of this study are as follows :  1. to understand and compare the differences on personal traits, lifestyles, leisure preferences, and consuming behaviors, among chinese, American, Japanese, and Korean college students.  2. to investigate the interrelationships between factors of the above constructs.  3. to provide business industries with relevant information about current college students, so that firms can identify market segmentation and marketing mix strategies. The information 'will also be useful for further empirical validations about this matter.   Through a series of mailed questionnaire survey for 1310 Taiwanese students in Taiwan, Taiwanese students in Japan, Taiwanese students in the U.S., Mainland students in Mainland China, Korean students in Seoul, Japanese students in Japan and American students in the U. S., this study found that American students have more self-confidence and independence, and also have more courage to take risk, while Japanese students are more dependent, willful, and suspicious. Also, American students have comparatively shown to be more fasion-conscious and more brand-oriented shoppers, preferring high-price and distinguished products; while Mainland and Japanese students have turned to be more economical and practical shoppers, preferring middle-price and low-price products.   Finally, this study found that if consumers are more self-confident, extrovergent, high-achieving, fasion-conscious, and brand-oriented, they would spend significantly more time on social activities, appreciation of art, music and literature, and gambling entertainments. Yet, if consumers are comparatively more dependent, mature, stable, and revealing an economical and pratical shopping style, they tend to spend significantly more time on outdoor activities.
期刊論文
1.Barrick, M. R.、Mount, M. K.(1991)。Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance。Journal of Applied Psychology,78(1),111-118。  new window
2.Krueger, Norris F.、Dickson, Peter R.(1994)。How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition。Decision Sciences,25(3),385-400。  new window
3.胡蘭沁(19930600)。臺南地區大專學生主要休閒型態之研究。臺南師院學報,26,169-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.毛國楠(19850600)。職業成熟與職業興趣的相關研究。教育心理學報,18,229-237。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.March, James G.、Shapira, Z.(1992)。Variable Risk Preferences and the Focus of Attention。Psychological Review,99(1),172-183。  new window
6.呂勝瑛(19820600)。資優兒童的心理特質之研究。教育與心理研究,5,225-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張光華(1991)。行銷本諸良心。世界經理文摘,56,80-86。  延伸查詢new window
8.錢姈姈(1987)。生活型態研究之運用。行銷與推銷,66,30-34。  延伸查詢new window
9.(1988)。How to Boost Your Self-Confidence。American Salesman,33(3),10-12。  new window
10.(1991)。Your Sales Personality。American Salesman,36(7),27-28。  new window
11.(1994)。Productivity: What Makes High Performance Tick。Association Management,46(1),1-12。  new window
12.Fletcher, Clive(1990)。The Relationship Between Candidate Personality, Self-Presentation Strategies, and Interviewer Assessments。Human Relationship,43(8),739-749。  new window
13.Greco, Alan J.、Paksoy, Christie H.(1989)。Profiling the Mature Fashion-Conscious Shopper。Akron Business & Economic Review,20(2),7-23。  new window
14.Charles, Handy(1990)。Teach Your Children Well。Director,43(7),25。  new window
15.Hitt, William D.(1993)。The Model Leader: A Fully Functioning Person。Leader ship & Organization Development Journal,14(7),4-11。  new window
16.Knippen, Jay T.、Green, Thad B.(1989)。Building Self-Confidence。Supervisory Management,34(8),22-27。  new window
17.McCarthy, Paulette A.(1986)。Effects of Feedback on The Self-Confidence of Men and Women。Academy of Management Journal,29(4),840-847。  new window
18.Schwer, R. Keith、Yucelt, Ugur(1984)。A Study of Risk-Taking Propensities Among small Business entrepreneurs and Managers。American Journal of small business,8(3),31-40。  new window
19.Singer, Alan、Singer, Ming(1894)。Risk: Probability or Personality。Accountancy,95(1092),105。  new window
20.Smimith, Emily T.、Yanchinski, Stephanie、Sabin, Margaret(1985)。Are You Creative? Research Shows Creativity Can Be Taught-and Companies Are Listening。Business Week,2914,80-84。  new window
21.Welch, John F. Jr.(1991)。In Pursuit of speed。Executives Speeches,6(1),1-3。  new window
22.李國華(19930600)。國民小學教師休閒活動狀況調查研究。臺南師院學報,26,313-332。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.楊極東(19851200)。政大學生學校生活適應之研究。國立政治大學學報,52,左15-58。  延伸查詢new window
24.郭為藩(19720600)。價值理論及其在教育學上的意義。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,14,39-64。  延伸查詢new window
25.翁淑緣(19840800)。臺灣北部地區大學生的價值觀念與生活型態之研究。教育與心理研究,7,95-117。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳麗華(1991)。台北市大專女生休閒活動參與態度研究。中華民國大專體育80年度學術研究討論會。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃士銘(1985)。台北市大專女生休閒運動參與與態度研究。中華民國大專體育80年度學術研究討論會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.莊仲仁(1987)。大學生生活型態與休閒活動選擇之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃俊傑(1986)。大都市青少年之生活型態、意識與價值觀之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鮑國勇(1990)。生活型態對消費者知覺風險影響之研究--女性化粧品之實證研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.薛政昌(1990)。消費者行銷反應指數及產品評估準則與市場區隔關係之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.粘榮發(1985)。價值觀與生活型態在印刷媒體選擇策略與廣告訴求策略之應用--雜誌讀者群調查(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃士銘(1989)。少女生活型態與化粧品消費行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭淑芬(1987)。臺北市民生活型態、動機與休閒運動選擇關係之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.丁虹(1983)。民營企業經理人員價值觀與生活型態之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.梁雲霞(1987)。大學生自我統整成訧動機、性別角色與事業發展之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.修慧蘭(1985)。臺北市就業者的休閒狀況與休閒倫理觀(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.葉志男(1990)。男性內衣購買者的生活型態及其市場區隔之探討(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.盧進賢(1990)。台灣政商雜誌讀者之生活型態與廣告態度研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.謝坤裕(1976)。台北市大安區與台南縣學甲鎮大專畢業公民閒暇活動調查比較研究(碩士論文)。師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.董瑪琍(1982)。管理研究所學生價值觀與生活型態之研究--以法學研究所學生為比較對象(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃淑芬(1982)。大學生自我統整與職業成熟及自我確認的關係(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.林清財(1984)。青少年自我統整與心理特質關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院經濟建設委員會住宅及都市發展處(1978)。台灣地區國民生活結構調查分析報告。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會住宅及都市發展處。  延伸查詢new window
2.文崇一(1998)。台灣區居民休閒活動的分析。南港:中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kogan, N.、Wallach, M. A.(1964)。Risk-Taking: A Study in Cognitive and Personality。New York:Holt, Rindhart, and Winston。  new window
4.Hofstede, Geert H.(1980)。Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values。Beverly Hills, California:Sage。  new window
5.Guilford, Joy Paul(1965)。Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education。McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.、Black, William C.(1995)。Multivariate Data Analysis: with Readings。Prentice Hall。  new window
其他
1.Goertz, Mary Jean(1991)。The Relationship of Leader Effectiveness and Selected Traits of Creativity。  new window
2.Immanuel, Mary Sulakshini(1989)。The Relationship Behavior Style of Executive Administrators of the Baccalaureate Nursing Programs in India and Its Relation to Conflict Management。  new window
3.Iranfar, Mohammad Taghi(1983)。International Education and Its Effect on Student Migration. Dissertation Abstract 1nternational。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lazer, W.(1963)。Life style concepts and marketing。Toward Scientific Marketing。Chicago, Illinois:American Management Association。  new window
2.李金漢(19820000)。個人價值觀念與消費行為 : 華人經理及西人經理的比較研究。社會及行為科學研究的中國化。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE