臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：紀登斯(A. Giddens)「結構化理論」對教育社會學研究的啟示
書刊名：教育研究集刊
作者：許殷宏 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsu, Yin-horng
出版日期：1998
卷期：40
頁次：頁93-112
主題關鍵詞：行動；結構；雙重性；結構化；Agency；Structure；Duality；Structuration
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(9) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:69
  • 點閱點閱:99
　　　　　由於長久以來受到社會科學研究取向分流的影響，教育社會學的發展陷入微觀典 鉅觀研究的紛爭之中。前者著重在班級社會互動的探討,後者以社會系統及教育政策為對象， 兩者之間呈現一種二元對立的關係。這種紛爭不僅發生在教育社會學的領域中，更是所有社 會科學所面臨的難題，也造成社會科學整體發展的滯礙。雖有學者不斷嘗試將兩者加以融合 統整，但是仍只限於研究結果的應用，並未觸及真正的核心。直到紀登斯提出結構化理論後， 結構與行動兩者才真正統整在聯貫的理論系統中。他認為過去有關行動與結構的論點都應該 被重新概念化，兩者的關係不再是二元對立，而是相輔相成的雙重性。紀登斯主張結構不再 只是以往研究中的外在非人為影響因素;相反的，它應被視為是社會交互作用的媒介及結果。 另外，紀登斯雖然並未直接論述本身理論在教育情境的應用，但他所提出的結構化理論卻對 教育社會學的研究產生深遠的影響。據此，本文旨在闡釋紀登斯結構化理論的重要內容，以 了解行動與結構兩者之間的真正意涵，進而申述其對教育社會學研究的啟示。
　　　　　Due to long influences of divisions of social science studies, developments of the sociology of education have fallen into disputes of micro and macro studies. The former focuses on discussions of social interactions in class; the latter has social systems and educational policies as subjects, a kind of dualism relationship presented between the two. This kind of dispute not only occurred in the area of the sociology of education, but also became thorny problems that all social science faced; in addition, it also caused impediments toward the whole development of social science. Although some scholars constantly tried to blend and unite the two, it is still limited to applications of study results that are yet to touch the core. The two, structure and agency, were not really united in the continuous theoretical systems until Giddens referred to the structuration theory. In his opinion, the past points at issue about agency and structure should be re-conceptualized; the relationship of the two is no longer dualism, instead, the complementary duality. Giddens' advocated structure is no more non-man-made influential factors in past investigations; on the contrary, it should be regarded as the go-between and result of social interactions. Although Giddens did not directly state the applications of his social theory in educational situations, the structuration theory he had referred to produced deep and far reaching influences toward the sociology of education. According to the above, this article aims at expounding the significant content of Giddens' structuration theory and determining the real meaning between agency and structure and further stating the implication that it has toward the sociology of education.
期刊論文
1.Hammersley, M.(1984)。Some Reflections on the Macro-Micro Problems in the Sociology of Education。Sociological Review，32(2)，316-324。  new window
2.Hammersley, M.(1987)。Ethnography and the Cumulative Development of Theory: A Discussion of Woods' Proposal for "Phase Two" Research。British Educational Research Journal，13，283-296。  new window
3.Hargreaves, D.(1980)。A Sociological Critique of Individualism in Education。British Journal of Educational Studies，28(3)，187-198。  new window
4.King, R.(1980)。Weberian Perspectives and tne Study of Education。British Journal of Sociology of Education，1(1)，7-23。  new window
5.Ozga, J.、Lawn, M.(1988)。Schoolwork: Interpreting the Labour Process of Teaching。British Journal of Sociology of Education，9，323-335。  new window
6.Skeggs, B.(1988)。Gender Reproduction and Further Education: Domestic Apprenticeships。British Journal of Sociology of Education，8(2)，131-149。  new window
7.Urry, J.(1986)。Review of Constitution of Society。Sociological Review，34，434-437。  new window
8.Archer, M. S.(1982)。Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action。British Journal of Sociology，33(4)，455-483。  new window
圖書
1.Bowles, S.、Gintis, H.(1976)。Schooling in Capitalist America。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
2.Bryant, C. G. A.、Jary, D.(1991)。Giddens' Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
3.Bryant, C. G. A.(1995)。Practical Sociology。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
4.Cassell, P.(1993)。The Giddens Reader。London：Macmillan。  new window
5.Cohen, I. J.(1989)。Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life。Houndmills：London：Macmillan。  new window
6.Craib, I.(1992)。Anthony Giddens。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
7.Derrida, J.(1973)。Speech and Phenomenon。Evanston：North-Western University Press。  new window
8.Giddens, Anthony(1971)。Capitalism and Modern Social Theory。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Giddens, A.(1976)。New Rules of Sociological Method。London：Hutchinson。  new window
10.Giddens, Anthony(1977)。Studies in Social and Political Theory。London：Hutchinson。  new window
11.Giddens, A.(1982)。Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory。London：Macmillan。  new window
12.Giddens, A.(1982)。Sociology: A Brief but Critical Introduction。London：Macmillan。  new window
13.Giddens, A.(1987)。Social Theory and Modern Sociology。Polity Press。  new window
14.Goffman, E.(1959)。The Presentation of Seif in Everyday Life。New York：Doubleday Anchor。  new window
15.Hargreaves, D.(1975)。Interpersonal Relations and Education。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
16.Lacan, J.(1977)。Ecrits。London：Tavistock。  new window
17.Giddens, Anthony(1984)。The Constitution of Society。Polity Press。  new window
18.Turner, Jonathan H.、Maryanski, Alexandra、Fuchs, Stephan(1991)。The Structure of Sociological Theory。Belmont, Calif.：Wadsworth Publication。  new window
19.Woods, Peter(1983)。Sociology and the School: An Interactionist Viewpoint。London：Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
20.Giddens, Anthony(1991)。Modernity and Self-Identity。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
21.Giddens, A.(1979)。Central Problems in Social Theory。London：Macmillan。  new window
22.洪鎌德(1997)。社會學說與政治理論--當代尖端思想之介紹。臺北：揚智文化事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Garfinkel, Harold(1967)。Studies in Ethnomethodology。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.張宏輝(1992)。結構化論的旗手--季登斯。當代社會思想巨擘：當代社會思想家。台北：中正書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bryant, C. G. A.、Jary, D.(1991)。Coming to Terms with Anthony Giddens。Giddens' Theory of Structuration: A Critical Appreciation。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
3.Dallmayr, F. R.(1997)。Agency and Structure。Anthony Giddens (II): Critical Assessments。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
4.Layder, D.(1997)。Power, Structure and Agency。Anthony Giddens (II) : Critical Assessments。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
5.Schilling, C.(1997)。Reconceptualising Structure and Agency in the Sociology of Education: Structuration Theory and Schooling。Anthony Giddens (IV): Critical Assessments。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
6.Thompson J. B.(1997)。The Theory of Structuration。Anthony Giddens (II) : Critical Assessments。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。  new window
7.West, G.(1984)。Phenomenon and Form in Interactionist and neo-Marxist Qualitative Educational Research。Social Crisis and Educational Research。London：Croom Helm。  new window
8.Parsons, T.(1961)。The School Class as a Social System。Education, Economy and Society。New York：Free Press。  new window
9.Althusser, L.(1972)。Ideology and ideological state apparatuses。Education: Structure and Society。Harmondsworth：Penguin Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：426（臺灣：419，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67422176
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上