:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣南島語的語言關係
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:何大安
作者(外文):Ho, Dah-an
出版日期:1998
卷期:16:2=32
頁次:頁141-171
主題關鍵詞:南島語臺灣南島語規律史分群創新AustronesianFormosanRule historySubgroupingInnovation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(3) 專書論文(4)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:213
  • 點閱點閱:115
     本文以規律史的角度檢討臺灣南島語的語言關係,主要的成果有以下幾點:( 1 )辨明臺灣南島語分群的主要共同創新,以及規律之間的互動關係; ( 2 )區分臺灣南島 語為兩大支群;( 3 )確認魯凱與鄒群同源;( 4 )重新調整舊排灣群、舊泰雅群的內容 ;( 5 )否定查摩洛語與排灣語、泰雅語的同源關係。
     The genetic relationships among Formosan languages are discussed using a rule-history approach. The main results include: (1) the identification of shared innovations and interactions among Formosan languages; (2) the establishment of Formosan subgroups; (3) reconfirmation of the Tsou-Rukei relationship; (4) reordering of the Paiwanic and Atayalic languages; (5) rejection of the Formosan Hypotheses for the origin of the Chamorro language in Guam.
期刊論文
1.Dyen, Isidore(1971)。The Austronesian Languages and Proto-Austronesian。Current Trends in Linguistics,8,5-54。  new window
2.Blust, Robert(1983)。Austronesian etymologies。Oceanic Linguistics,22/23,29-149。  new window
3.Blust, Robert A.(1977)。The Proto-Austronesian pronouns and Austronesian subgrouping: a preliminary report。Working Papers in Linguistics,9(2),1-15。  new window
4.何大安(19880300)。「濁上歸去」與現代方言。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,59(1),115-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李壬癸(19810600)。Reconstruction of Proto-Atayalic Phonology。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,52(2),235-301。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Blust, Robert(1996)。Some remarks on the linguistic position of Thao。Oceanic Linguistics,35(2),272-294。  new window
7.Blust, Robert(1970)。Proto-Austronesian Addenda。Oceanic Linguistics,9,104-165。  new window
8.Blust, Robert(1980)。Austronesian Etymologies I。Oceanic Linguistics,19(1),1-181。  new window
9.Blust, Robert(1988)。Austronesian Etymologies III。Oceanic Linguistics,25(1),1-123。  new window
10.Shigeru, Tsuchida(1982)。A Comparative Vocabulary of Austronesian Languages of Sinicized Ethnic Groups in Taiwan, Part I: West Taiwan。Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters,7,1-166。  new window
11.Blust, Robert(1989)。Austronesian Etymologies IV。Oceanic Linguistics,28,111-180。  new window
會議論文
1.李壬癸(1985)。The position of Atayal in the Austronesian family。Pacific Linguistics,257-280。  new window
2.何大安(1989)。X/F 在西南:一項規律史的研究。臺北。345-378。  延伸查詢new window
3.何大安。論原始南島語同源詞。  延伸查詢new window
4.Blust, Robert(1998)。Some Problems in Thao Phonology。Taipei。1-20。  new window
圖書
1.Dahl, Otto Christian.(1981)。Early phonetic and phonemic changes in Austronesian。Oslo:The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture。  new window
2.Dempwolff, Otto(1934)。Vergleichen de Lautlehre des Austronesischen Wortschatzes。Berlin:Deitrich Reimer。  new window
3.李壬癸(1997)。臺灣南島民族的族群與遷徙。台北市:常民文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Ferrell, Raleigh(1969)。Taiwan Aboriginal Groups: Problems in Cultural and Linguistic Classification。臺北:中研院民族所。  new window
5.Tsuchida, Shigeru(1970)。Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic Phonology。Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic Phonology。Tokyo。  new window
6.Topping, Donald M.、Ogo, Pedro M.、Dungca, Bernadita C.(1975)。Chamorro-English Dictionary。Chamorro-English Dictionary。Manoa。  new window
其他
1.李壬癸(1998)。邵族的地位─兼評白樂思(Blust 1996)的邵語地位說,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Li, Paul Jen-kuei(1995)。Formosan vs. non-Formosan features in some Austronesian languages in Taiwan。Austronesian Studies Relating to Taiwan。Taipei:Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica。  new window
2.李壬癸(1996)。台灣語言學先驅。宜蘭縣南島民族與語言。宜蘭縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
3.Starosta, Stanley(1995)。A Grammatical Subgrouping of Formosan Languages。Austronesian Studies Relating to Taiwan。Taipei:Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE