:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:家庭社會化和意識型態:臺灣選民政黨認同的世代差異
書刊名:臺灣社會學研究
作者:吳乃德 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Nai-teh
出版日期:1999
卷期:3
頁次:頁53-85
主題關鍵詞:政黨認同家庭社會化投票行為世代政治民主化Party identificationFamily socializationVotingGenerationDemocratization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(53) 博士論文(9) 專書(7) 專書論文(4)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:53
  • 共同引用共同引用:175
  • 點閱點閱:139
     政黨認同是投票行為最重要的變數之一,它同時也影響政黨勢力的消長和版圖分佈。「家庭社會化」是美國選民政黨認同形成的重要基礎。由於政 治歷史的不同,國內許多研究都指出:台灣選民政黨認同的主要基礎是意識 型態的分歧,包括民主理念、族群認同、和民族認同。可是台灣政治在近十 年有很大的變化。新的政治局面對政黨認同造成何種影響?當原先的政治分 歧消逝,台灣選民的政黨認同將以什麼為基礎?本文以實證的訪問調查資料回答這個問題。本文發現:相較於上一代的 兩個年齡層,三十歲以下的新世代並沒有比較傾向為獨立選民。第二,雖然 上一代選民的政黨認同持續以意識型態為主要基礎,可是新世代的政黨認同 卻和意識型態無關。新世代選民政黨認同的最重要基礎是家庭社會化的結果。新世代的選民在家庭生活中,繼承了父親對特定政黨的認同。在意識型態 的分歧過去後,家庭這個最原初的社會單位,成為台灣民眾政治社會化最重 要的場域之一。
     Party identification is one of the most important determinants in voting behavior. The balance of power of political parties is greatly influenced by the stability or shifts of party identification among the electorate. Various studies have found that family socialization through parental transmission is the most important factor in the formation of party identification among the American electorate. Due to different political histories, party identification among Taiwan's electorate, as many local studies revealed, is largely based on social divisions, including democratic attitudes, ethnic identities, and national identities. In the last decade, however, the political environment in Taiwan has changed dramatically. As these divisions disappear, what impact will this change have on party identification? This paper tries to answer this question by analysis of data from a nationwide survey. It found that contrary to popular belief, young voters (aged 19-30) are no less inclined to uphold a party identification than their elders. Second, as we have speculated, there is no difference in ideological dispositions between young supporters of the ruling Kuomintang and those of the opposing Democratic Progressive Party, although ideologies continue to be the dividing line for supporters of the two parties among elders. Finally, and most importantly, it found that parental transmission is the sole significant factor explaining the formation of party identification among young voters. As ideological divisions disappear from Taiwan's politics, the family becomes the most important arena of political socialization.
期刊論文
1.Schickler, Eric、Green, Donald, P.、Schickler, E.、Green, D. P.(1997)。The Stability of Party Identification in Western Democracies: Results from Eight Panel Surveys。Comparative Political Studies,30(4),450-483。  new window
2.Green, Donald P.、Palmquist, Bradley(1994)。How Stable Is Party Identification?。Political Behavior,16(4),437-466。  new window
3.Niemi, Richard G.、Jennings, M. Kent(1991)。Issues and Inheritance in the Formation of Party Identification。American Journal of Political Science,35(4),970-988。  new window
4.Kamieniecki, Heldon(1988)。The Dimensionality of Partisan Strength and Political Independence。Political Behavior,10(4),364-376。  new window
5.Achen, Christopher H.(1992)。Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle in Voting Research。Political Behavior,14(3),195-211。  new window
6.Beck, Paul Allen、Jennings, M. Kent(1991)。Family Traditions, Political Periods, and the Development of Partisan Orientations。Journal of Politics,53(3),742-763。  new window
7.何思因(19940500)。臺灣地區選民政黨偏好的變遷:1989-1992。選舉研究,1(1),39-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Sears, David O.、Valentino, Nicholas A.(1997)。Politics Matters: Political Events as Catalysts for Preadult Socialization。The American Political Science Review,91(1),45-65。  new window
9.Converse, P. E.、Pierce, R. E.(1985)。Measuring Partisanship。Political Methodology,11(4),143-166。  new window
10.Gerber, Alan、Green, Donald Philip(1998)。Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes。American Journal of Political Science,42(3),794-818。  new window
11.MacKuen, Michael B.、Erikson, Robert S.、Stimson, James A.(1989)。Macropartisanship。American Political Science Review,83(4),1125-1142。  new window
12.吳乃德(19950400)。社會分歧和政黨競爭--解釋國民黨為何繼續執政。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,78,101-130。  延伸查詢new window
13.Eckstein, Harry(1988)。A Culturalist Theory of Political Change。American Political Science Review,82(3),789-804。  new window
14.徐火炎(19930700)。選民的政黨政治價值取向、政黨認同與黨派投票抉擇:第二屆國大代表選舉選民的投票行為分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,3(2),144-166。  延伸查詢new window
15.吳乃德(19931100)。國家認同和政黨支持--臺灣政黨競爭的社會基礎。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,74,33-61。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉義周(19940500)。臺灣選民政黨形象的世代差異。選舉研究,1(1),53-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.游盈隆(19960700)。臺灣族群認同的政治心理分析。臺灣政治學刊,1,41-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.徐火炎(19911100)。政黨認同與投票抉擇:臺灣地區選民的政黨印象、偏好與黨派投票行為之分析。人文及社會科學集刊,4(1),1-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.何思因、吳釗燮(19960500)。臺灣政黨體系之下政黨認同的測量方法。選舉研究,3(1),1-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Barnes, Samuel H.(1988)。Party Identification and Party Closeness in Comparative Perspective。Political Behavior,10(3),215-231。  new window
21.Bowler, Susan、Farrell, David(1991)。Party Loyalties in Complete Settings: STV and Party Identification。Political Studies,39,350-362。  new window
22.Dalton, Russell(1980)。Reassessing Parental Socialization: Indicator Unreliability and Generational Transfer。American Political Science Review,74(June),421-431。  new window
23.Dennis, Jack、McCrone, Donald J.(1970)。Preadult Development of Political Party Identification in Western Democracies。Comparative Political Studies,3,243-263。  new window
24.Jennings, M. Kent、Niemi, Richard G.(1968)。The Transmission of Political Values from Parents to Child。American Political Science Review,62(1),169-184。  new window
25.Johnston, Richard(1992)。Party Identification Measures in the Anglo-American Democracies: A National Survey Experiment。American Journal of Political Science,36(2),542-559。  new window
26.Knight, Kathleen(1984)。The Dimensionality of Partisan and Ideological Affect: the Influence of Positivity。American Politics Quarterly,12(3),305-334。  new window
27.Knoke, David、Hout, Michael(1974)。Social and Demographic Factors in American Political Party Affiliations, 1952-72。American Sociological Review,39(5),700-713。  new window
28.Krosnick, Jon、Berent, Matthew K.(1993)。Comparison of Party Identification and Policy Preferences: the Impact of Survey Question Format。American Journal of Political Science,37(3),941-964。  new window
29.Searing, Donald、Wright, Gerald、Rabinowitz, George(1976)。The Primacy Principle: Attitude Change and Political Socialization。British Journal of Political Science,6(January),83-113。  new window
會議論文
1.吳乃德(1997)。Re-searching National Identities in Taiwan: Findings, Puzzles, and Agenda。St. Louis, MO。  new window
圖書
1.Greenstein, Fred I.(1969)。Children and Politics。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
2.Lasch, Christopher(1977)。Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged。Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
3.Jennings, M. Kent、Niemi, Richard G.(1981)。Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Youth Adults and Their Parents。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Fiorina, Morris P.(1981)。Retrospective Voting in American National Elections。Yale University Press。  new window
5.Jennings, M. Kent、Niemi, Richard G.(1974)。The political character of adolescence: The influence of families and schools。Princeton University Press。  new window
6.Miller, Warren E.、Shanks, J. Merrill(1996)。The New American Voter。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Wilson, Richard W.(1970)。Learning to be Chinese: The political socialization of children in Taiwan。Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press。  new window
8.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.Bennett, B. S.(1997)。Generation and Change: Some Initial Observations。After the Boom: the Politics of Generation X。Lanham。  new window
10.Budge, I.、Crewe, I.、Farlie, D.(1976)。Introduction. Party Identification and Beyond。Party Identification and Beyond。London, UK。  new window
11.Conover, Pamela Johnson(1991)。Political Socialization: Where's the Politics?。Political Science: Looking to the Future, Vol. 3。Evanston, IL。  new window
12.Crewe, Ivor(1976)。Party Identification Theory and Political Change in Britain。Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition。London, UK。  new window
13.Delli Carpini, Michael X.(1989)。Age and History: Generations and Sociopolitical Change。Political Learning in Adulthood。Chicago, IL。  new window
14.Dennis, Jack、Owen, Diana(1997)。The Partisanship Puzzle: Identification and Attitudes of Generation X。After the Boom: the Politics of Generation X。Lanham。  new window
15.Jennigs, M. Kent、Allerbeck, Klaus R.、Rosenmayr, Leopold(1979)。Generations and Families: General Orientations。Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies。Beverly Hills。  new window
16.Kaase, Max(1976)。Party Identification and Voting Behavior in the West German Election of 1969。Party Identification and Beyond。London, UK。  new window
17.Miller, Warren E.(1991)。Party Identification。Political Parties and Elections in the U. S., Vol. 2。N. Y.。  new window
18.Nathan, James A.、Remy, Richard C.(1977)。Comparative Political Socialization: A Theoretical Perspective。Handbook of Political Socialization。New York, NY。  new window
19.Renshon, Stanley(1992)。Political Socialization。Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, Vol. 1。London, UK。  new window
20.Sears, David O.(1991)。Whither Political Socialization Research? - the Question of Persistence。Political Socialization, Citizenship Education, and Democracy。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Shively, W. Phillips(1980)。The Nature of Party Identification: A Review of Recent Developments。The Electorate Reconsidered。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
2.Miller, W. E.(1976)。The Cross-National Use of Party Identification As A Stimulus to Political Inquiry。Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition。New York:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
3.Beck, Paul Allen(1977)。The Role of Agents in Political Socialization。Handbook of Political Socialization: Theory and Research。New York:Free Press。  new window
4.張茂桂(1989)。The Formation of Partisan Preference in Taiwan's Democratization Process, 1986-1987。Taiwan: A Newly Industrialized State。Taipei:Department of Sociology, National Taiwan University。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE