臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：政黨認同與投票抉擇：臺灣地區選民的政黨印象、偏好與黨派投票行為之分析
書刊名：人文及社會科學集刊
作者：徐火炎
作者(外文)：Shyu, Huoyan
出版日期：1991
卷期：4:1
頁次：頁1-57
主題關鍵詞：選民；政黨認同；投票抉擇；政黨印象；政黨偏好；黨派投票行為；臺灣
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(66) 博士論文(10) 專書(7) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:61
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:313
本文旨在探討臺灣地區選民對兩大政黨所持的印象與偏好之內涵，進而檢視選民
這種對政黨的心理傾向與黨派投票行為之間的關係。
首先，作者檢討歐美有關政黨認同的研究文獻及測量上的爭論，然後指出政黨認同概念適用
到臺灣時，必需考慮到不同制度與文化上的因素。
其次，作者以民國七十八年增額立法委員選舉的一筆全省抽樣調查資料為主，進行分析選民
對政黨印象與偏好。作者研究發現：（１）選民對兩黨的印象與偏好，呈現出兩極化傾向的
現象，符合政黨認同單一面向的「敵對性假設」；（２）選民對政黨的印象及偏好與是否加
入國民黨之間具有顯著的正相關關係。
第三，作者以選民對政黨的印象及偏好、是否加入國民黨與選民的個人及社會屬性變項作比
較分析，檢定究竟何者對選民的黨派投票決擇行為較具解釋效果。分析結果發現：（１）選
民對政黨的心理傾向，包括政黨印象與偏好等，對黨派投票抉擇具有直接而顯著的影響關係
；（２）選民是否加入國民黨，雖然對解釋黨派投票仍具有貢獻，但顯然不能與政黨印象與
偏好的變項相比。
本文結論指出，開放的政黨政治在臺灣雖然剛起步，但選民已具黨派的心理傾向，而且此種
政黨的心理傾向可以有效的解釋選民的黨派投票抉擇。可見臺灣的選民已具政黨認同，然而
仍有待進一步長期的追蹤研究，但在測量與概念化問題上，尤須先加以解決，本文的分析對
研究政黨認同可以提供一個討論的開始。
This paper attempts to explore electorate's images and preferences
toward two major parties in Taiwan. which are examined and related to partisan
vote-choice.
Based on analyzing an island-wide survey data set, Voters' party images and
partisan preferences are found consistent with the hostility hypothesis that one
who likes the KMT most tends to strongly dislike the DPP, and vice versa.
Electorate's party images and preferences are shown to be better predictors than
personal and socio-demographic attributes in explaining voters' partisan
vote-choice. Compared to partisan attitudes and/or party images, party
membership as an indicator of partisanship is a relatively awkward predictor for
partisan vote-choice.
This paper concludes that in Taiwan voter's psychological attachment to a party
as measured in terms of party images and preferences is able to effectively
explain voter's partisan vote-choice. However, it needs more empirical studies
to confirm as well as an adequate measurement to be developed to tap voter's
party identification. The author believes that those findings and discussions
addressed in this paper would serve a useful guide for further research on party
identification and voting behavior.
期刊論文
1.Maggiotto, Michael A.、Piereson, James E.(1977)。Partisan Identification and Electoral Choice: The Hostility Hypothesis。American Journal of Political Science，21(4)，745-767。  new window
2.McDonald, Michael D.、Howell, Susan E.(1982)。Reconsidering the Reconceptualizations of Party Identification。Political Methodology，8(4)，73-91。  new window
3.Petrocik, John R.(1974)。An Analysis of Intransitivities in the Index of Party Identification。Political Methodology，1(3)，31-47。  new window
4.Weisberg, Herbert F.(1980)。A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Party Identification。Political Behavior，2(1)，33-60。  new window
5.Wattenberg, Martin P.(1982)。Party Identification and Party Images: A Comparison of Britain, Canada, Australia, and the United States。Comparative Politics，15(1)，23-40。  new window
6.Rusk, Jerrold G.(1982)。The Michigan Election Studies: A Critical Evaluation。Micropolitics，2(2)，87-109。  new window
7.Barnes, Samuel H.、Jennings, M. Kent、Inglehart, Ronald、Farah, Barbara(1988)。Party Identification and Party Closeness in Comparative Perspective。Political Behavior，10(3)，215-231。  new window
8.Valentine, David C.、Van Wingen, John R.(1980)。Partisanship, Independence, and the Partisan Identification Questions。American Politics Quarterly，8(2)，165-186。  new window
9.Uslaner, Eric M.(1989)。Multiple Party Identifiers in Canada: Participation and Affect。Journal of Politics，51(4)，993-1003。  new window
10.胡佛(19860600)。選民的政見取向--結構、類型與運作的分析。社會科學論叢，34，111-143。  延伸查詢new window
11.Barnes, Samuel H.、McDonough, Peter、Pina, Antonio Lopez(1985)。The Development of Partisanship in New Democracies: The Case of Spain。American Journal of Political Science，29。  new window
12.Dennis, Jack(1988)。Political Independence in America, Part 1: On Being an Independent Partisan Supporter。British Journal of Political Science，18，77-109。  new window
13.Dennis, Jack(1983)。Political Independence in America, Part 2: Toward a Theory。British Journal of Political Science，18，197-219。  new window
14.Fiorina, Morris P.(1977)。All Outline for a Model of Party Choice。American Journal of Political Science，21，601-625。  new window
15.Howell, Susan E.(1980)。The Behavioral Component of Changing Partisanship。American Politics Quarterly，8，279-302。  new window
16.Hurwitz, Jon(1984)。Social Stereotyping and the Concept of Party Identification。Political Psychology，5(4)，707-736。  new window
17.Jacoby, William G.(1982)。Unfolding the Party Identification Scale: Improving the Measurement of An Import ant Concept。Political Methodology，8(2)，33-60。  new window
18.Katz, Richard S.(1979)。The Dimensionality of Party Identification: Cross-National Perspectives。Comparative Politics，11，147-163。  new window
19.LeBlanc, Hugh L.、Merrin, Mary Beth(1979)。Independent: Issue Partisanship. and the Decline of Party。American Politics Quarterly，7，240-256。  new window
20.Markus, Gregory B.、Converse, Philip E.(1979)。A Dynamic Simultaneous Equations Model of Electoral Choice。American Political Science Review，73，1055-1070。  new window
21.Miller, Arthur H.、Wattenberg, Martin P.(1983)。Measuring Party Identification: Independent or No Partisan Perference?。American Journal of Political Science，27(1)，106-121。  new window
22.Niemi, Richard G.、Wright, Stephen、Powell, Lyda W.(1987)。Multiple Party Identifers and the Measurement of Party Identification。Journal of Politics，49，1093-1103。  new window
23.Richardson, Bradley M.(1988)。Constitueiacy Cardidates Versus Parties in Japanese Voting Behavior。American Political Science Review，82(3)，695-717。  new window
24.Shively, W. Philips(1979)。The Development of Party Identification among Adults: Exploration of a Functional Model。American Political Science Review，73，1039-1054。  new window
25.Wattenberg, Martin P.(1981)。The Decline of Political Partisanship in the United States: Negativity of Neutrality。American Political Science Review，75，941-950。  new window
26.胡佛、游盈隆(19831200)。選民的投票取向：結構與類型的分析。政治學報，11，頁225-279。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Belknap, George、Campbell, Angus(1952)。Political Party Identification and Attitudes toward Foreign Policy。Public Opinion Quarterly，15(4)，601-623。  new window
28.Feldman, Stanley、Zuckerman, Alan S.(1982)。Partisan Attitudes and the Vote: Moving Beyond Party Identification。Comparative Political Studies，15(2)，197-222。  new window
29.Craig, Stephen C.(1985)。Partisanship, Independence, and No Preference: Another Look at the Measurement of Party Identification。American Journal of Political Science，29(2)，274-290。  new window
圖書
1.Miller, Warren E.、Levitin, Teresa E.(1976)。Leadership and Change: Presidential Elections form 1952 to 1976。Cambridge, Mass.：Wintrhop Publishers。  new window
2.Budge, Ian、Crewe, Ivor、Farlie, Dennis(1976)。Party Identification and Beyond。New York：John Wiley and Sons Ltd.。  new window
3.Hess, Robert D.、Torney, Judith V.(1967)。The Development of Political Attitudes in Children。Chicago, IL：Aldine。  new window
4.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
5.Campbell, Angus、Gurin, Gerald、Miller, Warren Edward(1954)。The Voter Decides。Row, Peterson & Company。  new window
6.Converse, Philip E.(1976)。The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort Analyzing Party Identification。Beverly Hills：Sage Publications。  new window
7.Blalock, Hubert M. Jr.(1979)。Social Statistics。New York：McGraw-Hill。  new window
8.胡佛(1987)。選民的投票行為。中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
9.Andersozi, John R.(1980)。Cognitive psychology and its implication。W. H. Freeman。  new window
10.胡佛(1990)。選民的投票行為：民國七十五增額立法委員選舉的分析。中央選舉委員會。  延伸查詢new window
11.Abramson, Paul R.(1974)。Political Attitudes in America: Formation and Change。San Francisco, CA：W. H. Freeman。  new window
12.Fiorina, Morris P.(1981)。Retorspective Voting in American National Elections。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
13.Oskamp, Stuart(1977)。Attitudes and Opinion。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall。  new window
14.Przeworski, Adam、Teune, Henry(1970)。The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Asher, Herbert B.(1983)。Voting Behavior Research in the 1980s--An Examination of Some Old and New Problem Areas。Political Science: The State of the Discipline。Washington, DC：American Political Science Association。  new window
2.Miller, Warren E.(1976)。The Cross-National Use of Party Identification as a Stimulus to Political Inquiry。Party Identification and Beyond。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Beck, Paul A.(1986)。Choice, Context, and Consequence: Beaten and Unbeaten Paths toward a Science of Electoral Behavior。Political Science: The Science of Politics。New York：Agathon Press。  new window
4.Converse, Philip E.(1966)。The Concept of Normal Vote。Elections and the Political Order。New York：John Wiley。  new window
5.Rochon, Thomas R.(1981)。Electoral Systems and the Basis of the Vote: The Case of Japan。Parties, Candidates, and the Voters in Japan: Six Quantitative Studies。Ann Arbor, MI：Center for Japanese Studies, The University of Michigan。  new window
6.Shively, W. Philips(1980)。The Nature of Party Identification: A Review of Recent Development。The Electorate Reconsidered。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage。  new window
7.Weisberg, Herbert F.(1986)。Model Choice in Political Science: The Case of Voting Behavior Research, 1940-1975。Political Science: The Science of Politics。New York：Agathon Press, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：704（臺灣：693，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1348743 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67146882
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上