:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:行政院與立法院關係之研究--以「人性與權力」「權責相應」的概念加以分析
書刊名:中國行政評論
作者:謝政諭 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Chen-yu
出版日期:1999
卷期:8:4
頁次:頁83-106
主題關鍵詞:人性論分權說均權說政治全能The theory of human natureSeparation of powerEquilibriumOmnipotence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:136
  • 點閱點閱:31
     本文以人性論、分權論、均權說、權責相應說等憲政原理,加以論述我國憲法本 文及四次修憲(1991、1992、1994、1997)以來行政院與立法院體制、職權之關係。   本文發現,西方強調人性幽暗與權力制約為憲政建構之要旨。因此,政府分權、互相制 衡、權責相應易於釐清。而我國以人性與權力的發揚分工合作說為要,加上制憲之時及之後 長期處於戡亂體制之下,以「政治安定」為設計原則頗濃。 因此,憲法本文中政府諸權強調分工而缺乏制衡,行政權獨大於立法權,加上修憲後賦予總 統緊急命令權,國家安全大政方針、直接任命行政院長等修憲設計,造成「雙行政中心」, 且出現國民大會、監察院與立法院分享立法權。在此雙頭多身的體制下,行政院與立法院權 責都遭受到弱化。 因此,如何正視「人性與權利」的制約、及強化與集中立法院(或未來國會之名、實)之職 權與有效能的運作,方足以節制行政院(及總統)之權力,以達權責相符之憲政原理。
     This article is based on the constitutional government theory of human nature, the theory of separation of power, the theory of equilibrium, and the concept of the power and duty corresponding. In addition to discuss the relationship of the system and power of office between Executive Yuan and Legislate Yuan in our constitution and 4th times amended in 1991, 1992, 1994, 1997. This article comes at the western society emphasize the gloomy human nature and power restrict are the main ideas to establish a constitutional government. Therefore government the separation of power, check and balance, and the power and duty will easy to make them clear. Therefore our country is focus on the human nature and enhance power to division of work and cooperation. In addition, the timing to restrict a constitution and for long term consider, under the system to suppress a rebellion. The devise principles is based on politics stable. However, the government power in the constitution is emphasized on division of work but too lack of restrict. Administration power is typically greater than the legislate power. Also give the president emergency order power after revised the constitution. The country's safety guiding policy was design to direct designate the premier power to revise the constitution and that caused duplicate administration center and it also appear a national assembly, Control Yuan and Legislate Yuan to share the legislative power. In the system of double headed and multi-body, the power and duty of Executive Yuan and Legislate Yuan both incure weakness. Therefore, how to face squarely restrict of the human nature and rights and to strengthen the job of Legislative Yuan (or the name of future congress) works efficiency. That can sufficient to restrict the power of Executive Yuan and the president to achieve a constitutional government principle of consistent in power and duty.
期刊論文
1.林濁水(19970204)。「半總統制」憲政運作展望。國家政策雙周刊,157,8-10。  延伸查詢new window
2.彭錦鵬(19990100)。修憲與國會改革的方向。政策月刊,42,8-9。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃昭元(19980100)。九七修憲後我國中央政府體制的評估。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,27(2),183-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Duverger, Maurice(1980)。A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government。European Journal of Political Research,8(2),165-187。  new window
5.葉俊榮(19980100)。九七憲改與臺灣憲法變遷的模式。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,27(2),7-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.湯德宗(19980100)。論九七修憲後的權力分立--憲改工程的另類選擇。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,27(2),135-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Badinter, Robert(1994)。法國第五共和的憲政發展。國家政策雙周刊,85,3-6。  延伸查詢new window
8.荊知仁(1998)。論五權架構與政府體制之調適。憲政時代,23(3),43-49。  延伸查詢new window
9.許志雄(1992)。國大制度的憲政病理。國家政策雙周刊,26,3-4。  延伸查詢new window
10.湯德宗(1992)。對第二屆國民大會臨時會修憲之評價與展望。法律評論,58(10),26-33。  延伸查詢new window
11.葉俊榮(1999)。以新國會運動作為國會改革的基調。政策月刊,42,10-12。  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭敦仁、江大樹(1997)。臺灣的憲政發展與民主鞏固。國家政策雙周刊,157,2-3。  延伸查詢new window
13.謝政諭(1999)。第四屆立法院政治生態與國會再造之分析。理論與政策,13(1),141-157。  延伸查詢new window
14.謝復生(1992)。對總統選舉方式及國民大會問題的幾點看法。律師雜誌,151,61-66。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.國民大會秘書處(1998)。國會制度改革之研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張良民(1990)。從行政立法兩院關係論我國中央政制,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.(1989)。國父全集。臺北市:近代中國。  延伸查詢new window
2.Panebianco, Angelo(1988)。Political Parties: Organization and Power。New York。  new window
3.維爾(1967)。Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers。沒有紀錄:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.張君勱(1997)。中華民國民主憲法十講。臺北:洛克出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Friedrich, Carl Joachim、周勇、王麗芝、梁治平(1997)。超驗正義:憲政的宗教之維。北京:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱志宏(1998)。我國立法院效率機制之研究。臺北:中國國民黨中央委員會政策工作會。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾濟群(198806)。中外立法制度之比較。台北:中央文物供應社發行。  延伸查詢new window
8.Pye, Lucian W.、Pye, Mary W.(1985)。Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimensions of Authority。Cambridge:The Belk nep Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
9.Sartori, Giovanni(1994)。Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes。New York University Press。  new window
10.Huntington, Samuel P.、劉軍寧(1994)。第三波:二十世紀末的民主化浪潮。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.謝瀛洲(1976)。中華民國憲法論。台北:謝瀛洲。  延伸查詢new window
12.Lijphart, Arend(1984)。Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries。Yale University Press。  new window
13.林水波(1997)。優質化總統行政院與立法院互動關係的策略。民主憲政與政黨政治。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.胡佛(1998)。憲政結構的流變與重整。憲政結構與政府體制。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.(1989)。比較憲法與政府資料選輯。比較憲法與政府資料選輯。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.(1997)。為什麼大家都說「不」-對國家發展會議決議。為什麼大家都說「不」-對國家發展會議決議。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
17.邵宗海(1997)。國民大會定位及其職權調整後之走向。民主憲政與政黨政治。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.Doren, Carl Van(1973)。The Federalist。The Federalist。Connecticut, USA。  new window
19.Friedrich, Carl J.(1964)。Transcendent Justice: The Religious Dimension of Constitutionalism。Duke University Press。  new window
20.Friedrich, Carl J.(1986)。Constitutional Government and Democracy。Constitutional Government and Democracy。Mass. Waltham。  new window
21.Locke, John(1955)。Two Treaties of Civil Government。Two Treaties of Civil Government。London, UK。  new window
22.Loewenstein, Karl(1965)。Politics Power and the Government Process。Politics Power and the Government Process。Chicago, IL。  new window
23.Mantesquieu(1977)。The Spirit of Law。The Spirit of Law。Berkeley。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE