研究通過兩項實驗考察人們對人類和智能機器在個人\非個人道德困境下的道德判斷。結果發現,(1)非個人道德困境下,人們對智能機器和人采用相同的道德評價標準,對其期望行為及實際行為的道德評價(責備度、許可度、正確性)完全相同。(2)個人道德困境下,人們對智能機器和人采用不同的道德評價標準,相比于人類,有更多人希望智能機器做出功利主義取向行為,對其功利主義行為的道德評價也更高。

In the current study,two experiments were adopted to investigate people’s moral judgment about human and robot agents in personal/impersonal dilemmas.The results showed that:(1) in impersonal dilemma(autonomous vehicle dilemma),people applied same moral norms to human and robot agents.They had the same expectation about what action the agents should do(utilitarian) and the same moral evaluation(of permissibility,rightness,blame) about the agents’ actual action.(2) In personal dilemma(footbridge dilemma),people applied different moral norms to human and robot agents.Despite that overall people wanted both human and robot agent choice deontology action,while compared with human,robot agents were more expected to take the utilitarian action,and they were given higher evaluation(higher permissibility,and lower blame) than their human counterparts about their utilitarian action.