REFERENCES
Acar, A. (2006). Models, norms and goals for English as an international language pedagogy and task based language teaching and learning. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 174-191.
Anton, M. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second-language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 303-18.
Artigal, J. (1992). Some considerations on why a new language is acquired by being used. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 221-240.
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L., & A. Palmer. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baker, D. (1989). Language testing: A critical survey and practical guide. London: Edward Arnold.
Bhatia, V. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Iberica: Revista De La Asociacion Europea De Lenguas Para Fines Especificos (AELFE), (4), 3-19.
Breen, M. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning task. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brindley, G. (1994). Task-centred assessment in language learning: The promise and the challenge. In N. Bird, P. Falvey, A. Tsui, D. Allison, & A. McNeil (Eds.): Language and Learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Language in Education, Hong Kong Education Department.
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.
Bygate, M. (2012). Task as work space for language learning and teaching. In Selected Papers from 2012 The Twenty-first International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.26-33). Taipei: Crane.
Cast, B. M. D. (1939). The efficiency of different methods of marking English composition. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 9(1), 257-269.
Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev., V. S., & Miller, S. M. (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, C. (2012). A qualitative study of social-cognitive strategies in L2 peer review. In Selected Papers from 2012 The Twenty-first International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.171-188). Taipei: Crane.
Chen, Y. L. & You, Y. L. (2010). A study on EFL university students’ draft-revision strategies. In Selected Papers from 2010 The Nineteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.243-254). Taipei: Crane.
Crookes, G. (1986). Task classification: A cross-disciplinary review. Technical Report No. 4. Honolulu: Center for Second Language Classroom Research, Social Science Research Institute, University of Haiwaii.
Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp.27-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dornyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 43-59.
Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunn, W. E., & J. P. Lantolf. (1998). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development and Krashen’s i+ 1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48, 411-412.
Estair, S., & Zanon, J. (1994). Planning classwork: A task based approach. Oxford: Heinemann.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 19-45.
Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: Mcquarie University/AMES.
Feng, M. C. (2009). Cooperative learning in a Taiwanese classroom: Turning failure into success. In Selected Papers from the Eighteenth International Symposium on English Teaching. Taipei: Crane.
Ferris, D. R. & J. S. Hedgcock. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice, 2nd edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flower, L. (1985). Problem solving strategies for writing, 2nd ed. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course, 3rd edition. New York: Routledge.
Globish. (2012). Definition of globish on Wikipedia. Retrieved on September 2012 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globish.
Goldstein, A. A., & Carr, P. G. (1996). Can students benefit from process writing? NAEPfacts, 1(3), n3.
Harre, R. (1995). Discursive psychology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & V. Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp.143-159). London: Sage.
Hartog, P. J., Rhodes, E. C., & Burt, C. L. (1936). The marks of examiners. London: Macmillan.
Holliday, A., & Cook, T. (1982). An ecological approach to ESP. In Issues in ESP (pp.123-143). Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education 5. Lancaster: Lancaster University Press.
Huang, P. C. (2007). A metacognitive approach to the task demands encountered in business English writing. In In Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.255-265). Taipei: Crane.
Hyland, K. (2011). Genre teaching: What’s in it for me? In Selected Papers from the Twentieth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.40-50). Taipei: Crane.
Ingram, E. (1970). Report on the marking of English composition, mimeo. University of Edinburgh, Linguistics.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jong, I. J. (2006). ELL teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching: With a focus on Korean secondary classroom practice. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 192-206.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pearson.
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.45-77). London: Academic Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp.1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian perspectives on second language research. In J. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1-32). Connecticut: Ablex Publishing.
Lee, J. (2000). Tasks and communicating in language classrooms. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Lin, B. (2006). Genre-based teaching and Vygotskian principles in EFL: The case of a university writing course. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 226-248.
Lingley, D. (2006). A task-based approach to teaching a content-based Canadian studies course in an EFL context. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 122-138.
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice Hall.
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243-249.
Liu, E. Z., Lin, S. S., Chiu, C., & Yuan, S, (2001). Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44, 246-251.
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379(1), 259-278.
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. TESOL, 82, 207-225.
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Hyltenstam, K., & Pienemann, M. (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. 18, 77-99. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Witchie, & T. Bhatia (Eds.): Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego: Academic Press.
Lougheed, L. (2002). Business correspondence: A guide to everyday writing, 2nd edition. Pearson Education.
Matsuda, P. K., & Silva, T. (Eds.). (2005). Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2006). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Tailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107-132.
McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.
Min, H. Z. (2008). Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 285-305.
Morrow, K. (1979). Communicative language testing: Revolution or evolution? In C. Brumfit, & K. Johnson (Eds.), The Communicative approach to language teaching (pp. 143-59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newton, J. (2001). Options for vocabulary learning through communication tasks. ELT Journal, 55(1), 30-37.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Nunan, D. (2006). Task-based language teaching in the Asia context: Defining ‘task’. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 12-18.
Nunn, R. (2006). Designing holistic units for Task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 69-93.
Oxford, R. L. (2006). Task-based language teaching and learning: An overview. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 94-121.
Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp.155-178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, J. W. (Ed.) (1993). Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Richards, J., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. London: Longman.
Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.
Roebuck, R. (2000). Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 79-95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rutherford, W. (1987). Second language grammar: Learning and teaching. London: Longman.
Sharples, A. (2001) How to Pass English for Business, First Level (3rd ed.). Kent, UK: London Chamber of Commerce and Industry Examinations Board.
Silva, T. (2005) On the philosophical bases of inquiry in second language writing: Metaphysics, inquiry paradigms, and the intellectual zeitgeist. In P. K. Matsuda, & T. Silva, (Eds.), Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp.3-16). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
Skehan, P., Xiaoyue, B., Qian, L., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170-187.
Stoller, F. L. (2010). Meet your ESP students’ needs with a read-analyze-write approach. In Selected Papers from the Nineteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.74-84). Taipei: Crane.
Streb, C. (2010). Exploratory case study. In A. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 373-375). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cool, & B. Seidlhofer (Ed.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of HG Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2011). Sociocultural theory in second language education : An introduction through narratives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Swales, J. M. (1985). Episodes in ESP. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sykes, J. (2010). Task based learning: A successful model for communicative English language instruction. In Selected Papers from the Nineteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.401-410). Taipei: Crane.
Taylor, S. (1998). Gartsides’ Model Business Letter and Other Business Documents (5th ed.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a case study methodology. The Qualitative Report, 3(3).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weir, C. J. (1990). Communicative language testing. Wilshire: Prentice Hall.
Wertsch, J. V., Minick, N., & Arms, F. A. (1984). The creation of context in joint problem-solving. In B. Rogoff, & J. Lave (Eds.) Everyday cognition: Its development in social contexts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
Wiseman, S. (1949). The marking of English composition in grammar school selection. British Journal of Education Psychology, 19(3), 200-209.
Xu, Y. (2007). Re-examining the effects and affects of electronic peer reviews in a first-year composition class. The Reading Matrix, 7(2), 1-21.
Yin, R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.
You, Y. L. (2008). How to teach English writing metacognitively in Taiwan EFL classroom. SPECTRUM: NCUE Studies in Language, Literature, Translation, and Interpretation, 2, 121-141.
You, Y. L. (2009). Enhancing EFL writers'' metacognitive awareness of writing strategy in English Writing. SPECTRUM: NCUE Studies in Language, Literature, Translation, and Interpretation, 5, 69-87.
Yuan, H. C. & Teng, H. C. (2010). A study of task types in new TOEIC writing test. In Selected Papers from the Nineteenth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.502-514). Taipei: Crane.
Zamel, V. (1987) Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 697-715.
中文文獻
技職再造-技專校院遴聘業界專家協同教學作業參考手冊 [Renovating the technical and vocational education—An operation manual for technical universities and colleges to invite industry experts as co-teachers]。(2010)。教育部技職司技職 [Division of Technical and Vocational Education, Ministry of Education]。(English translation by the researcher) Retrieved on Sept. 8, at http://www.iaci.nkfust.edu.tw/download/02_%E6%
A5%AD%E5% E5%B8%AB%E5%8F%83%E8%80%83%E6%89%8B%E5%86%
8A990223.pdf。
林海清 (Lin, H. C.)。(2006)。少子化效應對技職教育發展之衝擊與因應策略 [The impact of the low birth rate on the development of technical and vocational education and the coping strategies]。教育研究月刊 [Educational Research Monthly] ，151，32 - 45。(English translation by the researcher)林麗紅、林幼雀、楊淑雯 (Lin, L. H., Lin, Y. C., & Yang, S. W.)。(2013)。技職院校與普通大學通識教育實施之差異 [The differences in general education for technical and vocational schools and for general universities.] 。通識在線第四十六期。[General Education Online, 46]。Retrieved on August 18, 2013, http://www.chinesege.org.tw /geonline/html/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=309. (English translation by the researcher)
曾瑞譙 (Tseng, J. C.)。(2006)。大專技職校院面對“出生率降低”的學校經營管理壓力與因應之道 [The pressure and coping measures of school operation and management for the technical universities and colleges in the face of decreasing birth rate]。學校行政 [School Administration]，310-325。(English translation by the researcher)
曾瑞譙、張文軫、郭姿秀 (Tseng, J. C., Chang, W. J., & Kuo, T. H.)。(2009)。少子化對技專校院經營管理壓力與因應策略之分析 [A Study on the management pressure and coping strategy under the decreasing birth rate at technological college and Junior college in Taiwan]。教育研究與發展期刊，第5卷第3期 [Journal of Educational Research and Development Monthly, 5(3)]。蔡明學 (Tsai, M. S.)。(2007)。我國大專校院學生素質之探究 [A study on the quality of university and college students in Taiwan]。研習資訊 [Information for Professional Development]，第24卷第3期，135-143。(English translation is by the researcher.)
羅綸新 (Lwo, L. S.)。(2007)。台灣少子化現象對高等教育之衝擊與挑戰 [The impact and challenge of low birth rate on the higher education in Taiwan] 。教育資料與研究雙月刊 [Educational Information and Research Bimonthly]，74，133-150。(English translation by the researcher)