:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:啟聰學校教師口手語並用溝通之句子訊息與詞彙語意特質分析
書刊名:特殊教育與復健學報
作者:邢敏華 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsing, Min-hua
出版日期:2000
卷期:8
頁次:頁27-52
主題關鍵詞:口手語並用溝通句子訊息詞素不配合啟聰學校教學溝通Simultaneous communicationUtterance messageMorpheme mismatchSchools for the deafInstructional communication
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:30
     本研究的目的在探討臺灣三所啟聰學校教師使用語並用溝通模式時的句子訊息與辛彙語意特質的表現。17位使用口手語並溝通模式的改聰學校教師(15位為國小部聽力正常教師,2位為聾師)接受訪問與教學錄影。其受訪內容與上課時的口手語並用溝通教學內容經過語料專錄與分析。研究結果發現:(一)教師的語意完整比率的百分比較高,由65%至95%,平均達81%。(二)教師口語手語之間在句子訊息方面的口語手語完全一致的百分比由8%至63%,平均為27%;此外,教師的手語管道訊息不合國語文法的比率由4%至42%,平均達17%。(三)教師在辭彙的語意特質方面,口語手語之間的詞素不配合的情形,主要有遺漏、錯誤、替代、增加等類型。教師遺漏的詞性由高至低為:動詞、副詞、助詞、代名詞、與名詞。(四)教師的年資只與口語手語訊息完全一致的變項具有正相關,但是教師的遺漏比率與語意完整比率、口語手語句子完全相同和手語-口語對應比率呈負相關;教師的口語手語句子訊息不同比率,和手語-口語對應比率以及語意完整比率呈窅相關,但和詞素遺漏比率呈現正相關。教師的口語手語句子訊息完全相同比率和手語-口語對應比率、語意完整比率均呈現正相關。教師的詞素遺漏比率與口語手語速度比呈現正相關。依據研究結果,研究者邁議未來有關的特殊教育主管機關有必要督導啟聰學校教師的口手語並用溝通能力。
     The aim of this study was to understand deaf school teachers' consistency on utterance messages and morpheme semantic features under simultaneous communication in Taiwan. Seventeen deaf-school teachers (15 hearing and 2 deaf ) were chosen as subjects and they were interviewed and then videotaped twice for their daily teaching performance. Study results showed that (1)Teachers' semantic intact ratio ranging from 65% to 95% with a mean of 81%. (2)Teachers' utterance message equivalence match was low, ranging from 8% to 63% with a mean of 27. Besides, the ratio of teachers' ungrammatical messages in signed language channel ranged from 4% to 43% with a mean of 17%. (3)Teachers' morpheme mismatch types were mainly deletions, errors, substitutions, and additions. Teachers' most frequently omitted morphemes were verbs, adverbs, auxiliaries, pronouns, and nouns. (4)There was a positive correlation between years of teaching a speech/sign utterance equivalence percentage. Teachers' deletions rate had a negative correlation with semantic intact ratio, speech/sign utterance equivalence percentage, and sign-to-voice ratio. Teachers' speech/sign utterance equivalence percentage had a positive correlation with sign-to-voice ratio and semantic intact ratio. There was a positive correlation between teachers' morpheme deletions and teachers' speech rate. Based on research findings, the researcher suggested that special education authorities monitor deaf-school teachers' simultaneous communication performance so as to improve those teachers' sing language skills.
期刊論文
1.邢敏華(19950600)。臺北啟聰學校教師對校內溝通政策的看法及其執行方法之調查。特殊教育與復健學報,4,209-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張顯達(19980600)。平均語句長度在中文的應用。聽語會刊,13,36-48。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hsing, M. H.、Lowenbraun, S.(1997)。An investigation of teachers' perceptions and actions in carrying out communication policies in a public school for the deaf。American Annals of the Deaf,142,34-39。  new window
4.Hyde, M. B.、Power, D. J.(1991)。Teachers' use of simultaneous communication: Effects on the signed and spoken components。American Annals of the Deaf,136,381-387。  new window
5.Hyde, M. B.、Power, D. J.、Leigh, G.(1995)。Characteristics of the speech of teachers of the deaf to hearing students and deaf students under oral-only and simultaneous communication conditions。Australian Journal of Education of the Deaf,1(1),5-9。  new window
6.Luetke-Stahlman, B.(1988)。Documenting syntactically and semantically incomplete bimodal input to hearing-impaired subjects。American Annals of the Deaf,133,230-234。  new window
7.Mallery-Ruganis, D.、Fischer, S.(1991)。Characteristics that contribute to effective simultaneous communication。American Annals of the Deaf,136,401-408。  new window
8.Mayer, Peggy、Lowenbraun, Sheila(1990)。Total communication use among elementary teachers of hearing-impaired children。American Annals of the Deaf,135(3),257-263。  new window
9.Mear, K. M.、Maxwell, M.、Bernstein, M. E.(1992)。Simultaneous codes in different settings: Hearing teachers' performance。Sign Language Studies,77,289-306。  new window
10.Stewart, D. A.(1992)。Initiating reform in total communication programs。Journal of Special Education,26(1),68-84。  new window
11.Stewart, D.、Akamatsu, C. T.、Becker, B. J.(1995)。Aiming for consistency in the way teachers sign。American Annals of the Deaf,140,314-323。  new window
12.邢敏華(19980600)。臺灣區啟聰學校教師之教學溝通行為與所需具備之專業能力調查。特殊教育與復健學報,6,103-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Smith, W.(1990)。The morphological characteristics of verbs in Taiwan Sign Language(博士論文)。Indiana University,Bloomington, IN。  new window
圖書
1.朱翊新(1989)。詞性分解標準學生字典。台北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.祁致賢(1981)。國語基本句式。台北:中國語文月刊社。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅肇錦(1998)。國語學。台北:五南圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Schein, J. D.、Stewart, D. A.(1995)。Language in motion: Exploring the nature of sign。Washington DC:Gallaudet University Press。  new window
5.Luetke-Stahlman, B.、Luckner, J.(1991)。Effectively Educating Students with Hearing Impairments。New York:Longman。  new window
6.史文漢、丁立芬(1979)。手能生橋。台北市:中華民國聾人協會。  延伸查詢new window
7.林寶貴(1986)。聽覺障礙兒童敎材敎法。嘉義:百誠。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.曾志朗(1997)。聽覺障礙學生閱讀能力之提昇。  延伸查詢new window
2.方師鐸(1976)。國語辭彙學一構詞篇。  延伸查詢new window
3.手語書系硏究編輯委員會編(1998)。文字手語典。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺灣省政府教育廳(1999)。臺灣省國民中小學啓聰班敎育概況。  延伸查詢new window
5.岑清美(1997)。思考手語與聽障教育。  延伸查詢new window
6.邢敏華(1996)。比較中美聽障教育的教學溝通問題。  延伸查詢new window
7.邢敏華(2000)。臺灣啓聰學校教師口語手語配合度硏究。  延伸查詢new window
8.林寶貴(1984)。聽障敎育語言溝通法與語文敎學之研究。  延伸查詢new window
9.張蓓莉(1989)。啓聰學校的過去、現在與未來。  延伸查詢new window
10.張蓓莉(1995)。出席第十八屆國際聾教育會議報吿。  延伸查詢new window
11.張蓓莉(1996)。國小啓聰教師教學行爲之硏究。  延伸查詢new window
12.張蓓莉、蘇芳柳(1997)。從口語聽障學生的表現談未來啓聰教育語言溝通方式的發展方向。  延伸查詢new window
13.教育部(1999)。修訂版手語畫册(第一輯)。  延伸查詢new window
14.教育部(1999)。修訂版手語晝册(第二輯)。  延伸查詢new window
15.趙玉平(1999)。手語大師IV。  延伸查詢new window
16.趙建民(1998)。聾人文化概論。  延伸查詢new window
17.黎熙(1978)。國語文法。  延伸查詢new window
18.M. B. Hyde, D. J. Power & G. Leigh(1998)。Oral-only and simultaneous communication speech characteristics of teachers of the deaf。  new window
19.T. N. Kluwin(1981)。The grammaticatity of manual representations of English in classroom settings。  new window
20.B. Luetke-Stahlman(1991)。Following the rules: Consistency in sign。  new window
21.B. Luetke-Stahlman(1998)。Language issues in deaf education。  new window
22.G. S. Marmor & L. Petitto(1979)。Simultaneous communication in the classroom: How well is English grammar represen ted?。  new window
23.D. Moores(1987)。Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles, and practices。  new window
24.W. Newell, M. Stinson, D. Castle, Mallery-Rugains & B. R. Holcomb(1992)。Simultaneous communication: A description by deaf professionals working in an educational setting。  new window
25.S. P. Quigley & R. E. Kretschmer(1982)。The education of deaf children: Issues, theories, and practice。  new window
26.M. Strong & E. S. Charlson(1987)。Simultaneous communication: Are teachers attempting an impossible task?。  new window
27.M. V. Swisher & M. Thompson(1985)。Mothers learning simultaneous communication: The dimensions of the task。  new window
28.R. B. Wilbur & L. Petersen(1998)。Modality interactions of speech and signing in simultaneous communication。  new window
圖書論文
1.Maxwell, M.、Berstein, M.、Mear, K. M.(1991)。Bimodal language production。Theoretical issues in sign language research: Volume 2. Psychology。University of Chicago。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE