:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:陶藝教學問題的檢視與省思--非同步網路教學系統運用之個案研究
書刊名:新竹師院學報
作者:林麗真
出版日期:2001
卷期:14
頁次:頁319-330
主題關鍵詞:陶藝教學實務經驗文藝復興人多元智慧網路教學Ceramics teachingCeramics experienceUomo universaleMulti-intelligenceNetwork learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:15
     本文首先經由對陶藝教學現況的了解,檢視陶藝教學中所浮現的問題,並嘗試從三方面探尋改善的可能途徑。首先針對龐大的陶藝教材內容,筆者透過非同步網路教學系統的運用,資料庫的建立,作為陶藝教學的輔助媒判,藉以改進當前陶藝教學的不足與缺失,鼓勵學生以主動、自主的態度,解決學習上查詢、存取的困擾。其次經由對陶藝主題的設計與結構,幫助學生建立實務操作的經驗,以突破僵化的學習模式。最後以「文藝復興人」為典範,藉以闡述全方位發展的特質,並以之與當前多元智慧理論架構進行對比,從而分析陶藝教學內涵的全方位性。筆者期望透過三者的結合,對現今的陶藝教學作一種嘗試與省思,或許能有助益於學生,在這高速的科技與資訊的時代,面對陶藝這項傳統的技藝,能培養出清晰的思辨能力,有效率的行動能力,以及創造性的人格特質。
     The article is to examine the problems in ceramics teaching, and triying to combine three ways for solution. First, use the Network learning system as assistant teaching material to help students learning and finding the huge mass knowledge of Ceramics. Second, through the assignments develop the experience in working on clay. The third way is using the structure of multi-intelligence to present 「uomo universale」Renaissance spirit as a model of multi-development, and views the Ceramics teaching as medium for students learning as a whole. Based on these three ways, the author works on Ceramics teaching as an examination and develops the design for further studies.
期刊論文
1.林麗真(20000600)。從達文西到陶藝教學--一個非同步網路陶藝教學的設計理念。教學科技與媒體,51,19-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Sessions, Billie(1999)。Curriculum: What has it been? What could it be?。Art Education,September,7-11。  new window
3.De Muro, T.(1992)。Making a case for clay in art education。Dissertations Abstracts International,53(11),3119。  new window
4.Hill, J.(1988)。An historical analysis of and speculation about the value of clay work in American education。Dissertation Abstracts International,49(9),2507。  new window
5.Sessions, Billie(1999)。Curriculum: What has it been? What could it be?。Art Education: Journal of the National Art Education Association,1999(9),7-11。  new window
學位論文
1.De Muro, Theodore Edward(1992)。Making a Case for Clay in Art Education,沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Hill, James Kenneth(1988)。An Historical Analysis of and Speculations about the Value of Clay Working in American Education,沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書
1.Gelb, Michael(1999)。7Brains:怎樣擁有達文西的七種天才。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉蘊芳、Gelb, Michael(1999)。7 Brains:怎樣擁有達文西的7種天才。臺北市:大塊文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.李澤厚、汝信(1990)。美學百科全書。北京:北京:社會科學文獻出版社:新華。  延伸查詢new window
4.溫淑姿、劉良佑(1992)。陶藝研究:研究報告展覽專輯彙編。臺中:台灣省立美術館。  延伸查詢new window
5.Eisner, Elliot W.、郭禎祥(1991)。藝術視覺的教育。臺北:文景書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Dewey, J.(1934)。Art as experience。New York:Perigee Books。  new window
7.Campbell, Linda、Campbell, Bruce、Dickinson, Dee、郭俊賢、陳淑惠(1998)。多元智慧的教與學。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Campbell, Linda、Campbell, Bruce、Dickinson, Dee、郭俊賢、陳淑惠(1999)。多元智慧的教與學。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Gardner, H.(1983)。Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences。NY:Random House。  new window
10.王克先(1996)。學習心理學。臺北:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉子鍵(1999)。透視學習。透視學習。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Donhauser, Paul S.(1978)。History of American Ceramics the Studio Potter。History of American Ceramics the Studio Potter。USA。  new window
13.Rice, Paul、Gowing, Christopher(1989)。British Studio Ceramics in the 20th Century。British Studio Ceramics in the 20th Century。Pennsylvania, USA。  new window
14.Phillips, D. C.、Soltis, Jonas F.(1999)。透視學習。透視學習。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
15.Donhauser, Paul S.(1978)。History of American Ceramics the Studio Potter。History of American Ceramics the Studio Potter。America。  new window
16.Rice, Paul、Gowing, Christopher(1989)。British Studio Ceramics in the 20th Century。British Studio Ceramics in the 20th Century。Pennsylvania。  new window
其他
1.陳麗華(1999)。情境模式的教學設計,0。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳麗華(1999)。情境模式的教學設計。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE