臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：評析高高屏都市區域治理策略中的在地永續性定著：一個新自由主義空間的視角
書刊名：建築與規劃學報
作者：藍逸之
作者(外文)：Lan, I-chih
出版日期：2007
卷期：8:2
頁次：頁115-137
主題關鍵詞：城際競爭；都市企業主義；新自由主義空間；永續性定著；都市區域治理；Intercity competition；Urban entreprenurialism；Space of neoliberalism；Sustainability fix；Urban-region governance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:68
  • 點閱點閱:92
面對全球化的去領土化挑戰，回應並治理日益激化的城際競爭成為當前都市發展必須面對的重要任務。都市為了強化其在城際競爭過程中的在地優勢，以獲取流動的資本於地方發展上進行空間定著，一方面透過都市企業主義來鬆綁計畫發展管制的制約以爭取回應時空壓縮的量能，另一方面則是強調地方形象的重新塑造來突顯地方特質。就後者而言，重點要項之一就是透過重整地方永續性來建構地方特性；同時，並以開創可居環境品質作為地區行銷的提法來結合前者的空間治理策略，形成「永續性定著」的治理。然而，儘管強調環境與經濟的結合，由於概念上源自於新自由主義地理學的空間競爭特性，透過城際競爭與都市企業主義的交互操弄，促使都市治理過程中追求永續性定著在本質上隱含了空間與社會極化的潛在危機。當這種治理過程被擴大到都市區域的層級來檢視的時候，城市應當更謹慎地去解讀其中反被低估的危機。本文以南臺灣高高屏都市區域作為分析的個案，以該都市區域的治理背景及其提出的地方永續發展行動計畫進行制度檢視，並反思其缺失。
Facing the deterritoralizing challenge of globalization, it is the critical task for urban development that cities have to respond to and govern the increasingly intensive intercity competition. In order to improve the local advantage in the process of intercity competition and embed the mobile capital flows into a given area for development, on the one hand, municipality tries to deregulate the planning and regulation restriction to intensify the capacity for replying time-space compression; on the other, to emphasize the remaking of place image to be an attractive locality. For the latter, one of its main issues is to reconstruct locality through remaking the local sustainability; to create livable environment quality as the symbolic narrative of place marketing to combine the former strategies of spatial governance, which will form the governance of 'sustainability fix'. Despite highlighting the linkage between economy and environment, however, owing to the concept originated from the spatial competition under the geography of neoliberalism, it renders that, through the inter-manipulation between urban entreprenurialism and intercity competition, the process of urban governance pursuing sustainability fixity inevitably faces the implicit crisis of spatial and social polarization. When examining the crisis in a larger urban-region scale, cities should more deliberately perceive the misunderestimated crisis. In the paper, I try to take the KKP urban-region in southern Taiwan as a case study, to examine its governance context and LA 21 action project and to explore its defects.
期刊論文
1.Pow, C. P.(2002)。Urban Entrepreneurialism, Global Business Elites and Urban Mega-Development: A Case Study of Suntec City。Asian Journal of Social Science，30(1)，53-72。  new window
2.王文誠(20060600)。全球化趨勢下的都會治理：高雄的挑戰。環境與世界，13，35-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Lo, Fu-Chen、Marcotullio, Peter J.(2000)。Globalisation and urban transformations in the Asia-Pacific region: a review。Urban Studies，37(1)，77-111。  new window
4.Chang, T. C.、Yeoh, B. S. A.(1999)。New Asia-Singapore: Communicating local culture through global tourism。Geoforum，30，101-115。  new window
5.Cox, K. R.(1995)。Globalisation, Competition and the Politics of Local Economic Development。Urban Studies，32(2)，213-224。  new window
6.Douglass, Mike(2000)。Mega-urban regions and world city formation: Globalisation, the economic crisis and urban policy issues in Pacific Asia。Urban Studies，37(12)，2315-2335。  new window
7.Leitner, H.、Gamer, M.(1993)。The Limits of Local Initiatives: A Reassessment of Urban Entrepreneurialism for Urban Development。Urban Geography，14(1)，57-77。  new window
8.Marcotullio, P. J.、Rothenberg, S.、Nakahara, M.(2003)。Globalization and Urban Environmental Transitions: Comparison of New York's and Tokyo's Experiences。The Annals of Regional Science，37，369-390。  new window
9.Hall, T.、Hubbard, P.(1996)。The entrepreneurial city: new urban politics, new urban geographies?。Progress in Human Geography，20(2)，153-174。  new window
10.Chou, T-L.(1998)。Crisis and dysfunction of spatial development and management in Taiwan。Environment and Planning, C: Government and Policy，16，69-84。  new window
11.Wu, Fulong(2003)。The (post-) socialist entrepreneurial city as a state project: Shanghai’s globalization inquestion。Urban Studies，40(9)，1673-1698。  new window
12.Jessop, Bob、Sum, Ngai-Ling(2000)。An entrepreneurial city in action: Hong Kong's emerging strategies in and for (Inter) Urban Competition。Urban Studies，37(12)，2287-2313。  new window
13.Brenner, Neil(1999)。Globalisation as reterritorailisation: the re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union。Urban Studies，36(3)，431-451。  new window
14.Hou, J.(2000)。From dual disparities to dual squeeze: The emerging patterns of regional development in Taiwan。Berkeley Planning Journal，14，4-22。  new window
15.Rogerson, Robert J.(1999)。Quality of Life and City Competitiveness。Urban Studies，36(5/6)，969-985。  new window
16.周志龍(19970800)。資本主義全球化過程中的臺灣都市及區域發展之結構變遷。法商學報，33，1-45。  延伸查詢new window
17.孫義崇(1998)。台灣的區域空間政策。台灣社會研究季刊，1(2/3)，33-96。  延伸查詢new window
18.夏鑄九、劉昭吟(20030900)。全球網絡中的都會區域與城市：北臺都會區域與臺北市的個案。城市與設計學報，15/16，39-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Harvey, D.(1989)。From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: the Transformation in Urban Goverance in Late Capitalism。Geografiska Annaler: Series B: Human Geography，71(1)，3-17。  new window
20.廖石(20010800)。從都市企業化主義的觀點探討在全球化過程中的城鄉均衡發展課題。都市與計劃，28(2)，155-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Friedmann, John(1986)。The World City Hypothesis。Development and Change，17(1)，69-83。  new window
22.周志龍(20041000)。臺灣新都市主義與都市規劃的挑戰。都市與計劃，31(3)，195-213。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Molotch, Harvey(1976)。The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place。American Journal of Sociology，82(2)，309-332。  new window
24.Wang, Jenn-Hwan(2004)。World city formation, geopolitics and local political process: Taipei's ambiguous development。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，28(2)，384-400。  new window
25.李永展、藍逸之、莊翰華(20050600)。全球經濟變遷、發展型國家與臺灣城鄉規劃之重探：都市企業主義適用性的地理探查及其治理危機。地理學報，40，69-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Bassett , K.(1996)。“Partnerships , bussiness elites and urban politics : new forms of governance in an English city ?”。Urban Studies，33 ( 3 )，: 539-555。  new window
27.Brenner , N ,(1998)。Globai cities , glocal states : global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe。Review of International Political Economy，5 ( 1 )，1-37。  new window
28.Douglass, M.(2002)。“From global intercity competition to cooperation for livable cities and economic resilience in Pacific Asia”。Environment & Urbanization，14(1)，53-68。  new window
29.Hodson, M. and Marvin, M.(2007)。“Understanding the role of the national exemplar in constructing ‘strategic glurbanization”。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，31(2)，303-325。  new window
30.Marcotullio, P. J.(2003)。“Globalization, urban form and environmental conditions in Asia-Pacific Cities”。Urban Studies，40(2)，2l9-247。  new window
31.McCarthy, J.(1998)。Reconstruction, regeneration and re-imaging: the case of Rotterdam。Cities，15(5)，337-44。  new window
32.While, A.、Jonas, A. E. G.、Gibbs, D.(2004)。The environment and the entrepreneurial city:searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，28(3)，549-569。  new window
會議論文
1.Lan, I-Chih(2007)。“The Institutional Infrastructure of either Neo-liberalizing Space or Developmental State? Debating Pacific-Asian NIE’s Entrepreneurial Urbanism in the Politics of Scale”。Taipei。  new window
研究報告
1.洪富峰(2000)。「大高雄都會區跨域合作行動方案之研究」。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
2.高雄市政府研考會(2004)。「高高屏三縣市地方永續發展策略」。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉書瑜(2006)。「區域整合與行銷之政治經濟研究一以高高屏聯合招商為例」。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.但昭強(2002)。高雄市都市行銷的實踐與展望(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王德興(2004)。「我國地方府際合作一『高高屏跨域合作』個案研究」，高雄。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝孝昆(2005)。「台北都會區治理的制度障礙-政府間合作關係之研究」。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Friedmann, John(2002)。The Prospect of Cities。Minneapolis：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
2.Wackernagel, Mathis、Rees, William E.、李永展、李欽漢(2000)。生態足跡--減低人類對地球的衝撃。臺北：創興出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Knox, P. L.、Pinch, S.(2000)。Urban Social Geography: An Introduction。Harlow：Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Jessop, B.(2002)。The Future of Capitalist State。London：Polity。  new window
5.Stone, C. N.(1989)。Regime politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988。Lawrence, KA：University Press of Kansas。  new window
6.Brenner, Neil(2004)。New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Logan, John R.、Molotch, H.(1987)。Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place。University of California Press。  new window
8.Harvey, David、Braun, Bruce(1996)。Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference。Blackwell。  new window
9.朱柔若、童小珠(2005)。「南台灣永續發展的挑戰與出路」。台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊汝萬(2004)。全球化背景下的亞太城市。北京：科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Beatley , T and Manning , K .(1997)。The Ecology of Place , Planning for Enviorment , Economy , and Community。Washington DC。  new window
12.Carley, M.(2001)。“Top-down and bottom-up: the challenge of cities in the new centry”。Urban Development and Civil Society: the Role of Communities in Sustainable Cities。London。  new window
13.Friedmann, J.(1998)。“The new political economy of planning: the rise of civil society”。Cities for Citizens。Chichester。  new window
14.Kowk, R. Y-W.(2005)。Current dilemma and future uncertainty。Globalizing Taipei: The Political Economy of Spatial Development。NY。  new window
15.Marcotullio, P. J.(2001)。‘Globalization and the sustainability of cities in the Asia Pacific region’。Globalization and the Sustainability of Cities in the Asia Pacific Region。Tokyo。  new window
16.McGranahan, G,(2007)。‘Urban transitions and the spatial displacement of environmental burdens’。Scaling Urban Environmental Challenges- From Local to Global and Back。London。  new window
17.Selman, P.(1996)。Local Sustainability: Managing and Planning Ecologically Sound Places。London：Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd。  new window
18.Sum, N-L.(1999)。“Rethinking globalisation: rearticulating the spatial scale and temporal horizons o ftrans-border spaces”。Globalisation and the Asia-Pacific: Contested Territories。London。  new window
19.Sum, N-L.(2002)。“Globalization and Hong Kong’s entrepreneurial city strategies: contested visions and the remaking of city governance in (post-) crisis Hong Kong”。The Chinese New City: Globalization and Market Reform。London。  new window
20.Ward, S. V.(1998)。Selling Places: the Marketing and Promotion of Towns and Cities, 1850-2000。London。  new window
21.Yeung, Y-M(2000)。Globalization and Networked Societies: Urban-Regional Change in Pafic Asia。Honolulu。  new window
圖書論文
1.Swyngedouw, E. A.(1997)。Neither Global nor Local: Glocalization and the Politics of Scale。Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local。New York, NY：Guilford Press。  new window
2.Scott, A. J.、J. Agnew、E. Soja、M. Storper(2001)。Global city-regions。Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.夏鑄九(1993)。全球經濟再結構過程中的臺灣區域空間結構變遷。國土規劃的挑戰。臺北：業強。  延伸查詢new window
4.Brenner, Neil、Theodore, Nik(2002)。Cities and Geographies of 'Actually Existing Neoliberalism'。Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe。Blackwell Publishing Ltd.。  new window
5.張景森(1993)。地方政府、民衆組織與地方計劃：九○年代規劃的政治經濟學。國土規劃的挑戰。臺北：業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Harvey, David(1989)。The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change。Mapping the futures: Local culture, global change。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
7.McGee, Terence G.(1991)。The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: expanding a hypothesis。The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia。University of Hawaii Press。  new window
8.Brenner, N.(2003)。Glocalization as a state strategy: urban entreprenurialism and the new politics of uneven development in Western Europe。Remaking the Global Economy。London：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：470（臺灣：458，外國：12） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2298792 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68091469
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上