:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻
書刊名:本土心理學研究
作者:葉光輝 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Kung-hui
出版日期:2009
卷期:32
頁次:頁101-148
主題關鍵詞:本土心理學相互性孝道華人文化雙元模型權威性孝道Authoritarian filial pietyChinese cultureDual modelIndigenous psychologyReciprocal filial piety
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(41) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:41
  • 共同引用共同引用:123
  • 點閱點閱:402
由於孝道概念在華人文化中源遠流長且幾經轉折,為求周延把握其內涵,並消解過往國內、外許多孝道研究結果彼此衝突之爭議,「孝道雙元模型」在兼顧社會科學者對孝道的定義及測量構面,與人文學者對孝道之歷史意義演變的追溯探討下,由華人親子互動的關係運作特徵切入,釐清孝道所含括的不同屬性或具體行為內容,並以「相互性」與「權威性」兩面向,取代籠統概括的孝道概念,闡釋在概念內涵與運作效果上可明顯區隔的孝道雙元特徵。目前孝道雙元模型理論的建構與驗證已有初步成果,本文目的即是對此理論模型進行較全面性的介紹,並側重呈現系列實徵研究成果與理論發展歷程之間的密切關聯,讓讀者能從心理學的角度深入理解孝道概念。全文依序分為以下三部分:(1)先就雙元孝道模型之建構歷程,闡釋兩類孝道概念的定義內涵、性質、動力來源與關聯,並兼及介紹測量工具之發展;(2)再就系列實徵研究成果的相關發現,具體說明兩類孝道在個體層次上的心理運作機制與效果,以凸顯雙元孝道模型在理論上的特色;(3)最後則整合曾引用孝道雙元模型的國內、外文獻,讓讀者瞭解此模型多元的應用價值,並考量前全球化趨勢,提出較具發展潛力的未來研究議題與方向。根據本文的回顧評論可知,孝道雙元模型的主要貢獻即在於兼顧孝道概念的心理與文化原理,並對以往不一致的研究結果提出整合性解釋。目前其應用範疇已延伸至親子衝突、青少年問題行為、老年安養、代間交換及家庭諮商實務等議題,在理論模型與測量工具的信、效度上也持續獲致驗證。其兼具整合力與解釋力之理論優勢,確實值得後續研究者引用此觀點作為孝道研究的基本定論,以釐清研究議題或用以作為對相關現象的詮釋架構。
The concept of filial piety has a long tradition in Chinese culture and has been through several transformations. The Dual Filial Piety Model was constructed to elucidate the concept and resolve contradictions over whether it is beneficial or harmful to individuals. The central goal of this article is to explore this dual model framework comprehensively, linking theory with empirical results. First, I trace the theoretical development of the Dual Filial Piety Model and expound the meanings, characteristics, and implications of each filial aspect as well as the relationship between them. In addition, I address the development of a standard measure of dual filial piety, which has been supported by empirical research. Next, I review empirical results from a series of studies to illustrate the explicit functions and mechanisms of reciprocal and authoritarian filial piety and their corresponding effects on individual adjustment in order to demonstrate the validity of the theoretical model. Finally, in order to show the diverse applications of the dual model framework, I review the literature citing the Dual Filial Piety Model, which includes topics such as parent-child conflict, adolescent problem behavior, elderly care, intergenerational exchange, and family counseling. I use the literature review to address potential issues and to recommend the model as a powerful tool that should be used as a basic guide for future research on filial piety to clarify research questions and interpret related phenomena.
期刊論文
1.張健新、Bond, M. H.(1998)。Personality and filial piety among college students in two Chinese societies: The added value of indigenous constructs。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,29(3),402-417。  new window
2.陳獨秀(1916)。東西民族根本思想之差異。新青年,1(4)。  延伸查詢new window
3.Simmons, Roberta G.(1991)。Presidential address on altruism and sociology。The Sociological Quarterly,32(1),1-22。  new window
4.Roberts, R. E. L.、Bengtson, V. L.(1990)。Is Intergenerational Solidarity a Unidimensional Construct? A Second Test of a Formal Model。Journal of Gerontology,45(1),S12-S20。  new window
5.Mottram, S. A.、Hortacsu, N.(2005)。Adult Daughter Aging Mother Relationship over the Life Cycle: The Turkish Case。Journal of Aging Studies,19(4),471-488。  new window
6.Yeh, K. H.(2006)。The Impact of Filial Piety on the Problem Behaviors of Culturally Chinese Adolescents。Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,7(2),237-257。  new window
7.Ye, K. H.、Bedfor, O(2004)。Filial belief and parent-child conflict。International Journal of Psychology,39,132-144。  new window
8.Kwan, K. L. K.(2000)。Counseling Chinese people: Perspectives of filial piety。Asian Journal of Counseling,7,23-41。  new window
9.Yu, E. S. H.(1983)。Patterns of filial belief and behavior within the contemporary Chinese American family。International Journal of Sociology of the Family,13,17-36。  new window
10.Ho, D. Y. F.、Kang, T. K.(1984)。Intergenerational comparisons of childrearing attitudes and practices in Hong Kong。Developmental Psychology,20,1004-1016。  new window
11.韋政通(1969)。中國孝道思想的演變及其問題。現代學宛,3(5),1-10。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hamilton, Gary G.(1990)。Patriarchy, Patrimonialism, and Filial Piety: A Comparison of China and Western Europe。The British Journal of Sociology,41(1),77-104。  new window
13.葉光輝(19951200)。孝道困境的消解模式及其相關因素。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,79,87-118。  延伸查詢new window
14.葉光輝(19980600)。孝道概念的心理學探討:雙層次孝道認知特徵的發展歷程。本土心理學研究,9,53-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.葉明華、楊國樞(19980600)。中國人的家族主義:概念分析與實徵衡鑑。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,83,169-225。  延伸查詢new window
16.李國良(19730500)。儒家孝道思想研究。女師專學報,3,81-94。  延伸查詢new window
17.楊維中(20010500)。論傳統孝道的歷史價值和其現代意義。中國文化月刊,254,83-101。  延伸查詢new window
18.葉光輝(19980600)。年老父母居住安排的心理學研究:孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,83,121-168。  延伸查詢new window
19.Buehler, C.、Gerard, J. M.(2002)。Marital Conflict, Ineffective Parenting, and Children's and Adolescents' Maladjustment。Journal of Marriage and Family,64(1),78-93。  new window
20.黃堅厚(19770600)。從心理學的觀點談孝並分析青年對孝行的看法。教育心理學報,10,11-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.楊中芳(19930600)。試論如何深化本土心理學研究:兼評現階段之研究成果。本土心理學研究,1,122-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Yeh, Kuang-Hui、Bedford, Olwen(2003)。A test of the dual filial piety model。Asian Journal of Social Psychology,6(3),215-228。  new window
23.楊國樞、葉光輝、黃囇莉(19890600)。孝道的社會態度與行為:理論與測量。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,65,171-227。  延伸查詢new window
24.吳 虞(1917)。家族制度與專制主義之關係。新青年,2(6),1-4。  延伸查詢new window
25.Cheung, C. K.、Lee, J. J.、Chan, C. M.(1994)。Explicating Filial Piety in Relation to Family Cohesion。Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,9(3),565-580。  new window
26.Cicirelli, V. G.(1983)。Adult Children's Attachment and Helping Behavior to Elderly Parents。Journal of Marriage and the Family,45(4),815-825。  new window
27.Cicirelli, V. G.(1983)。A Comparison of Helping Behavior to Elderly Parents of Adult Children with Intact and Disrupted Marriages。The Gerontologist,23(6),619-625。  new window
28.Crockenberg, S.(1987)。Predictors and Correlates of Anger Toward and Punitive Control of Toddlers by Adolescent Mothers。Child Development,58,964-975。  new window
29.何友暉(1994)。Filial Piety, Authoritarian Moralism, and Cognitive Conservatism in Chinese Societies。Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs,120,349-365。  new window
30.Mc-Cann, R. M.、Dailey, R. M.、Giles, H.、Ota, H.(2005)。Beliefs about Intergenerational Communication across the Lifespan: Middle Age and the Roles of Age Stereotyping and Respect Norms。Communication Studies,56(4),293-311。  new window
31.Selig, S.、Tomlinson, T.、Hickey, T.(1991)。Ethical Dimensions of Intergenerational Reciprocity: Implications for Practice。The Gerontologist,31(5),624-630。  new window
32.Shagle, S. C.、Barber, B. K.(1993)。Effects of Family, Marital, and Parent-child Conflict on Adolescent Self-derogation and Suicidal Ideation。Journal of Marriage and the Family,55,964-974。  new window
33.Sung, K. T.(1990)。A New Look at Filial Piety: Ideas and Practice of Familycentered Parent Care in Korea。The Gerontologist,30(5),610-617。  new window
34.Sung, K. T.(1995)。Measures and Dimensions of Filial Piety in Korea。The Gerontologist,35(2),240-247。  new window
35.Sung, K. T.(2001)。Family Support for Elderly in Korea: Continuity, Change, Future Directions, and Cross-cultural Concerns。Journal of Aging and Social Policy,12,65-79。  new window
36.Sung, K. T.(2004)。Elder Respect among Young Adults: A Cross-cultural Study of Americans and Koreans。Journal of Aging Studies,18,215-230。  new window
37.Wang, F. T. Y.(2002)。Contesting Identity of Taiwanese Home-care Workers-worker, Daughter, and Do-gooder?。Journal of Aging Studies,16(1),37-55。  new window
會議論文
1.李鍌(1983)。孝道的現代意義。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.陶希聖(1983)。孝道與孝行研討會發言紀錄。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃堅厚(1982)。現代生活中孝的實踐。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊國樞(1985)。現代社會的新孝道。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉光輝(1999)。Parent-child Conflicts and Filial Piety: A Preliminary Study in Taiwan。  new window
學位論文
1.康琇喬(2003)。早年家庭暴力經驗、孝道與心理健康相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.李雅文(2006)。早年家庭暴力經驗與創傷修通對心理治療者效能影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃兆慧(2005)。「滯家青年」:家庭危機的守護天使?--以脈絡化觀點詮釋青年社會退縮者的滯家現象(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉致芬(2005)。孝悌楷模的家庭系統運作(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉碧素(2006)。探討影響世代孝道行為之相關因素(碩士論文)。國立臺北護理學院,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.石致華(1982)。儒家孝道思想研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張則凡(2006)。青少年之孝道態度與祖孫代間支持--以三代同堂家庭為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉光輝(1992)。孝道認知的類型發展及其相關因素(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭欵(2004)。大學生對親代安養態度與自我老年安養期待之差異(碩士論文)。南華大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.張慈容(2005)。多元文化諮商中抗拒的文化理解。  延伸查詢new window
11.Boey, K. W.(1976)。Rigidity and Cognitive Complexity: An Empirical Investigation in the Interpersonal, Physical, and Numeric Domains Under Task-oriented and Ego-oriented Conditions(博士論文)。University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong。  new window
12.Lee, A. E. Y.(1997)。Family Social Support Patterns of the Chinese Elderly in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Los Angeles: The Role of Filial Piety,Los Angeles。  new window
圖書
1.趙澤厚(1970)。孝學新論。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐復觀(1975)。中國思想史論集。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳自甦(1986)。倫理與社會。臺北:水牛出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳大齊(1973)。如何做父親。哲學倫理講話。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳立夫(1972)。人理學研究。人理學研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃月霞(1980)。兩代之間孝道觀念差距與親子和諧程度相關之研究。基隆:大洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃得時(1982)。孝道之本義與行孝之步驟。倫理道德的理論與實踐意義。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊國樞、葉光輝(1991)。孝道的心理學研究:理論、方法及發現。中國人中國心-傳統篇。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Choi, J. S.(1970)。Comparative Study on the Traditional Families in Korea, Japan, and China。Families in East and West。Paris。  new window
10.Hoffman, M. L.(1984)。Empathy, Its Limitations and Its Role in a Comprehensive Moral Theory。Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development。New York, NY。  new window
11.Jin, L.、Yuen, M.、Watkins, D.(2007)。The Role of Filial Piety in the Career Decision Processes of Postgraduate Students in China。Psychology of Decision Making in Education, Behavior and High Risk Situations。New York, NY。  new window
12.Kim, H. C.、Cho, N. J.、Choi, S. J.、Yu, I. H.(1986)。Development of a Standard Model of the Korean Family。Development of a Standard Model of the Korean Family。Seoul, Korea。  new window
13.Liu, W. T.、Kendig, H.(2000)。Who Should Care for the Elderly? An East-West Value Divide。Who Should Care for the Elderly? An East-West Value Divide。Singapore。  new window
14.Patterson, G. R.(1982)。A Social Learning Approach to Family Intervention: Ⅲ. Coercive Family Process。A Social Learning Approach to Family Intervention: Ⅲ. Coercive Family Process。Eugene, OR。  new window
15.葉光輝。Filial Piety and Autonomous Development of Chinese Adolescents。The Family and Social Change in Chinese Societies。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.Ho, E. K. F.(1994)。Validating the Five-factor Model of Personality: The Hong Kong Case。  new window
圖書論文
1.葉光輝(2005)。華人孝道的心理與行為。華人本土心理學。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
2.潘重規(1956)。孔子孝的學說。中國學術史論集。臺北:中華文化出版事業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ho, Y. F. David(1996)。Filial Piety and Its Psychological Consequences。The Handbook of Chinese Psychology。Oxford:Hong Kong:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.葉光輝(1997)。台灣民眾之孝道觀念的變遷情形。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
5.葉光輝(2003)。The Beneficial and Harmful Effects of Filial Piety: An Intergrative Analysis。Asian Social Psychology: Conceptual and Empirical Contributions。CT:Praeger。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE