:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:衝突與合作:企業內工會與資方的互動本質
書刊名:台灣勞動評論
作者:戴曉惠 引用關係
作者(外文):Tai, Hsiao-hui
出版日期:2009
卷期:1:1
頁次:頁67-88
主題關鍵詞:工會資方互動勞資衝突勞資合作Labor processLabor controlLabor subjectiveJournalist
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:94
  • 點閱點閱:40
本研究探討企業內工會與資方互動過程的本質,具有兩項研究問 題:企業內工會與資方間的互動關係如何形成或構造?企業內工會與資方間的互動過程如何進行?研究者首先回顧五個互動相關理論,歸納互動的本質;並以國內某家具有工會的民營化企業為研究對象,進行質性個案研究的參與觀察及深度訪談。研究發現如下:我國政府規範的權威影響企業內工會與資方的互動過程極深;工會必須鞏固行動力量的權力與資源,改變勞資間不對等的衝突結構;資方主動與工會互動的目的為影響工會成為企業助力。因此,合作與衝突為企業內勞資互動過程一體兩面的本質,互動過程的各種行為與模式因應而生,工會與資方不斷地衝突與妥協,以求各自權力、資源的累積。
This research explores the nature of interaction between unions and management in a workplace with two questions: How is the union-management interaction formalised or constructed? How does the union-management interaction take place? Five theories have been reviewed to draw on the nature of interaction. One unionised as well as privatised enterprise has conducted observant participation and in-depth interviews. The findings discuss how the authority of government deeply influences the union-management interaction; unions consolidate their power and resources to change the asymmetrical relationship with management; and how management actively interacts with unions to bring them into the fold. Nevertheless, cooperation and conflict are counterparts of the union-management interaction. Unions and management continually conflict and compromise to accumulate their own power and resources.
期刊論文
1.童世駿(2000)。哈伯馬斯現代性理論的幾個方法論特徴。社會理論學報,3(2),273-303。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chen, Shyh(2003)。Changing Patterns of Industrial Relations in Taiwan。Industrial Relations,42,315-340。  new window
3.衛民(20011200)。從政府規範到產業民主?--臺灣僱傭關係的轉變。香港社會科學學報,21,131-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Argyle, Micnael(1969)。Social Interaction。London:Methuen。  new window
2.Dahrendorf, Ralf.(1988)。The Modern Social Conflict: An Essay on the Politics of。London:Weidenfeld and Nicolson.。  new window
3.Katz, Harry Charles、Owen Darbishire.(2000)。Converging Divergences: Worldwide Changes in Employment Systems。New York:Cornell University Press。  new window
4.Knoke, David.(1990)。Organizing for Collective Action: The Political Economies of Associations。New York:Aldine de Gruyter, Inc。  new window
5.Salamon, Michael(1998)。Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice。London:Prentice Hall Europe。  new window
6.Habermas, J.、McCarthy, T.(1984)。The Theory of Communicative Action。Boston:Beacon Press。  new window
7.曾慶豹(1998)。哈伯瑪斯。臺北市:生智。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Giddens, Anthony(1984)。The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
9.Mead, George Herbert、Morris, Charles W.(1934)。Mind, Self and Society。University of Chicago Press。  new window
10.高宣揚(1991)。哈伯瑪斯論。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
11.胡正光(1998)。紀登士。台北:生智出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.羅曉南(19930000)。哈伯瑪斯對歷史唯物論的重建。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Dahrendorf, Ralf(1959)。Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society。Stanford University Press。  new window
14.李允傑(19990920)。臺灣工會政策的政治經濟分析。臺北:商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Elliott, Anthony.(2006)。Interaction." The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology。Cambridge: Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Edwards, Paul(2003)。The Employment Relationship and the Field of Industrial Relations。Industrial Relations, Theory and Practice。Oxford:Blackwell。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE