:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:一位女性國中初任校長生命史之批判詮釋學對話
作者:連秀玉
作者(外文):Siou -Yu Lian
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:教育政策與行政學系
指導教授:翁福元
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:初任校長國中女性校長生命史研究批判詮釋學校長培訓Novice PrincipalFemale High School PrincipalLife StoryCritical HermeneuticPrincipal trains.
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:173
論文摘要
本研究旨在以批判詮釋學對話的觀點,探討一位女性國民中學初任校長生命史的發展:從起心動念考校長到儲訓實習階段,經過遴選上任至初任校長一年間的心路歷程;同時透過批判詮釋學對話,了解在各歷程轉折時,所面臨的情境與因應方式,並透過自我的反思,為未來尋求更好的展現方式;希望藉此鼓勵傑出女性教師勇於突破本身性別的限制,以自身特質的展現實力,喚起女性主體的意識,朝更佳的教育環境前進。
研究結果發現:在主角生命史中,受家庭及學校教育影響大,傳統與現代兩股力量交結,蘊涵著形成女性校長柔和但堅毅特質的養分,加上不服輸的特性,在沒有預做校長職業生涯規劃下,一路從代課教師走上主任、校長之路。在校長儲訓班中,透過師傅校長的典範與個人特質分析,拼湊產生理想校長的圖像;在實習歷程中,逐步釐清對校長角色的認知,並產生對校長身份的認同。遴選時,第一次,面對自我錯誤評估與外部關係不足的衝擊,以正面思考調適,第二次,面對家長會與教師會意見相左以及第三勢力介入的衝擊,獲選後以謙遜、溝通、服務的態度化解衝突。在女性國中初任校長的自我定位上,擔任資源意見的整合者、教學熱誠的激發者及績效責任的承擔者三方面,因女性特質的融入,自我定位較明確,在教育新知的服務者、學校願景的領航者方面,因對校務的不熟悉,仍待加強。在女性國中初任校長校務發展的挑戰上,共分為家長會長的參與、舊勢力的抗拒、外在勢力的介入、與廠商的互動、小團體的掣肘、資源的缺乏、校園文化的塑造、與長官的互動、家長的拉力、教育政策的衝擊等十個層面。
ABSTRACT
The dissertation aims to study the life story of a novice female principal of a junior high school from the perspective of critical hermeneutic dialogue. Her life story is starting from her first thought of taking the principal’s exam. The second stage is her pre-service training of the novice principal. The third stage is her first year experience of being a female principal. Critical hermeneutic dialogue serves as the methodological foundation and thus this research can explore a female principal’s experiences and coping strategies in these different stages of life story. This research is seeking a better way of demonstrating a life story of one female principal via self-reflection. The ultimate goal of this research is to encourage excellent female teachers to fully develop their potential and ability and do not be restricted by their natural gender. To inspire female teachers’ subjectivity and self-consciousness and pursue a better education environment.
This research discovers the following findings. First of all, the life story of this female principal is largely influenced by her family and school education. The cross-connected power of tradition and modern nurtures her tender and persistent attitude. Second, her character of unwilling to succumb to defeat, she went through a career development path of being a substitute teacher, a director, and then finally being a principal. These are all out of her expectation. Second, in the principal training class, she learned a lot from the examples of master principals and the analyses of personal qualities, the novice principal creates an ideal principal vision. Third, during her pre-service training process, she gradually clarifies her cognition of principal’s role in a school, and identifies herself with the identity of being a principal. Fourth, in the principal selection phase, for the first time, she uses positive thinking to adjust her attitudes towards the shock of wrong self-evaluation and the lack of outer relationship. For the second time, she eases the conflicts between the parent association and teachers association with her humble, communicable, and service attitudes. In terms of the self-identity of being a novice female principal, she considers herself as a coordinator of resources and opinions, an inspirer of teaching enthusiasm, and a career of school accountability. She believes her clear self-identity is because of her female character. However, as for being the provider of the latest educational knowledge and being the navigator of the school’s perspective, these two aspects should be improved due to the unfamiliarity with the school affairs and environments. The novice female principal’s challenges on schools’ affairs include ten aspects: the participant of the chairman of parent teacher association, the resistance of old power, the involvement of outer influence, the interaction with factory owners, the obstruction of sub-groups, the lack of abundant resources, the unsuitable school culture, the interaction with the chiefs, the lack of support from parents, and the impact of macro education policy.
參考文獻
中文部分
丁興祥(2002)。生命史與心理傳記學-理論與方法的探索(Life histories and Psychobiography)(序)(頁11-15)。臺北市:遠流。
中正大學教育研究所(主編)(2000)。質的研究方法。高雄市:麗文。
王麗雲(2000)。自傳∕傳記∕生命史在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學(主編),質的研究方法(頁265-306)。高雄市:麗文。
方永泉(2004)。詮釋學理論與教育研究的關係:以呂格爾的詮釋學理論為例。載於潘慧玲﹙主編﹚,教育研究方法論:觀點與方法﹙191-222頁﹚。台北市:心理。
田秀蘭(1997)。女性生涯發展之主要型態。諮商與輔導,133,18-20。
江文瑜(1996)。口述史法。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁249-269)。臺北市:巨流。
朱淑如(2006)。從「因緣際會」到「綠樹成蔭」-三位國小女校長生涯發展故事(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22095NKNU5332044%22.&searchmode=basic
何怡君(2003)。交織一片藍天-我與一位女校長投入課程改革的生命史研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22091NTPTC611031%22.&searchmode=basic
何麗香(2003)。花蓮縣國小女性校長學校公共關係之研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22091NHLT1576004%22.&searchmode=basic
李明堂(2002)。從EAQ研究議題、研究方法探討教育行政研究典範的發展。屏東師院學報,17,175-214。new window
李英明(1986)。哈伯瑪斯。臺北市:東大。


李惠茹(2002)。台南市國中女教師的職業選擇與晉遷--性別的多數、權力的少數(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22090NCKU5635007%22.&searchmode=basicnew window
李端明(2005)。國小組織運作中的校長領導-一種自傳研究(博士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22093NCYU0576008%22.&searchmode=basicnew window
呂晶晶(2008)。以女性主義觀點探討國民中、小學女性校長之玻璃天花板。學校行政,56,107-123。
林瑩(2002)。我國國民中學女性校長學校公共關係處理(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22090NCNU0631004%22.&searchmode=basic
周顏玲(1988)。婦女與性別研究的理論架構、方法及其中國化未來發展。載於台大婦女研究室編(主編),性別角色與社會發展學術研討會論文集 (頁25-46)。臺北市:國立台灣大學人口研究中心婦女研究室。
洪雯柔(2008)。批判俗民誌的跨國研究─比較教育方法論之再思。臺北市:五南。
洪漢鼎(2001)。理解與解釋-詮釋學經典文選。北京:東方出版社。
洪漢鼎(2002)。詮釋學史。臺北市,桂冠圖書。new window
胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市:巨流。
師瓊璐(2000)。橫越生命的長河--三位國小女性教師的生命史研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22088NTTTC576020%22.&searchmode=basic
桂海君(2005)。「強價值介入」在社會工作研究和實務中的運用-對哈伯瑪斯的批判詮釋學的初淺理解。貴州大學學報(社會科學版),23(3),75-78。
郝琳(2008)。批判詮釋學及其在意義治療上的應用。湖南科技大學學報。29(2),70-72。
袁文彬(2004)。詮釋學的流變及其現代意義。中山大學研究生學刊(社會科學版)。25(2),125-135。
高敬文(1996)。質化研究方法論。臺北市:師大書苑。
孫秀琴(2008)。一位女性國小校長的教育生涯路(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22097NKNU5036002%22.&searchmode=basic
連秀玉(2008)。台灣近十年國民中小學女性校長相關博碩士論文之分析。論文發表於國立臺中教育大學教育學系、課程所暨學校行政領導專業發展中心舉辦之「2008年中小學校長專業發展學術研討會」,台中市。
許傳德(1999)。一位國小校長的生命史(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22087NTTTC576006%22.&searchmode=basic
馮秋桂(2004)。三位女性國小校長生涯發展歷程之研究-傾聽生命長河的真情告白(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22092NPTT1576067%22.&searchmode=basic
梁文蓁(2000)。教育行政領導理論的女性主義觀點評析。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育題的性別視野(頁1-39)。臺北市:國立台灣師範大學。
梁福鎮(2000)。詮釋學方法及其在教育研究的應用。載於中正大學(主編),質的研究方法(頁221-238)。高雄市:麗文。
梁福鎮(2004)。改革教育學-起源、內涵與問題的探究。臺北市,五南。new window
教育部統計處(2012a)。各級學校學生人數--性別分。取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0013/seriesdata.xls
教育部統計處(2012b)。國中小女性校長之比率【原始數據】。取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0013/overview59.xls 。
莊明貞( 1997)。邁向兩性平等之路。載於台北市政府教育局(主編),台北市政府教育局推展兩性平等教育成果報告書。臺北市:市政府教育局。
莊明貞與陳怡如譯(2005)。Corrine Glesne原著。質性研究導論(Qualitative Researchers:An Introduction)。臺北市:高等教育。
許慧楨(2006)。國小女性校長生涯阻礙及其因應策略之研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22094NTPTC576019%22.&searchmode=basic
張汝伦(1996)。解釋學在二十世紀。國外社會科學,1996(5),20-25。

張源泉(2006)。J. Habermas批判理論之集大成者。載於譚光鼎、王麗雲(主編),教育社會學,人物與思想(頁339-366)。臺北市:高等教育。
張晉芬與謝小芩(2004)。性別觀點與量化教育研究。載於潘慧玲(主編),觀點與方法—教育研究方法論(頁347-266)。臺北市:師大教育研究中心。
陳伯璋(1990)。教育研究方法新取向:質的研究方法(增訂版)。臺北市,南宏。
陳幸仁(2006)。學校組織行為之微觀政治學分析取向。第六屆台灣學者暨博士班生教育行政學術論文研討會。取自web.nutn.edu.tw/gac760/New00/file/2006.12.09/
陳宜宣(2000)。教育領導研究的女性主義觀點分析。載於潘慧玲(主編),教育議題的性別視野(頁41-72)。臺北市:國立台灣師範大學。
陳怡君(2006)。女校長相關研究議題探析。學校行政,43,120-133。
陳欣白(2003)。對話與溝通。臺北市,揚智。
陳峰(2003)。略論西方解釋學史的流變。天津社會科學,2003(2),p60-63。
陳啟濃(2011)。初任國中校長領導之實踐研究-個人自傳的敘說研究(博士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22099NCYU5579068%22.&searchmode=basicnew window
陳瑞成(2008)。國小校長創新領導實踐與反思之自傳研究─以兩個InnoSchool全國學校經營創新獎方案為例(博士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22097NTNT5576028%22.&searchmode=basicnew window
陳媺慈(2007)。我在太興的日子-一位初任女性校長學校經營之自傳俗民誌研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22095NCYU5576043%22.&searchmode=basic
陳艷紅(2001)。國民小學女性主管角色衝突與調適歷程(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22089NTCTC576030%22.&searchmode=basic
陳艷紅(2010)。女校長與石頭湯。取自http://w9.nges.chc.edu.tw/prin/htdocs/modules/tadnews/page.php?nsn=39。
曾慶豹(1999)。哈伯瑪斯。臺北市:生智。new window
曾秀鳳(2004)。女校長的教育伸展台-一位小學女校長領導風格之個案研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所國民教育研究學報,13,147-181。new window
黃金葉(2006)。女校長生命圖像中性別經驗的敘說(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22094NKNU0739004%22.&searchmode=basic
黃瑞祺主編(2010)。溝通、批判與實踐-哈伯瑪斯八十論集。臺北市,允晨。
彭启福譯(2003)。帕爾墨、海德格爾的本體論和伽達默爾的哲學詮釋學。安徽師範大學學報,2002(3),267。
彭启福(2003)。西方詮釋學詮釋重心的轉換及其合理走向。安徽師範大學學報(人文社會科學版)。31(2),125-130。
莊明貞(1997)。道德教育與評量—多元文化觀點。臺北市:師大書苑。
游美惠與柯伯昇(2008)。國小校長職位晉遷的事件史分析:性別和家庭照顧責任的探討。台灣社會學刊,40,45-88。
游婉琪與林志成(2012年5月24日)。愛慕先生!新好女人定義 教部挨批。中時電子報。取自http://news.chinatimes.com/focus/11050105/112012052400076.html
楊深坑(1988)。理論、詮釋與實踐:教育學方法論論文集(甲輯)。臺北市:師大書苑。new window
楊深坑(2002)。科學理論與教育學發展。臺北市:心理。new window
詹培莉(2012)。另一種風景-敘說初任校長成長的生命故事(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22100NHCT5149002%22.&searchmode=basic
翟智怡(2001)。高中職女性校長生涯發展歷程之研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22089NKNU0464018%22.&searchmode=basic
熊同鑫(2001)。窺、潰、饋:我與生命史研究相遇的心靈起伏。應用心理研究,12,107-131。new window
廖炳惠(1993)。里柯。臺北市:東大。new window


潘士銓(2009)。一位校長生涯發展之生命史研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22098NCYU5576003%22.&searchmode=basic
潘慧玲 (主編) (2000)。教育議題與性別視野。臺北市:國立台灣師範大學。
潘慧玲、梁文蓁和陳宜宣 (1999)。台灣近十年來教育領導博碩士論文分析:女性主義的觀點。婦女與兩性學刊,11,151-190。new window
蔡秀燕(2002)。國小女性校長與社區互動關係之研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22090NTPTC576066%22.&searchmode=basic
蔡錦昌(1982)。呂格兒詮釋學簡介。中國論壇,13(3),60-64。
劉麗美(2004)。國小女性校長參與行政心路歷程之研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22092CCU00331033%22.&searchmode=basic
賴佳敏(2000)。她的故事 一位國小女校長領導風格之個案研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22088TMTC0576008%22.&searchmode=basic
賴佳敏、張德銳(2003)。「她的故事」-一位國小女校長領導風格之個案研究。學校行政,26,16-34。
盧燕貞(1989)。中國近代女子教育史。臺北市:文史哲出版社。
謝錦雲(2004)。一所中學新任校長領導-適應與開創之心路歷程(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22092FJU00717028%22.&searchmode=basic
謝菊英(2002)。高屏區國小女性校長工作壓力與社會支持之研究(碩士論文)。取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22090NPTT1576018%22.&searchmode=basic
謝蕙風(2006)。初探七○年代男性知識份子對新女性主義的言論與態度。東華人文學報,8,173-212。new window
鐘琬鈴(2009)。台中縣國小退休校長生涯發展歷程之研究:三位退休校長的生命史分析(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22097CCU05395008%22.&searchmode=basic
嚴振農(2010)。女性校長職業生涯困境與轉折:批判俗民誌的應用(博士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22098NCNU0631001%22.&searchmode=basicnew window
顧瑜君(2002)。生命史研究運用在教育研究的價值:對〈窺、潰、饋:我與生命史研究相遇的心靈起伏〉一文的回應。應用心理研究,13,7-16。new window
蘇竟同(2007)。一位國小原住民校長的生命故事和教育觀點(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22096NPTT5576071%22.&searchmode=basic
蘇震泰(2009)。深耕教育半世紀杏壇人格者―林東瀛校長之生命史研究(碩士論文)。 取自http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22097TMTC5778051%22.&searchmode=basic
外文部份
Addi-Raccah, A., & Ayalon, H.(2002). Gender Inequality in leadership positions of teachers. British Joural of Sociology of Education, 23(2), 157-177.
Allport, G. W.(1942).The Use of Personal Documents in Psychological Research. New Yark, NY: Social Science Research Council.
Altshuler, S. J. (2003). From barriers to successful collaboration: Public schools and child welfare working together. Social Work, 48(1), 52-63. http://search.proquest.com/docview/62227223?accountid=12721
Atkinson, D. (1997). An Auto/biographical Approach to Learning Disability Research. Ashgate.
Antikainnen, A., & Komonen, K.(2003). Biography, Life Course, and the Sociology of Education. In C. A.Torres, & A . Antikainnen(Eds.), The international handbook on the sociology of education : an international assessment of new research and theory (pp.143-159). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Aspinwall, K.(1992). Biographical research: Searching for meaning. Management Education and Development, 23(3), 248-257.
Becker, H. S.(1966). Introduction. In: C. Shaw(Ed.), The Jack Roller: A Delinquent Boys Own Story. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, H. S.(1970). The History and the Scientific Mosaic. In H. S. Becker, Sociological Work: Method and Substance(pp.63-73). Aldine Publishing Company.
Bertaux, D.(1981). From the life-story approach to the transformation of sociological. In D. Bertaux(Eds.),Biographical and society: The life story approach in the social sciences.(pp. 29-45). London: Sage.
Bertaux, D. & Kohli, M.(1984). The life story approach: A continental review. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 215-237.
Bullough, R.(1998). Musings on life writing: biography and case study in teacher education, in C. Kridel (Ed.).Writing Educational Biography: Explorations in Qualitative Research, (pp. 19-32). New Yark: Garland.
Burns, R. B.(1994). Introduction to Research Methods. Melbourne: Longman Astralia Pty Ltd.
Cassel, J., & S. E.Jacobs, (Eds.).(1987).“Introduction.”In Handbook on ethical issues in anthropology, 1-3. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
Casey, K.(1993). I Answer With My Life: Life Histories of Women Teachers Working for Social Change. New York: Routledge.
Coffey, A . & Atkinson, P.(1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coffey, A.(1999). The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. London: Sage.
Coleman, M.(1998). Woman in educational management in China: experience in Shaanxi Province. Compare, 28(2), 141-154.
Coleman, M.(2005). Gender and secondary school leader. Gender issues in leadership, 33(2), 3-20.
Coleman, M.(2007). Gender and educational leadership in England : a comparison of secondary headteachers’views over time. School Leadership and Management, 27(4), 383-399.
Connolly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J.(1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
Cosslett, T.(1994). Women Writing Childbirth: Modern Discourses of Motherhood. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Cubillo, L., & Brown, M.(2003). Woman into educational leadership and management: international differences? Journal of educational administration, 41 (3), 278-291.
Daus-Magbual, R. (2010). Political, emotional, powerful: The transformative influence of the pin[at]y educational partnerships (PEP). University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, http://search.proquest.com/docview/375485260?accountid=12721
De Groot, J.& Maynard, M. (Eds.). (1993). Women´s studies in the 1990s: Doing things differently? New York : St. Martin.
Denzin, N.(1970).The Research Act in Sociology: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Chicago: Aldine.
Denzin, N.K.(1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York,NY:McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Denzin, N.K.(1989).Interpretive Biography. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Eagly, A. H.(2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1-12.
Elder, G..(1981). Histories and the life course. In D. Bertaux(Eds.),Biographical and society: The life story approach in the social sciences.(pp. 77-115). London: Sage.
Ellis, C. & Flaherty, M. G. (ed.)(1992). Investigating Subjectivity: Research on Lived Experience. London: Sage.
Faraday, A. & Plummer, K.(1979). Doing life histories. Sociological Review 27(4),773-789.
Ferrarotti, G..(1981). On the autonomy of the biographical Method. In D. Bertaux(Eds.),Biographical and society: The life story approach in the social sciences.(pp. 19-27). London: Sage.
Forcht, M. L. (2002). A critical hermeneutic inquiry into the nature of entrepreneurial leadership and commitment in high-technology organizations. University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 117 p. http://search.proquest.com/docview/305441125?accountid=12721
Gagnon, N. (1981). On the analysis of life accounts. In D. Bertaux(Eds.),Biographical and society: The life story approach in the social sciences.(pp. 47-60). London: Sage.

Garcia, Y. (2011). Early education in california: Communicative action in the public sphere. University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, http://search.proquest.com/docview/864272912?accountid=12721
Giele, J.Z., & Elder, G.H.(1998). Life course research: Development of a field. In J.Z. Giele, & G.H. Elder(Eds.), Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches(pp. 5-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Girous, H.(1991). Border Crossings. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Goodson, I.(1980). Life histories and the study of schooling. Interchange 12(4):62-76.
Goodson, I.(1991). History, Context and Qualitative Methods. In I. Goodson, & R. Walker(Eds.), Biography, Identity, and Schooling: Episodes in Educational Research(pp. 114-136). London: The Falmer Press.
Goodson, I.(1992). Studying Teachers` Lives. London: Routledge.
Goodson, I. & Fliesser, C.(1994). Exchanging gifts: collaborative research and theories of context, Analytic Teaching,15(2):41-6.
Goodson, I. & Fliesser, C.(1995). Negotiating fair trade: towards collaborative relationships between researchers and teachers in college settings. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(3):5-17.
Goodson, I. & Mangan, J.M.(1995). Developing a collaborative research strategy with teachers for the study of classroom computing. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 4(3):269-87.
Goodson, I. F. & Sikes, P. (2001). Life history research in educational settings: Learning from lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y.(1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In D. Fetterman(Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education. (pp. 215-246).
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A.(1995). Biographical work and new ethnography. In R. Josselson, & A. Lieblich(Eds.), Interpreting Experience. (pp. 45-58). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Habermas, J. (1988). On the logic of the social science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hassouneh-Phillips D& Beckett A.(2003). An education in racism. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(6),258-65.
Herda, E.A .(1999). Research conversations and narrative: A critical hermeneutic orientation in participatory inquiry. London: Praeger.
Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the Teacher: A qualitative introduction to school-based research(2nd ed). London: Routldge.
Kaniu, P. (2011). Critical hermeneutic inquiry in kagaa, kenya: Refiguring village health education through community inquiry. University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, http://search.proquest.com/docview/869529115?accountid=12721
Kincheloe, J.(1995). Meet Me Behind the Curtain: The Struggle for a Critical Postmodern Action Research, in McLaren, P. L. & Giarelli J. M. (eds.). Critical Theory and Educational Research, 71-79.
Kirby, D., & Gardner, M. (2010). The schooling they need: Voicing student perspectives on their fourth year in senior high school. Canadian Journal of Education, 33(1), 108-139. http://search.proquest.com/docview/742873623?accountid=12721; http://www.csse.ca/CJE/Articles/FullText/CJE33-1/CJE33-1-KirbyGardner.pdf
Knox, J. B. (1995). Black parenting: An afrocentric perspective. University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 130 p. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304297514?accountid=12721
Kohli, M.(1981). Biography:Account, Text, Method. In D. Bertaux(Eds.),Biographical and society: The life story approach in the social sciences.(pp. 19-27). London: Sage.
Kridel, C.(1998). Writing educational biography. New York: Garland Publishing.
Krüger, E., Eck, E., & Vermeulen, A.(2005). Why principals leave: risk factors for premature departure in the Netherlands compared for women and men. School Leadership and Management, 25(3), 241-261.
Kupper A. & Kuper J. (Eds.)(1996). The Socail Science Encyclopedia (2nd ed). London: Routldge.
Langness, L. L. & Frank G. (1995). Live : An Anthropological Aproach to Biography (6th ed.).Chandler & Sharp Publishers, Inc.
Lecompte, M., Preissle, J., & Tesh. R.(2003).Ethnography and qualitative design in education research. New york:Academic Press.

Li, J. (2008). Ethical Challenges in Participant Observation: A Reflection on Ethnographic Fieldwork. The Qualitative Report, 13(1), pp100-105. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-1/li.pdf.
Lichtman, M.(2010). Qualitative Research in Education: a user´s guide (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Llorente, S. R. R. (2004). Diaspora of dreams: A critical hermeneutic inquiry into philippine labor migration. University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 147 p. http://search.proquest.com/docview/305034391?accountid=12721
Lugg, C. A., & Shoho, A. R. (2006). Dare public school administrators build a new social order?: Social justice and the possibly perilous politics of educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(3), 196-208. http://search.proquest.com/docview/61921847?accountid=12721; http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230610664805
Madison, D. S.(2005). Critical ethnography: method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Miller, R. E.(1992). Not just story collecting: Towards a critical ethnography.(Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED345244).
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E. & Alexander, L.(1990). In-Depth Interviewing: Researching People. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
Moss, P. A. (2005). Understanding the Other/Understanding ourselves: Toward a constructive dialogue about "principles" in educational research. Educational Theory, 55(3), 263-283. http://search.proquest.com/docview/62145713?accountid=12721; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2005.00003.x
Mulready-Shick, J. (2008). The lived experiences of students as english language learners in the nursing classroom: A critical hermeneutic inquiry. University of Massachusetts Boston). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , n/a. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304816407?accountid=12721
Musil,C.A.(Ed.) .(1992). The courage to question: Women´s studies and student learning. Association of American Colleges and National Women’s Studies Association.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979). The Belmont Report:Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Publication No.【OS】78-0013). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Neff, M. E. (1986). Language and communication as educational processes: A critical hermeneutic approach to the study of theory and practice in nursing. University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 173 p. http://search.proquest.com/docview/303465583?accountid=12721
Nelson, C. J. (1992). A critical hermeneutic approach to science education: Developing scientific praxis. University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 175 p. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304017857?accountid=12721
Nielsen, J.(ed.)(1990).Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences. London: Westview Press.
Oakley, A.(1981). Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms, in H. Roberts(Ed.). Doing Feminist Research, pp.30-61. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Oplatka, I.(2001). Self-Renaewal and Inter-Organizational Transition Among Women Principals. Journal of Career Development, 28(1), 59-75.
Oplatka, I.(2006). Woman in educational administration within developing countries. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(6), 604-624.
Osler, A.(1997). Teachers’ biographies and educational development: a Keyyan case study. International Journal of Educational Development, 17(4), 361-377.
Pitman, M. A., & Maxwell, J.A.(1992).Qualitative approaches to evaluation: Models and Methods. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, & J. Preissle(Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education,(pp. 720-770). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Phillips, D. A. (2000). Language as constitutive: Critical thinking for multicultural education and practice in the 21st century. Journal of Nursing Education, 39(8), 365-372. http://search.proquest.com/docview/62340038?accountid=12721
Phillips, N & Brown, J.L. (1993). Analyzing Communication in and around Organizations: A Critical Hermeneutic Approach.The Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1547-1576.
Plummer, K.(1990). Herbert Blumer and the life history tradition, Symbolic Interactionism, 13,125-44.
Raccanello, P. J. (2011). Social networking texts among college students: Identity and imagination online. University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, http://search.proquest.com/docview/864274350?accountid=12721
Rankin, J.(2002). What is narrative? Ricoeur, Bakhtin and process approaches. Concrescence: The Australasian Journal of Process Thought, 3,1-12.
Reinharz, S.(1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York : Oxford University Press.
Ricoeur, P.(1984). Time and Narrative. (Vol.I),(K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Trans). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P.(1991). Life Quest of Narrative. In D. Wood(Ed.), On Paul Ricoeur-Narrative and interpretation. London: Routledge.
Ruijs, A.(November,1990).Women in educational management in European countries: The statistical picture. Paper presented at the Advances in Education Management Conference. Council of Europe: Vienna, Austria.
Rusch, E. A., & Marshall, C.(2006). Gender filters and leadership: Plotting a course to equity. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(3), 229-250.
Sarbin, T. R.(1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. New York: Preager.
Schein, V. E.(1994). Manageral sex typing: a persistent and pervasive barrier to women´s opportunities. In M. Davidson & R. Burke (Eds). Women in management: current research issues. London: Paul Chapman.
Schein, V. E.(2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women´s progress in management, Journal of Social issues, 67, 675-688.
Schmuck, P. A. (1996). Women´s place in educational administration: Past, present, and future. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration: Part 1 (pp. 337-367). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration (updated ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Sikes, P., Measor, L. & Woods, P.(1985). Teachers´ Careers: Crises and Continuities. Lewes: Falmer Press.

Sikes, P., Troyna, B. & Goodson, I.(1996). Talking lives: a conversation about life history, Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 1(spring):35-54.
Sikes, P.(2000). ´Truth´ and ´lies´ revisited, British Educational Research Journal, 26(2):257-70.
Smith, L. (1990). Ethics, field studies, and the padadigm crisis. In E. Gaba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp.139-157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Smith, L. M.(1994). Biographical Method. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(pp. 286-305). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Smith, L. M.(1996). Biographical Method. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(pp. 286-305). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stanley, I.(1990). Feminist Praxis, Research Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology. London: Routledge.
Stanley, L., & Wise. (1991). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis (pp.20-60). London: Routledge.
The Personal Narratives Group(1989). Interpreting Women´s Lives: Feminist Theory and Personal Narratives. Indiana University Press.
Thiessen, D., Bascia, N. and Goodson, I.(eds).(1996). Making a Difference About Difference: The Lives and Careers of Racial Minority Immigrant Teachers. Toronto: Garamond.
Thomas,W., & Znaniecki,F.(1927). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America.2nd edn. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Thompson, P.(1981). Life histories and the alalysis of social change. In D. Bertaux(Eds.),Biographical and society: The life story approach in the social sciences.(pp. 289-306). London: Sage.
Thompson, J.B.(1990). Ideology and modern culture: Critical social theory in the era of mass communication. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Tisdale, K.(2004). Being Vulnerable and Being Ethnical With/in Research. In K. deMarrais, & S. D. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for research : methods of inquiry in education and social sciences(pp.13-30). Mahwah : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Voss, M. L. (1993). Educational leadership roles in public schools: Conversations with selected school administrators about responsible and moral school practices. University of San Francisco). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, , 186 p. http://search.proquest.com/docview/304096728?accountid=12721
Wagner-Martin,L.(1998). The issue of gender: continuing problems in biography. In C. Kridel(Ed.). Writing Educational Biography: Explorations in Qualitative Research, (pp. 89-102). New York:Garland.
Ward, B.(2003). Reflecting on the value and use of the edited topical life history-A research approach. In O'Donoghue, T. & Punch, K (Eds.), Qualitative Educational Research in Action- Doing and Reflecting(pp. 26-41). UK: Routledge.
Waston,L. C.& Waston-Franke, M.-B.(1985).Interpreting Life Histories: An Anthropological Inquiry. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Woods, P.(1986). Inside Schools: Ethnography in Educational Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wu, M. (2006). Perspections about male and female managers in the Taiwanese public relations field: stereotypes and strategies for change. Public Relations Quarterly, 51(3), 36-42.




 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE