:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從生活滿意度探討福利服務方案--以身心障礙者為例
書刊名:社區發展季刊
作者:翁毓秀 引用關係
作者(外文):Weng, Betty Y.
出版日期:2010
卷期:131
頁次:頁487-515
主題關鍵詞:身心障礙者生活滿意度福利服務The disabledLife satisfactionWelfare services
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:103
  • 點閱點閱:175
本研究旨在從身心障礙者生活滿意度探討身心障礙者的福利服務措施,以作為改善身心障礙者福利服務的具體建議。同時,了解哪些因素最影響身心障礙者生活滿意度? 即為需要改善的福利服務部分。本研究為量化研究,採問卷調查方式進行;樣本以分層比例隨機抽樣法進行抽樣,抽取1,219個樣本。問卷資料以郵寄問卷方式與電話訪談方式取得。問卷內容包括身心障礙者基本人口資料、生活狀況資料與生活滿意度等。生活滿意度之內容包括生活與經濟、醫療與復健、人際關係、就學與就業等五個層面。 資料經SPSS 12.0統計軟體進行分析,顯著水準為P< .05。在基本人口變項方面,年齡、教育狀況、婚姻狀況與障礙等級在生活滿意度上呈顯著差異;性別與致障年數在生活滿意度上未呈顯著差異。在生活狀況變項方面,居住狀況、行動能力與家庭收支等三個變項均在生活滿意度上具顯著差異。為了解哪些元素能有效預測生活滿意度,以逐步回歸方式進行生活滿意度的預測發現,行動能力、家庭收支、教育程度、居住狀況與年齡等五個變項依序進入方程式;即對生活滿意度上具顯著預測力的元素。在五個預測生活滿意度的元素中,以行動能力為最重要。最後,根據研究結果提出具體建議。
The purpose of this research is to understand the welfare services from life satisfaction point of view, using the disabled welfare services as an example. It is a quantitative research with a survey questionnaire;the samples were chosen by stratified ratio random sampling method and 1219 samples were selected. The data were collected both by mailing questionnaire and by telephone interviews. The contents of the questionnaire are demographic characteristics, living characteristics, and life satisfaction scale. The life satisfaction scale contains five aspects which are living and financial, medical and rehabilitation, interpersonal, education and employment. The data were processed by SPSS 12.0 version, and the statistical significant level is set to p< .05. As to the demographic characteristics, age, educational level, marital status and disability level make significantly different to life satisfaction. As to the living characteristics, living arrangements, mobility and family financial status make significantly different to life satisfaction. Stepwise regression analysis was introduced to predict the degree of life satisfaction; mobility, family financial status, education level, living arrangement and age are significant in predicting degree of life satisfaction. Mobility is the most important factor in predicting life satisfaction. At the end, concrete recommendations are proposed.
期刊論文
1.許伊琍、曹桂榮、陳淑英、莊素貞、鄧旗明、李宏琳、黃芳蘭、蔡娟秀、羅桃、陳賢美、鍾寶玲、何貞慧(19920400)。屏東縣潮州鎮影響老人生活滿意度相關因素之探討。美和護專學報,10,44-59。  延伸查詢new window
2.Subaşı, F.、Hayran, O.(2005)。Evaluation of life satisfaction index of the elderly people living in nursing homes。Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics,41(1),23-29。  new window
3.林淑敏、李宗派(20050700)。臺中縣社區榮民老人社會支持與生活滿意度之探討。臺灣老人保健學刊,1(1),71-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王國羽(20020300)。我國身心障礙福利政策與體系--身心障礙者保護法的分析。社區發展季刊,97,115-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡長清、劉修祥、黃淑貞(20011200)。退休老人休閒參與量及類型與生活滿意度之關係。高雄應用科技大學學報,31,183-221。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.林麗惠(20040800)。高齡者生活滿意度之調查研究。玄奘社會科學學報,2,45-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.趙淑員、劉杏元、吳秋燕、紀夙芬、朱宗蘭、黃慈心、Clark, Mary Jo(20060300)。The Effects of Group Reminiscence Therapy on Depression, Self Esteem, and Life Satisfaction of Elderly Nursing Home Residents。The Journal of Nursing Research,14(1),36-45。new window  new window
8.葉淑娟、施智婷、莊智薰、蔡淑鳳(20040600)。社會支持系統與老人生活滿意度之關係--以高雄市老人為例。中山管理評論,12(2),399-427。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Diener, Edward、Oishi, Shigehiro、Lucas, Richard E.(2003)。Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life。Annual Review of Psychology,54(1),403-425。  new window
10.Diener, Edward D.、Emmons, Robert A.、Larsen, Randy J.、Griffin, Sharon(1985)。The satisfaction with life scale。Journal of Personality Assessment,49(1),71-75。  new window
11.Diener, Edward(1984)。Subjective well-being。Psychological Bulletin,95(3),542-575。  new window
12.Wu, Chia-huei、Yao, Grace(2006)。Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale。Personality and Individual Differences,40(6),1259-1268。  new window
13.Beutel, M.、Wiltink, J.、Hauck, E.、Auch, D.、Braehler, E.、Weidner, W.(2005)。693Aging male symptoms — A psychometric analysis between age, sex hormones, somplaints and life satisfaction in 263 aging urological outpatients。European Urology Supplements,4(3),176。  new window
會議論文
1.賴爾柔(1998)。從活動理論觀點談台灣鄉村老人的生活滿意。兩岸社會變遷與其相關問題學術研討會。台北:中國社會文化研究中心。153-185。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林佳蓉(2001)。老人生活滿意度模式之硏究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Brandmeyer, D. D.(1987)。Higher education activity and life satisfaction in the older adult(博士論文)。The University of Georgia。  new window
3.吳郁銘(2004)。活動型老人休閒運動參與與生活滿意度之研究--以中華基督教青年會萬華會所會員為例(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.Henry, Norbert James(1989)。A qualitative study about perceptions of lifestyle and life satisfaction among older adults(博士論文)。Syracuse University。  new window
5.程又強(1986)。公職退休老人心理適應之相關因素暨「結構式會心團體」效果研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉靜軒(2005)。老人社會大學學員智慧與生活滿意度相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃心珍(1995)。嘉義市老年婦女的自我概念對其生活滿意度及參與學習意願之影響研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gregg, J. P.(1996)。Psychological implications and personal perceptions of lifelong learning for adults in life satisfaction and self-esteem(博士論文)。Wayne State University。  new window
9.簡素枝(2004)。嘉義縣市高齡學習參與者與非參與者在人際關係、生活滿意度之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.范涵惠(2002)。長期照護機構老人健康狀況、生活適應及生活滿意度相關性之探討(碩士論文)。中國醫藥學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Frisch, M.(1994)。Quality of Life Inventory: Manual and treatment guide。Minneapolis, MN:National Computer system。  new window
2.內政部社會司(1999)。身心障礙者保護法規彙編。台北:內政部社會司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Edginton, C. R.、Jordan, D. J.、DeGraaf, D. G.、Edginton, S. R.(1995)。Leisure and life satisfaction: Foundational perspectives。Brown & Benchmark Pubilshers。  new window
4.邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與計量分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。五南。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Hollis, L. A.(1998)。Sex comparisons in life satisfaction and psychosocial adjustment scores with an older adult sample: Examining the effect of sex role differences in older cohorts,http://global.umi.com/pqdweb?Did=000000032218426&Fmt。  new window
2.(2001)。台閩地區八十九年身心障礙者生活調查。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2003)。台東縣九十二年身心障礙者生活狀況及福利需求調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
4.(2003)。台南市九十二年身心障礙者對生活狀況及福利需求調查分析報告。  延伸查詢new window
5.(2002)。嘉義市九十一年身心障礙者生活狀況及福利需求調查報告。  延伸查詢new window
6.United Nations.(1993)。Standards rules for the equalization of opportunity for persons with disabilities。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE