資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.116.12.43)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
高中教師教學集體效能量表之編製與建構效度研究
書刊名:
嘉大教育研究學刊
作者:
洪福源
/
邱紹一
/
黃德祥
作者(外文):
Hong, Fu-yuan
/
Chiu, Shao-i
/
Huang, Der-hsiang
出版日期:
2012
卷期:
28
頁次:
頁35-58
主題關鍵詞:
教師教學集體效能
;
建構效度
;
驗證式因素分析
;
Collective teacher efficacy
;
Construct validity
;
Confirmatory factor analysis
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
3
) 博士論文(
2
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
3
共同引用:
25
點閱:64
雖然教師教學集體效能對於教育實務具有相當的重要性,但是這個概念結構於國內較少於高中教師樣本獲得實徵性的探究,本研究將利用文獻分析,發展高中教師教學集體效能評量工具,進而驗證量表之信效度,做為提升學校效能之參考。本研究以291名台灣高中教師為對象,以結構方程模式(Structural Equation Modeling, SEM)方法,驗證在教師集體效能中「教學集體效能」、「管教與激勵學生」等二個潛在變項及7個觀察指標所組成的模式,是否具有穩定性。研究結果顯示,本研究所建構之模式以驗證式因素分析(變項間存在相關)的配適度理想,且觀察資料的模式適配度呈現良好結果。最後,本研究進行討論並對未來研究提出相關建議。
以文找文
Although collective teacher efficacy was considered important to educational practice, this conceptual structure has less empirical inquiry in Taiwan high school teachers. This study used literature analysis to develop high school teacher' collective efficacy scale, and verify the reliability and validity of this scale for the reference of the enhancing school effectiveness. There were 291 high school teachers participating in this study, and the method of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used in order to examine the stability of the model in this study. The study found that: (a) two latent variables containing "collective teacher efficacy" and "discipline and motivating students"; (b) seven observation indicators. The results of this study showed that the first order confirmatory factor analysis that the correlation between latent variables was significant and had the best goodness of fit. In addition, the goodness of fit of the observation data also revealed good. Finally, the research results are discussed and recommendations for future research are made.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Guzzo, R. A.、Yost, P. R.、Cambell, R. J.、Shea, G. P.(1993)。Potency in groups: Articulating a construct。British Journal of Social Psychology,32,87-106。
2.
Bird, A. M.、Brame, J. M.(1978)。Self versus team attributions: A test of the "I'm OK, but the team's So-So" phenomenon。Research Quarterly,49(3),260-268。
3.
郭生玉(19920600)。國小、國中與高中教師工作心厭之比較研究。教育心理學報,25,67-79。
延伸查詢
4.
Goddard, R. D.、Goddard, Y. L.(2001)。A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools。Teaching and Teacher Education,17(7),807-818。
5.
Hoy, W. K.、Sweetland, S. R.、Smith, P. A.(2002)。Toward an organizational model of achievement in high schools: The significance of collective efficacy。Educational Administration Quarterly,38(1),77-93。
6.
Goddard, R. D.、Hoy, W. K.、Hoy, Anita Woolfolk(2000)。Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and effect on student achievement。American Education Research Journal,37(2),479-507。
7.
Tschannen-Moran, M.、Barr, M.(2004)。Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement。Leadership and Policy in Schools,3(3),189-209。
8.
Earley, P. C.(1993)。East meets west meets mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups。Academy of Management Journal,36(2),319-348。
9.
Goddard, R. D.、Hoy, W. K.、Hoy, Anita Woolfolk(2004)。Collective Efficacy Beliefs: Theoretical Developments, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions。Educational Researcher,33(3),3-13。
10.
Gibson, C. B.、Randel, A. E.、Earley, P. C.(2000)。Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods。Group & Organization Management,25(1),67-97。
11.
Goddard, R. D.(2001)。Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement。Journal of Educational Psychology,93(3),467-476。
12.
Goddard, R. D.(2002)。A theoretical and empirical analysis of the measurement of collective efficacy: The development of a short form。Educational and Psychological Measurement,62(1),97-110。
13.
Lindsley, D. H.、Brass, D. J.、Thomas, J. B.(1995)。Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective。Academy of Management Review,20,645-678。
14.
呂玉琴、溫世展(20010900)。國小、國中與高中教師的數學教學相關信念之探討。國立臺北師範學院學報,14,459+461-490。
延伸查詢
15.
Pajares, Frank、Miller, M. David(1994)。Role of Self-Efficacy and Self-Concept Beliefs in Mathematical Problem Solving: A Path Analysis。Journal of Educational Psychology,86(2),193-203。
16.
Ware, Herbert、Kitsantas, Anastasia(2007)。Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment。Journal of Educational Research,100(5),303-310。
17.
Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorial simplicity。Psychometrika,39(1),31-36。
18.
Skaalvik, E. M.、Skaalvik, S.(2007)。Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout。Journal of Educational Psychology,99(3),611-625。
19.
Fornell, Claes、Larcker, David F.(1981)。Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error。Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50。
20.
Bandura, Albert(1993)。Perceived Self-efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning。Educational Psychologist,28(2),117-148。
21.
Bandura, Albert(1977)。Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change。Psychological Review,84(2),191-215。
22.
Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94。
23.
Tschannen-Moran, Megan、Hoy, Anita Woolfolk、Hoy, Wayne K.(1998)。Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure。Review of Educational Research,68(2),202-248。
24.
Hu, Li-tze、Bentler, Peter M.(1999)。Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives。Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1),1-55。
25.
蔡進雄(2006)。國民小學校長情緒智力影響集體教師效能感之研究。教育資料與研究雙月刊,72,103-118。
延伸查詢
26.
Friedman, I. A.、Kass, E.(2002)。Teacher self-efficacy: A classroom-organization conceptualization。Teaching and Teacher Education,18,675-686。
27.
McCoach, D. B.、Colbert, R. D.(2010)。Factors underlying the collective teacher efficacy scale and their mediating role in the effect of socioeconomic status on academic achievement at the school level。Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development,43(1),31-47。
會議論文
1.
George-Falvey, J.、Daniels, D.、Hopper, H.、Erez, M.(1996)。Influencing group efficacy and group performance: The effects of interpersonal relationship and cognitive enhancing interventions。Cincinnati, OH。
研究報告
1.
Gibson, C. B.(1996)。They do what they believe they can? Group efficacy beliefs and group performance across tasks and cultures。Madison, United States。
學位論文
1.
吳宥羢(2008)。國民中學校長領導行為、教師集體效能與團體凝聚力之研究─以彰化縣與雲林縣為例(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。
延伸查詢
2.
陳佳燕(2005)。台北縣國民小學校長教學領導、教師自我效能感與集體教師效能感關係之研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。
延伸查詢
3.
黃彥和(2005)。國民小學教師集體效能感之研究(碩士論文)。中原大學。
延伸查詢
4.
莊煥綱(2008)。國民中學教師權威性格、教師集體效能與管教風格之研究。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。
延伸查詢
5.
Barr, M. F.(2002)。Fostering student achievement: A study of the relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement(博士論文)。The College of William and Mary,Williamsburg, Virginia, United States。
6.
Dellinger, A. B.(2001)。A study of the measurement and sources of teachers' self and collective efficacy beliefs in professional learning environments。Louisiana State University,Baton Rouge, Louisiana。
圖書
1.
Bentler, P. M.(1993)。EQS: Structural equation program manual。Los Angeles, CA:BMDP Statistical Software。
2.
Mueller, R. O.(1996)。Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS。New York, NY:Springer。
3.
Bentler, P. M.(1988)。Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program。Newbury Park, California:Sage。
4.
Bollen, K. A.(1989)。Structural Equations with Latent Variables。New York:John Wiley & Sons。
5.
陳正昌、程炳林(1998)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
延伸查詢
6.
Tabachnick, Barbara G.、Fidell, Linda S.(2007)。Using multivariate statistics。Pearson/Allyn and Bacon。
7.
DeVellis, Robert F.(1991)。Scale Development: Theory and Applications。Sage。
8.
Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York:Freeman。
9.
Bandura, Albert(1986)。Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory。Prentice-Hall。
10.
Goddard, R. D.(2003)。The impact of schools on teacher beliefs, influence, and student achievement: The role of collective efficacy。Advances in teacher education \\ J. Raths ; A. McAninch (Eds.)。Westport, CT。
圖書論文
1.
Pajares, F.(1997)。Current directions in self-efficacy research。International advances in self research。Greenwich, CT:Information Age。
2.
Browne, Michael W.、Cudeck, Robert(1993)。Alternative ways of assessing model fit。Testing Structural Equation Models。Sage。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
工作便利?還是工作壓力?教師下班後即時通訊軟體公務使用情形與工作倦怠之關係--以教師工作價值觀為調節變項
2.
「臺灣中小學輔導人員施為行動短式量表」之發展與分析
3.
運用MSE模式於國中數學補救教學之合作式行動研究
4.
國民中學班級導師情緒勞務、工作壓力與職業倦怠之相關研究
5.
體育教師幽默量表之編製--以澎湖科技大學為例
6.
高中第二外語日語教師之教師自我效能及其教學行為
7.
台湾における日本語教師の教師効力感と教授行為--高等学校の日本語学科の場合
8.
國中小資源班任課教師數學專業知能及其受重視程度之研究
9.
高中師生自我效能、集體效能與學校效能研究模式之建立:自我效能中介效果、集體效能調節效果研究
10.
國民中學校長情緒智能、轉型領導對教師職業幸福感與學校組織效能之影響:教師情緒勞務的中介效果分析
11.
以數學史劇本設計引動教師專業成長之研究
12.
理論與實務持分者對不同身分國小教師所需數學教學專業知能觀點之比較研究
13.
教師專業學習社群與教師集體效能感關係模式驗證之研究
14.
臺東職前教師的數學教學信念研究
15.
大專校院教師情緒勞務與工作倦怠之相關研究
1.
國小特殊優良教師彰權益能之個案研究
2.
大臺北地區國民小學分布式領導對教育成效影響之研究
3.
我國高級中等學校教師與直屬處室主任關係品質、職場自尊、團體凝聚力與教學效能關聯性之研究
4.
完全中學校長正向領導、教師工作投入與學校效能關係之研究
5.
八位數學教師從傳統教學趨向建模教學之研究
6.
不同脈絡下,青少年的認同策略與適應問題之關係
7.
數學教室內之互動類型研究:一個國小四年級的班級個案
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code