:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:關係脈絡思考及個人脈絡思考對印象形成歷程的影響
書刊名:本土心理學研究
作者:孫蒨如 引用關係陳婉榕
作者(外文):Sun, Chien-ruChen, Wan-jung
出版日期:2012
卷期:37
頁次:頁3-56
主題關鍵詞:反差效果印象形成衍變效果個人脈絡思考關係脈絡思考Assimilation effectContextual thinkingContrast effectDynamic constructImpression formation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:44
本研究主要目的在探討印象形成的歷程中,相關他人訊息所扮演的角色,以及不同思考脈絡可能引導的印象改變。在過去有關印象形成的研究中,鮮少有人探討到目標人物周遭相關他人訊息對印象形成的影響,但對重視群己關係的華人而言,這實在是非常重要的議題。另外也因鮮少有人討論相關他人訊息的影響,所以也未曾有研究者考慮過印象形成是否也是一種動態建構的歷程,在本研究中希望藉由兩個實驗,針對這些議題做進一步的探討。實驗一主要探討僅有相關他人訊息供參考時,個體是否能依此形成對目標人物的印象,以及在先閱讀相關他人訊息時,亦即引發關係思考脈絡時,會如何影響印象評價。我們預測在引發關係思考脈絡時,個體看到相關他人訊息後會對目標人物產生預期,不同關係類型則會引發不同預期。當相關他人與目標人物的關係越緊密時,就會認為他們應該越相似,因此當後續接收到的本人訊息與先前預期相違背時,期待越強則會產生越大的反差效果,對目標人物的印象改變也就越大。所得結果大致支持研究假設。實驗二則主要在探討引發個人思考脈絡時,印象評價又有何種變化。我們預期在這種狀況下,個體先接收的本人訊息已使個體對目標人物產生一個基本的印象,而後再接收相關他人的訊息時,則會以此已形成的印象類化後來所接收到的訊息,且當相關他人與目標人物的關係越緊密,其訊息越容易被類化,因此對目標人物印象評價的改變就會越小,亦即會有較小的衍變效果。研究結果大致支持上述預期,當僅由相關他人訊息來形成對目標人物的印象時,個體會認為此時的印象評價正確性已有中等程度。尤其當先給予相關他人之負向訊息,隨後再給予本人訊息時,先閱讀父親訊息引發關係脈絡思考的組別,其對目標人物的印象改變量大於先閱讀朋友訊息來引發關係脈絡思考的組別。相對的,以閱讀個人負向訊息來引發個人思考脈絡的個體,在閱讀父親訊息後,其對目標人物的印象評價改變量顯著低於閱讀朋友訊息組。
Two experiments were conducted to investigate whether information about relational others has an effect on people's impression formation and how relational-contextual and individual-contextual thinking styles affect the process of impression change.In experiment 1, participants read information about relational others first, and then information about a target person. We hypothesized that when relational-contextual thinking was activated, a contrast effect would occur. In other words, information about relational others leads to certain expectations, and the closer the relationship was, the stronger the expectation would be. Thus, when the subsequent information about a target person was opposite to the expectation, the greater the expectation, the greater the impression change. The results supported the hypothesis: Impression change was greater in the parent-information condition than the friend-information condition. In experiment 2, participants' individual contextual thinking was activated by reading the target person's information first. It was predicted that after forming a basic impression of the target person, participants would use the impression to assimilate the subsequent information about relational others. The closer the relationship was, the easier the assimilation would be, and as a result, the impression change would be smaller. The results of experiment 2 supported the hypothesis: The impression change was smaller in the parent-information condition than in the friend-information condition.
期刊論文
1.Eagly, Alice H.、Ashmore, Richard D.、Makhijani, Mona G.、Longo, Laura C.(1991)。What Is Beautiful Is Good, but...: A Meta-analytic Review of Research on the Physical Attractiveness Stereotype。Psychological Bulletin,110(1),109-128。  new window
2.Anderson, Norman H.(1965)。Primacy effects in personality impression formation using a generalized order effect paradigm。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2(1),1-9。  new window
3.李慶善(19960600)。知解人心:從諺語看中國人社會認知的特點。本土心理學研究,5,314-334。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Hong, Ying Yi、Morris, Michael W.、Chiu, Chi Yue、Benet-Martínez, Verónica(2000)。Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition。American Psychologist,55(7),709-720。  new window
5.Dion, K. K.、Berscheid, E.、Walster, E.(1972)。What Is Beautiful Is Good。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,24(3),285-290。  new window
6.Kulik, C. T.、Bainbridge, H. T. J.、Cregan, C.(2008)。Known, by the company we keep: Stigma-by-association effects in the workplace。Academy of Management Review,33(1),216-230。  new window
7.Ottati, V.、Claypool, H. M.、Gingrich, B.(2005)。Effects of a group stereotype on memory for behaviors performed by a group member。European Journal of Social Psychology,35,797-808。  new window
8.Vrij, A.(1997)。Wearing black clothes: The impact of offenders’ and suspects’ clothing on impression formation。Applied Cognitive Psychology,11(1),47-53。  new window
9.Workman, J. E.、Johnson, K. K.(1991)。The role of cosmetics in impression formation。Clothing &. Textiles Research Journal,10(1),63-67。  new window
10.Ybarra, O.(2001)。When first impressions don’t last: The role of isolation and adaptation processes in the revision of evaluative impressions。Social Cognition,19(5),491-520。  new window
11.Asch, S. E.(1946)。Forming impressions of personality。The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,41(3),258-290。  new window
12.Butler, J.、Pryor, B.、Grieder, M.(1998)。Impression formation as a function of male baldness。Perceptual and Motor Skills,86(1),347-350。  new window
13.Gawronski, B.、Ehrenberg, K.、Banse, R.、Zukova, J.、Klauer, K. C.(2003)。It's in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation。Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,39(1),16-30。  new window
14.Govern, J. M.、Greco, M.(2002)。Evidence for the ‘guilt by familial association’ effect: Evil twins excepted。Current Psychology,21(3),213-219。  new window
15.康瑩儀、Benet-Martinez, V.、趙志裕、Morris, M. W.(2003)。Boundaries of cultural influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,34,453-464。  new window
圖書
1.陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫倩如(2006)。社會心理學。臺北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝冰瑩、李鍌、劉正浩、邱燮友、賴炎元、陳滿銘(2004)。新譯四書讀本。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.康螢儀(2009)。A dynamic constructivist approach to culture: Moving from describing culture to explaining culture。Understanding culture: theory, research, and application。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃光國(2005)。華人關係主義的理論建構。華人本土心理學。臺北:遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE