臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：探究男性親密暴力之文化意涵
書刊名：亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊
作者：邱獻輝 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chiou, Hsien-huei
出版日期：2012
卷期：8:1
頁次：頁27-49
主題關鍵詞：多元文化；建構主義；紮根理論；傳統華人；親密暴力；Constructivism；Grounded theory；Intimate partner violence；Multi-culture；Traditional Chinese
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:541
  • 點閱點閱:71
親密暴力案件的數量逐年攀升、舊案再犯率亦居高不下，加強男性加害者的探究已是刻不容緩。考量文化特徵是個體行為的重要內涵，因此本研究從文化適應的觀點切入，探索男性親密暴力行為脈絡中所隱含的文化意涵與心理機制。在研究方法上，本研究遵循建構主義研究典範，邀請十位目前在監服刑的親密暴力犯，進行半結構式的個別深度訪談，並邀請兩位協同分析者，一起根據紮根理論的開放編碼原則進行資料分析。研究結果共發現八個重要主題：「出軌：兩套標準」、「為了子女而維繫婚姻」、「妻子未盡家務之責」、「對保護令的反擊」、「催化或伴隨的因素：酒精」、「家內經費分配與使用權」、「丟臉」、「臨床問題」；研究者並從傳統華人文化變遷造成個體適應困擾的角度進行討論。
With the increasing amount of intimate partner violence and the high sustaining rate of recidivism during these past years, it is crucial to explore the psychological mechanism of male batterers. Cultural effects are essential factors regarding domestic violence. However, there are still not enough results of previous studies findings to describe male violence from indigenous perspectives. Based on the viewpoints of how cultural changing, this research tries to explore the cultural meanings of male intimate partner violence in Taiwan. In regard to methodology, this research follows Constructivism Paradigm. Ten prisoners who had violated domestic laws because they had assaulted their wives were invited as interviewees. Semi-structural interviews were processed and data were analyzed by open-coding of grounded theory with two co-analysts. The results demonstrate eight major themes: different fidelity rules between different genders, sustaining marriage for the sake of children care, blame wife for not attending to her role expectations at home, fighting against a restraining order, catalysis effects due to alcohol, the struggle for control the family's budget, shame, and clinical mental problems. The researcher also discusses the results from cultural changing effects on the individual's adjustment.
期刊論文
1.American Psychological Association(2003)。Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists。American Psychologist，58(5)，377-402。  new window
2.Sampson, Edward E.(1988)。The Debate on Individualism: Indigenous Psychologies of the Individual and Their Role in Personal and Societal Functioning。American Psychologist，43(1)，15-22。  new window
3.Annells, M.(1996)。Grounded theory method: Philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry, and postmodernism。Qualitative Health Research，6(3)，379-393。  new window
4.Holtzworth-Munroe, A.、Meehan, J. C.、Herron, K.、Rehman, U.、Stuart, G. L.(2003)。Do subtypes of maritally violent men continue to differ over time?。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，71(4)，728-740。  new window
5.Wu, B.(2009)。Intimate homicide between Asians and non-Asians:The impact of community context。Journal of interpersonal violence，24(7)，1148-1164。  new window
6.Holtzworth-Munroe, A.、Stuart, G. L.(1994)。Typologies of Male Batterers : Three Subtypes and the Differences among Them。Psychological Bulletin，116(3)，476-497。  new window
7.Browning, C. R.(2002)。The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence。Journal of Marriage and Family，64(4)，833-850。  new window
8.Fassinger, R. E.(2005)。Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: Grounded theory in counseling psychology research。Journal of counseling psychology，52(2)，156-166。  new window
9.Markus, Hazel Rose、Kitayama, Shinobu(1991)。Cultural and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation。Psychological Review，98(2)，224-253。  new window
10.Ponterotto, J. G.(2005)。Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science。Journal of Counseling Psychology，52(2)，126-136。  new window
11.Lincoln, Y. S.、Guba, E. G.(1995)。Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive research。Qualitative Inquiry，1(3)，275-289。  new window
12.陳秉華(20010800)。華人「人我關係協調」之諮商工作架構。測驗與輔導，167，3511-3515。  延伸查詢new window
13.林明傑(20110600)。男性婚姻暴力加害人之致命危險評估：DA 量表與CTS 量表在我國適用之再研究。犯罪學期刊，14(1)，31-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.黃宗堅、葉光輝、謝雨生(20040600)。夫妻關係中權力與情感的運作模式：以衝突因應策略為例。本土心理學研究，21，3-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Lu, L.(2008)。The individual-oriented and social-oriented Chinese bicultural self: Testing the theory。The journal of social psychology，148(3)，347-373。  new window
16.Lu, Luo、Yang, Kuo-Shu(2006)。Emergence and composition of the traditional-modern bicultural self of people in contemporary Taiwanese societies。Asian Journal of Social Psychology，9(3)，167-175。  new window
17.葉光輝、黃宗堅、邱雅沂(20060400)。現代華人的家庭文化特徵：以臺灣北部地區若干家庭的探討為例。本土心理學研究，25，141-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.楊國樞(20041200)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究，22，11-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Chen, Ping-Hwa(2009)。A Counseling Model for Self-Relation Coordination for Chinese Clients with Interpersonal Conflicts。The Counseling Psychologist，37(7)，987-1009。  new window
20.Almgren, G.(2005)。The ecological context oi interpersonal violence: From culture to collective efficacy。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，20，218-224。  new window
21.Anderson, K. L.(1997)。Gender, static, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches。Journal of marriage and the family，59，655-669。  new window
22.Avakame, E.(1999)。Females’ labor force participation and intimate femicide: An empirical assessment of the backlash hypothesis。Violence and Victims，14，277-291。  new window
23.Holtzworth-Munroe, A.、Meehan, J. C.、Herron, K.、Rehrnan, U.、Stuart, G. L.(2000)。Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe & Stuart (1994) batterer typology。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，68(6)，1000-1019。  new window
24.Lu, L.(2002)。A preliminary study on the concept of health among the Chinese。Counseling psychology quarterly，15(1)，179-189。  new window
25.Misra, G. I., Suvasini, C.、Srivastava, A. K.(2000)。Psychology of wisdom: western and eastern perspectives。Journal of Indian psychology，18(1/2)，1-32。  new window
26.Shek, D. T. L.(2001)。Chinese adolescents and their parents' view on a happy family: Implications for family therapy。Family therapy，28(2)，73-104。  new window
27.Suh, E.、Triands, H. C.、Diener, E.、Oishi, S.(1998)。The sifting basis of life satisfaction judgements across cultures: Emotions versus norms。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，74(1)，482-493。  new window
會議論文
1.邱獻輝(2010)。建構主義典範在多元文化諮商研究的實踐：以台灣遊療師權威教養生命經驗 及治療理念的交會爲例。2010年臺灣諮商心理學會年會暨學術研討會，台灣諮商心理學會 。台北：台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lincoln, Y. S.、Guba, E. G.(2000)。Paradigmatic controversies, and emerging confluences。The handbook of qualitative research。Beverly Hills, CA：Stage。  new window
2.黃曬莉(2006)。人際和諧與衝突。台北：揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Healey, K.、Smith, C.、O'Sullivan, C.(1998)。Batterer Intervention: Program Approaches and Criminal Justice Strategies。Washington, DC：National Institute of Justice。  new window
4.Sue, D. W.、Sue, D.(2008)。Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice。John Wiley and Sons。  new window
5.Johnson, M. P.(2008)。A Typology of Domestic Violence: Intimate Terrorism, Violent Resistance, and Situational Couple Violence。Northeastern University Press。  new window
6.McLaren, P.(1989)。Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education。New York：Longman。  new window
7.楊中芳(2001)。如何研究中國人：心理學研究本土化論文集。臺北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Guba, E. G.、Lincoln, Y. S.(1984)。Naturalistic inquiry。Newbury Park, CA：Sage。  new window
9.Dobash, R. E.、Dobash, R. P.(1979)。Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy。New York：Free Press。  new window
10.Wilson, W. J.(1987)。The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
11.Corey, Gerald F.、Callanan, Patrick、Corey, Marianne Schneider(1993)。Issues and ethics in the helping professions。Pacific Grove, California：Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
12.Creswell, John W.(1998)。Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions。Sage Publications。  new window
13.黃光國(19980000)。知識與行動：中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。臺北：心理。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Triandis, Harry Charalambos(1995)。Individualism and collectivism。Westview Press。  new window
15.Corbin, Juliet M.、Strauss, Anselm(2008)。Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory。Sage。  new window
16.Strauss, Anselm L.、Corbin, Juliet M.(1990)。Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedure and techniques。Sage。  new window
17.林明傑(2004)。婚姻暴力犯之心理病理及危險評估。法律犯罪心理學 \\ 林明傑 ; 沈勝昂 (主編)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
18.楊國樞(2002)。傳統價值觀與現代價值觀能否同時並存？載於楊國樞 (主編)。華人心理的本土化研究 \\ 楊國樞 (主編)。  延伸查詢new window
19.Bursik, R. J. Jr.、Grasmick, H. G.(1993)。Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control。New York：Lexington Books。  new window
20.Chen, G. M.(2002)。The impact of harmony on Chinese conflict management。Chinese Conflict Management and Resolution \\ Chen, G. M. ; Ma (Eds.)。Westport, CONN。  new window
21.Martin, G.(1992)。Issues in the measurement of acculturation among Hispanics。Psychological testing of Hispanics \\ Geisinger, K. F. (Ed.)。Washington, DC。  new window
22.Ridley, C. R., Liddle, M. C., Hill, C.、Li, L. C.(2001)。Ethical decision making in multicultural counseling。Handbook of multicultural counseling \\ Ponterotto, J. P. ; Casas, J. M. ; Suzuki, L. A. ; Alexander, C. M. (Eds.)。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
23.Wu, D.、Tseng, W. S.(1985)。Introduction: The characteristics of Chinese culture。Chinese culture and mental health \\ Tseng, W. S. ; Wu, D. (Eds.)。Orlando, FI。  new window
其他
1.(2011)。統計資訊。  延伸查詢new window
2.梁耀堅(2003)。測個性特徴量表。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃光國(2000)。關係與面子：華人社會中的衝突化解模式。邁進中的華人心理學。香港：香港中文大學出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kanuha, V.(1996)。Domestic violence, racism and the battered women's movement in the United States。Future interventions with battered women and their children。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
3.Mongold, J. L.、Braswell, M.(2007)。The function of correctional counseling and treating。Correctional counseling and rehabilitation。Cincinnati, OH：Anderson。  new window
4.楊國樞、余安邦、葉明華(1991)。中國人的個人傳統性與現代性：概念與測量。中國人的心理與行為。臺北：桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Fiske, Alan Page、Kitayama, Shinobu、Markus, Hazel Rose、Nisbett, Richard E.(1998)。The Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology。The Handbook of Social Psychology。McGraw-Hill。  new window
6.Yang, Kuo-Shu(1986)。Chinese personality and its change。The psychology of the Chinese people。Hong Kong：Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Schwandt, T. A.(1994)。Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Thousand Oaks, California：Sage Publications。  new window
8.Hsu, F. L. K.(1985)。The self in cross-cultural perspective。Culture and Self: Asian and Western perspectives。Tavistock。  new window
9.Charmaz, Kathy(2000)。Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
10.黃光國(2005)。華人關係主義的理論建構。華人本土心理學。臺北：遠流。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Yang, K. S.(1996)。Psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization。The handbook of Chinese psychology。Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Sampson, R. J.(2002)。Organized for what? Recasting theories of social (dis)organization。Crime and social disorganization。New Brunswick, NJ：Transaction Publishing。  new window
13.Strauss, A.、Corbin, J.(1994)。Grounded theory methodology: A overview。Handbook of qualitative research。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：782（臺灣：698，外國：84） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1328876 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67127847
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上