:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以教科書之插圖與版式設計增進教學藝術之觸發--以社會科教科書為例
書刊名:教科書研究
作者:詹寶菁 引用關係葉韋伶陳麗華 引用關係
作者(外文):Chan, Bao-jingYeh, Wei-lingChen, Li-hua
出版日期:2012
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁47-84
主題關鍵詞:插圖設計版式設計教學藝術Illustration designLayout designArt of teaching
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:82
教科書不僅為中小學階段最主要的教與學資源,其內容亦反映新世代國 民之明日圖像,兼備「美」與「用」之教科書設計不僅可以觸發教學藝術(the art of teaching)之實現,亦可為師生雙方帶出學習成效與美感經驗。本研究首 先敘明Eisner 教學藝術之四大意涵,並融合相關文獻提出五種觸發教學藝術 之教科書設計途徑,包括善用藝術作品深化學生感知能力、善用各種符號系 統發展多元智能、善用美感距離開展想像力及創造力、善用操作性設計以觸 發學習驚喜及樂趣,以及善用多層次、多向度及留白設計以激盪突現的目的 等。 此外,本研究試圖將插圖與版式設計之原則融入教科書設計,使教科書 成為激發學習動機和產生美感經驗交流的對象。最後,根據前述歸納之教學 藝術觸發途徑和插圖與版式設計之原則,本研究以日本與美國之社會科教科 書為分析對象,從中提出具有召喚教學藝術魅力之教科書設計案例。
Textbooks, an essential teaching and learning resource for secondary and elementary schools, help to shape tomorrow’s citizens. The textbooks incorporating both aesthetic features and functional purposes can be used to not only trigger the art of teaching but also conduct a better learning experience. First, this study illustrates the four major significances of the art of teaching of E. W. Eisner. Referring to these four significances and other literature, second, this study proposes five ways to use textbook design to initiate the art of teaching. They are 1) using art to deepen students’ perception ability, 2) employing various symbolic systems to develop students’ multiple intelligence, 3) utilizing aesthetic distance to develop students’ imagination and creativity, 4) using manipulative design to encourage joy and surprise from learning, and 5) using multi–layered, multi–dimensional and blank spaces to provoke emergent ends. Third, this study attempts to integrate the principles of illustration and layout design into textbook design. By employing these principles appropriately, we hope, textbooks become the objects which can promote students’ learning motivation and aesthetic experiences. Finally, referring to the methods proposed to encourage the art of teaching and principles in illustration and layout design, this study examines US and Japanese textbooks to provide positive examples which can make the art of teaching more fascinating.
期刊論文
1.洪詠善(200504)。以美感經驗轉化教學。課程與教學季刊,8(2),25-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Eisner, Elliot W.(2002)。What Can Education Learn from the Arts about the Practice of Education?。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,18(1),4-16。  new window
3.Schneider, F.(1961)。The immanent evolution of education: a neglected aspect of comparative education。Comparative Education Review,4(3),136-139。  new window
4.Eisner, E. W.(1983)。The art and craft of teaching。Educational Leadership,40(4),4-13。  new window
會議論文
1.Sato, M.(2010)。Issues on transformation in the ideas of curriculum reform, textbooks and teaching--from the perspectives of Japan。臺北市。108-111。  new window
研究報告
1.陳麗華、詹寶菁(2010)。中小學教科書設計之理論模型建構及實務案例發展:以社會學習領域為主 (計畫編號:NSC99-2410-H-133-012-MY3)。臺北市:臺北市立教育大學學習與媒材設計學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.江欣穎(2009)。科學課程美感經驗之探究--遊戲與想像的觀點(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.王怡婷(2008)。杜威(John Dewey)美學理論及其在教學藝術上的應用(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴如珊(2001)。雜誌版面設計形式與讀者認知度與符合度研究(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學,雲林。  延伸查詢new window
4.周世豐(2005)。學什麼?像什麼:報紙版面設計之競爭意涵--以蘋果日報出刊前後中時聯合自由三報為例(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.高新建(1991)。國小教師課程決定之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.林筱玲(2010)。應用美感經驗理念於公民科教學之個案研究。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊迪耘(2010)。書籍裝幀與編排設計之研究--以設計類企劃採訪報導書籍為例。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Eisner, E. W.(1994)。The Educational Imaginations: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
2.林逢祺(2008)。教育規準論。臺北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chambliss, M. J.、Calfee, R. C.(1998)。Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children's minds。Malden, MA:Blackwell。  new window
4.Dewey, J.(1934)。Art as experience。New York:Perigee Books。  new window
5.Mikk, J.(2000)。Textbook: Research And Writing。Frankfurt/M.:Berlin:Bern:Brussels:New York:Oxford:Vienna:Peter Lang GmbH。  new window
6.Pratt, D.(1980)。Curriculum: Design and development。New York, NY:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。  new window
7.鄧雅楠(2009)。插圖設計。濟南市。  延伸查詢new window
8.林品章(2007)。視覺傳達設計的理論與實踐。臺北縣:全華。  延伸查詢new window
9.邱紅、黃熙(2007)。版式設計。濟南市。  延伸查詢new window
10.柯華葳、幸曼玲、林秀地(1995)。小學日常教學活動之生態研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.夏井芸華(2009)。插圖設計。北京市。  延伸查詢new window
12.佐々木毅、岩田一彥、谷川彰英(2005)。新しい社会3、4下。東京。  延伸查詢new window
13.佐々木毅、岩田一彥、谷川彰英(2005)。新しい社会5下。東京。  延伸查詢new window
14.Boyd, C. D.、Gay, G.、Geiger, R.、Kracht, J. B.、Pang, V. O.、Risinger, C. F.、Sanchez, S. M.(2005)。Social studies: People and places。Glenview, IL。  new window
15.Jacobs, H. H.、LeVasseur, M.(2005)。World studies: Medieval times to today。Needham, MA。  new window
16.Jacobs, H. H.、LeVasseur, M.(2005)。World studies: The ancient world。Needham, MA。  new window
17.Honig, B.(1991)。California's experience with textbook improvement。Textbooks in American society: Politics, policy and pedagogy。New York。  new window
其他
1.陳麗華(20081200)。評介「為學習而設計的教科書」[by Marilyn J. Chambliss and Robert C. Calfee]及其對我國中小學教科書設計與研究的啟示。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE