臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從八年研究實驗課程經驗反思高中課程改革的挑戰
書刊名：教育研究集刊
作者：宋明娟／甄曉蘭 引用關係
作者(外文)：Sung, Min-chuan／Chen, Sharon Hsiao-lan
出版日期：2013
卷期：59:4
頁次：頁47-79
主題關鍵詞：高中課程；八年研究；課程改革；課程實驗；High school curriculum；The Eight-Year Study；Curriculum reform；Curriculum experiment
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:55
高中課程改革的問題牽涉多端，本文旨在藉由美國二十世紀30至40年代之著名教育實驗「八年研究」中的課程議題，反思高中課程改革所面臨的挑戰。論述架構主要分為四個層面，首先回顧八年研究實驗課程的歷史意義與評價，其次討論八年研究推動過程中所涉入的課程實務議題；繼之據以提出八年研究實驗課程經驗的批判反思，來釐清課程改革之目的、定位、意義與價值的重要；最後則延伸探討其對高中課程改革的啟示，藉之，希冀能為臺灣高中課程改革議題，提供不同的思維面向，以促進更審慎、更周延的高中課程改革決策。
High school curriculum reform involves many complicated issues. This study aims to discuss the challenges of high school curriculum reform by addressing the curriculum issues reflected in the Eight-Year Study, the well-known educational experiment conducted in the United States from 1930s to 1940s. Firstly, the authors review the historical significance of the experimental curriculum and the recommendations rendered by the Progressive Education Association at the end of the experiment. Then, this study discusses the issues involved in the implementation of the experimental curriculum in the Eight-Year Study. Additionally, the authors offer some critical reflections to rethink the curriculum experiment experience of the Eight-Year Study. Finally, this study addresses the implications of the issues and recommendations for the current high school curriculum reform in Taiwan. It is hoped that through the review of the historical curriculum events, this paper can provide different perspectives for more thoughtful deliberation in the policy making of the current high school curriculum reform.
期刊論文
1.黃嘉莉(20110600)。美國八年研究經驗對我國大學入學制度革新之啟示。教育科學研究期刊，56(2)，1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Aikin, W. M.(1953)。The eight-year study: If we were do it again。Progressive Education，31(1)，11-14。  new window
3.Blanshard, F. B.(1928)。An experiment in secondary education。Progressive Education，5(4)，355-359。  new window
4.Counts, G. S.(1928)。The changing high school curriculum。Progressive Education，5(4)，335-340。  new window
5.Dewey, J.(1928)。Progressive education and the science of education。Progressive Education，5(3)，197-204。  new window
6.Fowler, B. P.(1928)。The new secondary education。Progressive Education，5(4)，299-306。  new window
7.Froelicher, F. M.、Pollitzer, M.、Sipple, E. M.、Mirick, G. R.、Cooke, F. J.、Mintzer, E.、Smith, E. R.(1928)。Problems of the progressive secondary school: A symposium。Progressive Education，5(4)，306-334。  new window
8.Kahne, J.(1995)。Revisiting the eight-year study and rethinking the focus of educational policy analysis。Educational Policy，9(1)，4-23。  new window
9.Kridel, C.、Bullough, R. V. Jr.(2002)。Conceptions and misperceptions of the eight-year study。Journal of Curriculum & Supervision，18(1)，63-82。  new window
10.Nowakowski, J. R.(1983)。On educational evaluation: A conversation with Ralph Tyler。Educational Leadership，40(8)，24-29。  new window
11.Proctor, W. M.(1928)。The secondary school and college entrance requirements。Progressive Education，5(4)，341-345。  new window
12.Redefer, F. L.(1950)。The eight year study: After eight years。Progressive Education，28(2)，33-36。  new window
13.Sandison, H. E.(1928)。The college and the candidate from the progressive school。Progressive Education，5(4)，351-354。  new window
14.Smith, H. W.(1928)。An experiment in secondary education。Progressive Education，5(4)，366-370。  new window
15.卯靜儒、甄曉蘭、林永豐(20120700)。高中課程改革之政策形塑與實施的歷程分析：以95課程暫綱為例。課程與教學，15(3)，181-205。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.王麗雲、甄曉蘭(200804)。臺灣普通高中教育政策的回顧與前瞻。「臺灣高中教育政策之檢討與展望」專題研討會，國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心（主辦） 。臺北市。7-41。  延伸查詢new window
2.甄曉蘭、卯靜儒、林永豐(200804)。高中課程政策之檢討與展望。「臺灣高中教育政策之檢討與展望」專題研討會，國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心（舉辦） 。臺北市。105-129。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.潘慧玲、王如哲、吳武雄、吳清鏞、張炳煌、葉興華(2005)。普通高中課程綱要發展之基礎研究：普通高中課程必選修之研究。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Thigpen, C. M.(1978)。The development and evolution of the eight-year study(博士論文)。The University of North Carolina，Chapel Hill, CA。  new window
2.Hedlund, P. P.(2003)。The eght-year study revisited: A cross-case analysis of the use of integrated curriculum in Radnor, Pennsylvania(博士論文)。The George Washington University，Washington, DC。  new window
3.Redefer, F. L.(1951)。The eight year study: Eight years latter(博士論文)。Teachers College, Columbia University，New York, NY。  new window
圖書
1.Rugg, H.(1947)。Foundations for American education。New York, NY：World Book。  new window
2.Thirty Schools(1942)。Adventure in American education (vol. V). Thirty schools tell their story。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
3.莊明貞(2012)。課程改革：理念、趨勢與議題。臺北：心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.Aikin, W. M.(1942)。Adventure in American education (vol.I). The story of the eight-year study: With conclusions and recommendations。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
5.Alberty, H.(1947)。Reorganizing the high-school curriculum。New York, NY：The Macmillan。  new window
6.Chamberlin, D.、Chamberlin, E.、Drought, N. E.、Scott, W. E.(1942)。Adventure in American education (vol. IV). Did they succeed in college? The follow-up study of the graduates of the thirty schools。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
7.Giles, H. H.、McCutchen, S. P.、Zechiel, A. N.(1942)。Adventure in American education (vol. II). Exploring the curriculum; the work of the thirty schools from the viewpoint of curriculum consultants。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
8.Kridel, C.、Bullough, R. V. Jr.(2007)。Stories of the eight-year study: Reexamining secondary education in America。Albany, NY：State University of New York Press。  new window
9.Krug, E. A.(1960)。The secondary school curriculum。New York, NY：Harper & Row。  new window
10.Lipka, R. P.、Lounsbury, J. H.、Toepfer, C. F.、Vars, G. F.、Alessi, S. P.、Kridel, C.(1998)。The eight-year study revisited: Lessons from the past for the present。Columbus, OH：National Middle School Association。  new window
11.Popkewitz, T. S.(1987)。The formation of school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution。London：Falmer。  new window
12.Smith, E. R.、Tyler, R. W.、The Evaluation Staff(1942)。Adventure in American education (vol. III). Appraising and recording student progress。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
13.Kliebard, H. M.(2002)。Changing course: American curriculum reform in 20th century。New York, NY：Teachers College Press。  new window
14.甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務--解構理論與重建。臺北市：高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
15.Kliebard, H. M.(1986)。The struggle for the American curriculum。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
16.Cremin, Lawrence Arthur(1961)。The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876-1957。New York, NY：Vintage Books。  new window
17.Apple, M. W.、Christian-Smith, L. K.(1991)。The politics of the textbook。Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.。  new window
18.Tanner, Daniel、Tanner, Laurel(1990)。History of the school curriculum。Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
其他
1.國立臺灣師範大學教育研究與評鑑中心(2005)。後期中等教育共同核心課程研訂，http://www.cer.ntnu.edu.tw/ccc/index.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部中等教育司(2005)。後期中等教育共同核心課程，http://www.edu.tw/highschool/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8412。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Tyler, R. W.(1989)。Reflecting on the eight-year study。Curriculum history: Conference presentations from the society for the study of curriculum history。Lanham, MD：University Press of America。  new window
2.黃政傑(2012)。十二年國教變局下的課程改革展望。十二年國教課程教學改革：理念與方向的期許。臺北市：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.楊思偉、陳盛賢(2012)。十二年國教下後期中等教育課程銜接性之分析。十二年國教課程教學改革：理念與方向的期許。臺北市：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Alberty, H.(1953)。Designing programs to meet the common needs of youth。The 52nd yearbook of the national society for the education, Part I: Adapting the secondary-school program to the needs of youth。Chicago, IL：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Commission on the Relation of School and College(1942)。A proposal for better co-operation of school and college work。The story of the eight-year study: With conclusions and recommendations。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
6.Dalton Schools(1942)。The Dalton schools。Adventure in American education (vol. V). Thirty schools tell their story。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
7.Denver High Schools(1942)。Denver high schools。Adventure in American education (vol. V). Thirty schools tell their story。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
8.Hawkes, H. E.(1942)。Meeting of the Association of American Colleges。The story of the eight-year study: With conclusions and recommendations. Appendix。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
9.Schubert, W. H.、Schubert, A. L. L.(1984)。Ralph W. Tyler in review: An interview and antecedent reflections。Ralph Tyler in retrospect: Contributions to the field。Los Angeles。  new window
10.The University of Chicago(1942)。The university high school and the first two years of the four year college at the University of Chicago。Adventure in American education (vol. V): Thirty schools tell their story。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
11.The University School of Ohio State University(1942)。The University School of Ohio State University。Adventure in American education (vol. V). Thirty schools tell their story。New York, NY：Harper & Brothers。  new window
12.Kridel, C.(1998)。Implications for initiating educational change。The eight-year study revisited: Lessons from the past for the present。Columbus, OH：National Middle School Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：590（臺灣：587，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2488187 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68285027
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上