:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中高齡者參與合作式服務學習歷程及其支持系統之研究
書刊名:福祉科技與服務管理學刊
作者:李雅慧 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Y.-H.
出版日期:2015
卷期:3:1
頁次:頁61-68
主題關鍵詞:高齡學習成功老化合作式服務學習支持系統Older adult learningSuccessful agingCooperative service learningSupporting system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:4
本研究旨在瞭解中高齡者的合作式服務學習歷程及其支持系統。本計畫以兩年為規劃期程,第一年的研究目的是從中高齡學習者的層面出發,瞭解他們的合作式的服務學習歷程,包括最初團隊的形成因素、如何共同決定目標、採用何種學習內容與方法、每個成員所扮演的角色、對於內外部資源的應用情形、所遭遇的困境以及所需要的協助。第二年的研究目的則從高齡教育機構層面,探討機構對於中高齡者進行合作式服務學習的觀點、可以提供團隊的支持內涵以及他們在指導合作服務學習團隊時所遭遇的困境。本計畫於歸納學習者層面與機構層面的觀點之後,進而編製「中高齡者合作式服務學習問卷」,並商請學者專家評估問卷內涵之重要性與可行性,進而建構我國中高齡者合作式的服務學習模式。第一年的研究擬以焦點座談法進行,為了瞭解中高齡者的合作式的服務學習歷程,本計畫將從我國目前的自主學習團體中選取具有「合作學習」並且將學習成果進行「貢獻服務」的12個團體為研究對象,每個團體預計進行1-2次焦點座談。每個團體以5-12名成員計,約有144名中高齡合作服務學習者將參與本研究的焦點座談。第二年擬以半結構式訪談法進行,針對上述12個合作服務學習團體所隸屬之高齡機構的負責人、主管或經理人進行一對一的深度訪談,每個機構擬選取1-2位高齡教育機構人員為對象,第二年預計訪談24位高齡教育機構人員。本計畫隨後綜合中高齡學習者層面與高齡教育機構層面的觀點,編製「我國中高齡者合作式服務學習內涵及其支持系統」之問卷,並協請國內相關學者專家共計12名,以德懷術方法進行問卷內容之重要性與可行性之評定。最後綜合中高齡學習者層面、高齡教育機構層面以及學者專家三方觀點,建構「中高齡者合作式的服務學習模式」,做為我國未來推廣合作服務學習方案設計之參考。
The purpose of this two-year project is to understand the process of cooperative service learning and its supporting system for middle-aged and older adults. The first year is to investigate the process of cooperative service learning from the dimension of the middle-aged and older adult learners. The process includes the initial forming factors of the team, how the common goal will be determined together, what learning content and methods will be adopted, the role of each member, the obstacles they will encounter, and the needed assistance. The purpose of the second year study will focus on the dimension of the older adult educational organizations. In this period, we will research the organizations’ viewpoint regarding the cooperative service learning of the middle-aged and older adults, the meaning of the supporting system, and the difficulties when guiding the cooperative service learning. Having summarized the perspectives of both learners and the organizations, the researcher then composes the “Questionnaire of the Cooperative Service Learning of the Middle-Aged and Older Adults”. Following the experts’ evaluation of the importance and feasibility of the questionnaire, the researcher further constructs the cooperative service learning model for the middle-aged and older adults in Taiwan. The method of the first year will be the focus-group interviews. In order to explore the process of the cooperative service learning of the participants, we will select 12 self-learning groups which will provide their learning outcomes as “contribution services” after taking part in “cooperative learning”. Each group will undergo 1-2 focus-group interviews. The total number of participants will be about 144 elders in this cooperative service learning study, while each group contains 5-12 members. The semi-structured interviews will be conducted in the second year of this study. The participants will be the officers, directors or managers of the aforementioned older adult educational organizations that the 12 selected groups are attached to. One to two older adult educational institution personnel from each group will undergo one on one in-depth interview. Therefore, about 24 interviewees will be included in the second year study. After integrating both perspectives of older adult learners and older adult educational organizations, a questionnaire titled “The Meaning of Cooperative Service Learning and the Supporting System for Middle-Aged and Older Adults” will be composed. Furthermore, 12 scholars and experts will evaluate the importance and feasibility of the questionnaire by Delphi technique. Finally, a three dimensional integration, including the elder learners, the educational institutions, and the scholars and experts, will construct “The Elderly Cooperative Service Learning Model” to serve as a promotional reference of the program design for the cooperative service learning in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1989)。Toward a cooperative effort: A response to Slavin。Educational Leadership,46(7),80-81。  new window
2.李雅慧、葉俊廷(20121200)。成功老化的退休人員學習歷程之初探。教育學刊,39,41-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Crowther, Martha R.、Parker, Michael W.、Achenbaum, W. A.、Larimore, Walter L.、Koenig, Harold G.(2002)。Rowe and Kahn's model of successful aging revisited: positive spirituality--the forgotten factor。The Gerontologist,42(5),613-620。  new window
4.Cohen, E. G.(1994)。Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small-groups。Review of Educational Research,64(1),1-35。  new window
5.Kalache, A.、Gatti, A.(2002)。Active ageing: a policy framework。Advances in Gerontology,11,7-18。  new window
6.李雅慧、魏惠娟、胡夢鯨(20140900)。新加坡退休者的學習歷程之探索。當代教育研究季刊,22(3),91-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.McClusky, Howard Y.(1971)。Education: Background paper for 1971 White House conference on aging。The White House Conference on Aging。  new window
2.Lee, Y. H.、Wei, H. C.、Hsiao, Y. F.、Chang, L. Y.、Yu, C. Y.(2012)。An educational preparatory program for active aging: preliminary results based on proactive coping theory。CIAE Pre-Conference,72。  new window
研究報告
1.內政部統計處(2013)。102年第33週內政統計通報(102 年7月底人口結構分析)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王政彥、蔡錦墩、陳武宗、楊國德、譚大純(2009)。健康終老,幸福家園。高雄市:麗文文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Knowles, M. S.(1992)。The modern practice of adult education, andragogy versus pedagogy。New York:Association Press。  new window
3.Webb, N. M.、Palincsar, A. S.(1996)。Group processes in the classroom。Prentice Hall International。  new window
其他
1.內政部(2009)。98年老人狀況調查摘要分析,http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/Survey/list.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部統計處(2002)。國民參與志願服務情形及看法調查結果摘要分析,http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/topic/topic153.doc。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院主計處(2011)。100年中老年就業狀況調查統計結果綜合分析,http://goo.gl/h5ONh7。  延伸查詢new window
4.國民健康訪問調查(2005)。2005年「國民健康訪問暨藥物濫用調查」結果報告,http://goo.gl/cMPzHW。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(2000)。Cooperative learning, values, and culturally plural classrooms。Classroom issues: Practice, pedagogy and curriculum。London:Falmer Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE