臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Statecraft Values in Early Nineteenth Century China: Yan Ruyi's (1759~1826) Activist Historiography
書刊名：東方文化
作者：米丹尼 引用關係
作者(外文)：McMahon, Daniel
出版日期：2005
卷期：38:1/2
頁次：頁16-37
主題關鍵詞：嚴如熤；史學；經世；積極用世價值觀；宋學；Yan Ruyi；Historiography；Statecraft；Activism values；Song learning
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:92
  • 點閱點閱:10
Late Qing thought witnessed mounting concern with practical "statecraft" (jingshi), activist intent that underlies state innovation, pacification, and self-strengthening. This essay, a study of the origins of the nineteenth-century statecraft turn, focuses upon the jingshi pioneer Yan Ruyi's historical writings and the core "sagely" values they espouse: flexibility, meticulousness, determination, and moral consistency. Drawing on traditions of statecraft, classical, and historical scholarship — but clearly concerned with contemporary challenges — Yan Ruyi employed history to inculcate a new breed of men of action. His historiographical method, with the activist idealism at its heart, was dynamic in the manner it redefined and focused values. Equally, it was important for the qualities that connected it to contemporary literati writing. Concerned Song, Han, and New Text scholars, while disagreeing on texts and interpretation, increasingly concurred on the need for "world-ordering" and, to an extent, on the kind of man that should implement it. Their revitalized "ethic of social orientation", arguably reflected in Yan Ruyi's scholarship, offers evidence of a burgeoning late Qing statecraft ideology: a world of specific shared values and aspirations that shaped subsequent generations of imperial activists.
晚清時期， 主張維新自強、 安邦定國、 積極用世的經世實學， 日益為中國思想界所重視。 本文的研究對象， 是十九世紀中國經世致用思潮的源起； 討論的焦點， 則為經世實學先驅嚴如煜 （1759-1826) 的史學著作， 以及他的 "聖賢" 理念一立身不苟、 靈活通變、 堅定不移、 貫徹始終。 雖然立足於傳統經世實學、 經典學問和史學， 但嚴氏明顯是針對時局， 以史為訓， 以史育才， 志於用世。 他這種以實學為中心的治史方式， 以靈活的手法， 為政治倫理價值重新定位， 並且與當代的學術精神一脈相貫。 當時的宋學家、 漢學家和今文學家， 對於經典的訓釋雖然存有分歧， 但對 "經世" 為本， 以至 "經世” 人才等問題， 各家已經漸趨一致。 他們重新強調經世濟民， 以為立身處世的極則， 這在嚴氏之學是得到了充分的反映， 也成為了晚清治國理念的主流。
期刊論文
1.羅檢秋(2001)。清末古文家的經世學風及經世之學。近代史研究，6，21-54。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lin, Man-houng(199112)。Two Social Theories Revealed: Statecraft Controversies Over China's Monetary Crisis, 1808-1854。Late Imperial China，12(2)，1808-1854。  new window
3.Elman, Benjamin A.(198812)。The Relevance of Sung Learning in the Late Ch'ing: Wei Yüan and the Huang-ch'ao Ching-shih Wen-pien。Late Imperial China，9(2)，56-57。  new window
4.McMahon, Daniel(2002)。Identity and Conflict on a Chinese Borderland: Yan Ruyi and the Recruitment of the Gelao During the 1795-1797 Miao Revolt。Late Imperial China，23(2)，53-86。  new window
5.Chang Hao(197411)。On the ching-shih ideal in Neo-Confucianism。Ch'ing-shih wen-t'i，3(1)，36-61。  new window
6.Whitbeck, Judith。From k’ao-cheng. to ching-shih: Kung Tzu-chen and the redirection of literati commitment in early nineteenth century China。Jinshi Zhongguo jingshi sixiang yantaohui lunwen ji，323-339。  new window
7.Chan Su-chuan、Hsu Shu-ling、Huang K'o-wu、Lai Hui-min、Metzger, Thomas A.。Ching-shih thought and the societal changes of the late Ming and early Ch'ing periods: some preliminary considerations。Jinshi Zhongguo jingshi sixiangyantaohui Imwen ji，21-35。  new window
8.Jones, Susan Mann(197512)。Scholasticism and politics in late eighteenth century China。Society for Ch'ing Studies，3(4)，29。  new window
9.Whitbeck, Judith。Three images of the cultural hero in the thoughts of Kung Tzu-chen。Reform in Nineteenth-Century China，26-28。  new window
10.Ng, On-cho(1993)。Revisiting Kung Tzu-chen’s (1792-1841) Chin-wen (New Text) precepts: an excursion in the history of ideas。Journal of Oriental Studies，31(2)，249-254。  new window
11.On-cho Ng(1994)。Mid-ChMng New Text (Chin-wen) classical learning and its Han provenance: the dynamics of a tradition of ideas。East Asian History，8(1)，1-32。  new window
12.McMahon, Daniel(200506)。The Yuelu Academy and Hunan'€™s Early Nineteenth Century Turn Toward Statecraft。Late Imperial China。  new window
13.Hartwell, Robert M.(1971)。Historical Analogism, Public Policy and Social Science in Eleventh-and-Twelfth-Century China。American Historical Review，76(3)，690-727。  new window
會議論文
1.劉廣京(1984)。魏源之哲學與經世思想。近世中國經世思想研討會。臺北：中央研究院近代史研究所。359-392。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Polachek, James Montel(1977)。Literati Groups and Literati Politics in Early Nineteenth Century China(博士論文)。University of California Berkeley，Berkeley。  new window
2.Jones, Susan Mann(1971)。Hung Liang-chi (1746-1809): The Perception and Articulation of Political Problems in Late Eighteenth Century China(博士論文)。Stanford University。  new window
3.McMahon, Daniel(1999)。Restoring the Garden: Yan Ruyi and the Civilizing of China‘s Internal Frontiers, 1795-1805(博士論文)。University of California。  new window
圖書
1.楊慎初、朱漢民、鄧洪波(1986)。嶽麓書院史略。長沙：嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Leonard, Jane K.(1984)。Yuan and China's Rediscovery of the Maritime World。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard Council on East Asian Studies。  new window
3.楊布生(1986)。嶽麓書院山長考。上海：華東師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Elman, Benjamin A.(1984)。From Philosophy to Philology: Intellectual and Social Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press。  new window
5.李遠濤、胡逢祥(1998)。近代史學家。Taipei：Zhaowen she。  延伸查詢new window
6.錢穆(1956)。國史大綱。Taiwan：Guoli bianyiguan。  延伸查詢new window
7.向鵠志(1992)。論陶澍。Changsha：Yuelu shuyuan chuban faxing。  延伸查詢new window
8.李曉鍾、陳海波(1995)。嶽麓書院導遊。Changsha：Hunan daxue chubanshe。  延伸查詢new window
9.Li、Chen(1996)。The history and tradition of the Yuelu Academy。Changsha：Hunan daxue chubanshe。  new window
10.Elman, Benjamin A.(1990)。Classicism, Politics, and Kinship: The Ch’ang-Chou School of New Text Confucianism in Late Imperial China。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
11.Rowe, William T.(2001)。Saving the World: Chen Hongmou and Elite Consciousness in Eighteenth-Century China。Stanford：Stanford University Press。  new window
12.Polachek, Jame M.(1992)。The Inner Opium War。Cambridge, Mass：Council on East Asian Studies and Harvard University。  new window
13.Metzger, Thomas A.(1973)。The Internal Organization of Ch'ing Bureaucracy: Legal, Normative, and Communication Aspects。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
14.杜維運(1984)。清代史學與史家。臺北：東大圖書有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳谷嘉、鄧洪波(1998)。中國書院史資料。杭州：浙江教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.Nivison, D. S.(1966)。The Life and Thought of Chang Hsuen-Cheng。California：Stanford University Press。  new window
17.Theodore de Bary、Richard Lufrano(2001)。Sources of Chinese Tradition: From 1600 through the Twentieth Century。New York：Columbia University Press。  new window
18.Bol, Peter K.(1992)。"This culture of ours": intellectual transitions in T'ang and Sung China。Stanford, California：Stanford University Press。  new window
19.劉廣京(19900000)。經世思想與新興企業。臺北：聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Kuhn, Philip A.(1970)。Rebellion and Its Enemies in Late Imperial China: Militarization and Social Structure, 1796-1864。Cambridge, Mass.：Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.嚴如煜。樂園文鈔。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bol, Peter K.(1993)。Government, Society, and State: On the Political Visions of Ssu-ma Kuang and Wang An-shih。Ordering the World: Approaches to State and Society in Sung Dynasty China。University of California Press。  new window
2.Hao, Chang(1980)。Intellectual change and the reform movement, 1890-8。The Cambridge History of China。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Jones, Susan Mann、Kuhn, Philip(1978)。Dynastic decline and the roots of rebellion。The Cambridge History of China。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.LYWC shouAa。For a discussion of Yan Ruyis statecraft scholarship。Restoring the garden。  new window
5.Hao, Chang(1976)。The Intellectual Context of Reform。Reform in Nineteenth-Century China。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1273（臺灣：1272，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2259778 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68055998
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上