臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：體育課無動機量表中文化後的信度與效度：以國小和國中學生為對象
書刊名：臺灣運動心理學報
作者：王文宜／陳婷婷
作者(外文)：Wang, Wen-yi／Chen, Ting-ting
出版日期：2015
卷期：15:2
頁次：頁1-17
主題關鍵詞：自我決定理論；學習動機；加速規；身體活動；Self-determination theory；Learning motivation；Accelerometer；PA
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:54
  • 點閱點閱:13
目的：本研究旨在翻譯Shen, Wingert, Li, Sun，與Rukavina（2010）發展之體育課無動機量表，並探討其中文化後的信度與效度。方法：本研究共包含三個階段，第一階段為英文版量表的中文翻譯和以393位體育課學習動機較弱的國小學生為對象，進行測量工具的項目分析及驗證性因素分析；第二階段是以341位體育課學習動機較弱的國中學生為對象，進行測量工具的跨群組不變性檢驗；第三階段是以30位低動機的國小學生配戴加速規來探討無動機與體育課身體活動量的關係。結果：本研究結果指出體育課無動機量表包含能力信念、努力信念、工作價值及工作特性等四個因素，共16個題目，內部一致性的信度良好。四因素的測量模式也與觀察資料有適當的適配度。而本測量模式也具有跨群組的不變性，適用於國中學生群體。最後，無動機程度與體育課的中高強度身體活動量呈現負相關。結論：體育課無動機量表經過中文化之後，具有不錯的信度和效度，可以用來幫助體育老師和研究者更深入了解低學習動機學生的起因，發展更有效的教學策略來幫助其提升體育課的參與程度。未來研究也可以進一步的探討與體育課無動機有關的議題，並且進行跨文化的比較。
Purpose: This study examined the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Amotivation in Physical Education Scale (AI-PE; Shen, Wingert, Li, Sun, & Rukavina, 2010). Method: Three stages were conducted in this study. At the first stage, the original AI-PE was translated into Chinese and 393 pupils who were less interested in PE completed the AI-PE for processing the item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. At the second stage, 341 junior high school students who were low motivation in PE were recruited for testing the cross-group invariance of the AI-PE. At the third stage, 30 pupils who were less motivated in PE were recruited to examine the relation between the AI-PE and physical activity levels recorded by an accelerometer in one PE class. Results: The results indicated that the 16-item AI-PE contained four subscales, including Ability Beliefs, Effort Beliefs, Value of Task, and Task Characteristics, with a moderate reliability. The 4-factor model showed a good fit to the data observed. Further, the AI-PE demonstrated satisfactory cross-group invariance by using a sample of middle school students. The AI-PE was found to negatively relate to the level of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in PE. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the AI-PE shows adequate psychometric properties and can be extended for use with understanding the reasons why students demonstrate less motivation in PE. PE teachers and researchers can utilize the information to develop effective teaching strategies. Future studies are suggested to conduct cross-cultural comparisons by using the AI-PE.
期刊論文
1.Legault, L.、Green-Demers, I.、Pelletier, L. G.(2006)。Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support。Journal of Educational Psychology，98(3)，567-582。  new window
2.Shen, B.、Wingert, R. K.、Li, W.、Sun, H.、Rukavina, P. B.(2010)。An amotivation model in physical education。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education，29(1)，72-84。  new window
3.Baker, S. R.(2004)。Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance。Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social，23，189-202。  new window
4.Ntoumanis, N.、Pensgaard, A. M.、Martin, C.、Pipe, K.(2004)。An idiographic analysis of amotivation in compulsory school physical education。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology，26(2)，197-214。  new window
5.Shen, B.、Li, W.、Sun, H.、Rukavina, P. B.(2010)。The Influence of Inadequate Teacher-to-Student Social Support on Amotivation of Physical Education Student。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education，29，417-432。  new window
6.Shen, B.、McCaughtry, N.、Martin, J.(2008)。The influence of domain specificity on motivation in physical education: Between and within domain relations。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport，79(3)，333-343。  new window
7.Vlachopoulos, S. P.、Katartzi, E. S.、Kontou, M. G.(2013)。Fitting multidimensional amotivation into the self-determination theory nomological network: Application in school physical education。Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science，17(1)，40-61。  new window
8.How, Y. M.、Whipp, P.、Dimmock, J.、Jackson, B.(2013)。The effects of choice on autonomous motivation, perceived autonomy support, and physical activity levels in high school physical education。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education，32(2)，131-148。  new window
9.陳其昌、謝文娟(20080600)。國中生體育課動機量表的編製與測量。休閒運動期刊，7，97-108。  延伸查詢new window
10.韓大衛、蔡博隆、盧居福(20050600)。臺北市國小學生體育課學習需求內涵調查研究。大專體育學刊，7(2)，1-9。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Sallis, J. F.、McKenzie, T. L.(1991)。Physical education's role in public health。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport，62(2)，124-137。  new window
12.Pelletier, L. G.、Fortier, M. S.、Vallerand, R. J.、Brière, N. M.(2001)。Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study。Motivation and Emotion，25，279-306。  new window
13.吳淑芳(20060200)。國外量表之兩階段翻譯及信、效度測試。護理雜誌，53(1)，65-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉義群(20040800)。不同性質體育課程學生的知覺動機氣候、自覺能力、參與體育課動機與滿意度之研究。北體學報，12，123-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Carlson, T. B.(1995)。"Now I Think I Can." The reaction of eight low-skilled students to sport education。ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal，42(4)，6-8。  new window
16.Perlman, D. J.、Goc Karp, G.(2010)。A self-determined perspective of the sport education model。Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy，15(4)，401-418。  new window
17.Coakley, Jay、White, Anita(1992)。Making Decisions: Gender and Sport Participation among British Adolescents。Sociology of Sport Journal，9(1)，20-35。  new window
18.陳素青、詹俊成、鄭志富(20130900)。臺北市高中體育教師領導風格與班級氣氛對體育課學習動機之影響。體育學報，46(3)，257-272。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Vallerand, R. J.、Pelletier, L. G.、Blais, M. R.、Brière, N. M.、Senecal, C.、Vallieres, E. F.(1993)。On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the academic motivation scale。Educational and Psychological Measurement，53(1)，159-172。  new window
20.Jones, P. S.、Lee, J. W.、Phillips, L. R.、Zhang, X. E.、Jaceldo, K. B.(2001)。An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research。Nursing Research，50(5)，300-304。  new window
21.Standge, M.、Duda, J. L.、Ntoumanis, N.(2003)。Positive a model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions。Journal of Educational Psychology，95(1)，97-110。  new window
22.Ntoumanis, N.(2001)。A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education。British Journal of Educational Psychology，71(2)，225-242。  new window
23.Martin, Charles L.(1988)。Enhancing children's satisfaction and participation using a predictive regression model of bowling performance norms。The Physical Educator，45(4)，196-209。  new window
24.Standage, M.、Duda, J. L.、Pensgaard, A. M.(2005)。The effect of competitive outcome and task-involving, ego-involving, and cooperative structures on the psychological well-being of individuals engaged in a co-ordination task: A self-determination approach。Motivation and Emotion，29，41-68。  new window
25.蔣憶綺、季力康(20131200)。無動機模式在體育課之應用。中華體育季刊，27(4)=107，343-349。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Erwin, H. E.、Stellino, M. B.、Beets, M. W.、Beighle, A.、Johnson, C. E.(2013)。Physical education lesson content and teacher style and elementary students' motivation and physical activity levels。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education，32(3)，321-334。  new window
27.Freedson, P.、Pober, D.、Janz, K. F.(2005)。Calibration of accelerometer output for children。Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise，37(11 Suppl)，S523-S530。  new window
28.Mazyari, M.、Kashef, M. M.、Hassan, M.、Ameri, S.、Araghi, M.(2012)。Students' amotivation in physical education activities and teachers' social support。World Applied Sciences Journal，20，1570-1573。  new window
29.Morgan, C. F.、Beighle, A.、Pangrazi, R. P.(2007)。Physical education's contribution to daily physical activity levels of elementary school children。Research Quarterly in Exercise and Sport，78，407-412。  new window
30.蘇美如、黃英哲(20090500)。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係--應用自我決定理論。臺灣運動心理學報，14，33-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Wigfield, Allan、Eccles, Jacquelynne S.(2000)。Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation。Contemporary Educational Psychology，25(1)，68-81。  new window
32.Pelletier, L. G.、Tuson, K. M.、Fortier, M. S.、Vallerand, R. J.、Brière, N. M.、Blais, M. R.(1995)。Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS)。Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology，17(1)，35-53。  new window
33.陳其昌、謝文娟(20090600)。國中體育教師領導風格對學生上體育課動機的影響。大專體育學刊，11(2)，31-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Deci, Edward L.、Ryan, Richard M.(2000)。The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior。Psychological Inquiry，11(4)，227-268。  new window
會議論文
1.林季燕、季力康、劉義群(2003)。體育課動機量表之信度與效度分析。中華民國大專院校九十二年度體育學術研討會。桃園縣：體育學院。449-458。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式：方法與實務運用。麗文文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳寬裕、王正華(2013)。論文統計分析實務：SPSS與AMOS的運用。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Deci, Edward L.、Ryan, Richard M.(1985)。Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior。Plenum Press。  new window
4.吳明隆、涂金堂(2006)。SPSS與統計應用分析。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.(2009)。Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective。Prentice-Hall。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1054（臺灣：1036，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67882438
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上