臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：行動者的失敗？或是結構的限制？--臺灣勞工退休金改革的再辯證
書刊名：人文及社會科學集刊
作者：葉崇揚 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yeh, Chung-yang
出版日期：2016
卷期：28:4
頁次：頁541-580
主題關鍵詞：勞工退休金；行動-結構；比較資本主義；結構中的行動者；中小企業為核心的發展型體制；Corporate pension；Action-structure；Comparative capitalisms；Actors within structure；The SMEs-dominated developmental regime
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:472
  • 點閱點閱:183
本文企圖發展一個所謂「結構中的行動者」的分析架構，從資本主義的制度結構瞭解行動者的政策偏好以及行動者之間的策略互動與權力不對稱，進而分析臺灣勞工退休金新制為何會採取個人帳戶制。1984 年國家希望透過勞基法促進產業升級，卻造成企業年金與資本主義制度結構之間的制度性錯置。1990 年代行動者開始尋找勞退金與資本主義之間制度均衡。在民主化之後，國家必須爭取勞工支持和選票，同時也要避免過重的勞動成本負擔。因此個人帳戶制度成為主要的制度選擇；確定給付制的附加年金保險只是敷衍勞工的虛幻承諾。
This article attempts to develop an analytical framework ＂actors with structure＂ to understand how actors' policy preferences, strategic interactions and power asymmetries are shaped by capitalist structure, and to explain why the Individual Account was chosen in the Labour Pension Act. In 1984, the Labour Standard Act was introduced to facilitate industrial upgrading, but resulted in an institutional misfit between the SMEs-dominated developmental regime and the DB corporate pension system. From the early 1990s, actors attempted to look for a new institutional equilibrium between the corporate pension system and capitalist structure. After democratisation, the state faced a straitened challenge: on the one hand, to vie for labour's support and votes; on the other hand, to avoid huge labour costs. Therefore, the Individual Account was chosen, and the DB pension scheme was a political strategy for appeasing labour.
期刊論文
1.唐文慧、葉書毓(20060600)。國民年金及勞退新制立法過程之比較：政體中心的觀點。研究臺灣，1，59-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Therborn, Goran(1986)。Karl Marx Returning: The Welfare State and Neo-Marxist, Corporatist and Statist Theories。International Political Science Review，7(2)，131-164。  new window
3.Hu, M. W.、Schive, C.(1998)。The changing competitiveness of Taiwan's manufacturing SMEs。Small Business Economics，11(4)，315-326。  new window
4.Korpi, Walter(1989)。Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship: social rights during sickness in eighteen OECD countries since 1930。American Sociological Review，54(3)，309-328。  new window
5.Hall, Peter A.、Thelen, Kathleen(2009)。Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism。Socio-Economic Review，7(1)，7-34。  new window
6.Moe, Terry M.(2005)。Power and Political Institutions。Perspectives on Politics，3(2)，215-233。  new window
7.Holliday, Ian(2000)。Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia。Political Studies，48(4)，706-723。  new window
8.Tsai, Ming-Chang(2001)。Dependency, the State and Class in the Neoliberal Transition of Taiwan。Third World Quarterly，22(3)，359-379。  new window
9.Skocpol, Theda、Amenta, Edwin(1986)。States and Social Policies。Annual Review of Sociology，12(1)，131-157。  new window
10.陳政亮(20100900)。社會保險的失敗：從勞基法到勞工退休金條例。臺灣社會研究，79，5-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.白正憲(2001)。勞工退休金制度附加年金制是最佳選擇。全產總工訊，2，28-29。  延伸查詢new window
12.林格義(1992)。勞基法修改，退休制將如何？。勞動者，52，16-17。  延伸查詢new window
13.徐學陶(20050300)。附加年金的故事。社區發展季刊，109，174-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.勞工陣線(1992)。勞動基準法修法相對草案。勞動者，58，1-57。  延伸查詢new window
15.勞工陣線(1997)。勞退政策大亂，勞陣建議蕭內閣“棄圭保蕭”。勞動者通訊，92，5。  延伸查詢new window
16.勞工陣線(2001)。勞退金魔法書--教您如何活到老，吃到老。勞動者特刊，121，1-48。  延伸查詢new window
17.劉進興(1993)。勞工陣線版勞基法：我們為什麼這樣主張？。勞動者，64，5-8。  延伸查詢new window
18.Hall, P. A.(2008)。Systematic Process Analysis: When and How to Use It。European Political Science，7(3)，304-317。  new window
19.Orenstein, M. A.(2013)。Pension Privatization: Evolution of a Paradigm。Governance，26(2)，259-281。  new window
20.Paster, T.(2013)。Welfare State Development: Why Did Employers Accept Social Reforms?。World Politics，65(3)，416-451。  new window
21.Przeworski, Adam、Wallerstein, Michael(1988)。Structural Dependence of the State on Capital。The American Political Science Review，82(1)，11-29。  new window
22.葉崇揚、陳盈方(20130300)。民主、資本主義與年金體系的發展：臺灣經驗的分析。人文及社會科學集刊，25(1)，45-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Lee, Yih-Jiunn、Ku, Yeun-wen(2007)。East Asian Welfare Regimes: Testing the Hypothesis of the Developmental Welfare State。Social Policy and Administration，41(2)，197-212。  new window
24.潘美玲、張維安(20010600)。彈性生產與協力網絡：協力廠觀點的個案研究。臺灣社會學刊，25，201-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.立法院公報處(1982)。立法院第1屆第69會期立法院內政、經濟、司法三委員會第一次聯席會議。  延伸查詢new window
2.立法院公報處(1996)。立法院第3屆第1會期中華民國八十六年度中央政府總預算案第一組第七次會議。  延伸查詢new window
3.立法院公報處(1999)。立法院第4屆第1會期第十次會議。  延伸查詢new window
4.立法院公報處(2002)。立法院第5屆第2會期衛生環境及社會福利委員會第三次全體委員會議。  延伸查詢new window
5.立法院公報處(2004)。立法院第5屆第5會期衛生環境及社會福利委員會審查「勞工退休金條例草案」及「勞工保險條例部分條文修正草案」相關問題公聽會。  延伸查詢new window
6.勞動部勞動基金運用局(2013)。勞動基金運用局統計彙編。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Yeh, Chungyang(2014)。Public-Private Pension Mix in East Asia: An Integrated Political-Economic Explanation(博士論文)。University of Southampton，Southampton。  new window
2.吳明儒(1999)。公私年金政策與制度發展之互動因素分析--臺灣與英國之比較研究(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.郭明政(2009)。年金政策與法制。臺北市：元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Amable, Bruno(2003)。The Diversity of Modern Capitalism。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Iversen, Torben(2005)。Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Korpi, Walter(1983)。The Democratic Class Struggle。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
5.李國鼎、劉素芬、陳怡如(2005)。李國鼎：我的臺灣經驗--李國鼎談台灣財經決策的制定與思考。臺北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.王永慶(1985)。革心、革新：王永慶對經濟革新委員會之建言。臺北：經濟日報。  延伸查詢new window
7.立法院圖書館(1986)。勞動基準法。臺北：立法院圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.Fields, Karl J.(1995)。Enterprise and the State in Korea and Taiwan。Cornell University Press。  new window
9.Gough, Ian(1979)。The Political Economy of the Welfare State。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
10.Beach, Derek、Pedersen, Rasmus Brun(2013)。Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines。Ann Arbor：University of Michigan Press。  new window
11.Lee, Y.-Y.(2011)。Militants or Partisans: Labor Unions and Democratic Politics in Korea and Taiwan。Standford：Standford University Press。  new window
12.何明修、蕭新煌(2006)。台灣全志‧卷九--社會志‧社會運動篇。國史館臺灣文獻館。  延伸查詢new window
13.Haggard, Stephan(1990)。Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries。Ithaca, New York：Cornell University Press。  new window
14.Scharpf, Fritz W.(1997)。Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research。Westview Press。  new window
15.王振寰(20100000)。追趕的極限：臺灣的經濟轉型與創新。巨流圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Wilensky, Harold L.(1975)。The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures。University of California Press。  new window
17.Skocpol, Theda(1995)。Social Policy in the United States: Future Possibilities in Historical Perspective。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
18.Eavns, B. P.、Rueschemeyer, Dietrich、Skocpol, Theda(1985)。Bring the State Back In。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
19.Myles, J.(1989)。Old Age in the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Public Pensions。Lawrence, Kansas：University Press of Kansas。  new window
20.Immergut, Ellen M.(1992)。Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe。Cambridge University press。  new window
21.Offe, C.、Keane, John(1984)。Contradictions of the welfare state。London：Hutchinson。  new window
22.勞工委員會(1993)。適用勞動基準法事業單位：勞動條件概況調査報告。臺北：勞工委員會。  延伸查詢new window
23.經濟發展諮詢委員會議實錄編輯委員會(2001)。經濟發展諮詢委員會會議實錄。臺北：總統府。  延伸查詢new window
24.暢流(1984)。勞動基準法的經緯：暨立法委員謝深山等對勞基法的貢獻。臺北：暢流半月刊社。  延伸查詢new window
25.Ho, Ming-sho(2014)。Working Class Formation in Taiwan: Fractured Solidarity in State-Owned Enterprises, 1945-2012。Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
26.Wade, R.(2004)。Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industralization。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
27.Skocpol, Theda(1992)。Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States。The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
28.Stephens, John D.(1979)。The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism。London：Macmillan。  new window
29.Deyo, Frederic C.(1989)。Beneath the Miracle: Labor Subordination in the New Asian Industrialism。University of California Press。  new window
30.陳介玄(19940000)。協力網絡與生活結構：台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析。臺北：聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Evans, Peter B.(1995)。Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
32.Esping-Andersen, Gøsta(1990)。The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism。Polity Press。  new window
33.謝國雄(19970000)。純勞動：臺灣勞動體制諸論。臺北：中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.李允傑(19990920)。臺灣工會政策的政治經濟分析。臺北：商鼎文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
35.Hall, Peter A.、Soskice, David W.(2001)。Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage。Oxford University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.詹火生，林昌勳(2002)。勞工退休金政策分析--國家干預的觀點，http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/091/SS-R-091-020.htm。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中國時報(20011112)。工會龍頭翻案勞退草案添變數。  延伸查詢new window
2.苦勞網(2005)。勞退金新制爭議勞委會該負起歷史責任，http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/59868。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃崇憲(2010)。從開港到加入WTO--當代台灣資本主義的歷史與結構轉型。帝國邊緣：台灣現代性的考察。臺北：群學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Estévez-Abe, Margarita、Iversen, Torben、Soskice, David(2001)。Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State。Varieties of Capitalism: the Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.蔡明璋(2010)。臺灣與世界：「接」與「結」的歷史。帝國邊緣：臺灣現代性的考察。臺北：群學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Skocpol, Theda、Ikenberry, John、Rueschemeyer, D.、Evans, P. B.(1985)。Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research。Bringing the State Back In。New York。  new window
5.Hall, Peter A.、Soskice, David(2001)。Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism。Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage。Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Hall, P. A.(2005)。Preference Formation as a Political Process: The Case of Monetary Union in Europe。Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism。New York：Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
7.Immergut, E. M.、Andersen, K. M.(2006)。Editors’ Introduction: The Dynamics of Pension Politics。The Handbook of West European Pension Politics。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Pempel, T. J.(2002)。Labor Exclusion and Privatized Welfare: Two Keys to Asian Capitalist Development。Models of Capitalism: Lessons for Latin America。Pennsylvania：The Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
9.Pierson, P.(2015)。Power and Path Dependence。Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Cheng, Tun-Jen(1990)。Political Regimes and Development Strategies: South Korea and Taiwan。Manufacturing Miracles: Path of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia。Princeton University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：998（臺灣：981，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67669575
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上