臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：論經濟、社會及文化權利國際公約適當住房權在我國之實踐：以司法院釋字第709號及其嗣後之裁判為中心
書刊名：國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者：徐揮彥 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsu, William Hui-yen
出版日期：2017
卷期：46:3
頁次：頁801-876
主題關鍵詞：經濟社會及文化權利國際公約；適當住房權；居住自由；生存權；強迫驅離；釋字第709號；International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights；Right to adequate housing；Freedom of residence；Right to survival；Forced eviction；Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 709
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:335
  • 點閱點閱:15
釋字第709號首次援引經濟、社會及文化權利國際公約第11條第1項的「適當住房權」，並將其視為得作為限制居住自由及財產權的法律依據。此號解釋為大法官首次針對非憲法所保障的經濟、社會與文化權利國際公約權利予以討論，其重要性可見一斑。然而，此解釋卻與國際人權機構之解釋及其他締約國實踐間出現顯著差異，甚至可能影響我國對此權利之實施，導致違反公約義務的結果。本文之研究目的在釋字第709號對適當住房權首次適用的背景下，自國際人權法探討適當住房權的規範性質及義務內涵，並探究此權利在我國司法體系實施的狀況是否符合其規範目的，包括是否受釋字第709號之影響，以及在適用上所呈現之問題為何。據此，本文第貳章將探討國際法中住房權的形成背景及適當住房權的規範要素及國家義務內涵，第參章將探究此權利的可司法性及在其他國家的司法及司法以外的實踐狀況。在完整地瞭解此權利的規範內涵及實踐狀況後，本文在第肆章將探究適當住房權規範在我國國內法律制度中的規範依據，分析釋字第709號對適當住房權的認識與前二章所釐清的國際規範與實踐間是否一致，並觀察我國司法制度中關於適當住房權之案件對於此權利的解釋與適用是否正確，最後在第伍章做出本文之結論，針對適當住房權在我國司法制度的實踐狀況做出觀察。
The right to adequate housing provided in Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (hereinafter 'ICESCR') is totally strange to the system of constitutional rights. It was referenced in Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 709. After the incorporation of ICESCR in Taiwan's domestic legal system, it was the first time the Constitutional Court referring to such ICESCR rights not provided in the Constitution. However, the norm of the right to adequate housing was treated as the legal basis for imposing restrictions on the people's rights to property and freedom of residence in Interpretation No. 709. This method of interpretation by the Constitutional Court deviated from the General Comments on the right to adequate housing made by the UN Committee on the Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the practice of other Contracting Parties of the ICESCR. This misunderstanding of the right to adequate housing in the Interpretation might lead to the failure to meet the obligations of this right. The purposes of this article are to analyze the normative content of the right to adequate housing and the obligations of the Contracting Parties, the legal status of this right in the constitutional framework, and the normative impacts of Interpretation No. 709 on the realization of adequate housing in subsequent court cases. In the concluding chapter, observations and assessment will be given regarding the implementation of the right to adequate housing in the judicial system of Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.鄧衍森(2012)。國際法的規範向度。司法新聲，104，7-19。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡志偉(20090900)。災後重建與人權保障--以原住民族文化為本的思考。臺灣民主季刊，6(3)，179-193。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李惠宗(20101000)。法律隱藏漏洞的發現與填補之法理基礎--司法院大法官違憲審查實踐的觀察。月旦法學雜誌，185，5-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.小林直樹、李鴻禧(19790900)。生存權思想及問題。憲政思潮，47，92-101。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫迺翊(20120600)。社會給付權利之憲法保障與社會政策之形成空間：以德國聯邦憲法法院關於年金財產權保障及最低生存權保障之判決為中心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，41(2)，445-516。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.廖福特(20091100)。批准聯合國兩個人權公約及制訂施行法之評論。月旦法學，174，223-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李念祖(20010700)。論我國憲法上外國人基本人權之平等保障適格。憲政時代，27(1)，80-100。  延伸查詢new window
8.許宗力(20141100)。2013年憲法發展回顧。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，43(特刊)，1031-1074。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡茂寅(19990600)。社會權--生存權與勞動基本權。月旦法學，49，137-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李震山(19920300)。人性尊嚴之憲法意義。律師通訊，150，34-45。  延伸查詢new window
11.李永然(20160600)。從居住權的保障談《住宅法》的落實！。都市前瞻，9，17-21。  延伸查詢new window
12.林紀東(19690300)。論生存權工作權與財產權之保障。中山學術文化集刊，3，153-181。  延伸查詢new window
13.翁燕菁(20150100)。適足居住權之可裁判性--初探國際人權法及其實踐。全國律師，19(1)，4-17。  延伸查詢new window
14.溫麗圜(20160600)。居住正義仍路遙？--兩公約作為公法上請求權基礎之探討。全國律師，20(6)，102-108。  延伸查詢new window
15.Bell, K.(2013)。Protecting Public Housing Tenants in Australia from Forced Eviction: The Fundamental Importance of the Human Right to Adequate Housing and Home。Monash University Law Review，39(1)，1-37。  new window
16.Fitzpatrick, J.、Slye, R. C.(2003)。Republic of South Africa v. Grootboom, Case No. CCT 11/00.2000 (11) BCLR 1169 and Minister of Health v. Treatment Action Campaign, Case No. CCT 8/02。American Journal of International Law，97(3)，669-680。  new window
17.Leckie, S.(1989)。The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Right to Adequate Housing: Towards an Appropriate Approach。Human Rights Quarterly，11(4)，522-560。  new window
18.Levy-Vroelant, C.(2015)。The Right to Housing in France: Still a Long Way to Go from Intention to Implementation。Journal of Law and Social Policy，24，88-108。  new window
19.王鵬翔(20070400)。基本權作為最佳化命令與框架秩序--從原則理論初探立法餘地(gesetzgeberische Spielräume)問題。東吳法律學報，18(3)，1-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.林明鏘(20130701)。都市更新之公共利益--兼評司法院大法官釋字第709號解釋。臺灣法學雜誌，227，121-139。  延伸查詢new window
21.徐揮彥(20141100)。「公民與政治權利國際公約」與「經濟、社會與文化權利國際公約」在我國最高法院與最高行政法院適用之研究。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，43(特刊)，839-909。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.翁燕菁(20130700)。《經濟、社會與文化權利國際公約》的黯然登場：大法官釋字七〇九號與經社權利保障。月旦法學，218，239-246。  延伸查詢new window
23.詹鎮榮(20041100)。基本權各論基礎講座（14）--居住自由。法學講座，30，13-29。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.黃昭元(2015)。公民與政治權利國際公約與憲法解釋。司法院大法官一Ｏ四年度學術研討會：人權公約與我國憲法解釋，司法院 (會議日期: 2015/12/05)。臺北：司法院。101-128。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭明政(2012)。國際人權條約中有關社會權保障的裁判適用：從日本外國人社會保障訴訟看國內法院援引國際人權條約的可能性。中華民國國際法學會民國101年年會暨學術研討會，中華民國國際法學會 。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Sunstein, C. R.(2001)。Social and Economic Rights? Lessons from South Africa。  new window
學位論文
1.Dordelli-Rosales, N. R.(2013)。Constitutional Jurisprudence in the Supreme Court of Venezuela(博士論文)。University of Ottawa，Ottawa。  new window
圖書
1.Damel, Moeckli、Sangecta, Shah、Sivakumaran, Sandesh(2010)。International Human Rights Law。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.吳庚、陳淳文(2013)。憲法理論與政府體制。臺北：吳庚。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.丘宏達、陳純一(2012)。現代國際法。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳新民(2015)。憲法學釋論。臺北：陳新民。  延伸查詢new window
5.張佛泉(1973)。無法出讓的權利。台北：大林書店。  延伸查詢new window
6.俞寬賜(2002)。國際法新論。台北：啟英。  延伸查詢new window
7.許慶雄(1999)。憲法入門（I）：人權保障篇。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.羅惠珍(2015)。巴黎不出售。臺北：尖端。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hohmann, J.(2013)。The Right to Housing。Oxford：Hart Publishing。  new window
10.Gardiner, R. K.(2010)。Treaty Interpretation。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Friedmann, D.、Barak-Erez, D.(2001)。Human Rights in Private Law。Oxford：Hart Publishing。  new window
12.Langford, M.、Nolan, A.(2006)。Litigating Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: legal practitioners dossier。Geneva：The Centre on Housing Rights and Eviction。  new window
13.李震山(2005)。多元、寬容與人權保障--以憲法未列舉權之保障為中心。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.李惠宗(2015)。憲法要義。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Saul, Ben、Kinley, David、Mowbray, Jacqueline(2014)。The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Commentary, Cases, and Materials。Oxford University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights(1998)。General Comment No. 9, The domestic application of the Covenant(E/C./12/1998/24)。  new window
2.Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights(1997)。General Comment No. 7, The right to adequate housing (art. 11(1) of the Covenant): Forced evictions(E/1998/22)。  new window
3.Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights(1993)。UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Concluding observations: Canada(E/C.12/1993/5)。  new window
4.Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights(1992)。General Comment No. 4, The right to adequate housing (art. 11 (1) of the Covenant)(E/1992/23)。  new window
5.Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights(1991)。General Comment No. 3, The nature of States parties' obligations (art. 2, para. 1, of the Covenant)(E/1991/23)。  new window
6.Kothari, M.(2007)。UN Human Rights Council: Report of the Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standards of living(A/HRC/4/18,5)。  new window
7.Sachar, R.(1994)。The Right to Adequate Housing: Second Progress Report(E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/20)。  new window
8.U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights(2004)。Commission on Human Rights: Resolution 2004/28: Prohibition of Forced Evictions(E/CN.4/RES/2004/28)。  new window
9.U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights(2009)。Fact Sheet No. 21, The Right to Adequate Housing，Geneva：UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights。，(Fact Sheet No. 21/Rev. 1)。 。  new window
其他
1.Presidential office Human rights Consultative Committee(2013)。Review of the Initial Reports of the Government of Taiwan on the Implementation of the International Human Rights Covenants: Concluding Observations and Recommendations，http://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/public/Data/5415171652675.pdf。  new window
2.Presidential office Human rights Consultative Committee(2017)。Review of the Second Reports of the Government of Taiwan on the Implementation of the International Human Rights Covenants, Concluding Observations and Recommendations，http://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/HitCounter.asp?xItem=459876。  new window
圖書論文
1.張文貞(2009)。憲法與國際人權法的匯流：兼論我國大法官解釋之實踐。憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳怡凱(2010)。國際人權公約之內國效力：以公民與政治權利公約暨經濟社會文化權公約施行法為例。台灣法學新課題。元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brouant, J.(2011)。Implementation of the Enforceable Right to Housing (DALO) Confronted by the French Regions。Social Housing Across Europe。Paris：Imprimerie de la Direction legale et administrative。  new window
4.Eide, A.(2001)。The Right to An Adequate Standard of Living Including the Right to Food。Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Textbook。Hague：Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
5.Craven, M.(2003)。History, Pre-History and the Right to Housing in International Law。National Perspectives on Housing Rights。Hague：Springer。  new window
6.Courtis, C.(2008)。Argentina: Some Promising Signs。Social rights jurisprudence: emerging trends in international and comparative law。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Kinley, D.(2014)。Article 11: The Right to Adequate Standard of Living。The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Commentary, Cases and Materials。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
8.King, J. A.(2008)。United Kingdom: Asserting Social Rights in a Multi-layered System。Social Rights Jurisprudence。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Leckie, S.(1995)。The Justiciability of Housing Rights。The Right to Complain about Economic, Social and Cultural Rights。Utrecht：SIM。  new window
10.李建良(2014)。論國際條約的國內法效力與法位階定序：國際條約與憲法解釋之關係的基礎課題。憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院法律學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1156（臺灣：1139，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67636449
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上