臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：商標法與言論自由之交錯：美國Matal v. Tam案之合憲性探討--再探我國商標法之「公序良俗條款」
書刊名：政大法學評論
作者：許炳華
作者(外文)：Hsu, Pin-hua
出版日期：2019
卷期：156
頁次：頁1-78
主題關鍵詞：詆毀性商標禁止註冊條款；公序良俗條款；言論自由；違憲條件原則；商業性言論；政府言論；觀點差別待遇規範；嚴格審查；中度審查；事前限制；Disparaging provision；Ordre public and morality provision；Freedom of speech；Unconstitutional conditions doctrine；Commercial speech；Government speech；Viewpoint discriminatory regulations；Strict scrutiny；Intermediate scrutiny；Prior restraint
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:112
  • 點閱點閱:17
期刊論文
1.林洲富(20100900)。色情影片之著作權保護--評析最高法院88年度臺上字第250號刑事判決。月旦財經法雜誌，22，1-15。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳仲嶙(20111200)。商業性言論憲法解釋十年回顧與評析。中原財經法學，27，101-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Morin, Eileen(1997)。Of Mice and Men: The Ethics of Patenting Animals。Health Law Journal，5。  new window
4.Lemley, Mark A.、Volokh, Eugene(1998)。Freedom of Speech and Injunctions in Intellectual Property Cases。Duke Law Journal，48，147-184。  new window
5.Bagley, Margo A.(2003)。Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law。William and Mary Law Review，45(2)，469-547。  new window
6.余信達(20041000)。從人性尊嚴與倫理道德之定位探索基因相關技術之可專利性。月旦法學，113，175-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Sullivan, Kathleen M.(1989)。Unconstitutional Conditions。Harvard Law Review，102(7)，1415-1506。  new window
8.Smith, Regan(2007)。Trademark Law and Free Speech: Protection for Scandalous and Disparaging Marks。Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review，42。  new window
9.Kuruk, Paul(2007)。Goading A Reluctant Dinosaur: Mutual Recognition Agreements as a Policy Response to the Misappropriation of Foreign Traditional Knowledge in the United States。Pepperdine Law Review，34。  new window
10.許曉芬(20110300)。人之砒霜我之蜜糖--從原創性觀點評高等法院九十四年度上訴字第一二九五號判決。月旦法學，190，158-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.許曉芬(20110900)。從比較法觀點論妨害公共秩序或善良風俗之商標--評智慧財產權法院九十七年度行商訴字第八十五號判決。高大法學論叢，7(1)，123-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Reich, Charles A.(1964)。The New Property。Yale Law Journal，73(5)，733-787。  new window
13.王服清、許炳華(20080400)。從憲法基本權利保障之觀點評析商標法的「公序良俗」條款之規定。律師雜誌，343，49-62。  延伸查詢new window
14.Farber, Daniel A.(1991)。Free Speech without Romance: Public Choice and the First Amendment。Harvard Law Review，105，554-583。  new window
15.Berman, Mitchell N.(2002)。Commercial Speech and the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine: A Second Look at "The Greater Includes the Lesser"。Vanderbilt Law Review，55，693-796。  new window
16.王服清、張國華、許炳華(20061100)。從憲法觀點批判著作權法上援用「公序良俗條款」的正當性問題--色情光碟片為探討中心。法令月刊，57(11)，98-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.吳信華(20170500)。「商業性言論」因「事前審查」而不採「寬鬆標準」？--釋字第744號解釋評析。月旦裁判時報，59，27-37。  延伸查詢new window
18.呂姝賢(20140800)。日本商標審查實務之探討--以識別性及地名、著名已逝人名作為商標不得註冊之事由為中心。智慧財產權月刊，188，32-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.李仁淼(20170800)。商業廣告與表現自由。月旦法學教室，178，6-9。  延伸查詢new window
20.陳宏杰(20120200)。商標違反公序良俗之研究--我國相關法令與歐、英、澳、美實務探討。智慧財產權月刊，158，5-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.陳宗憶(20170900)。言論自由違憲審查模式的變遷--釋字第744號解釋之微言大義。月旦裁判時報，63，46-56。  延伸查詢new window
22.劉宗德(20170500)。商業言論管制與違憲審查。月旦法學，264，140-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.劉靜怡(20130901)。政府補助的限制：言論自由下的違憲條件。臺灣法學雜誌，231，155-160。  延伸查詢new window
24.劉靜怡(20170800)。事前審查所為何事？--司法院釋字第七四四號解釋簡評。月旦法學，267，194-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Abdel-khalik, Jasmine(2015)。Disparaging Trademarks: Who Matters。Michigan Journal of Race and Law，20(2)。  new window
26.Baird, Stephen R.(1993)。Moral Intervention in the Trademark Arena: Banning the Registration of Scandalous and Immoral Trademarks。Trademark Reporter，83。  new window
27.Bonadio, Enrico(2015)。Brands, Morality and Public Policy: Some Reflections on the Ban on Registration of Controversial Trademarks。Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review，19(1)。  new window
28.Carpenter, Megan M.、Murphy, Kathryn T.(2011)。Calling Bulls**t on the Lanham Act: The 2(a) Bar for Immoral, Scandalous, and Disparaging Marks。U. LOUISVILLEL. Rev.，49。  new window
29.Casarez, Nicole B.(2000)。Public Forums, Selective Subsidies, and Shifting Standards of Viewpoint Discrimination。Albany Law Review，64。  new window
30.Casciato, Colin(2016)。In re Tam: The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Does Not Care if You Are Offended。TUL. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP.，19。  new window
31.Chu, Alexandria(2015)。The Washington Redskins and the Current Standard for Disparaging Trademarks: The Impact of Disparaging Trademarks in the Modern World。S. CAL. REV. L. SOC. JUST.，25。  new window
32.Davis, Andrew R.(2015)。Disparaging Trademarks: An Analysis of Section 2(a)'s Disparagement Standard and the Standard's Application from Harjo to Blackhorse。OKLA. CITY U. L. REV.，40。  new window
33.Davis, Theodore H. Jr.(1993)。Registration of Scandalous, Immoral, and Disparaging Matter Under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act: Can One Man's Vulgarity Be Another's Registered Trademark?。Trademark Reporter，83。  new window
34.Deveraux, Amy(2016)。In re Tam: Treating Trademarks as Expressive Speech。DENV. L. REV. ONLINE，94。  new window
35.Dougherty, Terence(1998)。Group Rights to Cultural Survival: Intellectual Property Rights in Native American Cultural Symbols。COLUM. HUM. RTS. L. REV.，29。  new window
36.Farber, Daniel A.、Frickey, Philip P.(1987)。Practical Reason and the First Amendment。UCLA Law Review，34。  new window
37.Farley, Christine Haight(2014)。Stabilizing Morality in Trademark Law。American University Law Review，63。  new window
38.Grynberg, Michael(2016)。A Trademark Defense of the Disparagement Bar。YALE L. J. FORUM，126。  new window
39.Heins, Maijorie(1996)。Viewpoint Discrimination。Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly，24，99-169。  new window
40.Jurgensen, Drew(2016)。When All You Have Is a Hammer, Everything Looks Like a Nail: In re Tam and the Federal Circuit's Conflation of Federal Trademark Registration and the First Amendment。J. PAT. & TRADEMARK Off. SOC'Y，98。  new window
41.Katyal, Sonia K.(2010)。Trademark Intersectionality。UCLA Law Review，57。  new window
42.Kelber, Bruce C.(1994)。Scalping the Redskins: Can Trademark Law Start Athletic Teams Bearing Native American Nicknames and Images on the Road to Racial Reform。Hamline Law Review，17。  new window
43.Kustina, Emily M.(2016)。Discriminatory Discretion: PTO Procedures and Viewpoint Discrimination Under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，164，513-562。  new window
44.Lee, Michelle B.(1997)。Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act as a Restriction on Sports Team Names: Has Political Correctness Gone Too Far。Sports Law Journal，4。  new window
45.Lefstin, Jeffrey(2000)。Does the First Amendment Bar Cancellation of REDSKINS?。STAN. L. REV.，52。  new window
46.Mason, William T.(2016)。Blackhorse Down: Do NFL Teams Need Trademark Protection?。Texas Law Review，94。  new window
47.Minniti, Carl J.(2016)。The Lanham Act's Unconstitutional Hodgepodge。Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion，17。  new window
48.Norton, Helen、Citron, Danielle Keats(2010)。Government Speech 2.0。DENV. U. L. REV.，87。  new window
49.Olree, Andy G.(2009)。Identifying Government Speech。CONN. L. REV.，42，365-433。  new window
50.Oswald, Lynda J.(2004)。Challenging the Registration of Scandalous and Disparaging Marks Under the Lanham Act: Who Has Standing to Sue?。American Business Law Journal，41(2/3)，251-312。  new window
51.Pace, Kimberly A.(1994)。The Washington Redskins Case and the Doctrine of Disparagement: How Politically Correct Must a Trademark Be?。Pepperdine Law Review，22。  new window
52.Papandrea, Mary-Rose(2016)。The Government Brand。Northwestern University Law Review，110，1195-1234。  new window
53.Phillips, Ron(2008)。A Case for Scandal and Immorality: Proposing Thin Protection of Controversial Trademarks。U. BALT. INTELL. PROP L. J.，17。  new window
54.Plass, Stephen A.(1992)。Bedrock Principles, Elusive Construction, and the Future of Equal Employment Laws。Hofstra Law Review，21，313-383。  new window
55.Ramsey, Lisa P.(2016)。A Free Speech Right to Trademark Protection?。Trademark Reporter，106。  new window
56.Rasul, Hammad(2015)。The Washington Redskins' Deflating Hope: The Lanham Act Survives the First Amendment Challenge。Marquette Sports Law Review，26。  new window
57.Rogers, Edward S.(1909)。Comments on the Modern Law of Unfair Trade。Illinois Law Review，3。  new window
58.Schauer, Frederick(1979)。Speech and Speech--Obscenity and Obscenity: An Exercise in the Interpretation of Constitutional Language。Georgetown Law Journal，67。  new window
59.Stewart, James、Waidelich, Sarah(2015)。Redskins and Slants: The Lanham Act and the First Amendment on a Collision Course?。Communications Lawyer，31。  new window
60.Stout, Kristian D.(2015)。Terrifying Trademarks and a Scandalous Disregard for the First Amendment: §2(A)'s Unconstitutional Prohibition on Scandalous, Immoral, and Disparaging Trademarks。Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology，25。  new window
61.Strasser, Mark(2016)。Government Speech and Circumvention of the First Amendment。Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly，44，37-60。  new window
62.Sunstein, Cass R.(1990)。Why the Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine Is an Anachronism (with Particular Reference to Religion, Speech, and Abortion)。Boston University Law Review，70。  new window
63.Thomas, John C. III(2015)。Clear and Convincing Disparagement: An Argument for a Higher Evidentiary Standard for When the T.T.A.B. Considers Cancelling a Well-Known, Tenured Trademark。Journal of Intellectual Property Law，22。  new window
64.Tushnet, Rebecca(2016)。The First Amendment Walks into a Bar: Trademark Registration and Free Speech。Notre Dame Law Review，92。  new window
65.Tushnet, Rebecca(2017)。Registering Disagreement: Registration in Modern American Trademark Law。Harvard Law Review，130。  new window
66.VerSteeg, Russ(2016)。Blackhawk Down or Blackhorse Down? The Lanham Act's Prohibition of Trademarks That "May Disparage" & the First Amendments。Oklahoma Law Review，68。  new window
67.Volokh, Eugene(2003)。Freedom of Speech and Intellectual Property: Some Thoughts After Eldred, 44 Liquormart, and Bartnicki。Houston Law Review，40。  new window
68.Voskanyan, Lilit(2008)。The Trademark Principal Register as a Nonpublic Forum。The University of Chicago Law Review，75，1295-1328。  new window
69.Wallace, John R.(2011)。Discriminatory & Disparaging Team Names, Logos & Mascots: Workable Challenges & the Misapplication of the Doctrine of Laches。Rutgers Race and the Law Review，12。  new window
70.Winegust, Tamara Céline、Engle-Hardy, Noelle、Keri, Susan J.(2015)。Redskins, Eskimos, and Indians: The Canadian Approach to Disparaging Trademarks。Trademark Reporter，105。  new window
71.Wright, Robert H.(2005)。Today's Scandal Can Be Tomorrow's Vogue: Why Section 2(A) of the Lanham Act Is Unconstitutionally Void for Vagueness。Howard Law Journal，48。  new window
72.黃昭元(20040500)。憲法權利限制的司法審查標準：美國類型化多元標準模式的比較分析。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，33(3)，45-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
73.Pitcher, Amanda S.(2003)。Comment: Contrary to First Impression, Genes are Patentable: Should there be Limitations?。Journal of Health Care Law & Policy，6。  new window
74.Redish, Martin H.(2007)。Commercial Speech, First Amendment Intuitionism and the Twilight Zone of Viewpoint Discrimination。Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review，41，67-132。  new window
圖書
1.謝銘洋(2012)。智慧財產權法。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文吟(2005)。商標法論。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wright, R. George(1997)。Selling Words: Free Speech in a Commercial Culture。New York University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.李震山(2011)。人性尊嚴之憲法意義。人性尊嚴與人格保障。  延伸查詢new window
2.王偉霖(2015)。商標使用與言論自由。「商標使用」規範之現在與未來。  延伸查詢new window
3.林子儀(2002)。言論自由之理論基礎。言論自由與新聞自由。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：883（臺灣：870，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67660621
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上