:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以徵收動態性匝道費緩解國道塞車之可行性研究--以國道五號為例
書刊名:管理資訊計算
作者:于健 引用關係李南昌
作者(外文):Yu, ChienLi, Nan-chang
出版日期:2020
卷期:9:2
頁次:頁10-25
主題關鍵詞:匝道費願付價格國道五號環境態度條件評估法Ramp feeWillingness to payNational Road No. 5Environmental attitudeContingent valuation method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:61
  • 點閱點閱:8
國五塞車,舉國皆知,雖然政府及民間都多方設想提出紓解方案但皆未見成效。本研究嘗試提出,以徵收依塞車嚴重狀況而連動調整的動態性『匝道費』收費制度。透過對用路人對塞車的耐受性及願付價格意願的了解,企圖利用『以價制量』的方式來解決國五的塞車問題。本研究以條件評估法(Contingent Valuation Method, CVM)推估遊客匝道費之願付價格,並探討人口背景、環境態度、收費管制認同度、塞車耐受度,對其之影響。以年滿二十歲且有造訪過宜蘭的遊客為研究對象,共得到545份有效樣本。研究結果發現:(1)複迴歸模式進行估算的匝道費之願付價格為10.10元,可望降低52.5%的車流。(2)收費管制認同度、環境態度、人口背景對於匝道費之願付價格有預測力;(3)塞車耐受度對匝道費之願付價格則並無預測力。本研究結果可提供相關管理單位與後續研究之參考。
National Highway No. 5 traffic jam is well known throughout the country. Although the government and the private sector have all envisaged a solution, they have not achieved results. This study attempts to propose a dynamic "ramp fee" charging system that is levied and adjusted in accordance with the serious situation of the traffic jam. Through the understanding of the passers-by to the traffic jam and the willingness to pay the price, we attempted to solve the problem of traffic jam on National Highway No. 5 by means of the "price system". This study uses the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) to estimate the willingness to pay for tourists' ramp fees, and to explore the impact of population background, environmental attitudes, Charge control approval, Traffic jam tolerance, the impact on it. For the 20-year-old tourists who have visited Yilan, a total of 545 valid samples were obtained. The results of the study found that: (1) The estimated price of the ramp fee estimated by the complex regression model is 10.10 yuan, which is expected to reduce the traffic flow by 52.5%. (2) Charge control approval, environmental attitude, and demographic background are predictive of the willing price of the ramp fee (3) The congestion tolerance is not predictive of the willingness to pay for the ramp. The results of this study can provide reference for relevant management units and subsequent research.
期刊論文
1.Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorical simplicity。Psychometrica,39(1),31-36。  new window
2.Wiidegren, Ö.(1998)。The new environmental paradigm and personal norms。Environment and Behavior,30(1),75-100。  new window
3.林晏州、Peterson, George L.、林寶秀、Champ, Patricia A.(20071200)。遊客與居民對太魯閣國家公園資源保育願付費用之影響因素分析與比較。觀光研究學報,13(4),309-326。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Albrecht, Don、Bultena, Gordon、Hoiberg, Eric、Nowak, Peter(1982)。The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: Measuring Environmental Concern。Journal of Environmental Education,13(3),39-43。  new window
5.Dunlap, Riley E.、Van Liere, Kent D.、Mertig, Angela G.、Jones, Robert Emmet(2000)。Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale。Journal of Social Issues,56(3),425-442。  new window
6.Dunlap, Riley E.、Van Liere, Kent D.(1978)。The New Environmental Paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results。The Journal of Environmental Education,9(4),10-19。  new window
7.杜素豪(20020400)。態度量表跨文化應用之有效性分析--以「新生態價值量表」為例。調查研究,11,73-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡志弘(2005)。新環境典範量表與新生態典範量表於預測環境行為意向上之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.李佩姍(2011)。大學生對生態保育之環境態度與願付價格(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.鐘龍治(2005)。羅東林區民眾參與社區林業之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳怡全(2009)。雪山隧道空氣污染物實場調查分析(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.張瑋尹(2015)。森林遊樂區遊客對森林議題與環境態度認知之探討--以新化與惠蓀林場為例(博士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭暐達(2017)。從環境知識、環境態度、環境行為探討生態保育費用願付價格--以內洞森林遊樂區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Tukey, John W.(1977)。Exploratory Data Analysis。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
2.Mueller, D. J.(1986)。Measuring Social Attitudes: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners。Teachers College Press。  new window
3.蕭代基(20020000)。環境保護之成本效益分析:理論、方法與應用。臺北:俊傑書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.許慶雄(2007)。經典公路--國道幸福5號。台北市:交通部國道新建工程局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Pigou, A. C.(1920)。The Economics of Welfare。  new window
6.Ajzen, Icek、Fishbein, Martin(1980)。Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
7.von Ciriacy-Wantrup, Siegfried(1942)。Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies。Berkeley, California:University of California Press。  new window
其他
1.蘇振維,張舜淵,楊幼文,歐陽恬恬(2018)。北宜運輪路廊供需體檢,台北市:交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.交通部(2016)。噶瑪蘭傳奇、國道五號,https://transport-curation.nat.gov.tw/museum-no5/index.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃友恆(2017)。國道五號北上瓶頸路段最佳通過量之分析,http://www.ceci.org.tw/Modules/ResearchDevelopment/ResearchDevelopment-Details?node=9518a45d-9406-47cd-81ef-757190ec246b&id=b06359e9-3728-4f3f-8ec4-f6b3b93c6a0e。  延伸查詢new window
4.梁尚倫(20120229)。怠速熄火做環保,環保署空保處謝燕儒處長專訪,https://feature.u-car.com.tw/article/15672。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE