:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:強制解密與不自證己罪--以美國法院判決為中心
書刊名:法學叢刊
作者:朱富美
作者(外文):Ju, Fu-meei
出版日期:2022
卷期:67:1=265
頁次:頁31-65
主題關鍵詞:加密強制解密不自證己罪原則非供述證據科技偵查FisherEncryptionCompelled decryptionSelf-incriminationFisher v. United StatesScience and technology investigationForegone conclusionAct of production
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:64
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.王士帆(20080800)。德國聯邦最高法院裁判--不自證己罪在臥底偵查的適用界限。軍法專刊,54(4),76-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王士帆(20081000)。德國聯邦最高法院裁判--不自證己罪在臥底偵查的適用界線。軍法專刊,54(5),127-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.朱富美(20060100)。為對質指認強制被告變髮與採取聲調。日新,6,148-156。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊雲驊(20030300)。刑事訴訟法期末考試題--不自證己罪原則的幾個基本問題。法學講座,15,49-54。  延伸查詢new window
5.林鈺雄(20060300)。論不自證己罪原則--歐洲法整合趨勢及我國法發展之評析。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,35(2),1-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Cohen, Aloni、Park, Sunoo(2018)。Compelled Decryption and the Fifth Amendment: Exploring the Technical Boundaries。HARV. J. LAW AND TEC.,32。  new window
7.林文村(20200200)。陸海空軍懲罰法適用不自證己罪原則之探討。軍法專刊,66(1),15-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Thomson, Peter M.(2019)。The Fifth Amendment's Act of Production Doctrine: An Overlooked Shield Against Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum。Federalist Society Review,20。  new window
9.(2021)。State v. Andrews: Supreme Court of New Jersey Holds that Compelled Disclosure of Defendant's IPhone Passcodes Does Not Violate the Self-Incrimination Clause。HARV. L. Rev.,134。  new window
10.Sacharoff, Laurent(2018)。Unlocking The Fifth Amendment: Passwords and Encryptied Devices。FORDHAM L. Rev,87。  new window
11.Rangaviz, David Rassoul(2020)。Compelled Decryption and State Constitutional Protection Against Self-Incrimination。Am. Crim. L. Rev,57。  new window
12.Palfreyman, Brendan M.(2009)。Lessons from the British and American Approaches to Compelled Decryption。BROOK. L. REV,75。  new window
13.Oberheiden, Nick(2021)。You Received a Grand Jury Subpoena: What Now?。The National Law Review,11(260)。  new window
14.Oberheiden, Nick(2021)。Understanding the Basics of Grand Jury Indictments。The National Law Review,11(273)。  new window
15.Nagareda, Richard A.(1999)。Compulsion "To Be A Witness and The Resurrection of Boyd"。N.Y.U. L. REV.,74。  new window
16.Mohan, Vivek、Villasenor, John(2012)。Decrypting the Fifth Amendment: The Limits of Self-Incrimination in the Digital Era。Journal of Constitutional Law Heightened Scrutiny,15,11-28。  new window
17.Martin, G. Arthur(1960)。The privilege against Self-Incrimination under Foreign Law。Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology,51。  new window
18.Clemens, Walter(1960)。Germany。The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science,51(2),172-175。  new window
19.Kerr, Orin S.(2019)。Compelled Decryption and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination。Texas Law Review,97。  new window
20.Kemp, John A.(1958)。The Background of the Fifth Amendment in English Law: A Study of Its Historical Implications。William & Mary Law Review,1(2)。  new window
21.Inbau, Fred E.(1999)。Self-Incrimination: What Can an Accused Person be Compelled to do?。Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology,89。  new window
22.Hoffman, Janet Lee(2005)。The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination in Civil Proceedings。LITIGATION JOURNAL,24(1)。  new window
23.Keenan, Bernard(2019)。State access to encrypted data in the UK: the 'Transparent' approach。Common Law World Review,49(3/4),223-244。  new window
學位論文
1.黃奕欣(2019)。不自證己罪特權之適用範圍(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.朱富美(2004)。科學鑑定與刑事偵查。翰蘆出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.王兆鵬(19990000)。刑事被告的憲法權利。臺北:王兆鵬。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Koops, B. J.(2012)。Decryption Order and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Do Developments Since 2000 Suggest a Need to Force Suspects to Decrypt?。Netherlands Ministry of Justice。  new window
單篇論文
1.Dizon, Michael Anthony C.,McHugh, Philip James。Encryption laws and regulations in one of the Five Eyes: The case of New Zealand,https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/14640/Dizon%20mchugh%20encryption%20laws%20in%20NZ.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y。  new window
其他
1.Foster, Michael A.(2020)。Catch Me If You Scan: Constitutionality of Compelled Decryption Divides the Courts,https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2020-03-06_LSB10416_2a8b1e8e28f39dfbd6d5e3dfe7870b10b7792c22.pdf。  new window
2.(20201009)。談科技偵查法中手機解碼的必要性,https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1404848。  延伸查詢new window
3.Thomas, James G.(2017)。The Act of Production Doctrine,https://www.nealharwell.com/blog/the-act-of-production-doctrine/。  new window
4.Rizvi, Alina(20191122)。Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules defendants cannot be compelled to provide computer passwords,https://www.jurist.org/news/2019/11/pennsylvania-supreme-court-rules-defendants-cannot-be-compelled-to-provide-computer-passwords/。  new window
5.Freeman, Jason B.(2020)。The Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self Incrimination and the Foregone Conclusion Doctrine in the Context of Foreign Tax Records,https://freemanlaw.com/fifth-amendment-privilege-self-incrimination-foregone-conclusion-doctrine-context-foreign-tax-records/。  new window
6.Rasch, Mark(2019)。PA Supreme Court Rules Defendant Need Not Decrypt Drive,https://securityboulevard.com/2019/11/pa-supreme-court-rules-defendant-need-not-decrypt-drive/。  new window
7.Oerlemans, Jan-Jaap(2012)。Is the 'decryption order' a good idea?,https://leidenlawblog.nl/articles/is-the-decryption-order-a-good-idea。  new window
8.Merken, Sara(20210518)。U.S. Supreme Court nixes appeal over forced password disclosure,https://www.reuters.com/business/legal/us-supreme-court-nixes-appeal-over-forced-password-disclosure-2021-05-17/。  new window
9.Kerr, Orin(20160607)。The Fifth Amendment limits on forced decryption and applying the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine,https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/06/07/the-fifth-amendment-limits-on-forced-decryption-and-applying-the-foregone-conclusion-doctrine/。  new window
10.Herpig, Sven,Heumann, Stefan(2019)。The Encryption Debate in Germany,https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/05/30/encryption-debate-in-germany-pub-79215。  new window
圖書論文
1.林鈺雄(2013)。不自證己罪於非刑事程序之前置效力--評九十六年度台上字第七二三九號判決及相關裁判。最高法院刑事裁判評釋。  延伸查詢new window
2.林鈺雄(2013)。不自證己罪原則之射程距離--最高法院相關裁判之回顧與評釋。最高法院刑事裁判評釋。  延伸查詢new window
3.Koops, B. J.(2000)。The Decryption Order and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Do developments since 2000 suggest a need to force suspects to decrypt?。Het decryptiebevel en het nemo-teneturbeginsel。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE