:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:數位控制模式下之平臺外送員從屬性認定--以歐盟及其會員國近期發展為參考
書刊名:臺北大學法學論叢
作者:邱羽凡張文祈
作者(外文):Chiu, Yu-fanChang, Wen-chi
出版日期:2023
卷期:128
頁次:頁89-179
主題關鍵詞:從屬性勞工勞動基準法第2條第6款外送員歐盟平臺工作指令草案西班牙騎士法演算法按件計酬勞工身分推定SubordinateEmployeeArticle 2, Paragraph 6 of the Labor Standards ActPlatform couriersProposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Improving Working Conditions in Platform WorkRiders' Law in SpainAlgorithmic managementPiece-rate paymentsRebuttable presumption of an employment relationship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:141
  • 點閱點閱:49
人工智慧與大數據等科技掘起,開啟了工作場所數位化的趨勢,其中數位平台工作讓勞動力透過網路平台外包化,並運用演算法和App開展全新的勞務提供模式,使平台工作成為當代最富爭議的非典型勞動型態。在數位控制的運作下,組織與監控勞務提供過程的方式早已超越預排工作時間、打卡等典型模式,代之以運用動態費用結構進行操控,或是透過電子工具監控,在「激勵」與「抑制」的槓桿上限制工作者的自由,顯示出平台的控制邏輯為要求外送員遵守派單指示,此已遠離承攬契約以特定且獨立的工作成果為對象的範疇,更彰顯工作者的從屬性。然平台工作者在身分上時常遭錯誤分類為承攬工作者,無法主張勞工的基本權利,近年不論是西班牙騎士法或是歐盟2021年通過「關於改善平台工作之工作條件指令草案」,均是以推定勞工身分之方式為解方。在我國勞動基準法已將從屬性訂為勞動契約之法定要件下,實務上仍不能有效辨別數位平台工作者的勞工身分下,本文建議參酌歐盟及其會員國的司法實務發展,將數位科技控制納入從屬性的審查之中,並於立法上採取推定僱傭關係的模式。
The emergence of technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data has made digitization in the workplace become a trend. Through digital platform work, the labor force is allowed to be outsourced, and the use of algorithms and Apps helps develop a new model to provide services. Platform work become the most controversial atypical labor pattern of modern times. Under the algorithm's operation, the way to organize and monitor the service provision process has already surpassed the typical models such as pre-scheduling working hours and punch-in. Instead, it is controlled by dynamic fee structures for manipulation, or monitoring through electronic tools restricting the freedom of workers on the levers of "incentive" and "inhibition", which is far away from the scope of the contract of work that two parties agree on specific and independent work results. Furthermore, it highlights the worker's subordination. However, platform workers are often misclassified as self-employment workers in terms of status and cannot claim the basic rights of employees. In recent years, both the Riders' Law in Spain and the European Union's "Proposal for a Directive on improving working conditions in platform work" in 2021 have adopted the method of the rebuttable presumption of an employment relationship as a solution. In Contrast, under our country's Labor Standards Act, which has established subordination as a statutory element of employment contracts, it is still impossible to effectively identify the labor status of digital platform workers in practice. This article proposes to consider the development of judicial practice in the European Union and its member states, to include digital technology control in the review of subordination, and to adopt the model of the rebuttable presumption of employment relationships in legislation.
期刊論文
1.蔡茂寅(20010700)。函釋的法律性質。月旦法學,74,24-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.謝國雄(19890600)。黑手變頭家--臺灣製造業中的階級流動。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(2),11-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.邱羽凡(20190200)。保險業務員法律地位之再檢討--以釋字第740號解釋為中心。月旦法學,285,125-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉士豪(20051200)。勞動契約的主要義務與附隨義務之研究。銘傳大學法學論叢,5,57-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.翁禮祺(20170700)。平臺經濟與金融創新機會。會計研究月刊,380,89-93。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳哲毅(2021)。勞務提供之受指揮監督在勞工(勞動契約)認定上之定位--兼評近來之二則最高行政法院判決。律師法學期刊,6,43-63。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳業鑫(20210100)。勞動契約認定指導原則及勞動契約從屬性判斷檢核表之商榷。月旦法學,308,118-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林佳和(20210700)。後釋字第740號解釋之勞動趨勢分析。月旦法學,314,6-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bayreuther, Frank(2020)。Arbeitnehmereigenschaft und die Leistung fremdbestimmter Arbeit am Beispiel des Crowdworkers。RdA,2020(4),241-248。  new window
10.Maschmann, Frank(2013)。Fremdpersonaleinsatz im Unternehmen und die Flucht in den Werkvertrag。NZA,2013(23),1305-1312。  new window
11.Schubert, Claudia(2020)。Crowdworker--Arbeitnehmer, arbeitnehmerähnliche Person oder Selbständiger. Zugleich eine Besprechung zum Urteil des LAG München v. 4.12.2019-8 Sa 146/19。RdA,2020(4),248-255。  new window
12.Werths, Wolfgang(2014)。Vom Auftraggeber eines Werkvertrags zum Arbeitgeber。NJW-Spezial,2014(16),498-499。  new window
13.Kocher, Eva、Hensel, Isabell(2016)。Herausforderungen des Arbeitsrechts durch digitale Plattformen: ein neuer Koordinationsmodus von Erwerbsarbeit。Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht,984-990。  new window
14.侯英泠(20200600)。論美食外送服務網路平臺之法律性質探討--以Uber Eats為例。月旦民商法雜誌,68,85-106。  延伸查詢new window
15.邱羽凡(20210900)。勞動契約從屬性認定標準之趨勢與反思--兼論平臺工作者之「勞工性」。臺北大學法學論叢,119,141-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.張譯文(20210700)。勞務供給契約之類型與區分標準--以定性的困境為中心。月旦法學,314,47-62。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.吳哲毅(20220300)。工會會員資格與工會法上之勞工--以日本法借鏡。法律扶助與社會,8,93-155。  延伸查詢new window
18.李建良(20220400)。法學方法4.0。臺灣法律人,10,81-95。  延伸查詢new window
19.Cherry, Miriam A.、Aloisi, Antonio(2017)。"Dependent Contractors" in the Gig Economy: A Comparative Approach。American University Law Review,66(3),635-689。  new window
20.洪瑩容(20210700)。從平臺經濟之多元勞務提供模式談勞務提供者之法律地位與勞動權益之保護。國立中正大學法學集刊,72,1-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.辛昀浩(20230500)。義大利中間類型勞動者保障法制之省思。月旦法學,336,119-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.林均禧(20220400)。平臺勞動下自營作業者之勞動及社會保障--以西班牙自營作業者法為參考。萬國法律,242,91-112。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳俊元(20220600)。談保險業務員之勞務契約、新近判決與保險法第177條修正草案。臺灣法律人,12,38-50。  延伸查詢new window
24.施穎弘(2021)。最高法院針對勞動從屬性之最新見解。理律新知,2021(10月號)。  延伸查詢new window
25.蔡宛芸、王志弘(20221200)。追逐自由的省時戰?數位中介食物外送的勞動體制。臺灣社會研究季刊,123,183-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Aloisi, Antonio(2021)。Demystifying Flexibility, Exposing the Algorithmic Boss: A Note on the First Italian Case Classifying a (Food-delivery) Platform Worker as an Employee。Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal Dispatch,35,1-10。  new window
27.Aloisi, Antonio(2022)。Platform Work in Europe: Lessons Learned, Legal Developments and Challenges Ahead。EUR. LAB. L. J.,13(1),4-29。  new window
28.Borelli, Silvia、Gualandi, Sofia(2021)。Which Social Security Regime for Platform Workers in Italy?。INT' L SOC. SEC. REV.,74(3/4),133-154。  new window
29.De Stefano, Valerio(2016)。The Rise of the "Just-in-Time Workforce": On-demand Work。COMPAR. LAB. L. & POL' Y J.,37,471-504。  new window
30.Ke Li, Angela(2022)。Beyond Algorithmic Control: Flexibility, Intermediaries, and Paradox in the On-demand Economy。INFO., COMMC' N & SOC' Y.,25(14),2012-2027。  new window
31.Naumowicz, Kamila(2021)。Some Remarks to the Legal Status of Platform Workers in the Light of the Latest European Jurisprudence。STUD. ON LAB. L. & SOC. POL' Y.,28,177-189。  new window
32.Pallini, Massimo(2019)。Towards a New Notion of Subordination in Italian Labor Law?。Italian Labour Law E-Journal,12(1),1-24。  new window
33.Shapiro, Aaron(2018)。Between Autonomy and Control: Strategies of Arbitrage in the "On-demand" Economy。NEW MEDIA & SOC'Y.,20(8),2954-2971。  new window
34.Shapiro, Aaron(2020)。Dynamic Exploits: Calculative Asymmetries in the On-demand Economy。NEW TECH., WORK & EMP.,35(2),162-177。  new window
35.Smith, Chris(2015)。Continuity and Change in Labor Process Analysis Forty Years After Labor and Monopoly Capital。Labor Studies Journal,40(3),222-242。  new window
36.Boemke, Burkhard(2021)。Arbeitsrecht: Arbeitnehmerstatus sog. Crowdworker。JuS,695-698。  new window
37.Günther, Jens、Böglmüller, Matthias(2015)。Arbeitsrecht 4.0--Arbeitsrechtliche Herausforderungen in der vierten industriellen Revolution。NZA,1025-1031。  new window
38.Krause, Rüdiger(2022)。Auf dem Weg zur unionsrechtlichen Regelung von Plattformtätigkeiten. Die Kommissionsinitiative zur Plattformarbeit。NZA,521-533。  new window
39.Martina, Dietmar(2021)。Crowdworker: Arbeitnehmer, Heimarbeiter oder Solo-Selbstständige?。NZA,616-620。  new window
40.Raif, Alexander、Nann, Philipp(2016)。Arbeitsrecht 4.0--Möglichkeiten und Hürden in der digitalen Arbeitswelt。GWR,221-224。  new window
41.Temming, Felipe(2021)。Zur Arbeitnehmereigenschaft eines Crowdworkers。JA,687-690。  new window
42.Todolí-Signes, Adrián(2020)。Notes on the Spanish Supreme Court Ruling That Considers Riders to Be Employees。Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal Dispatch,30,1-7。  new window
研究報告
1.邱羽凡(2022)。平台外送員的勞動條件、職業安全與勞動保護。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳麗惠(2012)。主管魅力領導與賦權、員工當責與組織績效(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃品慈(2023)。外送平台工作者勞工身分推定之立法研究--以西班牙騎士法為參考(碩士論文)。國立陽明交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡宛芸(2021)。省時戰:數位中介食物配送勞動的移動政治(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.宋庭語(2020)。餐飲外送平台經濟工作者勞動關係之探討--以美國加州法規範為比較。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Schaub, Günter、Ahrendt, Martina、Koch, Ulrich、Linck, Rüdiger、Treber, Jürgen、Vogelsang, Hinrich(2019)。Arbeitsrechts-Handbuch: Systematische Darstellung und Nachschlagewerk für die Praxis。  new window
3.Vogel, Friedemann、Pötters, Stephan、Christensen, Ralph(2015)。Richterrecht der Arbeit--empirisch untersucht: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen computergestutzter Textanalyse am Beispiel des Arbeitnehmerbegriffs。  new window
4.黃程貫(2001)。勞動法。國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kinicki, Angelo、Williams, Brian K.、榮泰生(2013)。管理學。美商麥格羅希爾國際股份有限公司台灣分公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Jones, Phil、陳依萍(2022)。為演算法服務的免洗人力:平台資本主義時代的勞動與剝削。商周文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳麗萍、王素彎(2022)。透過平台業者APP程式提供勞務之國內工作者工作態樣研究--以食品外送平台為例。勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉錦鴻(2007)。民法系列--承攬。三民。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭津津、馬財專、劉士豪、辛昀皓、陳威霖(2022)。零工經濟下各國「類勞工」法制之研究。勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所。  延伸查詢new window
10.BERG, JANINE、FURRER, MARIANNE、HARMON, ELLIE、RANI, UMA、SILBERMAN, M. SIX(2018)。DIGITAL LABOUR PLATFORMS AND THE FUTURE OF WORK: TOWARDS DECENT WORK IN THE ONLINE WORLD。  new window
11.MCGOVERN, MARION(2017)。THRIVING IN THE GIG ECONOMY: HOW TO CAPITALIZE AND COMPETE IN THE NEW WORLD OF WORK。  new window
12.PRASSL, JEREMIAS(2018)。HUMANS AS A SERVICE: THE PROMISE AND PERILS OF WORK IN THE GIG ECONOMY。  new window
13.Däubler, Wolfgang(2006)。Das Arbeitsrecht 1: Leitfaden für Arbeitnehmer。  new window
14.Däubler, Wolfgang、Deinert, Olaf、Walser, Manfred(2021)。AGB-Kontrolle im Arbeitsrecht。  new window
15.Kramer, Stefan(2019)。IT-Arbeitsrecht。  new window
16.Kreß, Stefan(2021)。Crowdwork。  new window
17.Rolfs, Christian、Giesen, Richard、Kreikebohm, Ralf、Meßling, Miriam、Udsching, Peter(2023)。Beck'scher Online Kommentar Arbeitsrecht。  new window
18.邱聰智(2008)。新訂債法各論。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.HIEßL, CHRISTINA(2022)。JURISPRUDENCE OF NATIONAL COURTS CONFRONTED WITH CASES OF ALLEGED MISCLASSIFICATION OF PLATFORM WORKERS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS。  new window
其他
1.劉清耿(20220600)。「工夫到厝,欲食就有」:評《我的黑手父親》、《失去青春的孩子》、《萬能店員》[評1.謝嘉心著,《我的黑手父親:港都拖車師傅的工作與生命》(臺北:游擊文化,2021) 2.涂曉蝶著,《失去青春的孩子:美髮建教生的圓夢與碎夢》(臺北:游擊文化,2021) 3.張立祥著,《萬能店員:我的便利、你的過勞,超商的社會代價》(臺北:游擊文化,2021)]。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林更盛(2018)。勞動契約之特徵「從屬性」--評最高法院81年度台上字第347號判決。勞動法案例研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.王松柏(2005)。勞動契約。勞動基準法釋義:施行二十年之回顧與展望。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kártyás, Gábor(2022)。Working Time Flexibility: Merits to Preserve and Potentials to Adjust to Change。DECENT WORK IN THE DIGITAL AGE: EUROPEAN AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES。  new window
4.Recchia, Giuseppe Antonio(2020)。Gig Work and the Qualification Dilemma: From the Judicial to the Theoretical Approach。NEW FORMS OF EMPLOYMENT。  new window
5.Risak, Martin(2017)。Gig-Economy und Crowdwork--was ist das?。Arbeit in der Gig-Economy: Rechtsfragen neuer Arbeitsformen in der Crowd und Cloud。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE