:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:崔述「考信錄」評析
書刊名:臺南師院學報
作者:邱麗娟
作者(外文):Chuan, Li-chiu
出版日期:1997
卷期:30
頁次:頁197-216
主題關鍵詞:崔述考信錄
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:819
  • 點閱點閱:13
     清代史家崔述生於考證大興的乾嘉時期,其傾畢生心力所著的「考信錄」是部辨 偽上古史事的史學名著。他甚於「尊經衛道」的理念,秉持「考信於六藝」的原則,長期孤 寂地對古代的文獻從事考證的工作,因而揭露古書記載的錯誤、矛盾,對於釐清上古史事的 真相有很大的貢獻。但由於他疑古太過,反難容於當時的學者,被視之為離經叛道、誣聖蔑 道,致其作品遭受長達百年的冷落,直到民初他的研究價值才受到學者的肯定、稱許,被視 為「疑古先驅」。儘管崔述因尊儒的立場過於濃厚,不免使其論斷流於主觀的弊病,但其鍥 而不捨、勇於懷疑的治史氣魄,仍值得後世習史者學習效尤。
     Tsuei Shu (1740-1816) was a lonely historian in Ching Dynasty, and the most famous of his works was "Kau Chin Lu", which he ispected historial events in Chinese ancient time. He respected Confucianism and their classics, but, when he found the classics was misunderstood, he decided to clear them. He spent almost 30 years to write this book. He analyzed the content of many ancient documents, appointed their mistakes, and researched the real facts of ancient history. Because he doubted dosuments too much, his viewpoints could not received by Ching's scholars. Therefore, this book had been neglected for hundred years. Until 1920s, Tsuei Shu's textual research was revalued, and "Kau Chin Lu" became the famous book which many scholars were eager to read. In fact, the demonstaction of Tsuei Shu is not correct completely for his subjective judgement, and the content of this book is still controversial. Although his study has some faults, his spirit of working with perseverance and daring to doubt authoritative statements is the model for later historical learners.
期刊論文
1.王健文(19921200)。一個寂寞的史學家--典範變遷中的崔述。國立成功大學歷史學報,18,153-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王仲孚(19870600)。顧頡剛的古史研究與著述。歷史學報,15,351-387。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.路新生(19920900)。崔述與顧頡剛。孔孟學報,64,135-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陶懋柄(1984)。崔述「考信錄」初探。史學史研究,1。  延伸查詢new window
5.趙光賢(1991)。崔述在古史辨偽上的貢獻和局限。史學史研究,2,33。  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇慶彬(1961)。閻若璩胡渭崔述三家辨偽方法之研究。新亞書院學術年刊,3,26-38。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳廖安(19871200)。崔東壁與石屏朱、陳師弟遇合之行誼。孔孟月刊,26(4)=304,29-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.錢穆(1974)。讀崔述洙泗考信錄。綜合月刊,72,125。  延伸查詢new window
9.周億孚(1983)。清代崔述的史學。珠海學報,5,315。  延伸查詢new window
10.邵東方(1994)。崔述學術中的幾個問題。中國文化,9,107。  延伸查詢new window
11.謝金美(1985)。崔東壁著作提要及諸家評論。臺南詩專學報,18,42。  延伸查詢new window
12.路新生(1987)。論崔述的超家派治學解經法。江淮論壇,1987(4),97。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.孫劍秋(1992)。清代漢學形成原因綜論。高雄。26。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.高瑞穗(1975)。崔述與疑古史學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李景瑜(1985)。崔述讀風偶識之研究(碩士論文)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.梁啟超(1963)。古書真偽及其年代。古書真偽及其年代。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.呂思勉(1987)。論學集林。上海。  延伸查詢new window
3.顧頡剛。評論續輯。  延伸查詢new window
4.彭明輝(1991)。疑古思想與中國史學的發展。疑古思想與中國史學的發展。  延伸查詢new window
5.梁啟超(1966)。中國近三百年學術史。中國近三百年學術史。沒有紀錄:中華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.史革新(1994)。晚清理學研究。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Schneider, Laurence A.、梅寅生(1984)。顧頡剛與中國新史學。臺北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.李紀祥(1992)。明末清初儒學之發展。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.林慶彰(1990)。清初的群經辨偽學。文津出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王汎森(19870000)。古史辨運動的興起:一個思想史的分析。臺北:允晨。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.梁園東(1979)。古史辨的史學方法商榷。中國上古史論文選集(上冊)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.林慶彰(1981)。實證精神的尋求─明清考據學的發展。浩瀚的學海。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.謝金美(1985)。崔東壁及其洙泗考信錄研究。崔東壁及其洙泗考信錄研究。  延伸查詢new window
14.崔述。商考信錄。  延伸查詢new window
15.(1975)。清崔東壁先生述年譜。清崔東壁先生述年譜。  延伸查詢new window
16.顧頡剛。古史辨(第一冊)。古史辨(第一冊)。  延伸查詢new window
17.杜正勝(1979)。導論─中國上古史研究的一些關鍵問題。中國上古史論文選集(上冊)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)崔述。考古續說。  延伸查詢new window
2.那珂通世。序目。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)崔述。考信錄。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)崔述。無聞集。  延伸查詢new window
5.(清)崔述。洙泗考信餘錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.〈清〉陳履和。傳狀。  延伸查詢new window
7.胡適。科學的古史家崔述。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)崔述。風鎬考信錄。  延伸查詢new window
9.(清)崔述。夏考信錄。  延伸查詢new window
10.補上古考信錄。  延伸查詢new window
11.(清)崔述。孟子事實錄。  延伸查詢new window
12.(清)崔述。唐虞考信錄。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE