:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:後設認知理論對數學解題教學的啟示
書刊名:教育研究資訊
作者:涂金堂
作者(外文):Yu, Gin-tong
出版日期:1999
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁122-137
主題關鍵詞:後設認知數學解題MetacognitionMathematical problem solving
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:28
     數學解題是目前世界各國數學教育的重心,各國的數學課程都強調數學的解題活動。而數學解題的成功與否,除了是否具備足夠的數學知識外,解題者在解題時所表現的後設認知行為,亦是一個重要的關鍵。因此,本文旨在闡明後設認知與數學解題的關係,以及後設認知理論對數學解題教學的啟示。
期刊論文
1.Garofalo, J.、Lester, F. K. Jr.(1985)。Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,16(3),163-176。  new window
2.譚寧君(19920600)。兒童數學態度與解題能力之分析探討。臺北師院學報,5,619-687。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡文煥(19880600)。認知心理學對數學解決問題教學的一些提示。國教世紀,23(6),31-39。  延伸查詢new window
4.汪榮才(19900900)。Metacognitive Behaviors in Mathematical Problem Solving in Gifted and Average Sixth Grade Students。初等教育學報,3,199-243。new window  new window
5.Cardelle, E. M.(1995)。Effects of metacognitive instruction on low achievers in mathematics problems。Teaching & Teacher Education,11,81-95。  new window
6.Chi, M. T. H.、Feltovich, P. J.、Glaser, R.(1981)。Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices。Cognitive Psychology,18,293-328。  new window
7.Kotovsky, K.、Hayes, J. R.、Simon, A.(1985)。Why are some problem hare? Evidence from the tower of Hanoi。Cognitive psychology,17,248-294。  new window
8.陳李綢(19920600)。國小男女生後設認知能力與數學作業表現的關係研究。教育心理學報,25,97-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.林清山、張景媛(19930700)。國中生後設認知、動機信念與數學解題策略之關係研究。教育心理學報,26,53-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李靜瑤(1994)。高雄市國二學生數學解題歷程之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pan, H. M.(1993)。A study of Metacognitive behaviors in mathematical problem solving of older elementary school students in Taiwan, the republic of China(博士論文)。Northern Colorado University。  new window
3.Gibson, L. S.(1991)。The effects of modeling multiplication on the conceptual understanding of the operation and its application to word problem-solving performance of third grade students(博士論文)。Temple University。  new window
4.Hazel, K. C.(1984)。The effect of metacognitive strategies upon mathematical problem-solving ability(博士論文)。Pittsburg State University。  new window
5.Kiser, S. S.(1989)。Logo programming, metacognition skills in mathematical problem-solving, and mathematics achievement(博士論文)。North Carolina University。  new window
6.Tougan, P. W.(1993)。A study of the effect of using an ‘open approach' to teaching mathematics upon the mathematical problem-solving behaviors of secondary school students(博士論文)。Southern Illinois University,Carbondale。  new window
7.Wilburne, J. M.(1997)。The effect of teaching metacognition strategies to preservice elementary school teachers on their mathematical problem-solving achievement and attitude(博士論文)。Temple University。  new window
8.Paik, S. Y.(1991)。Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving in Mathematics: individual differences in the use and metacognitive process(博士論文)。Temple University。  new window
圖書
1.Pólya, George(1945)。How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Sternberg, R. J.(1996)。Cognitive psychology。Fort Worth, TX:Orlando, FL:Harcourt Brace Colledge Publishers。  new window
3.劉錫麒(1997)。數學思考教學研究。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Mason, J.、Burton, L.、Stacey, K.(1989)。Thinking mathematically。Workingham:Addison-Wesley。  new window
5.Hayes, J. R.(1989)。The complete problem solver。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
6.Schoenfeld, A. H.(1985)。Mathematical problem solving。Orlando, Florida。  new window
7.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989)。Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics。Reston, VA:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
8.Mayer, Richard E.(1992)。Thinking, problem solving, cognition。W. H. Freeman and Company:Times Books:Henry Holt & Company。  new window
單篇論文
1.Lester, K. F.(1989)。The role of metacogniton in mathematical problem solving: A study of two grade seven classes(ED 281 758)。  new window
2.Wong, S. K. P.(1989)。Students' metacognition in mathematical problem solving(ED 328 438)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lester, F. K.(1985)。Methodological consideration in research on mathematical problem solving instruction。Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbum Associates。  new window
2.Lester, K. F.(1980)。Research on mathematical problem solving。Research in mathematics educations。Reston, VA:The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics。  new window
3.National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1980)。Problem solving be the focus of school mathematical in the 1980's。An agenda for action。Palo Alto, CA:Dale Seymour Publications。  new window
4.Flavell, J. H.(1987)。Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition。Metacognition, motivation, and understanding。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Flavell, J. H.(1976)。Metacognition Aspects of problem-solving。The nature of intelligence。Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum。  new window
6.Lester, F. K.(1983)。Trends and issues in mathematical problem-solving research。Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes。New York:Academic Press。  new window
7.林本喬(1995)。後設認知的學習策略。學習輔導。台北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Flavell, J. H.、Wellman, H.(1997)。Metamemory。Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition。Hillsdale, N. J:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
9.Kilpatrick, J.(1985)。A retrospective account of the past 25 years of research on teaching mathematical problem solving。Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives。Hillsdale, N.J:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
10.Brown, A. L.(1987)。Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms。Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
11.Romberg, T. A.、Carpenter, T. P.(1986)。Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry。Handbook of research on teaching。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
12.Wittrock, M. C.(1986)。Students' thought process。Hand-book of research on teaching。New York:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE