:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:教師專業成長之個案研究:一位國中自然教師探究教學觀點的轉變
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:陳均伊 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Jun-yi
出版日期:2010
卷期:55:2
頁次:頁233-264
主題關鍵詞:科學探究探究教學專業成長Scientific inquiryInquiry teachingProfessional development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:107
摘要: 本研究為個案研究,採開放編碼進行資料分析,探討專業成長情境中一位國中自然教師對於探究教學觀點的轉變,以及專業成長情境對其轉變的成效。蒐集會議錄影、問卷、訪談、課室觀察與文件等資料,發現個案教師在參與專業成長計畫初期,認為探究教學的實施必須是開放、具有固定程序,進行科展是最佳策略。歷經專業成長計畫的參與,個案教師對於探究教學的觀點產生轉變,認為探究教學具有不同的開放程度與實施方式,課前體驗活動能有效解決時間不足的問題,惟,科學本質仍受到忽略。在專業成長情境中,合作、對話、反思是促進教師專業發展的重要元素,影響個案教師產生轉變的策略有:閱讀具有實例的文獻、撰寫與討論教案、教學觀摩等。
Abstract: This case study was conducted as part of a professional development project. A science teacher’s views on inquiry teaching and the effect of this professional development project were investigated. The data included meeting records, an open-ended questionnaire, formal and informal interviews, classroom observations and artifacts. The method of open coding was adopted to analyze the data. It was found that the case teacher thought that inquiry teaching had to be open-ended and initially include routine procedures. She indicated that the science fair was the only way to implement inquiry teaching in schools. After participating in this professional development project, she interpreted inquiry teaching in a more flexible and extensive manner. Activities before classes were planned to increase teaching efficiency. However, the subject’s inquiry teaching had a weak relationship with the nature of science. Collaboration, discussion and review were viewed as critical elements of professional development. Case discussion, lesson plan writing and discussion as well as field observations were effective ways to improve the case teacher’s views of inquiry teaching.
期刊論文
1.Marx, R. W.、Blumenfeld, P. C.、Krajcik, J. S.、Fishman, B.、Soloway, E.、Geier, R.、Tal, R. T.(2004)。Inquiry-based science in middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(10),1063-1080。  new window
2.林淑梤、張惠博、段曉林(20090300)。促進實習教師教學學習的夥伴式實習輔導。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),23-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Haney, J. J.、Czerniak, C. M.、Lumpe, A. T.(1996)。Teacher Beliefs and Intentions Regarding the Implementation of Science Education Reform Strands。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33(9),971-993。  new window
4.Pataray-Ching, J.、Roberson, M.(2002)。Misconceptions about a curriculum-as-inquiry framework。Language Arts,79(6),498-505。  new window
5.Lederman, N. G.、Abd-El-Khalick, F.、Bell, R. L.、Schwartz, R. S.(2002)。Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(6),497-521。  new window
6.Roehrig, G. H.、Luft, J. A.(2004)。Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons。International Journal of Science Education,26(1),3-24。  new window
7.張清濱(20000500)。探究教學法。師友月刊,395,45-49。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kanari, Z.、Millar, R.(2004)。Reasoning from data: How students collect and interpret data in science investigations。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41(7),748-769。  new window
9.Hiebert, J.、Carpenter, T. P.、Fennema, E.、Fuson, K.、Human, P.、Murray, H.、Olivier, A.、Wearne, D.(1996)。Problem solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics。Educational Researcher,25(4),12-21。  new window
10.蘇素慧、詹勳國(20050400)。實施九年一貫課程後國小教師數學教學信念與行為之研究。師大學報. 教育類,50(1),27-51。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Wee, B.、Shepardson, D.、Fast, J.、Harbor, J.(2007)。Teaching and Learning About Inquiry: Insights and Challenges in Professional Development。Journal of Science Teacher Education,18(1),63-89。  new window
12.Lavonen, J.、Jauhiainen, J.、Koponen, I. T.、Kurki-Suonio, K.(2004)。Effect of a long-term in-service training program on teachers' beliefs about the role of experiments in physics education。International Journal of Science Education,26(3),309-328。  new window
13.Van Driel, J. H.、Beijaard, D.、Verloop, N.(2001)。Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(2),137-158。  new window
14.Keys, Carolyn W.、Bryan, Lynn A.(2001)。Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,38(6),631-645。  new window
15.Martin-Hansen, Lisa M.(2002)。Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom。Science Teacher,69(2),34-37。  new window
16.Gibson, H. L.、Chase, C.(2002)。Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science。Science Education,86(5),693-705。  new window
17.Jeanpierre, B.、Oberhauser, K.、Freeman, C.(2005)。Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(6),668-690。  new window
18.Driver, R.、Asoko, H.、Leach, J.、Mortimer, E.、Scott, P.(1994)。Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom。Educational Researcher,23(7),5-12。  new window
19.楊巧玲(20080400)。教育改革對教師專業認同之影響:五位國中資深教師的探索性研究。師大學報. 教育類,53(1),25-54。  延伸查詢new window
20.黃鴻博(20000600)。兒童科學探究活動遭遇問題的探討。臺中師院學報,14,389-409。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A.,、Lederman, N. G.(2003)。Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40,487-509。  new window
22.Byers, A.,、Fitzgerald, M. A.(2002)。Networking for leadership, inquiry and systemic thinking: A new approach to inquiry-based learning。Journal of Science Education and Technology,11,81-91。  new window
23.Crawford, B. A.(2000)。Embracing the essence of inquiring: New role for science teachers。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(9),916-937。  new window
24.Crawford, B. A.(2007)。Learning to teach science as inquiry as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44,613-642。  new window
25.Dunkhase, J. A.(2003)。Coupled-inquiry cycle: A teacher concerns-based model for effective student inquiry。Science Educator,12,10-15。  new window
26.Furtak, E. M.(2006)。The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching。Science Education,90,452-467。  new window
27.Gengarelly, L. M.、Abrams, E. D.(2009)。Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and the secondary science classroom。Journal of Science Education and Technology,18,74-84。  new window
28.Howes, E. V., Lim, M.,、Campos, J.(2009)。Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study.。Science Education,93,189-217。  new window
29.Khishfe, R.,、Abd-El-Khalick, F.(2002)。Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39,551-578。  new window
30.Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P.,、Enders, C.(2004)。Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41,1021-1043。  new window
31.Lotter, C.、Harwood, W. S.、Bonner, J. J.(2007)。The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44,1318-1347。  new window
32.Oliver-Hoyo, M., Allen, D.,、Anderson, M.(2004)。Inquiry-guided instruction: Practical issues of implementation。Journal of College Science Teaching,33(6),20-24。  new window
33.Radford, D. L.(1998)。Transferring theory into practice: A model for professional development for science education reform。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,35(1),73-88。  new window
34.Sandoval, W. A.,、Morrison, K.(2003)。High school students’ ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40,369-392。  new window
35.Schwartz, R. S.,、Lederman, N. G.,(2008)。What scientists say: Scientists’ views of nature of science and relation to science context。International Journal of Science Education,30,727-771。  new window
36.Sweeney, A. E., Bula, O. A.,、Cornett, J. W.(2001)。The role of personal practice theories in the professional development of a beginning high school chemistry teacher。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38,408-441。  new window
37.Thakkar, U., Bruce, B. C., Hogan, M. P.,、Williamson, J.(2001)。Extending literacy through participation in new technologies.。Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,,45,,212-219。  new window
會議論文
1.Gerber, B. L., Price, C., Barnes, M., Hinkle, V., Barnes, L., Gordon, P. et al.(2003)。Excellence in rural science teaching: Examining elements of professional development models。Philadelphia, PA.。  new window
2.Reiff, R., Harwood, W. S.,、Phillipson, T.(2002)。A scientific method based upon research scientists’ conceptions of scientific inquiry.。Charlotte, NC.。  new window
3.Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., Khishfe, R., Lederman, J. S., Matthews, L.,、Liu, S. Y.(2002)。Explicit/reflective instructional attention to nature of science and scientific inquiry: Impact on student learning。Charlotte, NC.。  new window
4.Shymansky, J. A.(2008)。Teachers helping teachers teach science inquiry: The “just ask” project。Taipei, Taiwan.。  new window
5.Thompson, S. L.(2003)。Development of a framework to measure science teachers’ inquiry perceptions and practices.。the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science,(會議日期: 200301)。St. Louis, MO.。  new window
6.Trautmann, N., MaKinster, J.,、Avery, L.(2004)。What makes inquiry so hard? (And why is it worth it?)。Vancouver, BC, Canada.。  new window
學位論文
1.蘇麗涼(2002)。國中理化實施探究導向教學對學生學習成效影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Merriam, S. B.(1998)。Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach。Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
2.Trowbridge, L. W.、Bybee, R. W.(1990)。Becoming a secondary school science teacher。New York:Merrill。  new window
3.Hinrichsen, J.,、Jarrett, D.(1999)。Science inquiry for the classroom: A literature review。Portland, OR:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory。  new window
4.Loucks-Horsley, S.、Hewson, P. W.、Love, N.、Stiles, K. E.(1998)。Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics。Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press, Inc.。  new window
5.Minstrell, J.、van Zee, E. H.(2000)。Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science。Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science。  new window
6.教育部(2003)。科學教育白皮書。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
8.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
9.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993)。Benchmarks for science literacy。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1989)。Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report on scientific literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology.。Washington, DC。  new window
11.Carin, A. A., Bass, J. E.,、Contant, T. L.(2005)。Teaching science as inquiry (10th ed.)。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
12.Hanson, D. M.(2005)。Designing process-oriented guided-inquiry activities。Faculty guidebook: A comprehensive tool for improving faculty performance。Lisle, IL。  new window
13.Morine-Dershimer, G.,、Kent, T.(1999)。The complex nature and sources of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge。Examining pedagogical content knowledge。Dordrecht, the Netherlands:。  new window
14.Putnam, R. T.,、Borko, H.(1997)。Teacher learning: Implications of the new view of cognition。The international handbook of teachers and teaching。Dordrecht, the Netherlands。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程總綱綱要,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Kemmis, S.(1988)。Action research。Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook。Oxford:Pergamon Press。  new window
2.Marx, R. W.、Freeman, J. G.、Krajcik, J. S.、Blumenfeld, P. C.(1998)。Professional development of science teachers。International handbook of science education。Kluwer。  new window
3.Settlage, J.(2007)。Moving past a belief in inquiry as a pedagogy: Implications for teacher knowledge。Inquiry in the classroom: Realities and opportunities。Charlotte, NC:Information Age。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE