:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:安身立命於無以為(國)家:泰緬邊境克倫難民的民族主義
作者:趙中麒
作者(外文):Chung-chi, Chao
校院名稱:臺灣大學
系所名稱:社會學研究所
指導教授:張茂桂
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:national order of things克倫領土的延伸流離失所的社會性文化社會性記憶同時性national order of thingsextension of Karen territorydisplaced societal Culturesocial memorysimultaneity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
現代世界是由享有主權的民族國家所構成,並一直被視為是一種自然的、全球性的national order of things。在此秩序中,所有人都被預期屬於某個國家。但,跨國界難民不屬於任何國家,他們是對此秩序的污染。國際援助組織針對難民的救援行動,希望使難民離開兩國之間的邊界。這種行動,目的在穩定既有的national order of things。不過,對某些類型的難民來說,他們有他們自己的方式去重新界定這個national order of things。難民的民族主義運動即是一例。
自緬甸獨立後,便陷入長期內戰。現在,共有超過14萬的克倫難民被暫時安置在泰緬邊境。在淪為難民之前,他們透過民族主義運動重新界定national order of things;在淪為難民之後,他們仍然堅持他們的民族運動。在本文中,我以Anthony Smith的族群符號論為途徑,以理解克倫難民為何堅持其民族主義,以及在流離失所狀態下如何透過文化、歷史與記憶等符號的使用與詮釋,以延續此民族主義運動。
克倫族堅持其民族主義,是源於其神話中對理想國的預示。他們的理想國是一個美麗的、和平的Kawthoolei。為了實現理想國,在流離失所狀態下,他們利用機會,讓難民營成為克倫領地的延伸(extension of Karen territory),並在其中建立他們的社會性文化。因為社會性文化是一個根於領土上的文化。在這個不是真正的領土中所建立的社會性文化,稱之流離失所的社會性文化(displaced societal culture)。為了有效凝聚難民們的民族歸屬意識,革命組織透過各種組織性的活動、民族主義符號的使用,以及集體性社會記憶(social memory)之建構,來動員群眾。不過,群眾並非被動地被動員,他們也透過自發性的活動來凝聚彼此的民族情感。甚至,流離失所這個狀態本身,也成為一種激發民族主義意識的力量。社會性文化中的各種符號,創造出一種同時性(simultaneity),讓所有難民在同一時間內,共同承載相同的記憶與經驗。
克倫難民堅持其民族運動的力量,是來自於一個詮釋並理解過去歷史、當前苦難與未來希望的信念體系。這個信念體系,一方面是根源於他們的神話中對於理想國的預示,一方面則是構築在日常性的生活實踐之上。於是,民族主義,就克倫難民來說,不是某些理論家所說的國家擘畫,而是一些與日常生活及制度安排盤根錯節在一起的社會實踐。
The contemporary world consists of sovereign countries. It has been perceived as a globally accepted national order of things. The global order prescribes that all people must belong to a particular country. However, cross-border’s refugees do not belong to any countries. If they are resulted from communal war, the nationalist movement will also exist among them. The nationalism among Karen refugees is one of the most obvious examples.
Before degraded into refugees, the Karen launched their nationalist movement in their land to politically territorialize the land. However, as refugees, they are fenced in refugee camps locating in Thailand rather than freely living in their homeland. They can not use the camps as the base to launch counterattack. But, they still to the greatest extent make use of the situation facing them to continue the struggle. In some condition, the displacement even becomes a force useful for their nationalism.
Nationalism is a movement to territorialize the space belonging to particular national community. The KNU attempts to continually territorialize their homeland through hard and soft struggles. The former is proceeded with by deploying landmines and strategic fighting while the latter is processed through political alignment, humanitarian programs, and human right campaigns. Refugee camps are in Thai soil rather than in Karen land. Therefore, such kind of territorialization seems not possible to exist in the camps. Yet, because of a tacit consensus existing between the KNU and Thai authorities, the camps to a certain degree are transformed into a extension of Karen territory. Within the extension of territory, refugees even build their displaced societal culture.
The societal culture is built by various daily practices. With practicing the various daily activities, the experiences of running away from homeland as well as the collective memories of the unsuccessful revolution are internalized and become the fabrics of the camps. Living in such fabrics, Karen refugees use various activities, including economic and socio-cultural, as well as organizational and non-organizational, to re/forge their national consciousness and to inspire people’s blood loyalty toward their struggle.
Because refugees are fenced in the designated spaces, not only displacement but also fencedness constitutes the inner feature of refugees’ societal culture. The reality and experiences of displacement and fencedness, through these activities, are continually used to re/forge Karen refugees’ national belonging. As a result, Karen nationalism in refugee camps becomes practices processed in everyday life. The most important is, through the daily practices, their relation to homeland is linked up. Consequently, refugees are symbolically “restored” to their aspired homeland.
Nationalism always places the potential or real nation at the centre of its concerns and seeks to promote its autonomy, unity and/or identity by pursuing an ideal kingdom. Such an ideal kingdom is the ultimate goal aspired by the members of particular nation. Karen nationalism also has an imagination of the utopia. Yet, a unanimous perspective on how to reach the expected new world had never existed in Karen history. Fortunately, probably after been refugees for over 20 years, the KNU eventually has a blueprint for realizing the ideal kingdom. It is the pursuit of a democratic federal Burma. However, such a blueprint does not acquire unanimity from the Karen. Notwithstanding, Karen refugees still stand with the KNU.
For a belief that one day "going back to live in the aspired Kawthoolei with dignity" is not merely a dream, they thus still support the KNU and their nationalism. Where does the notion derive from? The notion is firmly rooted in their past and a system of interpretation of their present plights and prospective happiness. Nationalism in this regard is defining social practices interwoven with people’s daily lives and institutional arrangements in defiance against the adversaries surrounding them.
Anderson, Benedict
1999 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Extended edition. London: Verso.
Andersen, Kirsten Ewers
1981 “Two Indigenous Karen Religious Denominations,” in Folk. Vol. 23: 252-261.
Appadurai, Arjun
2000 “The Grounds of the Nation-State: Identity, Violence and Territory,” in Kjell Goldmann, Ulf Hannerz and Charles Westin eds., Nationalism and Internationalism in the Post-Cold War Era. Pp. 129-142. London: Routledge.
2006 Fear of Small N umbers: An Essay on the Geography of Anger. Durham: Duke University Press.
Arnold, Dennis and Kevin Hewison
2005 “Exploitation in Global Supply Chains: Burmese Workers in Mae Sot,” in Journal of Contemporary Asia. Vol. S5-3: 319-340.
Armstrong, J.
1982 Nations before Nationalism. Chapel Hill: University of Chicago Press.
Aung Hla, Saw
2004 The Loyal Karen in Burma History. Mae Sot: Kwae K Aung National Books Store.
Ba Saw Khin
1999 Fifty Years of Struggle: Review of the Fight for a Karen State.
Bar-Tar, Daniel
2003 “Collective Memory of Physical Violence: Its Contribution to the Culture of Violence,” in Ed Cairns and Micheal D. Roe eds., The Role of Memory in Ethnic Conflict. Pp. 77-93. New York: Macmillan.
Breuilly, John
1996 “Approaches to Nationalism,” in Gopal Balakrishnan ed., Mapping the Nation. Pp: 146-174. London: Verso.
Brown, Michael E.
2001 “The Causes of Internal Conflict: An Overview,” in Michael E. Brown, Owen R. Cote Jr., Sean M. Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller eds., Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict. Pp. 3-25. London: The MIT Press.
Burma Lawyer’s Council (BLC)
2007 Analysis on the Situation of the Refugee Camps: From the Rule of Law Perspective.
Cassese, Antonio
1996 Self-determination of People. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Catt, Helena and Michael Murphy
2002 Sub-State Nationalism: A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Design. New York: Routledge .
Cheesman, Nick
2002 “Seeing ‘Karen’ in the Union of Mynmar,” in Asian Ethniciy. Vol. 3 (2): 199-220.
Christie, Clive
2000 “The Karens: Loyalism and Self-Determination,” in Jean Michaud ed., Turbulent Times and Enduring Peoples: Mountain Minorities in the Southeast Asian Massif. Pp. 99-122. Surrey: Curzon Press.
Connor, Walker
1994 Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Coronil, Fernando
1995 “Rational Nationalism: The Passionate Nationalism of Rational Choice,” in John L. Comaroff and Paul C. Stern eds., Perspectives on Nationalism and War. Pp. 123-134. Luxembourg: Gordon and Beach Publishers.
Crisp, Jeff
2004 “The Local Integration and Local Settlement of Refugees: A Conceptual and Historical Analysis,” New Issues on Refugee Research, Working Paper No 102. Published by UNHCR.
Cross, E. B.
1854 “On The Karens,” in Journal of the American Oriental Society. Vol. 4: 289-316.
Decha, Tangseefa
2003 Imperceptible Naked-Lives & Atrocities Forcibly Displaced Peoples & The Thai-Burmese In-Between Spaces. Ph. D. Disertation, Graduate Division of the University of Hawai’i.
Devine-Wright, Patrick
2003 “A Theoretical Overview of Memory and Conflict,” in Ed Cairns and Micheal D. Roe eds., The Role of Memory in Ethnic Conflict. Pp. 9-34. New York: Macmillan.
Donnan, Hastings and Thomas M. Wilson
2001 Borders: Frontiers of Identity, Nation and State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duara, Prasenjit
1996 “Historicizing National Identity, or Who imagine What and When,” in Geoff Eley and Ronald Grigor Suny eds., Becoming National: A Reader. Pp. 151-177. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dun, Smith
1980 Memoirs of The Four-Foot Colonel. New York: Cornell University
Elshtain, Jean Bethke
1993 “Sovereignty, Identity, Sacrifice,” in Marjorie Ringrose and Adam J. Lerner eds., Rethinking the Nation. Pp. 159-175. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Entessar, Nader
1992 Kurdish Ethnonationalism. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Falla, Jonathan
1991 True Love and Bartholomew: Rebels on the Burmese Border. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fink, Christina
2001 “Introduction,” in San C. Po, Burma and the Karens. Pp. ix-xlvi. Bangkok: White Lotus.
Fong, Jack
2005 Employing the Ethnodevelopment Model to Analyze Karen Self-Determination between 1949 and 2005. Ph. D. Dissertation in Sociology, University of California Santa Cruz.
Furnivall, J. S.
1956 Colonial policy and practice : a comparative study of Burma and Netherlands India. New York : New York University Press.
Gans, Chaim
2003 The Limits of Nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gellner, Ernest
1983 Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Giddens, Anthony
1984 The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goodwin-Gill, Guy S.
2002 The Refugee in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gravers, Mikael
1996 “The Karen Making of a Nation,” in Stein Tonnesson and Hans Antlov eds., Asian Forms of Nation. Pp. 237-269. Richmond: Curzon Press.
1999 Nationalism as Political Paranoia in Burma: An Essay on the Historical Practice of Power. Richmond: Curzon Press.
2001 “Cosmology, Prophets, and Rebellion Among the Buddhist Karen in Burma and Thailand,” in Moussons. 4:3-31.
2007 “Conversion and Identity: Religion and the Formation of Karen Ethnic Identity in Burma,” in Mikael Gravers ed., Ethic Diversity in Burma. Pp. 227-258. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
Green, Margaret, Karen Jacobsen and Sandee Pyne
2008 “Invisible in Thailand: Documenting the Need for Protection,” in Force Migration Rivew. Vol. 30:31-33.
Guibernau, Montserrat
1999 Nations without States: Political Communities in a global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Guyot, Dorothy Hess
1978 “Communal Conflict in the Burma Delta,” in Ruth T. Mcvey ed., Southeast Asia Transitions: Approach through Social History. Pp. 191-234. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hannum, Hurts
1992 Autonomy, Sovereignty, and Self-determination: The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hayami, Yoko
2004 Between Hills and Plains: Power and Practice in Socio-Religious Dynamics among Karen. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.
Hayes, Carlton J. H.
1960 Nationalism: A Religion. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Hobsbawm, Eric
1990 Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Human Right Watch (HRW)
2004 Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Policy Toward Burmese Refugees and Migrants. Vol 16, No 2 (C).
Hutchinson, John
2001 “Nations and Culture,” in Montserrat Guibernau and John Hutchinson eds., Understanding Nationalism. Pp. 74-96. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hyndman, Jennifer
2000 Management Displacement: Refugees and the Politics of Humanitarian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ignatieff, Michael
1993 Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism. London: BBC Books.
Karen National Union (KNU)
2000 The Karens and Their Struggle for Freedom.
Karen Refugee Committee (KRC)
2006 The Manifesto of Karen Refugees in Search for Freedom and Justice.
Karen Rivers Watch (KRW)
2004 Burma Army Atrocities Pave the Way for Salween Dams in Karen State.
Karen Youth Organization (KYO)
ND The introduction of Karen Youth Organization Central.
Karen Women Organization (KWO)
2004 Shattering Silences: Karen Women Speak Out about the Burmese Military Regime’s Use of Rape as a Strategy of War in Karen State.
Kedourie, Elie
1994 “Nationalism and Self-Determination,” in John Hutchinson and Anthony Smith eds., Pp. 49-54. Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kengkunchorn, Aranya
2006 An Assessment of the Needs for Higher Education of Karen Refugees along the Thai-Myanmar Border: A Case of Nu Po Camp. Master Thesis, Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.
Kenney, William Howland
1999 Recorded Music in American Life: The Phonograph and Popular Memory, 1890-1945. New York: Oxford University Press.
Keyes, Charles
1977 The Golden Peninsula: Culture and Adaption in Mainland Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Klein, Harold E.
ND The Karen People of Burma: Their Search for Freedom and Justice.
Krasner, Stephen D.
1999 Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kratoska, Paul H.
2002 “The Karen of Burma under Japanese Rule,” in Paul H. Kratoska ed., Southeast Asian Minorities in Wartime Japanese Empire. London: Routledge Curzon.
Kunstadter, Peter
1979 “Ethnic Group, Category, and Identity: Karen in Northern Thailand,” in Charles F. Keyes ed., Ethnic Adaptation and Identity. Pp. 119-164. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
Kwanchewan, Buadaeng
2007a “Letters of Contestation: Leke Religious Cults of the Karens in Thailand and Myanmar,” paper presented at a special seminar organized at the center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University. 23rd of March.
2007b “Ethnic Identities of the Karen Peoples in Burma and Thailand,” in James L. Peacock, Patricia M. Thornton and Patrick G. Inman eds., Identity Matters: Ethnic and Sectarian Conflict. Pp. 73-97.Oxford: Berghabn Books.
Kymlicka, Will
1996 Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lake, David A. and Donald Rothchild
2001 “Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict,” in Michael E. Brown, Owen R. Cote Jr., Sean M. Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller eds., Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict. Pp. 126-162. London: The MIT Press.
Lang, Hazel J.
2002 Fear and Sanctuary: Burmese Refugees in Thailand. New York: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Cornell University.
Lebar, Frank M., Gerald C. Hickey and John K. Musgrave
1964 Ethnic Groups of Mainland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Human Relations Area Files Press.
Lee, Sang Kook
2001 The Adaptation and Identities of the Karen Refugees: A Case Study of Mae
La Refugee Camp in Northern Thailand. Master Thesis, Southeast Asian Study, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Korea.
2004 “Karen Refugees, Refugee Camps and Inter-connections in the Thailand-Burma Borderlands,” paper presented at International conference on “Impact of Globalization, Regionalism and Nationalism on Minority Peoples in Southeast Asia,” on 15-17 November, Chiang Mai.
Lian, H. Sakhong
2006 Peaceful Co-Existence: Towards Federal Union of Burma (Series No. 12) Policy Papers, Letters and Statements. Chiang Mai: UNLD Press.
Mae La Refugee Elders
AD The Allegation: British Betrayal Trust. The Relationship between Karen and British Government and the Historical Journey of Karen-Burman Smoldering Racial Conflicts British.
Malkki, Liisa H.
1995 Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory, and National Cosmology among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. London: University of Chicago Press.
1997 “National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity among Scholars and Refugees,” in Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson eds., Culture, Power and Place: Exploration in Critical Anthropology. Pp. 52-74. London: Duke University Press.
Marlowe, David H.
1979“In the Mosaic: The Cognitive and Structure Aspects of Karen-Other
Relationships,” in Charles F. Keyes ed., Ethnic Adaptation and Identity. Pp, 165-214. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
Marshall, Harry Ignatius
1922/1997 The Karen People of Burma: A Study in Anthropology and Ethnology. Bangkok: White Lotus.
Martin, Susan F., Patricia W. Fagen, Kari Jorgensen, Lydia Mann-Bondat, and Andrew Schoenholtz
2005 The Uprooted: Improving Humanitarian Responses to Forced Migration. Toronto: Lexington Books.
Mason, Francis
1884 The Karen Apostle, Or Memoir of Ko Thah Byu, the First Karen Convert with Notices Concerning His Nation. Bassein: Sgau Karen Press.
McMahon, A. R.
1876 The Karens: Golden Chersonese. London: Harrison, 59, Pall Mall.
Mellor, David and Di Bretherton
2003 “Reconciliation between Black and White Australia: the Role of Social Memory,” in Ed Cairns and Micheal D. Roe eds., The Role of Memory in Ethnic Conflict. Pp. 37-54. New York: Macmillan.
Miller, David
1995 On Nationality. Oxfrod: Clarendon Press.
Moore, Margaret
2001 The Ethnics of Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Musgrave, Thomas
1997 Self-determination and National Minorities. London: Oxford University Press.
Paasi, Anssi
2005 “The Changing Discourse on Political Boundaries: Mapping the Backgrounds, Contexts and Contents,” in Henk van Houtum, Oliver Kramsch and Wolfgang Zierhofer eds., B/ordering Space. Pp. 17-32. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Raja, Ananda
1993 “Transformations of Karen Myths of Origin and Relations of Power,” in Gehan Wijeyewardene and E. C. Chapman (eds), Patterns and Illusions: Thai History and Thought. Pp. 235-274.Camberra: The Richard Davis Fund.
2002 “A ‘Nation of Intent’ in Burma: Karen ethno-nationalism, nationalism and narrations of nation,” in The Pacific Review. Vol. 15 (4): 517-537.
Randall, Annie J.
2005 Music, Power, and Politics. New York: Routledge.
Renard, Ronald D.
1980 Kariang: History of Karen-T’ai Relations From The Beginning to 1923. Ph. D. Dissertation, Graduate Division of the University of Hawaii.
1990 “The Karen Rebellion in Burma,” in Ralph R. Premdas, S. W. R. de A. Samarasinghe and Alan B. Anderson eds., Secessionist Movements in Comparative Perspective. Pp. 93-110. London: Pinter Publishers.
Rogers, Benedict
2004 A Land Without Evil: Stopping the Genocide of Burma’s Karen People. Oxford: Monarch Books.
Rolley, Mika
1980 “The Karens fight for Peace.”
Ross, Marc Hoeard
1997 “Cultural and Identity in Comparative Political Analysis,” in Marc Hoeard Ross ed., Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure. Pp. 42-80. London: Cambridge University Press.
Saibaba, V. V. S.
2005 Theravada Buddhist Devotionalism in Ceylon, Burma and Thailand. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld (p) Ltd.
San C. Po
1928/2001 Burma and the Karens. Bangkok: White Lotus Press.
Schafer D. Paul
1998 Culture: Beacon of the Future. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Scott, Colin H.
1993 “Custom, Tradition, and the Politics of Culture: Aboriginal Self-Government in Canada,” in Noel Dyke and James B. Waldram eds., Anthropology, Public Policy and Native Peoples in Canada. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University.
Shain, Yossi
1991 Governments-in-Exile in Contemporary World Politics. New York: Routledge.
Silverstein, Josef
1980 Burmese Politics: The Dilemma of National Unity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Sheppard, Anne-Marie
1997 “The Karen Revolution in Burma: A Political Question,” in Don McCaskill and Ken Kampe eds., Development or Domestication? Indigenous Peoples of Southeast Asia. Pp. 568-609. Chiang Mai: Trasvin Publications.
Smith, Anthony D.
1991 National Identity. New York: Penguin Books.
1996a “Anthony D. Smith’s Opening Statement: Nations and their pasts,” in Nations and Nationalism 2(3): 357-370.
1996b “Nationalism and the Historians,” in Gopal Balakrishnan ed., Mapping the Nation. Pp: 174-197. London: Verso.
1998 Nationalism and Modernism. London: Routledge.
1999 Myths and Memories of the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.
2001 Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2008 The Culture Foundations of Nations: Hierarchy, Covenant, and Republic. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Smith, Martin
1995 “A State of Strife: The Indigenous Peoples of Burma,” in R. H. Barnes, Andrew Gray and Benedict Kingsbury eds., Indigenous Peoples of Asia. Pp. 221-245. Michigam: Association for Asian Studies.
1999 Burma: Insurgency and the Politics of Ethnicity. Bangkok: White Lotus.
2000 “Burma: The Karen Conflict,” in Satinder Kumer ed., Encyclopaedia of South Asian Tribes. Pp. 9-25. New Delhi: Anmol Publications Pvt.
Soguk, Nevzat
1999 States and Strangers: Refugees and Displacement of Statecraft. London: University of Minnesota Press.
South, Ashley
2008 Ethnic Politics in Burma: States of Conflict. London: Routledge.
Stern, Paul C.
1995 “Why Do People Sacrifice for Their Nations,” in John L. Comaroff and Paul C. Stern eds., Perspectives on Nationalism and War. Pp. 99-122. Luxembourg: Gordon and Beach Publishers.
Stern, Theodore
1968 “Ariya and the Golden Book: A Millenarian Buddhist Sect among the Karen,” in The Journal of Asian Studies. Vol. 27 (2): 297-238.
Tamil, Yael
1993 Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Taylor, Robert
1987 The State in Burma. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Thailand Burma Border Consortium (TBBC)
2007 Programme Report: January to May 2009.
http://www.tbbc.org/camps/2009-05-may-map-tbbc-unhcr.pdf
Thornton, Phil
2006Rebels, Refugees, Medics and Misfits on the Thai-Burma Border.
Bangkok: Asia Book Co. Ltd.
Thuleibo
2004 The Karen Revolution in Burma.
Tully, James
1995 Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Van Evera, Stephen
2001 “Hypotheses on Nationalism and War,” in Michael E. Brown, Owen R. Cote Jr., Sean M. Lynn-Jones and Steven E. Miller eds., Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict. Pp. 26-60. London: The MIT Press.
Weinstein, Jeremy M.
2007 Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buergenthal, Thomas, Dinah Shelton and David P. Stewart
2007 《國際人權概觀》。台北:國立編譯館。(楊雅婷、陳文暉譯)
Chao, Chung-Chi (趙中麒)
2001 《部落主權與文化實踐:台灣原住民族自治運動之理論建構》。國立台灣大學政治學系碩士論文。
2003 〈關於台灣原住民「民族」生成的幾個論證〉,在《台灣社會研究季刊》,51: 185-224。
Giddens, Anthony
1998 《民族-國家與暴力》。北京:三聯書店。(胡宗澤、趙力濤譯)
Gurr, Ted Robert and Barbara Harff
1994 《國際政治中的族群衝突》。台北:韋柏文化事業出版社。(鄭又平、王賀白、藍於琛譯)
Kocka, Jurgen
2006 《社會史:理論與實踐》。上海:上海人民出版社。(景得祥譯)
Lauren, Paul Gordon
2003 《國際人權的進展》。台北:國立編譯館。(徐子婷、司馬學文、楊雅婷等譯)
Leach, E. R.
2003 《上緬甸諸政治體制:克欽社會結構之研究》。台北:唐山出版社。(張恭啟、黃道琳譯)
Wang, Mingke(王明珂)
2003 《羌在漢藏之間:一個華夏邊緣的歷史人類學研究》。台北:聯經出版社。
Wang, Xien (王希恩)
1998 《民族過程與國家》。蘭州:甘肅人民出版社。
CCSDPT
http://www.ccsdpt.org/members.htm
“Interview: DKBA Colonel Breaks Silence,”
http://www.karen.org/news2/messages/382.html.
Karen National Union (KNU)
www.Karen.Org
Karen Women Organization (KWO)
http://www.karenwomen.org/projects.html
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE