臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大學智慧資本與技術移轉辦公室對技術移轉績效之影響分析
作者：馮輝毅
作者(外文)：Hui-I Feng
校院名稱：臺灣大學
系所名稱：商學研究所
指導教授：陳家聲
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2011
主題關鍵詞：技術移轉；智慧資本；產業群聚；結構方程模式；technology transfer；intellectual capital；industrial clusters；structural equation modeling
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
本研究旨在建立一概念模型，檢驗技術移轉創新過程中智慧資本的重要性，以及驗證大學專業技轉室、高教與技職體系、園區大學及校齡在此過程中所扮演之影響角色為何，並以台灣地區之大專院校為研究系絡，進行模型之實證。在觀念架構上，本研究整合技術移轉、智慧資本、大學技轉室、產業群聚等文獻，提出大學研究成果與技轉績效之影響模式。
根據上述研究架構，本研究探討三個問題：大學在進行技轉活動時，其績效會受到哪些因素之影響？大學在進行技轉活動時，如何透過技轉室來強化其績效？大學在進行技轉活動時，高教與技職體系、園區大學及校齡是否是其績效強化之因素？針對第一個問題，本研究以智慧資本理論，提出6項路徑假設，包括H1: 人力資本正向影響研究成果；H2: 結構資本正向影響研究成果；H3: 關係資本正向影響研究成果；H4: 人力資本正向影響技轉績效；H5: 關係資本正向影響技轉績效；及H6: 研究成果正向影響技轉績效。而針對後兩個問題，則進一步以大學技轉室、高教與技職體系與產業群聚觀點為基礎，提出4大項調節假設，包括H7: 大學技轉室在人力資本、關係資本與研究成果對技轉績效的正向關係上有強化作用；H8: 高教體系大學在人力資本與研究成果對技轉績效的正向關係上有強化作用，而技職體系大學在關係資本對技轉績效的正向關係上有強化作用；H9: 近園區大學在人力資本、關係資本與研究成果對技轉績效的正向關係上有強化作用；H10: 高校齡大學在人力資本、關係資本與研究成果對技轉績效的正向關係上有強化作用。
在研究方法上，本研究以95至98學年度間的台灣地區129所大專院校為分析樣本，並蒐集、統整與計算教育部統計處、國科會、財團法人高等教育評鑑基金會以及WOS等資料庫之資訊，運用逐步複迴歸及結構方程模式等統計分析方法，進行模型的檢定，得到下列研究結論：
1、 在路徑效果上，H2、H3、H5與H6等4個假設達顯著並獲得支持，僅H1與H4未獲顯著支持，其中H1甚至呈現出負向的顯著效果。再以總效果觀之，不論是在研究成果或是技轉績效的表現上，關係資本皆佔有最重要之影響地位，而以結構資本次之，人力資本則皆出現負向之效果。H1的結果，本研究推論與大學成長速度過快、研究人才生涯規劃及教育部所訂定之評鑑計畫與升等規定有關。
2、 在調節效果方面，具專業化技轉室之大學正向調節了人力資本對技轉績效之影響效果；技職體系大學與近園區大學則正向調節了關係資本對技轉績效之影響效果；高校齡大學則正向調節了研究成果對技轉績效之影響效果。
This study examines the importance of intellectual capital in the process of technology transfer innovation. As well, this study also tests the moderating roles of a university’s technology transfer offices (UTTOs), the type of learning institution in question (e.g., traditional university or technology and vocational institute), the proximity of a university to scientific parks, and the age of a university in the process of technology transfer innovation. The theoretical model is evidenced by using Taiwanese universities as research samples. Also, this study integrates the literature on technology transfer, intellectual capital, UTTOs, and industrial clusters, and presents the influencing model among universities’ intellectual capital, research outcomes, and technology transfer performance.
According to the research framework, as mentioned above, this study will attempt to discuss the following three research questions: What factors will influence a university’s performance as it proceeds with technology transfer activities? How do universities strengthen their performance through UTTOs as they proceed with technology transfer activities? Are the type, location, and age of universities strengthening factors as universities proceed with technology transfer activities? With regard to the first question, this study proposes six path-effect hypotheses incorporating the theorem of intellectual capital. These hypotheses include the following: H1: Human capital (HC) positively affects research outcomes (RO). H2: Structural capital (SC) positively affects RO. H3: Relational capital (RC) positively affects RO. H4: HC positively affects technology transfer performance (TTP). H5: RC positively affects TTP. H6: RO positively affects TTP. With regard to the last two questions, this study further proposes four moderating-effect hypotheses incorporating the concepts of UTTOs, of the traditional university and the technology and vocational institute types of learning institutions, and of industrial clusters. These hypotheses are as follows: H7: The positive influence of HC, RC, and RO on TTP will increase when a university has a specialized UTTO. H8: The positive influence of HC and RO on TTP will increase when a university is a traditional university, while the positive influence of RC on TTP will increase when a university is a technology and vocational institute. H9: The positive influence of HC, RC, and RO on TTP will increase when a university is near scientific parks. H10: The positive influence of HC, RC, and RO on TTP will increase when a university is an older university.
With regard to the research methodology, this study targets 129 Taiwanese universities during the Taiwanese academic years ‘95 to ‘98, sampling, collecting, arranging, and calculating data from the following datasets: Department of Statistics at the Ministry of Education in Taiwan, National Science Council, Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan, and Web of Science. Using the statistical techniques of stepwise multiple regression and structural equation modeling, this study tests the hypothesized model and concludes that:
1. With regard to the path-effect hypotheses, H2, H3, H5, and H6 are all significantly supported, but H1 and H4 are not. In particular, H1 is even negatively significant. Furthermore, from the perspective of total effects, both RO and TTP are positively affected by RC most strongly and by SC second-most strongly, while they are negatively affected by HC. With respect to the results of H1, this study infers that the reasons may be the fast growth of Taiwanese universities, career planning of research talents, and the appraisal and promotion rules for research talents legislated by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan.
2. With regard to the moderating-effect hypotheses, universities with specialized UTTOs positively moderate the influence of HC on TTP. Additionally, technology and vocational institutes and universities near scientific parks positively moderate the influence of RC on TTP. Finally, older universities positively moderate the influence of RO on TTP.
參考文獻
一、中文部份
王淑娟(2006)，技術移轉績效影響因素之探討-以逢甲大學為例，工研院創新與科技管理研討會。
江炯聰(1981)，台灣工業技術之發展與移轉，國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
江雪嬌(2004)，從國家創新系統探討大學推動研發服務業的發展，經濟情勢暨評論，10(3)，19-34。
宋大崙(2004)，知識移轉的機制：建立學界與產業的橋樑，行政院科學資訊中心簡訊，19(3)，1-2。
李文瑞(2002)，從交易成本、資源基礎與行為決策理論探討中小企業技術取得模式之影響因素，管理學報，19(5)，873-900。new window
吳京(1996)，當前技職教育改革的基本理念與方向，技術及職業教育雙月刊，36，台北：教育部技術及職業教育司。
吳思華(2000)，網際網路智慧資本衡量與發展措施研究，資策會：台北。
林瑞池(1997)，技術合作策略影響因素之研究，國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林騰蛟(1997)，台灣地區高等技術及職業教育政策發展之研究，國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
洪東波(2004)，公民營電廠工程專案之跨國技術學習與技術移轉之比較研究，大葉大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
行政院國家科學委員會(2003)，國科會專利資料彙整暨產學合作與技術移轉績效評量研究。
國科會科學技術資料中心(2003)，國科會專利資料彙整暨產學合作與技術移轉績效評量研究。
曾信超、王文賢(1993)，技術之移轉、擴散與交流的探討，中山管理評論，2(4)，111-133。new window
葉匡時、蔡敦浩、周德光(1993年)，策略聯盟的發展策略—交易成本的觀點，管理評論，12，99-118。new window
楊君琦(2000)，技術移轉互動模式失靈及重塑之研究－以研究機構與中小企業技術為例，國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。new window
楊家彥(2004)，我國產學研發能量檢視與學界技術移轉關鍵因素，經濟部技術處。
劉瑞圖(1994)，科技管理(八)科技企業的技術移轉，工業簡訊，28，34-45。
二、英文部份
Ackoff, R.L. (1982). Creating the Corporate Future, New York: Wiley.
Agor, W. H. (1997). The measurement, use, and development of intellectual capital to increase public sector productivity. Public Personnel Management, 27(2), 175-186.
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisition and the innovative performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 197-220.
Anderson, G. (1994). Industry clustering for economic development, Economic Development Review, 12(2), 26-32.
Archibugi, D., Cohendet, P., Kristensen, A. & Schäffer, K.A. (1995). Evaluation of the Community Innovation Survey. Report to the European Commission, Sprint/Eims Report, Luxembourg.
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169.
Arikan, A. T. (2009). Interfirm knowledge exchanges and the knowledge creation capability of clusters. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 658-676.
Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). AUTM Licensing Survey, 1998, 2004, 2010.
Auster, E. R. (1990). The interorganizational environment: Network theory, tools, and applications. In Frederick Williams and David Gibson (eds.), Technology Transfer: A Communication Perspective: 63-89. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Azagra Caro, J. M., Lucio, I. F., & Gracia, A. G. (2003). University patents: Output and input indicators…of what? Research Evaluation, 12(1), 5-16.
Azoulay, P., Ding,W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 637-676.
Bassi, L. J., & McMurrer, D. P. (1998). Training investment can mean financial performance. Training and Development, 52(5), 40-42.
Bassi, L. J., & Van Buren, M. E. (1999). Valuing Investment in Intellectual Capital. International Journal of Technology Management, 18 (5/6/7/8), 414-432.
Battisti, G., & Stoneman, P. (2010). How Innovative are UK Firms? Evidence from the Fourth UK Community Innovation Survey on Synergies between Technological and Organizational Innovations. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 187-206.
Behrens, T. R., & Gray, D. O. (2001). Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy, 30(2), 179-199.
Bell, C. R. (1997). Intellectual capital. Executive Excellence, 14(1), 15-16.
Bell, S. J., Tracey, P., & Heide, J. B. (2009). The organization of regional clusters, Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 623-642.
Benevene, P., & Cortini, M. (2010). Interaction between structural capital and human capital in Italian NPOs. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 123-139.
Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655
Bremer, H. W. (1999). University technology transfer evolution and revolution. http://web.mit.edu/osp/www/cogr/ bremer.htm 2/18/99.
Breznitz, S. M. (2011). Improving or impairing? Following technology transfer changes at the University of Cambridge. Regional Studies, 45(4), 463-478.
Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual Capital, Thomson Business Press, London.
Brown, A. Jr., Osborn, T., Chan, J. M., & Jaganathan, V. (2005). Managing Intellectual Capital. Research Technology Management, 48(6), 34-41.
Bueno, E. (2003), Gestión del Conocimiento en Universidades y Organismos públicos de Investigación. Ediciones de la Dirección General de Investigación, Consejería de Educación, Comunidad de Madrid.
Carayannis, E. G., Rogers, E. M., Kurihara, K. & Allbritton, M. M. (1998). High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. Technovation, 18(1), 1-11.
Cardozo, R., Ardichvili, A., & Srauss, A. (2011). Effectiveness of university technology transfer: an organizational population ecology view of a maturing supplier industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 173-202.
Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(special issue), 199-232.
Cook, G., Pandit, N. R., & Swann, P. (2001). The dynamics of industrial clustering in British broadcasting, Information Economics and Policy, 13(2), 351-375.
Dacin, T. M. (1997). Isomorphism in context: the power and prescription of institutional norms, Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 46-81.
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields, American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
Del-Palacio, I., Sole, F., & Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2008). University entrepreneurship centres as service businesses. The Service Industries Journal, 28(7), 939-951.
Del-Palacio, I., Sole, F., & Berbegal, J. (2010). Which services support research activities at universities? The Service Industries Journal, 1-20. Retrieved September 28, 2010, from Taylor & Francis Group database.
Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The measurement and management of intellectual capital: an introduction. Management Accounting, 78(2), 32-36.
Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capital at Skandia. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 366-373.
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Roots, USA: Happer Collins.
Enright, M. (1996). Regional clusters and economic development: a research agenda. In: Staber, U., Schaefer, N. and Sharma, B. (eds.) Business networks: prospects for Regional Development, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 190-213.
Ernst, H. (2001). Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: Evidence from time-series cross-section analysis on the firm level. Research Policy, 30(1), 143-157.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
European Commission. (2002). Innovation and technology transfer-innovation scoreboard. Innovation and Technology Transfer. 1-24.
Feser, E. J., & Bergman, E. M. (2000). National industry cluster templates: a framework for applied regional cluster analysis, Regional Studies, 34(1), 1-20.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Pinter, London.
Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30.
Fritsch, M., & Schwirten, C. (1999). Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation system. Industry and Innovation, 6(1), 69-83.
Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the under finable tacitness of being (there), Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75-99.
Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Research Policy. 35(6), 790-807.
Goldhor, R. S., & Lund, R. T. (1983). University to industry advanced technology transfer: a case study. Research Policy, 12(3), 121-152.
Graff, G., Heiman, A., & Zilberman, D. (2002). University research and offices of technology transfer. California Management Review, 45(1), 88-115.
Granieri, M. (2003). Beyond Traditional Technology Transfer of Faculty-Generation Inventions: Building A Bridge Toward R＆D. Les Nouvelles, December. 167-175.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(special issue), 109-122.
Grantham, C. E., & Nichols, L. D. (1997). A framework for the management of intellectual capital in the health care industry. Journal of Health Care Finance, 2(3), 1-19.
Gregorio, D. D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209-227.
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flow within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 473-496.
Guthrie, J. (2001). The management, measurement and reporting of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(1), 27-41.
Hameri, A. (1996). Technology transfer between basic research and industry. Technovation, 16(2), 51-57.
Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organization, American journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
Harmon, B., Ardishvili, A., Cardozo, R., Elder, T., Leuthold, J., Parshall, J., & et al. (1997). Mapping the university technology transfer process. Journal of Business Venture, 12(6), 423-434.
Hu, T.S., Lin, C.Y., & Chang, S.L. (2005). Technology-based regional development strategies and the emergence of technological communities: a case study of HSIP, Taiwan, Technovation, 25(2), 367-380.
Hubert, S. (1996). Tacit knowledge: the key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital. Strategy and Leadership, 24(2), 10-14.
Jansen, C., & Dillon, H. (1999). Where do the leads come from? Source data from six institutions. The Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, 11, 51-66.
Johnson, W. H. A. (1999). An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital: measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital components in the firm. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5/6/7/8), 562-575.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard－measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75-85.
Kirby, D. A., & Ibrahim, N. (2010). Entrepreneurship education and the creation of an enterprise culture: provisional results from an experiment in Egypt. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Retrieved April 15, 2010, from Springer Science and Business Media BV (Springer) database.
Kneller, R. (1999). Intellectual property rights and university-industry technology transfer in Japan. Science and Public Policy, 26(2), 113-124.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
Kong, E. (2007). The strategic importance of intellectual capital in the non-profit sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(4), 721-731.
Kong, E. (2008). The development of strategic management in the non-profit context: intellectual capital in social service non-profit organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(3), 281-299.
Kong, E. (2010). Intellectual capital and non-profit organizations in the knowledge economy: editorial and introduction to special issue. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 97-106.
Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lambe, C. J., & Spekman, R. E. (1997). Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 14(2). 102-116.
Langford, C. H., Hall, J., Josty, P., Matos, S., & Jacobson, A. (2006). Indicators and outcomes of Canadian university research: Proxies becoming goals? Research Policy, 35(10), 1586-1598.
Lee, J., & Win, H. N. (2004). Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation, 24(5). 433-442.
Leuenberger, T. (1999). Know How and Technology Strategies for University, manuscript.
Lipsey, R.G. (2002). Some implications of endogenous technological change for technology policies in developing countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(4), 321-351.
Lucking, B. (2004) International Comparisons of the Third Community Innovation Survey. Department of Trade and Industry, London.
Luu, N., Wykes, J., Williams, P., & Weir, T. (2001). Invisible value: the case for measuring and reporting intellectual capital. Canberra: Department of Industry, Science and Resources, Commonwealth of Australia.
Lynn, B. E. (1999). Culture and intellectual capital management: a key factor in successful ICM implementation. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5/6/7/8), 591-603.
Macho-Stadler, I., Pérez-Castrillo, D., & Veugelers, R. (2007). Licensing of university inventions: the role of a technology transfer office. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(3), 483-510.
Markusen. A. (1996). Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 72, 293-313.
Marques, C. S., Ferreira, J., Rodrigues, R. G., & Ferreira, M. (2010). The contribution of yoga to the entrepreneurial potential of university students: a SEM approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Springer Science and Business Media BV (Springer) database.
Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 921-943.
McElroy, M. W. (2002). Social innovation capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(1), 30-39.
Meyer, M., Sinilainen, T., & Utecht, J. T. (2003). Towards hybrid triple helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors. Scientometrics, 58(2), 321-350.
Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 135-152.
Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31, 491-503.
Morgan, R. P., & Strickland, D. E. (2001). US university research contributions to industry: findings and conjectures. Science and Public Policy, 28(2), 113-121.
Mouritsen, J., Larsen, H.T., & Bukh, P.N. (2001). Intellectual capital and the ‘capable firm’: narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7-8), 735-762.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N., (2005). Universities in national innovation systems. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 209-239.
Munro, H., & Noori, H., (1988). Measuring commitment to new manufacturing technology: integrating technology push and marketing pull. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 35(2), 63-70.
Naktiyok, A., Karabey, C. N., & Gulluce, A. C. (2010). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention: the Turkish case. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(4), 419-435.
National Science Council. (2006). Indicators of Science and Technology Republic of China. National Science Council: printer.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company, New York: Oxford University Press.
OECD. (1996). Reviews of National Science and Technology Policy. Paris Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes, Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009.
Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2001). To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 99-114.
Pablos, P. O. (2003). Intellectual capital reporting in Spain: a comparative view. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(1), 61-81.
Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Pfeffer, J. (1995). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1), 55-69.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Cluster and the new economics of competition, Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.
Pouder, R., & St. John, C. H. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1192-1225.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-141.
Rabellotti, R. (1999). Recovery of a Mexican cluster: devaluation bonanza or collective efficiency, World Development, 27( 9), 1571-1586.
Redman, J. M. (1994). Understanding state economies through industry studies. Council of Governors’ Policy Advisors, Washington, DC.
Ramírez, Y., Lorduy, C., & Rojas, J. A. (2007). Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(4), 732-748.
Ravenscraft, D. J., & Scherer, F. M. (1982). The lag structure of returns to research and development. Applied Economics, 14(6), 603-620.
Reitzig, M. (2003). What determines Patent value-insights from the semiconductor industry. Research Policy, 32(1), 13-26.
Rennie, M. (1999). Accounting for knowledge assets: do we need a new financial statement? International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5/6/7/8), 648-659.
Roberts, H. (1999). The control of intangibles in the knowledge-intensive firm. paper presented at the 22nd Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Bordeaux.
Robertson, T. S., & Gatignon, H. (1998). Technology development mode: a transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 515-531.
Roos, J., Roos, G., Edvinsson, L., & Dragonetti, N. C. (1998). Intellectual Capital: Navigation in the New Business Landscape. London: Macmillan.
Rosenfeld, S. (1995). Industrial Strength Strategies: Regional Business Clusters and Public Policy. Aspen Institute, Washington, DC.
Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Business Clusters that Work: Prospects for Regional Development. Regional Technology Strategies Inc., Chapel Hill, NC.
Sánchez, J. C. (2010). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Retrieved March 31, 2010, from Springer Science and Business Media BV (Springer) database.
Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7), 1163-1180.
Saxenian, A. (1996). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press., Cambridge, MA.
Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Frohlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(2), 303-328.
Scott, P. (1998). Unified and Binary Systems of Higher Education in Europe, edited in Goals and Purposes of Higher Education in the 21st Century by Arnold Burgen.
Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1994). Institutional Environments and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142.
Simmie , J. (2004). Innovation and clustering in the globalised international economy. Urban studies, 41, 1925-1112.
Smilor, R., & Matthews, J. (2004). University venturing: Technology transfer and commercialization in higher education. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization, 3(1), 111-128.
Stewart, T. A. (1991). Brainpower. Fortune, 3, 44-60.
Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Stuart, T. E. (2000). Inter-organizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in high-technology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791-811.
Sull, D. N. (1999). Industrial clusters and organisational inertia: an institutional perspective, London Business School, Working Paper, London Business School.
Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29, 258-271.
Tan, R. R. (1996). Success criteria and success factors for external technology transfer projects. Project Management Journal, 27(2), 45-56.
Tether, B. S., Miles, I., Blind, K., Hipp, C., Liso, N. D., & Cainelli, G. (2001). Innovation in the Service Sector: Analysis of Data Collected Under the Community Innovation Survey (CIS-2). Report for the European Commission within the Innovation Programme, CRIC, University of Manchester, UK.
Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109-124.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Industry perspectives on licensing university technologies. Industry and Higher Education, 15(4), 289-294.
Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C., & Jensen, R. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major US universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 59-72.
Tornatzky, L. G. (2000). Building state economics by promoting university-industry technology transfer. NGA. 1-31.
Ulrich, D. (1998). Intellectual Capital = Competence × Commitment. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 15-26.
Valentin, E. M. M. (2000). University-industry cooperation: A framework of benefits and obstacles. Industry and Higher Education, 14(3), 165-172.
Van Buren, M. E. (1999). A yardstick for knowledge management. Training & Development, 53(5), 71-78.
Visser, E. J. (2009). The complementary dynamic effects of clusters and networks, Industry and Innovation,16(2), 167-195.
Vock, P. (2003). University technology transfer Switzerland organization, legal framework, policy and performance. 189-201.
Wolfe, D. A., & Gertler, M. S. (2004). Cluster from the inside and out: local dynamics and global linkage. Urban Studies, 41(5), 1071-1093.
Yusof, M., & Jain, K. K. (2010). Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: a literature survey. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(1), 81-96.
Zhou, A. Z., & Fink, D. (2003). The intellectual capital web: a systematic linking of intellectual capital and knowledge management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(1), 34-48.
Zieminski, J., & Warda, J. (1999). Paths to Commercialization University Collaboration Research. Ottawa, ON: The Conference Board.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1012（臺灣：985，外國：27） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67474853
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上