臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以文章寫作和造句測驗評估國小學生作文能力之效度研究
書刊名：特殊教育研究學刊
作者：葉靖雲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yeh, Ching-yun
出版日期：2000
卷期：18
頁次：頁151-172
主題關鍵詞：小學；作文；評量；效度；學習障礙；文章寫作；造句；總字數；相異字數；非常用字數；Elementary；Written expression；Assessment；Validity；Learning disabilities；Passage writing；Sentence construction；Total number of words；Number of different words；Matures words
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:106
　　　　　本研究為以效度為核心，主旨在於發展適用國小中、高年牧的徵成性作文能力測量工作。文章寫作測量方法包括故事開頭、單圖、四格連環可之記敘文與問題解決性、比較性說明文等五種作文能力測驗。使用總數字數及相異字數兩種評分方法。所探究的效度包括以作文和國語文學期成績為效標的效標關聯效度，以及比較不同年級(四、五、六)、能力(學習障礙與一般能力)學生表現差異的建樣效度。除上述之文章寫作測驗外，本研究也同時檢驗三種造句測驗分數(意義正確的句子數、成語數、非常用字數)與作文能力效標間的關係，並比較不同年級、能力學生在這些造句測驗上的表現。本研究之樣本包括建立效標關聯效度之普通班學生樣本，以及發展建構效度之學習障礙與一般能力學生樣本，分為四到六年級學生。結果顯示上述文章寫作測驗的總字數和相異字數與效標間皆有顯著的連結關係。除四年級外，效度係數大致在中度相關的範圍內。各種文章寫作測驗的分數也大多能夠有效區不同年級、作文能力學生。造句測驗中意義正確的句數和非常用字數的效標關聯效度大致在中到高度相關的範圍內，這兩種造句測驗的計分結果能夠清楚鑑別不同年級、能力的學生。
　　　　　The purpose of the study was to establish the validity (criterion-related as well as construct validity) of direct, objective and quantitative measures of written expression. There were five passage writing measures, including story starter, single-picture and four-consessive-pictures of story writing, along with problem solving and comparative expository writing measures. Two types of scores (the number of words and the number of different words written) were derived from these measures. Besides, validity of scores got from sentence construction task (the number of sentences constructed meaningfully, the numbers of slangs and the number of mature words written) was examined. The criterion measures included class grades of written expression and language. Two groups of 4th-, 5th-, 6th-grade subjects were involved: regular class students and students with learning disabilities. The results revealed that passage writing measures with the number of different words written as dependent variable correlated moderately with the criterion measures. Moreover, of different words written derived from each passage writing measure could differentiate students form various grades and with different writing competence. Scores of sentence construction measure correlated stongly with the criterion measures and the able to discriminate students with different writing competence.
期刊論文
1.柯華葳、陳俊文(1992)。小學生說話與作文產品之比較。國立中正大學學報，3(1)，27-46。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉靖雲(19990600)。五種作文能力測驗的效度研究。特殊教育學報，13，331-366。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Wiggins, G. P.(1989)。A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment。Phi Delta Kappan，70(9)，703-713。  new window
4.Shinn, M. R.、Marston, D.(1985)。Differentiating mildly handicapped, low achieving, and regular education students: A curriculum-based approach。Remedial and Special Education，6(2)，31-38。  new window
5.Barenbaum, E.、Newcomer, P.、Nodine, B.(1987)。Children's ability to write stories as a function of variation in task, age, and developmental level。Learning Disability Quarterly，10，175-188。  new window
6.Neilsen, L.、Piche, G. L.(1981)。The influence of headed nominal complexity and lexical choice on teachers' evaluation of writing。Research in the Teaching of English，15(1)，65-73。  new window
7.Barenbaum, E. M.、Nodine, B. F.、Newcomer, P. L.(1985)。Story Composition by Learning Disabled, Reading Disabled, and Normal Children。Learning Disability Quarterly，8，167-179。  new window
8.向惠芳(1993)。寫出圖來－談看圖作文。國教新知，39(5/ 6)，40-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Grump, W. D.、Blair, T. K.(1984)。Effects of discourse mode on the syntactic complexity of learning disabled students' written expression。Learning Disability Quarterly，7(1)，19-29。  new window
10.McVicar, R.、Thurlow, M. L.、Ysseldyke, J. E.、Christneson, S. L.(1989)。Written language instruction for students with mild handicaps: Is there enough quantity to ensure quality?。Learning Disability Quarterly，12，219-229。  new window
11.Gajar, A. H.(1989)。A computer analysis of written language variables and a comparison of compositions written by university students with and without disabilities。Journal of Learning Disabilities，22(2)，125-130。  new window
12.Harriman, N.、Gajar, A. H.(1987)。Identifying data based procedures for written expression disabilities at the university level。Education，107(3)，252-258。  new window
13.Isaacson, S. L.(1988)。Assessing the written product: Qualitative and quantitative measures。Exceptional Children，54，528-534。  new window
14.Montague, M.、Graves, A.(1993)。Improving Students' Story Writing。Teaching Exceptional Children，25(4)，36-37。  new window
15.Barenbaum, E. M.、Newcomer, P. L.(1991)。The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980 to 1990。Journal of Learning Disabilities，24(10)，578-593。  new window
16.Outhred, L.(1989)。Word processing: Its impact on children's writing。Journal of Learning Disabilities，22(4)，262-264。  new window
17.Padia, W.、Parater, D.(1983)。Effects of modes of discourse on writing performance in grades four and six。Research in the Teaching of English，17(2)，127-134。  new window
18.Poteet, J. A.(1980)。Informal assessment of written expression。Learning Disability Quarterly，3(4)，88-98。  new window
19.Garriss, C.、Vallecorsa, A.(1990)。Story composition skills of middle grade students with learning disabilities。Exceptional Children，57，48-53。  new window
20.Wong, B.、Wong, R.、Blenkinsop, J.(1989)。Cognitive and metacognitive aspectsof learning disabled adolescents' composing problems。Learning Disability Quarterly，12，300-322。  new window
21.Crowhurst, M.(1987)。Cohension in argument and narration at three grade levels。Research in the Teaching of English，21，185-201。  new window
22.Deno, S.、Marston, D.、Mirkin, P.(1982)。Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression。Exceptional Children，48，358-371。  new window
23.Skare, S.、Scierka, B. J.、Espin, C. A.、Halverson, N.(1999)。Criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measures in writing for secondary students。Reading and Writing Quarterly，15(1)，5-27。  new window
24.Graves, A.、Semmel, M.、Gerber, M.(1994)。The effects of story prompts on the narrative production of students with and without learning disabilities。Learning Disability Quarterly，17，154-164。  new window
25.Goodman, L.(1985)。The effective schools movement and special education。Teaching Exceptional Children，17，102-105。  new window
26.Hoffman, J. V.、Rutherford, W. L.(1984)。Effective reading programs: A Critical review of outlier studies。Reading Research Quarterly，20，79-92。  new window
27.Knudson, R. E.(1992)。Analysis of argumentative writing at two grade levels。Journal of Education Research，85(3)，169-179。  new window
28.Quellmalz, E. S.、Capell, F. J.、Chou, C. P.(1982)。Effects of discourse and response mode on the measurement of writing competence。Journal of Educational Measurement，19(4)，241-258。  new window
29.Parker, R. I.、Tindal, G.、Hasbrouck, J.(1991)。Progress monitoring with objective measures of writing performance for students with mild disabilities。Exceptional Children，58，61-73。  new window
30.Rieth, H. J.、Polsgrove, L.、Semmel, M. I.(1981)。Instructional variables that make a difference: Attention to task and beyond。Exceptional Education Quarterly，2(3)，61-72。  new window
研究報告
1.葉靖雲(1998)。國小學習障礙學生作文錯誤類型分析及有效學習策略之研究（一）。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.林寶貴、黃瑞珍、彭千紅(1997)。兒童書寫語言發展指標研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.周台傑(1997)。國民小學閱讀障礙學生閱讀錯誤類型分析及有效學習策略之研究（I）。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Deno, S. L.、Videen, J.、Marston, D.(1982)。Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
學位論文
1.施錚懿(1997)。國小六年級寫作學習障礙與普通學生在故事與說明文寫作成果之比較(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Huang, R. J.(1996)。Indices of Written Language Development in Taiwanese Youth: Syntax and Semantics，0。  new window
圖書
1.周台傑(1992)。國民小學國語文成就測驗。彰化縣彰化市：精華出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.杜淑貞(1986)。國小作文教學探究。臺北市：臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wiggins, G. P.(1993)。Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing。Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.黃國彥、鍾思嘉、傅粹馨(1977)。羅桑二氏非語文智力測驗指導手冊。臺北市：正昇教育科學社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Marston, D.、Mirkin, P. K.、Deno, S. L.(1980)。Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests。Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
6.Hammill, D. D.(1995)。Teaching students with learning and behavior problems: Managing mild to moderate difficulties in resource and inclusive settings。Teaching students with learning and behavior problems: Managing mild to moderate difficulties in resource and inclusive settings。Austin, TX。  new window
7.Marston, D. B.、Tindal, G. A.(1990)。Classroom based assessment: Evaluating instructional outcomes。Classroom based assessment: Evaluating instructional outcomes。New York, NY。  new window
8.曹綺雯、周碧紅(1993)。寫作基本法。寫作基本法。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳弘昌(1998)。國小語文科教學研究。國小語文科教學研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.蘇軏(1980)。臺灣省國民中小學學生作文發表能力之剖析。臺灣省國民中小學學生作文發表能力之剖析。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.Larsen, S. C.、Hammill, D. D.(1996)。Test of written language: examiner's manual。Test of written language: examiner's manual。Austin, TX。  new window
12.Marston, D. B.(1989)。A Curriculum-based Measurement Approach to Assessing Academic Performance: What it is and Why Do it。Curriculum-based Measurement: Assessing Special Children。New York, NY。  new window
13.Mastropieri, M. A.、Scruggs, T. E.(1994)。Effective instruction for special education。Austin, TX：PRO-ED。  new window
14.Vacca, J. L.、Vacca, R. T.(1989)。Content area reading。Content area reading。Glenview, IL。  new window
單篇論文
1.Thomas, D.，Donlan, D.(1980)。Correlations between holistic and quantitative methods of evaluating students' writing, grade 4-12(ED 211 976)。  new window
其他
1.Brand, A. G.(1991)。Construction tasks for direct writing assessment: A frontier revisited，0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Finn, P. J.(1977)。Computer-aided description of mature words choices in writing。Evaluating writing: Describing, measuring, judging。Urbana, IL：National Council of Teachers of English。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：997（臺灣：975，外國：22） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67544216
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上