The thought of the late Ming always has been looked at as espousing antitraditional sentiments, liberal thinking and individualism. When traditional values are on the verge of collapsing and being reconstructed, uncertainty, lack of order and doubt are bound to occur, forming a necessary part of cultural transition. It was during this period that wild chan 狂禪 appeared, which fully possessed its traditional meaning. Wild chan is a deviant form of Buddhist practice that appeared in the lat Ming. It is not only a chan studies categorical noun, but also a special philosophical and cultural reference. This article places wild chan after the Wang Yangming 王陽明 school of thought and looks at it through the Long Xi 龍溪 and Tai Zhou 泰州 schools of thought. It is my hope to provide a basis of knowledge via an insightful view of this broad, late Ming cultural phenomenon. This article first outlines the gatherings of Buddhist practitioners common at that time and a scholarly background of the Confucian/Buddhist melding. Second, the arguments of religious circles on the accumulated defamation and crisis of chan studies are explored. Third, this article delves into the li studies practitioners' acceptance of chan studies, such as Wang Yangming's arguments on Buddhism and Confucianism. It also describes the distinctive "playing with circumstances" of the Long Xi and Tai Zhou schools of thought and clarifies how they further brought about the wild chan craze. Next, the article looks into this trend's effect on the cultural elit and into the literatis' writings on the wild. This article greatly appreciates the graceful bearing of those wild persona, including Li Zhu 李贄 and his lascivious lifestyle, which was spurred on by the wild chan rage. The final section of the article cites Yuan Zhonglang's 袁中郎 "the chan that fails to be chan and the ru that fails to be ru" 禪不成禪, 儒不成儒 in an attempt to depict the historical value of wild chan in the late Ming/early Qing.