:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:婚姻暴力的性別政治
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:潘淑滿 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Shu-man
出版日期:2003
卷期:15
頁次:頁195-253
主題關鍵詞:婚姻暴力身體政治女性主義媒體社會工作質性研究Domestic violenceBody politicsFeminismQualitative researchSocial workMedia
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(25) 博士論文(2) 專書(3) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:22
  • 共同引用共同引用:194
  • 點閱點閱:161
「身體政治」一直是女性主義論述的核心概念。自一九七0年代以來,女性主義對資本主義父權社會的挑戰,就著重於女性身體經驗相關議題,包括:強暴、婚姻暴力、塑身美容、及生殖科技與母職經驗等。女性主義者主張女性在資本社會的身體經驗,絕對不是一種個人的生活經驗而已,而是兩性互動過程權力資源分配不平等的事實;因此,身體政策的制定一直都被視為是,婦女解放運動的最根本目標。然而,女性主義福利學家也質疑,身體政策的制定是否真的能夠促進兩性平等?婦女保護制度的建構是否能保障女性免於暴力的威脅?   在本研究中,我將延續女性主義對身體政治的論述,整合質性研究之檔案分析法與深度訪談法,深入探討台灣家庭暴力防治法通過前後十年,媒體如何建構婚姻暴力的圖像,及家庭暴力防治制度建立之後,位居第一線提供受虐婦女直接服務的社會工作人員,其性別意識是否影響對婚姻暴力現象的詮釋,進而影響專業服務的內涵與專業關係之建立?研究結果發現:過去十年來,台灣媒體對於婚姻暴力事件的報導中,不斷的複製著父權思維;而社會工作人員對於婚姻暴力的詮釋,卻是在家庭暴力與女性主義理論之間擺盪。可喜的是,婦女團體對性別政治的論述,不只帶來理念的翻新,同時也帶來實踐行動的動力。
Body politics has become a core concept of feminist discourse. Since the 1970s, feminists have challenged the capitalist society and centered their focus on women's body experiences such as rape, domestic violence, reproductive technology and motherhood. Feminists argue that women's body experiences in contemporary society reflect the face of sexual power inequalities. Therefore, the enactment of body policies has been regarded as the primary goal of women's liberation movement. Recently many feminist policy analysts doubt that whether or not body policies can achieve the goal of sexual power equality, and social institutions can protect women against domestic violence? The purpose of this study, based on feminist perspective on sexual power equality, is to investigate how the problem of domestic violence in Taiwan defined by the public and social work professionals. What kind of gender ideology is represented in body policies and transferred to societal institutions that help maintain the structure of male domination. The results of this study show that three major sources contributing to the interpretation of the phenomenon of domestic violence are the public, women liberation advocates, and politicians. There are significant differences on the concept of domestic violence among the public, politicians, and women liberation advocates. The results also show a significant difference on the concept of domestic violence identified by social workers. The majority of social workers in this study define the phenomenon of domestic violence in terms of sex power inequality, while few social workers consider the problem of domestic violence as a result of individual characteristics and bad communication skills.
期刊論文
1.黃翠紋(19990300)。家庭暴力研究趨勢及其方法論上的一些議題。中央警察大學學報,34,263-286。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張盈堃(19980700)。從女性主義立場論觀點談家庭暴力的輔導。諮商與輔導,151,13-18。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃志中(20011200)。精神虐待之醫療介入處置。律師雜誌,267,21-29。  延伸查詢new window
4.王燦槐(20000100)。性侵害受害者的心理歷程。厚生雜誌,9,9-10。  延伸查詢new window
5.呂寶靜(19921200)。如何結合社會資源加強婦女保護工作。社會福利,103,33-37。  延伸查詢new window
6.阮祺文(20010300)。疑似家庭暴力案例之處置:法入家門--暴力遠離。臺灣醫界,44(3),49-50。  延伸查詢new window
7.武自珍(19970700)。針對婚姻暴力受虐者之認知取向社會工作方法。當代社會工作學刊,3,49-61。  延伸查詢new window
8.彭淑華(19990800)。臺灣婚姻暴力防治工作的發展與省思。福利社會,73,1-9。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃怡瑾(20010600)。婚暴中的權力控制--個人自覺與社會結構的互動歷程。婦女與兩性學刊,12,95-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Bush, D. M.(1992)。Women's movements and state policy reform aimed at domestic violence against women: A comparison of the consequences of movement mobilization in the U.S. and India。Gender & Society,6(4),587-608。  new window
11.Butler, J.(1989)。Foucault and the paradox of bodily inscriptions。Journal of Philosophy,86(11),601-607。  new window
12.Quinn, P.(1996)。Identifying gendered outcomes of gender-neutral policies。Affilia,11(2),195-206。  new window
13.Yick, A. G.(2001)。Feminist theory and status inconsistency theory。Violence Against Women,7(5),545-562。  new window
14.Yllo, K.(1999)。Violence between intimate partners: Patterns, causes, and effects。Journal of Interpersonal Violence,14(5),562-565。  new window
15.Straus, M. A.(1992)。Sociological Research and Social Policy: The Case of Family Violence。Sociological Forum,7(2),211-237。  new window
16.許雅惠(20010600)。家庭暴力防治--性別化的政策分析。社區發展季刊,94,277-288。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Johnson, M. P.、Ferraro, K. J.(2000)。Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions。Journal of Marriage and the Family,62(4),948-963。  new window
18.Straus, M. A.、Gelles, R. J.(1986)。Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys。Journal of Marriage and the Family,48,465-479。  new window
19.王燦槐(20010600)。臺灣性侵害受害者服務政策之困境分析--談官方性侵害防治中心的服務困境。社會文化學報,12,115-131。  延伸查詢new window
20.沈慶鴻(20010600)。由代間傳遞的觀點探索婚姻暴力對目睹兒童的影響。中華心理衛生學刊,14(2),65-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.劉惠琴(19990400)。女性主義觀點看夫妻衝突與影響歷程。婦女與兩性學刊,10,41-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.李佳燕(19980500)。家庭暴力服務網絡中醫療體系的困窘--我們能做什麼﹖會做什麼﹖肯做什麼﹖。醫望雜誌,25,30-32。  延伸查詢new window
23.Dobash, R. P.、Dobash, R. E.、Wilson, M.、Daly, M.(1992)。The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence。Social Problems,39(1),71-91。  new window
24.Westlund, A. C.(1999)。Pre-modern and modern power: Foucault and the case of domestic violence。Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,24(4),1045-1066。  new window
25.林佩瑾(19981200)。女性主義社會工作的實施與婚姻暴力防治。社區發展季刊,84,86-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.彭淑華(19970900)。臺灣地區受虐婦女專業整合服務現況之探討--社會福利機構工作人員的觀點。社區發展季刊,79,26-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.周月清(19940400)。臺灣受虐婦女社會支持探討之研究。婦女與兩性學刊,5,69-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.劉可屏(19870000)。虐妻問題。輔仁學誌. 法管理學院之部,19,375-391。  延伸查詢new window
29.高鳳仙(19950300)。美國家庭暴力法概觀。東吳法律學報,8(2),189-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.陳芬苓(20010600)。私領域公問題--性侵害與家庭暴力的結構因素探討。臺大社會工作學刊,4,243+245-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.黃志中(20001100)。家庭暴力防治法之醫療服務經驗回顧與前瞻--以婚姻暴力防治為關注重點的討論。全國律師,4(11),22-28。  延伸查詢new window
32.林明傑(20000600)。美加婚姻暴力犯之治療方案與技術暨其危險評估之探討。社區發展季刊,90,197-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.黃淑玲、林方皓、吳佩玲(20010600)。都市原住民婚暴狀況及社工處遇初探--以臺北市某社區為例。本土心理學研究,15,113-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.林明傑(1997)。家庭暴力加害人處遇計畫─美國與我之現況探討。律師雜誌,130,10-13。  延伸查詢new window
35.洪文惠(1997)。婚姻暴力及性暴力工作實務探討。社會福利,130,10-13。  延伸查詢new window
36.Gordon, J. S.(1996)。Community services for abused women: A review of perceived usefulness and efficacy。Journal of Family Violence,11(4),315-329。  new window
37.McLeer, S. V.、Anwar, R. A. H.、Herman, S.、Maquiling, K.(1989)。Education is not enough: A System failure in protecting battered women。Annual of emergency medicine,18,651-653。  new window
38.Yick, A.(1993)。Domestic violence in the Chinese community: Cultural taboos and barriers。Family violence and sexual assault bulletin,15(4),16-23。  new window
會議論文
1.Pagelow, M. D.(1987)。Application of research to policy in partner abuse。The family violence research violence for practitioners and policymakers。Durham, NH:University of New Hampshire。  new window
學位論文
1.湯琇雅(1993)。婚姻暴力中婦女受虐狀況與其因應過程之初探(碩士論文)。東吳大學,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.魏英珠(1995)。受虐婦女介入方案發展暨評估研究--以台北市政府社會局北區婦女福利服務中心之受虐婦女團體方案為例(碩士論文)。東吳大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Reed-Danahay, D.(1997)。Introduction。Auto/ Ethnography:Rewriting the self andthe social。Oxford, UK:Berg。  new window
2.Stark, E.、Flitcraft, A.(1996)。Women at risk: Domestic violence and women’s health。Thousand Oak, CA:Sage。  new window
3.Friedan, B.(1963)。The feminine mystique。New York:Dell:W.W. Norton。  new window
4.Pascall, Gillian(1997)。Social Policy: A New Feminist Analysis。London:Routledge。  new window
5.Dobash, R. E.、Dobash, R. P.(1998)。Rethinking Violence against Women。Sage。  new window
6.王麗蓉(1995)。婦女與社會政策。台北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Walker, L. A.(1993)。The Battered Woman Syndrome is a Psychological Consequence of Abuse。Current Controversies on Family Violence。Newbury Park, Calif:Sage Publications。  new window
2.Gelles, R. J.(1993)。Through a sociological lens: Social structure and family violence。Current controversies on family violence。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
3.Kurz, D.、Stark, E.(1988)。Not-so-benign neglect: The medical response to battering。Feminist perspectives on wife Abuse。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
4.O'leary, K. D.(1993)。Through a psychological lens: Personality traits, personality disorders, and levels of violence。Current controversies on family violence。Newbury Park, CA:Sage。  new window
5.Woodward, K.(1997)。Feminist critiques of social policy。Social policy: A conceptual and theoretical introduction。London:Sage。  new window
6.Kurz, D.(1993)。Social science perspectives on wife abuse: Current debates and future directions。Violence against women: The bloody footprints。London:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE