臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：自然、都市規劃與環境意識論--論臺灣的生態現代化問題
書刊名：思與言
作者：蔡采秀
作者(外文)：Tsai, Tsai-hsiu
出版日期：2004
卷期：42:2
頁次：頁117-181
主題關鍵詞：自然；都市規劃；環境意識；生態現代化；九二一大地震；Nature；Urban planning；Ecological modernization；The 921 earthquake；Environmental consciousness
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:147
這篇研究主要的目的在於，從過臺灣社會的發展經驗以及九二一大地震的重建程，來檢視生態現代化在開發中國家的問題癥結。
所謂的生態現代化，主是為了平衡經濟發展和環境保護之間的衝突所發展出來的論述。然而，這個選擇的平衡點至今卻仍無定論，以致這個名詞的用法相當分歧。這個論述一方面可以看作是西方勢力所發展出來的「現代化」概念的殘餘；另一方面也是企圖要彌補西方過去乃至現在已經脫離自然的「現代化」缺失。對許多非西方的開發中國家而言，生態現代化是個可欲不可求的環境目標。這些國家在現代化過程中為了加快經濟發展的腳步，往往使他們無法兼顧環境問題，取得兩者之的平衡。1999年的九二一大地震就呈顯出，臺灣過去的發展經驗和生態現代化這個環境議題之間的落差所在。
本研究發顯非非西方社會的生態現代化問題除了和西方世界一樣，必須面臨技術和決策論述的問題之外，有許多歷史文化殘餘也是阻礙形成解決環境問題共識的 重要影響因素。臺灣從日治時期到戰後國民政府的經濟發展掛帥前提下，都市計畫的規劃幾乎不曾考慮到「自然」的環境需要，只考慮到人的需要，以統治者在軍事和政治上的需要為需要。長期下來，人遺忘了自然，也失了自然之滿日的連繫和相互依整的一體感。整個社會的環境意識中只有個別化的「受害意識」，根本缺乏「環境問題」的整體概念。
The aim of this article is trying to illustrate some historical and cultural respects of the discourse on ecological modernization in a developing country like Taiwan, by means of examining its past experience of urban planning and the reconstructing process of 921 earthquake since 1999.
In spite that various discussions on the discourse of ecological modernization are endeavoring to resolve the instinct conflicts between economic development and environment protection, there seldom exists any agreement on what is an appropriate environmental policy and how to make an exact choice. For many developing countries, ecological modernization is a desirable but remote goal in their pursuing process of economic growth. The reconstructing process of 921 earthquake on 1999 reveals such discrepancy.
The main findings of this research shows, such discrepancy is not only a part of technological development like in the western societies, but also incurred by some residuals of historical and cultural elements. The urban planning of Taiwan seldom set its base on the environmental needs of nature, but only military and political needs of the rulers, on the requirement of economic growth since the Japanese-ruled period. It makes people forget nature and lose the connection and solidarity with nature. The environmental consciousness of whole society focused only on the individual benefits, but lack of a kind of holistic preconception on the surrounding environment.
期刊論文
1.大江二郎(1936)。大安溪地震調査報吿。鑛物及地質調査報吿，4。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳坤宏(19891100)。有關都市生態學空間結構的理論與批評。規劃學報，16，1+3-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蕭新煌(2002)。台灣的地方環保運動（1980-2000）：歷史與空間的比較分析。永續台灣簡訊，4(2)，34-68。  延伸查詢new window
4.Blowers, A.(1997)。Environment Policy: Ecological Modernization or the Risk Society?。Urban Studies，34(5/6)，845-871。  new window
5.Guano, Emanuela(2002)。Spectacles of Modernity: Transnational Imagination and Local Hegemonies in Neoliberal Buenos Aires。Cultural Anthropology，17(2)，181-209。  new window
6.Mumford, Lewis(1925)。Regions: To Live in。Survey，54，151-152。  new window
7.Simonis, U. E.(1989)。Ecological Modernization of Industrial Society。International Social Science Journal，121，347-361。  new window
8.Spaargaren, Gert、Mol, Arthur P. J.(1992)。Sociology, Environment and Modernity: Ecological Modernization as a Theory of Social Change。Society and Natural Resources，5(4)，323-344。  new window
9.張景森(19880700)。戰後臺灣都市研究的主流範型：一個初步的回顧。臺灣社會研究季刊，1(2/3)，9-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Wirth, Louis(1938)。Urbanism as a Way of Life。American Journal of Sociology，44(1)，1-24。  new window
圖書
1.Jung, C. G.、劉國彬、楊德友(1997)。榮格自傳--回憶‧夢‧省思。台北：張老師。  延伸查詢new window
2.Petras, James、Veltmeyer, Henry(2001)。Globalization Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century。Halifax。  new window
3.臺灣省文獻委員會(2001)。臺灣地區水資源史。南投：臺灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Mol, Arthur P. J.(1995)。The Refinement of Production: Ecological Modernization Theory and the Chemical Industry。Utrecht：Van Arkel。  new window
5.內政部都市計畫委員會(1987)。都市計畫委員會委員應有之認識。臺北：內政部都市計畫委員會。  延伸查詢new window
6.台灣科技大學(2001)。南投縣埔里鎮災後重建綱要計畫。南投：埔里鎮公所。  延伸查詢new window
7.東海大學(2000)。南投縣中寮鄉災後重建綱要計畫。南投：中寮鄉公所。  延伸查詢new window
8.東海大學(2001)。南投縣信義鄉災後重建綱要計畫。南投：信義鄉公所。  延伸查詢new window
9.臺灣省建設廳疏散房屋工程處(1960)。臺灣省政府疏散工程總報吿。臺北：臺灣省建設廳疏散房屋工程處。  延伸查詢new window
10.員林鎮公所(2000)。彰化縣員林鎮重建綱要計畫。員林：員林鎮公所。  延伸查詢new window
11.淡江大學(2000)。南投縣仁愛鄉災後重建綱要計畫。南投：仁愛鄉公所。  延伸查詢new window
12.淡江大學(2000)。苗栗縣卓蘭鎮災後重建綱要計畫。苗栗：卓蘭鎮公所。  延伸查詢new window
13.經濟部水資源統一規劃委員會(1956)。大甲溪流域開發規劃報吿。臺北：經濟部水資源統一規劃委員會。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊華同(1978)。都市計畫法釋義。臺北：黎明文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.臺灣省政府(1996)。臺灣中部區域計畫（第一次通盤檢討）。臺北：臺灣省政府。  延伸查詢new window
16.臺灣總督府(1936)。臺灣震災誌。東京：三秀舍。  延伸查詢new window
17.Barlow, Taine(1997)。Foundations of Colonial Modernity in East Asia。Durham：Duke University Press。  new window
18.Crosby, Alfred W.(1996)。Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900-1900。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
19.Foiedland, Roger、Boden, Deirdre(1994)。NowHere: Space, Time and Modernity。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
20.Hajer, M. A.(1995)。The Politics of Environment Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
21.Hauser, Philip M.、Schnore, Leo F.(1967)。The Study of Urbanization。New York：John Wiley & Sons, Inc。  new window
22.Hawley, Amos H.(1981)。Urban Society: An Ecological Approach。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
23.Hoogvelt, Ankie M. M.(1983)。The Sociology of Developing Societies。London：Macmillan Press Ltd。  new window
24.Huntington, Samuel P.(1969)。Political Order in Changing Societies。Yale University Press。  new window
25.Moore-Gilbert, Bart(2000)。Postcolonial Theory: Contexts, Practices, Politics。London：Verso。  new window
26.Wagner, Philip(1960)。The Human Uses of the Earth。Glence：Free Press。  new window
27.Wood, C.(1995)。Trading in Futures。Lincoln：Royal Society for Nature Conservation。  new window
28.大華不動產鑑定股份有限公司(2000)。台中縣和平鄉重建綱要計畫。台中：台中縣和平鄉公所。  延伸查詢new window
29.林本炫、董娟娟、張仁傑(1993)。國有土地問題之政治經濟分析。臺北：業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
30.曾華璧(2001)。人與環境：臺灣現代環境史論。臺北：正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
31.Apter, David Ernest(1967)。The Politics of Modernization。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
32.Carter, Neil(2001)。The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
33.Castells, Manuel、Sheridan, Alan(1977)。The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach。Cambridge, Mass：London：MIT Press：Edward Arnold。  new window
34.Comaroff, J.、Comaroff, J.(1992)。Ethnography, and the Historical Imagination。Boulder：Westview Press。  new window
35.Dryzek, John S.(1997)。The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourse。Oxford：Oxford University press。  new window
36.Eisenstadt, S. N.(1973)。Tradition, Change, and Modernity。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
37.Giddens, Anthony(1991)。Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age。Cambridge：Blackwell Publishers。  new window
38.Fischer, Frank、Hajer, Maarten A.(1999)。Living with Nature: Environmental Politics as Cultural Discourse。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
39.Hall, Peter(1988)。Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century。Basil Blackwell Ltd。  new window
40.Hawley, Amos H.(1986)。Human Ecology: A Theoretical Essay。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
41.Hirst, Paul、Thompson, Grahame(1999)。Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance。Polity。  new window
42.Jameson, Fredric、Miyoshi, Masao(1998)。The Cultures of Globalization。Duke University Press。  new window
43.Knox, Paul L.、Taylor, Peter J.(1995)。World Cities in A World-system。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
44.Mol, Arthur P. J.(2001)。Globalization and Environmental Reform: The Ecological Modernization of the Global Economy。London：Mass：The MIT Press。  new window
45.Mumford, Lewis(1961)。The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects。New York：Houghton Mifflin Harcourt。  new window
46.Pred, Allan(1986)。Place, Practice and Structure: Social and Spatial Transformation in Southern Sweden: 1750-1850。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
47.Riggs, Fred W.(1964)。Administration in Developing Countries: the Theory of Prismatic Society。Boston：Houghton Mifflin。  new window
48.Savage, Michael、Warde, Alan(1993)。Urban sociology, Capitalism and Modernity。London：New York, NY：Macmillan Press：Continuum。  new window
49.Teymur, Necdet(1982)。Environmental Discourse: A Critical Analysis of 'Environmentalism' in Architecture, Planning, Design, Ecology, Social Sciences and the Media。London：Question Press。  new window
50.張景森(1993)。台灣的都市計畫(1895-1988)。台北：業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
51.Sassen, Saskia(1994)。Cities in a World Economy。Pine Forge/Sage Press。  new window
52.Pye, Lucian W.(1966)。Aspects of Political Development。Boston：Little Brown and Company。  new window
53.黃朝陽(1991)。都市計畫及關係法規彙編。臺北：營建雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
54.Giddens, Anthony(1990)。The Consequences of Modernity。Stanford, CA：Stanford University Press。  new window
55.蕭新煌(20020000)。臺灣社會文化典範的轉移：臺灣大轉型的歷史和宏觀記錄。臺北：立緒。new window  延伸查詢new window
56.Logan, John R.、Molotch, H.(1987)。Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place。University of California Press。  new window
57.Harvey, David、Braun, Bruce(1996)。Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference。Blackwell。  new window
58.Robertson, Roland(1992)。Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture。Sage。  new window
其他
1.王智勇(19991123)。中央日報。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部(19990929)。經濟日報。  延伸查詢new window
3.林志成(20010929)。ICDP將鎮探車籠埔斷層。  延伸查詢new window
4.林淑玲(19991110)。中國時報。  延伸查詢new window
5.侯南芬(19991001)。中國時報。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.夏鑄九(1993)。全球經濟再結構過程中的臺灣區域空間結構變遷。國土規劃的挑戰。臺北：業強。  延伸查詢new window
2.西村傳三(1936)。臺灣地震史。臺灣震災誌。東京：三秀舍。  延伸查詢new window
3.李晨鐘(1973)。本會歷年促進工作概述。促成大甲溪主要資源開發輯要。臺中：大甲溪綜合開發促進委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.夏鑄九、張景森(1993)。台灣地區國土規劃歷史的回顧與檢討。國土規劃的挑戰。臺北：業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bermingham, Ann(1994)。Redesigning Nature: John Constable and the Landscape of Enclosure。NowHere: Space, Time and Modernity。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
6.Christoff, Peter(2000)。Ecological Modernization, Ecological Modernities。The Emergence of Ecological Modernization: Integrating the Environment and the Economy。London：Routledge。  new window
7.Gould, K. A.、Murphy, J.(1997)。Ecological Modernization: Restructuring Industrial Economies。Green the Millennium: the New Politics of the Environment。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
8.Kronsell, Annica(2000)。A 'Sustainable' Impact on the EU? An Analysis of the Making of the Fifth Environmental Action Programme。The Emergence of Ecological Modernization: Integrating the Environment and the Economy。London：Routledge。  new window
9.Owen, S.(1997)。Interpretating Sustainable Development: the Case of Land-use Planning。Green The Millennium? The New Politics of the Environment。Oxford：Blackwells。  new window
10.Tucker, Richard P.(1988)。The Depletion of India's Forest under British Imperialism: Planters, Foresters, and Peasants in Assam and Kerala。The Ends of the Earth: Perspectives on Modern Environmental History。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Weiskel, Timothy C.(1988)。Toward Archaeology of Colonialism: Elements in the Ecological Transformation of the Ivory Coast。The Ends of the Earth: Perspectives on Modern Environmental History。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Young, Stephen C.(2000)。Introduction: The Origins and Evolving Nature of Ecological Modernization。The Emergence of Ecological Modernization: Integrating the Environment and the Economy。London：Routledge。  new window
13.夏鑄九(1993)。空間形式演變中之依賴與發展--台灣彰化平原的個案。空間、歷史與社會--論文選1987-1992。台北：唐山。  延伸查詢new window
14.張景森(1993)。地方政府、民衆組織與地方計劃：九○年代規劃的政治經濟學。國土規劃的挑戰。臺北：業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.Crosby, Alfred W.(1988)。Ecological Imperialism: The Overseas Migration of Westerm European as a Biological Phenomenon。The Ends of the Earth: Perspectives on Modern Environmental History。Cambridge, MA：Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：471（臺灣：465，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67428074
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上