:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:性別化的興趣與能力:高中學生類組選擇之探究
書刊名:臺灣教育社會學研究
作者:楊巧玲 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Chiao-ling
出版日期:2005
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁113-153
主題關鍵詞:性別關係性別政權性別教育高中學生類組選擇Gender relationsGender regimeGender educationSenior high school studentsSubject choice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:14
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:83
本文旨在探究高中學生的類組選擇,聚焦在性別如何對類組選擇產生影響。以南部地區一所男女合校的公立高級中學為研究場域,在三個類組中各選一個班級進行分組焦點團體訪談,根據訪談所得資料加以分析、提出詮釋與進行討論。本文主張高中階段的類組選擇是學校教育的性別政權機制之一,看似按照個人興趣、能力所做的自由選擇,卻反映社會中的性別權力關係,高中學生將學科╱知識二分為硬與軟兩個位階,透過「男生擅理、女生擅文」的論述,建構知識的性別關係,具體而言,一類學科在知識位階中的低下與女性在性別關係裡的從屬連結,二、三類學科在知識位階中的優越與男性在性別關係裡的主控連結,形成學校中性別政權的一個面向,由此引伸出對性別平等教育的研究與實務之啟示。
This article is to inquire the choice made by senior high school students about the major subject area, particularly focusing on how gender influences their choice. A co-educational public high school in the southern part of Taiwan was selected and one class for each major participated. Focus group interviews were conducted and data were analyzed, interpreted and discussed. This article argues that choosing the major subject area in the senior high school stage serves as a mechanism of gender regime in schools. The choice appears as if one exercised one’s own free will in accordance with their interest and ability. Indeed, it reflects the gender relations in society at large. Senior high school students dichotomize subjects/knowledge into a hierarchal order and, through the discourse that boys are good at science and girls are good at literature, construct the gender relations of knowledge. Implications for research and practice in the field of gender equity education are drawn.
期刊論文
1.吳懷遠(1982)。高中學生選組輔導之研究。輔導月刊,18(3/4),25-40。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊龍立(199305)。我國高中學生主修科別與性別的關係之研究。教育研究資訊,1(3),64-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳建州(20040200)。教育期望的性別差異:高中、高職的比較。兩性平等教育季刊,26,43-57。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭靜姿、林美和、胡寶玉(20031200)。高中資優班畢業女性之角色刻板知覺、生涯阻礙因素與潛能發揮自評。資優教育研究,3(2),1-36。  延伸查詢new window
5.Aveling, Nado(2002)。'Having It All' and the Discourse of Equal Opportunity: Reflections on Choices and Changing Perceptions。Gender and Education,14(3),265-280。  new window
6.Warrington, M.、Younger, M.、Williams, J.(2000)。Student Attitudes, Image and the Gender Gap。British Educational Research Journal,26(3),393-407。  new window
7.Arnot, Madeleine(2000)。Gender Relations and Schooling in the New Century: Conflicts and Challenges。Compare,30(3),293-302。  new window
8.蕭鍚錡(2002)。綜合高中學生學程組別選擇影響因素之研究。課程與教學,5(2),97-114。  延伸查詢new window
9.Kessler, S.、Ashenden, D. J.、Connell, R. W.、Dowsett, G. W.(1985)。Gender Relations in Secondary Schooling。Sociology of Education,58(1),34-48。  new window
10.Francis, Becky(2000)。The Gendered Subject: Students' Subject Preferences and Discussions of Gender and Subject Ability。Oxford Review of Education,26(1),35-48。  new window
11.Equal Opportunities Commission(1999)。Gender Issues in Vocational Education and Training and Workplace Achievement of 14-19 Year Olds: An EOC Perspective。The Curriculum Journal,10(2),209-229。  new window
12.Gaskell, Jane(1985)。Course Enrollment in the High School: The Perspective of Working-class Females。Sociology of Education,58(1),48-59。  new window
13.Gaskell, Jane(1984)。Gender and Course Choice: The Orientations of Male and Female Students。Journal of Education,166(1),89-102。  new window
14.Schoon, Ingrid(2001)。Teenage Job Aspirations and Career Attainment in Adulthood: A 17-Year Follow-up Study of Teenagers Who Aspired to Become Scientists, Health Professionals, or Engineers。International Journal of Behavioral Development,25(2),124-132。  new window
15.Calvert, Sarah、Gilbert, Jane(2003)。Challenging Accepted Wisdom: Looking at the Gender and Science Education Question through a Different Lens。International Journal of Science Education,25(7),861-878。  new window
圖書
1.Connell, R. W.(2000)。The Men and the Boys。University of California Press。  new window
2.Carspecken, Phil Francis(1996)。Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide。Routledge。  new window
3.Vaughn, S.、Schumm, J. S.、Sinagub, J. M.(1996)。Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology。Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
4.謝文全(2001)。中等教育--理論與實際。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.Madriz, Esther(2003)。Focus Groups in Feminist Research。Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
6.Clewell, Beatriz Chu(2002)。Breaking the Barriers: The Critical Middle School Years。The Jossey-Bass Reader on Gender in Education。San Francisco, CA。  new window
7.West, Candace、Fenstermaker, Sarah(2002)。Doing Difference。Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power, and Institutional Change。London, UK/ New York, NY。  new window
8.American Association of University Women(2002)。Course-taking Patterns。The Jossey-Bass Reader on Gender in Education。San Francisco, CA。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2004)。大專院校學生人數:九十二學年度,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Richardson, L.。Writing: a method of inquiry。Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
2.胡幼慧(1996)。焦點團體法。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Silverman, D.(2003)。Analyzing talk and text。Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE