臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：監獄與社會排除：一個批判性的分析
書刊名：犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者：許華孚 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hsu, Hua-fu
出版日期：2005
卷期：5
頁次：頁191-235
主題關鍵詞：監獄論述；邊緣化；底層階級；社會排除；Prison discourse；Marginalization；Underclass；Social exclusion
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:478
  • 點閱點閱:57
由於我國近年來幾次假釋政策性修訂，不論從嚴或從寬之假釋政策，其對於降低累再犯率或撤銷假率其效果並不顯著，九十四年二月二日剛修正通過之刑法，其假釋條件又更嚴苛。故本研究希望對假釋出獄人其再犯罪之歷程加以探討與了解，以更了解假釋出獄人再犯歷程與相關因素，才能對症下藥，擬定相關之治安對策。 本研究選定在臺灣臺北監獄執行中之假釋中再犯罪，而再度入監執行之受刑人，以立意取樣之方式，抽取六名並有意願接受訪談的犯罪人，進行半結構式濚度訪談，以了解假釋出獄後再犯罪之歷程。而資料之分析則採用現象學方式加以分析。 資料分析之結果:假釋出獄人之再犯罪歷程主要是經過下列四個歷程之階段的演變:(一)假釋出監前時期:即立志悛悔向上、重回社會之期待期; (二)假釋出監至再犯案時期:此時期主要是假釋出獄人回歸社會後之生活適應狀況，其內心常處於實境與堅持過正常生活的矛盾與衝突中; (三)假釋中再犯罪時期:此一時期常由於自己好玩把持不住、受以前一起玩的朋友或獄中朋有的影響、社會的排斥與找尋工作所遇到的挫折等個人、社會及同儕等因素之影響，再度誤入歧途; (四)撤銷假釋後再入監執行時期:即再度因犯罪而又重回監獄執行撤銷假釋殘刑期與再犯罪案件之心態調適與對重刑化假釋政策之反應。 出獄人之再犯罪歷程，由出監前之充滿信心，到回到社會中因種種因素而適應不良，終至再度誤歧途，而重回監獄。由本研究受訪者之口中所說出的一句話「會怕關一天的就怕，不怕的關再久還是不怕。」即可印證今日重刑化之假釋政策對預防出獄人再犯罪其效果並不顯著之原因。由此再犯歷程之研究可以看出，增加對出獄後之就業輔導、家庭、社會的支持及相關協助資源之投資，才能真正阻斷出獄人再犯罪之動機，解決假釋出獄人再犯罪問題。
The parole policy in Taiwan has corrected many a time, but whatever it is severe or light, its effectiveness is not notable to reduce the recommitment rate and revoked parole rate the study hope to understand parolees’ experience from pre-parole to re-imprisonment in outside. That can make us better realize relevant factors and careers cause parolees recommit crime. In this study we utilize Semi-structure interviewing to interview six inclination recommitment prisoner through purposed sampling from the Taipei Prison. To more understand their criminal career and another relative recommitment factors after parole. According to data analyses, the findings of this study about criminal recommitment career have four stages: the first stage, pre-parole period, the general inmates are determined to turn over a new leaf, once they are released by parole, and genuinely respect to return to society. The second stage, parole to recommitment crime period, the parolees in this period need to adapt themselves to the society life when they are released from prison. Their inner world always have some conflict between the real society repelled and decision to live a normal life by themselves. The third stage is recommitment crime during parole period due to some negative factors to affect them. For example, parolees can’t keep a kindhearted behavior or resist peer pressure, and the frustration for looking for jobs, etc. Then they commit crime again. The fourth, revoked re-imprisonment in prison period, how to adjust their attitude when they recommit crime and re-imprison. In addition, researcher is to explore their perspectives about the severe parole policy. Regarding parolees’ recommitting career, they are always full of confidence to come back free society, but always meeting many negative factors which affect their adjustment. Finally, they always make similar mistakes again, and then they are brought back prison again. Interviewees say “IF a inmate was afraid of imprisonment, just one day is enough for him/her, if not, even through he/her is imprisoned for a long time, he isn’t still afraid.” This can explain the function of the deterrence of the severe parole policy why it is not notable. From the conclusion of study, we can realize from parolees’ recommitting career, our government want to reduce the recommitment rate they should focus on helping their post-parole life in society, not just using in severe laws to deter them.
Other
1.Cohen, S.(1985)。Visions of Social Control。  new window
期刊論文
1.侯崇文(2000)。美國三振出局條款。中華民國犯罪學學會會刊，1(3)，9-10。  延伸查詢new window
2.許華孚(20040300)。英美刑罰發展與臺灣經驗之探究：一個批判性的分析。犯罪與刑事司法研究，2，1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Garland, David(1996)。The limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society。The British Journal of Criminology，36(4)，445-471。  new window
4.黃世鑫、林志鴻、林昭吟(20031200)。新貧問題與社會福利政策--科學vs.價值&菁英vs.普羅。國家政策季刊，2(4)，83-124。  延伸查詢new window
5.林山田(20030100)。刑法改革與刑事立法政策--兼評二○○二年刑法部分條文修正草案。月旦法學，92，8-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王永慈(20010900)。「社會排除」--貧窮概念的再詮釋。社區發展季刊，95，72-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.吳嘉苓(20010200)。空間、規訓與生產政治。國立臺灣大學社會學刊，29，1-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃徵男(2003)。從刑罰本質探討我國犯罪矯正發展趨勢。矯正月刊，127。  延伸查詢new window
9.Martinson, Robert(1974)。What works?--Questions and Answers about Prison Reform。The Public Interest，35，22-54。  new window
10.李淑容(19960300)。由中美貧窮線現制之檢討論我國貧窮線之研擬。東吳社會工作學報，2，161-182。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.郭奕玲(2004)。對貧窮的恐懼就像癌症。PCHome商業周刊電子報。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.行政院主計處(2003)。國情統計通報。臺北：行政院主計處。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Castoriadis, C.(1997)。World in fragments: Writings on politics, society, psychoanalysis, and the imagination。Stanford, Calif.：Stanford University Press。  new window
2.Dixon, John、Macarov, David(1998)。Poverty: A Persistent Global Reality。London：Routledge。  new window
3.Bourdieu, Pierre(1999)。The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society。Cambridge, MA：Stanford University Press。  new window
4.Clemmer, D.(1958)。The prison community。Boston：Christopher。  new window
5.Garland, David(1990)。Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.Mathiesen, T.(1990)。Prison on Trial: A Critical Assessment。London：Sage。  new window
7.Young, Jock(1999)。The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime and Difference in Late Modernity。London：Sage。  new window
8.Zimring, Franklin E.、Hawkins, Gordon(1995)。Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Lull, J.、陳芸芸(2004)。全球化下的傳播與文化。韋伯。  延伸查詢new window
10.Sykes, G. M.(1958)。The society of captives。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
11.許春金(1996)。犯罪學。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.Johnson, Allan G.、成令方、林鶴玲、吳嘉苓(2001)。見樹又見林：社會學作為一種生活、實踐與承諾。臺北市：群學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.Gramsci, Antonio、Hoare, Quintin、Smith, Geoffrey Nowell(1971)。Selections from the Prison Notebooks。Lawrence & Wishart。  new window
14.周愫嫻(1997)。變遷中的犯罪問題與社會控制--台灣經驗。臺北：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.Wilson, W. J.(1987)。The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。  new window
16.Jenks, Chris、俞智敏、陳光達、王淑燕(1998)。文化。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
17.Bauman, Zygmunt、張君玫(2001)。全球化：對人類的深遠影響。群學。  延伸查詢new window
18.Giddens, Anthony(1990)。The Consequences of Modernity。Stanford, CA：Stanford University Press。  new window
19.蔡德輝、楊士隆(2004)。犯罪學。臺北：五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Christie, Nils、許華孚(2004)。犯罪控制工業時代的來臨。臺北：—品出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.Foucault, Michel、劉北成、楊遠嬰(1992)。規訓與懲罰：監獄的誕生。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
22.許福生(1998)。當前犯罪控制對策之研究：兩極化刑事政策之觀點。桃園：中央警察大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.黃富源、范國勇、張平吾(2002)。犯罪學概論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.Lipset, Seymour Martin(1960)。Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics。Doubleday & Company。  new window
25.林山田(1998)。刑罰學。臺北：商務。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王志弘譯， Bauman , Z. 著。工作、消費與新貧(Work , Consumerism and the New Poor. London : open University Press)。  延伸查詢new window
2.王旭(1999)。收看電視與對治安觀感之問的關聯：涵化理論的驗證。  延伸查詢new window
3.李培元譯， Bauman, Z.著(2004)。全球化浪潮的政治定位(In Search of Politics . Cambridge: Polity Press)。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱天助(2002)。布爾迪厄文化再裂理論。  延伸查詢new window
5.林山田、 林東茂、林燦璋(2002)。  延伸查詢new window
6.許振明(2004)。臺灣的兩岸經貿政策及兩岸經濟政策合作之分析。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊瑩、陳麗欣(1996)。臺灣地區不同家庭背景子女教育機會差異之研究。  延伸查詢new window
8.薛承泰(2001)。臺灣單親戶及貧窮之趨勢分析。  延伸查詢new window
9.瞿海源(1999)。社會新聞與社會問題犯罪新聞為例。  延伸查詢new window
10.法務部犯罪問題研究中心編印。92年犯罪狀況及其分析。  延伸查詢new window
11.法務部(2004)。法務部法務統計。  延伸查詢new window
12.內政部(2005)。內政統計月報。  延伸查詢new window
13.主計處(2003)。主計處重要指標統計。  延伸查詢new window
14.Andenaes, J.(1975)。Punishment and Deterrence。  new window
15.Bondeson, U.(1977)。Offender Care in the Community: intentions and Reality。  new window
16.Christie, N.(1982)。Limits to Pam。  new window
17.Cohen, S.(1973)。Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers。  new window
18.Duff, R. A. and D. Garland(1994)。Introduction: Thinking about Punishment。  new window
19.Ferge, Zs. and Miller, S. M.(1987)。Social Reproduction and the Dynamics of Deprivation。  new window
20.Foucault, M.(1977)。Subject and Power. In Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow’ s Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics。  new window
21.Gans, H. J.(1995)。The War against the Poor: The Underclass and Antipoverty Policy。  new window
22.Garland, D.(2000)。Culture of Control。  new window
23.Garland, D. and R. Sparks.(2000)。Criminology, social theory and the challenge of our times。  new window
24.Goffinan, E.(1961)。On the Characteristics of Total Institutions。  new window
25.Hall, S., J. Clarke, C. Critcher, T. Jefferson and B. Roberts(1978)。Newsmaking and Crime。  new window
26.Hall, S., J. Clarke, C. Critcher, T. Jefferson and B. Roberts(1979)。Policing the Crisis。  new window
27.Hauge, R.(1984)。Alcohol and Crime: Study / Prepared, at the Request of the Council of Europ。  new window
28.von Hirsch(1986)。Past or Future Crimes: Deservedness and Dangerousness in the Sentencing of Criminals。  new window
29.Hjemdal, O. K. and L. Risan(1985)。Information Activity。  new window
30.Hudson, B.(2002)。Punishment and Control。  new window
31.Human Rights Watch(1997)。Prison Human Rights: Taiwan Human Rights Report 1997。  new window
32.Ignatieff, M.(1978)。A Just Measure of Pain。  new window
33.Marx, K.(1961)。Capital, vols I-III。  new window
34.McCorkle L. W. and Richard R. Korn(1954)。Resocialization within Walls。  new window
35.Parsons, T.(1951)。The Social Systems。  new window
36.Quinney, R.(1975)。Criminology。  new window
37.Reiman, J. H.(2000)。The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison, The: Ideology, Class, and Criminal Justice: Ideology, Class, and Criminal Justice。  new window
38.Reynolds, M. O.(1995)。Crime-Stoppers’ Textbooks。  new window
39.Ryan, M and Joe Sim(1995)。The Penal System in England and Wales: Round Up the Usual Suspects。  new window
40.Schumann, K. F., C. Berlitz, H. W. Claus arid R. kaulitzki(1987)。Juvenile Delinquency and the Limits of General Prevention。  new window
41.Scraton, P. and Kathryn Chadwick(1996)。The Theoretical and Political Priorities of Critical Criminology。  new window
42.Simon, J.(1997)。Governing Through Crime。  new window
43.Walker, N.(1991)。Why Punishment? Theories of punishment Reassessed。  new window
44.Welch, M.(2004)。War on Terror and the Criminology of the Other: Examining Detention and the Rise of a Global Culture of Control。  new window
45.Wilson, J. Q.(1982)。Thinking about Crime。  new window
46.Wright, E. O.(1976)。Class Boundaries in Advanced Capitalist Societies。  new window
47.Wright, E. O.(1978)。Class, Crisis and the State。  new window
48.Young, J.(1997)。Left Realist Criminology。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bottoms, A.(1995)。The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing。The politics of sentencing reform。New York, NY：Oxford：Oxford University Press：Clarendon Press：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Morgan, R.(2000)。The Politics of Criminological Research。Doing Research on Crime and Justice。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Weiss, Robert P.(1998)。Conclusion: Imprisonment at the Millennium 2000: Its variety and patterns throughout the world。Comparing Prison Systems: Toward a Comparative and International Penology。Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：648（臺灣：645，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1885225 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67691331
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上