本文主要以戴雪的國會主權論為研究主題，嘗試引介並評估其國會主權理論，重點包括：定義、內容、特性、是否可能受到限制與歷史背景。就最關鍵的概念而言，戴雪認為，英國政治制度所有且主要的特性，就是國會主權。進一步，他認為，一、此主權的存在是一件法律事實，久經英國法律明白承認；二、世間（外國）盛行的法律制度不適用於英國；三、在英國憲法下，國會是一絕對主權之立法機關。整體而言，戴雪的觀點毫無疑問是最全面、豐富與深入。尤其他標幟出英國國會的主要特徵，不僅相當正確符合當時的政治情勢；從比較的觀點而言，也提供我們在研究國會問題時，一個相當特殊的觀點。

The topic of this article is the Albert Venn Dicey’s discourse on parliamentary sovereignty. It attempts to introduce and evaluate the theory of parliamentary sovereignty, including its definition, contents, characters, possible limits and historic background. The key concept of this article that Dicey think, parliamentary sovereignty was the main character of U.K. political institution. Furthermore, he points 1) that parliamentary sovereignty existed was the law reality, and it was recognized by U.K. law; 2) the foreign law was not applied in U.K.; 3) under U.K. constitution, the Parliament was a legislative body of absolute sovereignty. As a whole, Dicey’s view was so all-around, abundant and deep by no means. Especially he pointed the main charter of U.K. Parliament, not only agreed the political situation in 18th century; but also provided the special view on parliamentary studies in a comparative perspective.