:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:住院中與出院後病人滿意度差異比較--系絡觀點
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:陳建立梁素琴
作者(外文):Chen, Chien-liLiang, Su-chin
出版日期:2007
卷期:26:3
頁次:頁208-217
主題關鍵詞:病人滿意度系絡觀點因素恆等性效果量Patient satisfactionContextual perspectiveFactorial invarianceEffect size
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:135
  • 點閱點閱:20
目標:以系絡觀點探究住院中與出院後病人滿意度其因素結構的測量恒等性;進而比較住院中與出院後病人滿意度評價之差異。 方法:採用THIS住院滿意度量表,針對同一期間住院病人實施住院中與出院後滿意度測量,以住院中樣本 (n=1128) 進行探索性因素分析,萃取滿意度因素;再採平衡樣本設計,從全部住院中樣本隨機抽取685份與出院後樣本 (n=641) 使用多樣本結構方程模式進行驗證性因素分析,檢驗滿意度之因素恒等性,最後則以效果量比較住院中與出院後滿意度之差異。 結果:獲得住院滿意度5因素結構,累積解釋變異量72.8%;兩個樣本之因素負荷量介於.78-.92之間,具因素恒等性;住院中病人滿意度高於出院後,具統計上 (p<.001) 與實務上 (Cohen's d) 的顯著性差異,效果量介於.46-.71之間,屬中等程度差異。 結論:實證資料顯示實體環境與社會系絡會影響住院滿意之態度與評價,住院中與出院後的病人滿意度知覺呈顯著性差異,服務滿意的測量應重視構念效度以及測量可能的偏誤。
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to find out the measurement invariance of satisfaction factor structure of hospitalized and discharged patients and to compare the differences of satisfaction assessment between them. Methods: THIS questionnaire was used to measure patient satisfaction before and after discharge in the same interval. We selected 1128 hospitalized patients for exploratory factor analysis to get the satisfaction factor. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed among 685 hospitalized random patients and 641 discharged patients, using multi-group structural equation modeling to test the factorial invariance of satisfaction. We compared effect size between hospitalized and discharged patients’ satisfaction. Results: Five factor structures were found in the hospitalized patient satisfaction, which explained 72.8% of the total cumulative variance. Factor loading of the two groups was between 0.78 and 0.92 with factorial invariance. Hospitalized patient satisfaction was higher than discharged patient satisfaction (p<0.001, Cohen’s d). Effect size had a medium different level between 0.46 and 0.71. Conclusions: Physical environment and social context affect hospitalized patient satisfaction. Satisfaction perception between hospitalized and discharged patients was significantly different. Construct validity and biases should be assessed in measuring service satisfaction.
期刊論文
1.Rousseau, D. M.、Fried, Y.(2001)。Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research。Journal of Organizational Behavior,22,1-13。  new window
2.Fischer, E.、Gainer, B.、Bristor, J.(1997)。The Sex of the Service Provider: Does it Influence Perceptions of Service Quality?。Journal of Retailing,73(3),361-382。  new window
3.Mone, M. A.、Mueller, G. C.、Mauland, W.(1996)。The Perceptions and Usage of Statistical Power in Applied Psychology and Management Research。Personnel Psychology,49(1),103-120。  new window
4.Salancik, G. R.、Pfeffer, J.(1978)。A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Tasj Design。Administrative Science Quarterly,23(2),224-253。  new window
5.石曜堂(19780800)。醫療品質評估。醫院,11(2),106-109。  延伸查詢new window
6.DiMaggio, Paul J.、Powell, Walter W.(1983)。The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields。American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160。  new window
7.Bagozzi, Richard P.、Yi, Youjae(1988)。On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,16(1),74-94。  new window
8.林鉦棽、彭台光(20061200)。多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報,23(6),649-675。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Podsakoff, Philip M.、MacKenzie, Scott B.、Lee, Jeong-Yeon、Podsakoff, Nathan P.(2003)。Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies。Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5),879-903。  new window
10.Vandenberg, Robert J.、Lance, Charles E.(2000)。A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research。Organizational Research Methods,3(1),4-70。  new window
11.Gutek, B. A.、Bhappu, A.、Liao-Troth, M.、Bennett, C.(1999)。Distinguishing between Service Relationship and Service Encounters。Journal of Applied Psychology,84,218-233。  new window
12.Conlon, D. E.、Van Dyne, L.、Milner, M.、Ng, Y. K.(2004)。The Effects of Physical and Social Context on Evaluations of Captive, Intensive Service Relationships。The Academy of Management Journal,47,433-445。  new window
13.Lispsy, M. W.、Wilson, D. B.(1993)。The Efficacy of Psychological。American Psychologist,48,1181-1209。  new window
14.Stokols, D.(1995)。The Padadox of Environmental Psychology。American Psychologist,50,821-837。  new window
15.Brock, JK-U.(2003)。The 'Power' of International Business Research。Journal of International Business Studies,34,90-99。  new window
研究報告
1.(2006)。民國93年國民醫療保健支出。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會(20060127)。95年度新制醫院評鑑基準暨評分說明手冊。臺北:財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺灣醫務管理學會(2003)。臺灣醫療照護品質指標系列。臺北:臺灣醫務管理學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Roethlisberger, F. J.、Dickson, W. J.(1939)。Management and the Worker。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Gutek, B. A.(1995)。The Dynamics of Service: Reflections on the Changing Nature of Provider/Customer Interactions。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
5.黃營杉、汪志堅、Lerlinger, Fred N.、Lee, Howard B.(2002)。研究方法。臺北:華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
6.Kotler, P.(1988)。Marketing Management Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control。Prentice Hall。  new window
7.Barnard, Chester I.(1938)。The Functions of the Executive。Harvard University Press。  new window
8.邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式--LISREL的理論、技術與應用。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
9.Cohen, Jacob E.(1988)。Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
圖書論文
1.Murphy, K.(2002)。Using Power Analysis to Evaluate and Improve Research。Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology。Malden, MA:Blackwell。  new window
2.Pfeffer, J.(1998)。Understanding organizations: concepts and controversies。Handbook of Social Psychology。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
3.Cronbach, L. J.(1971)。Test validation。Educational measurement。Washington, DC:American Council on Education。  new window
4.Paulhus, D. L.(2002)。Socially Desirable Responding: The Evolution of a Construct。The Role of Constructs in Psychological and Educational Measurement。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 運動心理資本對高中運動員知覺自我運動表現影響:教練家長式領導行為的跨層次分析
2. 若即若離?探索TSSCI商管社群網絡結構及知識活動--編輯群重疊的策略觀點
3. 知覺教育訓練成效與離職傾向關係之調節式中介模式:心理契約觀點
4. 雇主品牌管理與員工品牌權益:跨層次之中介與調節影響效果
5. 轉化型領導對群體成員企業社會責任價值觀的雙向影響:程序公正與領導者-部屬企業社會責任價值觀一致性的中介效果
6. 建言行為與員工創新行為績效:一個探討促進型建言、抑制型建言、領導與部屬交換關係與員工創新行為績效的三階交互作用模型
7. 會考成績對就近入學影響之研究:多層次分析的取向
8. 應用日誌法探究餐飲業顧客無禮行為對服務人員情緒耗竭之影響:跨層次分析
9. 道德領導與員工建言行為:情感信任與團隊成員關係衝突知覺的中介角色研究
10. 參與學習過程經驗及組織脈絡因素對樂齡學習中心學習者績效表現知覺之影響:階層線性模式分析
11. 以策略觀點探討服務績效之多層次研究
12. 急性子主管不好嗎?主管時間緊迫性格對不當督導之影響
13. 員工建言行為:回顧與未來
14. 交換關係對於知識分享以及創造力影響之多層次研究:一個整合社會兩難困境與代理問題之分析
15. 從服務關係探討銷售人員情緒智商對顧客忠誠度之影響
 
1. 道德領導力對團隊績效與員工建言影響之探索 -以團隊關係衝突為跨層次中介模式
2. 以跨層次模型探討職涯使命感與組織公平氛圍對公部門員工個人工作行為之影響
3. 跨層次觀點下家長式領導、倫理氣候、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究
4. 威權領導對任務績效之影響:以LMX及部屬職場偏差行為為中介因子
5. 科技大學教師專業背景、教師教學表現與學生學習成就之關聯:階層線性模式分析
6. 公部門團隊成員行動化知識分享行為之研究-科技信任與雙元性知識分享之調節效果
7. 團隊中的自主性與成員效能:家長式領導的調節
8. 競爭氣候如何燃起員工績效?檢驗競爭氣候與競爭特質交互對工作重塑、工作敬業與工作績效的關係
9. 以多層次分析探討組織認同在個人-組織適配度與離職傾向之調節式中介效果
10. 組織變革對員工離職傾向之跨層次分析:心理契約違反與共享心智模式的中介效果
11. 高績效工作系統與員工績效之跨層次研究:人力資本中介效果及創意自我效能與服務導向干擾效果
12. 我國高級中等學校教師與直屬處室主任關係品質、職場自尊、團體凝聚力與教學效能關聯性之研究
13. CVIPP模型在我國樂齡學習中心績效評估應用之研究
14. 影響護理人員任務績效與離職意向因素之跨層次研究
15. 團隊斷層、團隊創新氣候對團隊知識分享行為之影響
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE