臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：自然災害後政府重建資源分配之決策因素分析：以921地震為例
書刊名：公共行政學報
作者：洪鴻智 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hung, Hung-chih
出版日期：2007
卷期：23
頁次：頁95-124
主題關鍵詞：災後重建；利益團體；複雜公共利益；資源分配；921地震；地方政府；Post-disaster recovery；Interest groups；Sophisticated public interest；Resource allocation；921 Chi-chi earthquake；Local government
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:223
  • 點閱點閱:70
多數研究災後重建的地方治理文獻，偏重在社區觀察與重建程序的歸納。然對於真正影響重建方式與資源分配效率的政治經濟因素及分配機制，卻缺乏深入的討論。本文應用複雜公共利益理論 (sophisticated public interest theory)，以1999年921地震災後重建為例，詮釋政府部門的災後重建資源分配決策。透過三個步驟的迴歸分析，發現影響政府重建經費分配的重要因素，是兼具損失導向 (loss-based) 與資源重分配效應的補助模式。來自地方的政治利益團體，可能透過遊說或資源爭取過程，主導政府重建資源配置的選擇行為，而導致重建資源產生重分配與損失復原的效應。此政治經濟運作過程，不但可能因而降低地方自動從事減災與避免在災害敏感地開發的誘因，亦會犧牲重建資源分配的經濟效率。
Previous researches that investigate the local governance of post-disaster recovery were mainly focused on the recovery procedures induction and the community activity observations from limited disaster event samples. However, these works lacked detailed discussion of the political economic factors and resource distribution mechanism that would determine the post-disaster recovery procedures choice and the efficiency of resource allocation. This article applied a sophisticated public interest model to explain the governmental decision-making process associated with the post-disaster recovery resources allocation. A three-step regression method is designed to conduct an empirical analysis by using the data with respect to the governmental subsidies allocation following the 921 Chi-Chi Earthquake in 1999. The results indicate that the governmental post-disaster subsidies allocation is not only based on a loss-based rule but also presenting a resource reallocation effect. Once the recovery plans were introduced, the locally political interest groups played an important role in determining the reallocation of resources. This process may decrease the incentives for local authorities to adopt hazard migration measures or to reduce land development in hazard-prone areas. This phenomenon would also decrease the economic efficiency of governmental post-disaster recovery resource allocation.
期刊論文
1.邵珮君(20031200)。臺灣集集震災後社區營造式重建機制之探討--以軍功里和劉家伙房之重建為例。都市與計劃，30(4)，371-389。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.賴美蓉(20021200)。居民對921災後社區住宅重建之意願調查分析。都市與計劃，29(4)，533-550。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.洪鴻智、黃欣怡(20031100)。洪災保險的購買意願：以基隆河中下游沿岸居民為例。都市與計劃，30(3)，241-258。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Berke, Philip R.、Kartez, Jack、Wenger, Dennis(1993)。Recovery after disaster: Achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity。Disasters，17(2)，93-109。  new window
5.魯炳炎(20030100)。中央與地方財政關係--我國地方政府觀點之分析。經社法制論叢，31，159-185。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉麗雯、邱瑜瑾、陸宛蘋(20030600)。九二一震災的救災組織動員與資源連結。中國行政評論，12(3)，139-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林元祥、許志敏、邱益瑞(20031200)。消防人員對九二一震災消防搶救時序之認知研究。行政暨政策學報，37，1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.呂育誠(20050300)。地方治理意涵及其制度建立策略之研究--兼論我國縣市推動地方治理的問題與前景。公共行政學報. 政大，14，1-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Lynn, L. E. Jr.、Heinrich, C. J.、Hill, C. J.(200004)。Studying Governance and Public Management: Challenges and Prospects。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory，10(2)，233-261。  new window
10.Stigler, George J.(1971)。The Theory of Economic Regulation。The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science，2(1)，1-21。  new window
11.Peltzman, Sam(1976)。Toward a More General Theory of Regulation。Journal of Law and Economics，19(2)，211-240。  new window
12.呂朝賢(20020900)。非營利組織與政府的關係--以九二一賑災為例。臺灣社會福利學刊，2，39-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.孫本初、鍾京佑(20050900)。治理理論之初探：政府、市場與社會治理架構。公共行政學報，16，107-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.賴美如、洪鴻智、陳素櫻、陳亮全(2002)。921地震的社會經濟衝擊與災後重建：以臺中縣與南投縣為例。土木水利：中國土木水利工程學會會刊，29(2)，8-20。  延伸查詢new window
15.郭春敏、賴素鈴(2003)。921地震對臺灣國際觀光旅館之衝擊－介入模式。觀光研究學報，9(1)，123-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.蔡克銓、羅俊雄(2000)。九二一大地震建築物損壞調查結果初步報告。科學發展月刊，28(2)，85-89。  延伸查詢new window
17.張其祿(2003)。我國地方政府財政地位之經驗研究。公共行政學報（政大），8，99-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.王鴻楷(1999)。集集地震社會經濟震災勘查。結構工程，14(3)，177-216。  延伸查詢new window
19.Schneider, S. K.(2005)。Administrative Breakdown in the Governmental Response to Hurricane Katrina。Public Administration Review，65，515-516。  new window
20.Rubin, C. B.、Barbee, D. G.(1985)。Disaster Recovery and Hazard Mitigation: Bridging the Intergovernmental Gap。Public Administration Review，45，57-63。  new window
21.Ink, D.(2006)。An Analysis of the House Select Committee and White House Reports on Hurricane Katrina。Public Administration Review，66(6)，800-807。  new window
22.Kartez, J. D.(1984)。Crisis Response Planning: Toward a Contingent Analysis。Journal of the American Planning Association，50，9-21。  new window
23.Wu, J. Y.、Lindell, M. K.(2004)。Housing Reconstruction after Two Major Earthquakes: The 1994 Northbridge Earthquake in the United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan。Disasters，28，63-81。  new window
24.Bates, F. L.、Peacock, W. G.(1989)。Long Term Recovery。International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters，7，349-365。  new window
25.Comfort, L.、Wisner, B.、Cutter, S.、Pulwarty, R.、Hewitt, K.、Oliver-Smith, A.、Wiener, J.、Fordham, M.、Peacock, W.、Krimgold, F.(1999)。Reframing Disaster Policy: The Global Evaluation of Vulnerable Community。Environmental Hazards，1，39-44。  new window
26.Mustafa, D.(2004)。Reinforcing Vulnerability? Disaster Relief, Recovery, and Response to the 2001 Flood in Rawalpindi, Pakistan。Environmental Hazards，5，71-82。  new window
27.Crone, C.、Tschirhart, J.(1998)。Separating Economic from Political Influences on Government Decisions。Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization，35，405-425。  new window
28.Kamel, N.、Loukaitou-Sideris, A.(2004)。Residential Assistance and Recovery Following the Northridge Earthquake。Urban Studies，41，533-562。  new window
研究報告
1.洪鴻智(2004)。災後重建體系及其運作機制之檢討與建置。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部建築研究所(1999)。921集集大地震建築物震害調查初步報告。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.S.K, Schneider(1995)。Flirting With Disaster: Public Management in Crisis Situation Armonk。New York：Vintage Books。  new window
2.Mader, G. G.、Spangle, W. E.、Blair, M. L.(1980)。Land Use Planning after Earthquakes。Portola Valley, CA：William Spangle and Associate。  new window
3.Coburn, Andrew、Spence, Robin(2002)。Earthquake Protection。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
4.Haas, J. Eugene、Kates, Robert W.、Bowden, Martyn J.(1977)。Reconstruction Following Disaster。Cambridge, MA：The MIT Press。  new window
5.Mileti, Dennis S.(1999)。Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States。Joseph Henry Press。  new window
6.江明修(20000000)。第三部門：經營策略與社會參與。臺北：智勝文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.May, P. J.(1985)。Recovering Catastrophes: Federal Disaster Relief Policy and Politics。Recovering Catastrophes: Federal Disaster Relief Policy and Politics。London, UK。  new window
8.Uphoff, N.(1986)。Local Institutional Development: An Analytical Sourcebook with Cases。Local Institutional Development: An Analytical Sourcebook with Cases。West Hartford, CT。  new window
9.Bolin, R.、Stanford, L.(1998)。The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster。The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster。London, UK。  new window
10.Platt, R. H.(1999)。Disaster and Democracy: The Politics of Extreme Natural Events。Disaster and Democracy: The Politics of Extreme Natural Events。Washington, DC。  new window
11.Panda, S. M.(2001)。NGOs as Partners in Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction: Case of Gujarat Earthquake。NGOs as Partners in Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction: Case of Gujarat Earthquake。Nagoya, Japan。  new window
12.行政院九二一震災災後重建推動委員會(2003)。921重建四年成效報告。921重建四年成效報告。南投。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳杰穎、洪鴻智(2006)。臺北市政府推動防救災工作計畫協助復原重建綱領之擬定：以颱洪地震災害為例。臺北市政府推動防救災工作計畫協助復原重建綱領之擬定：以颱洪地震災害為例。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.March, J. G.(2002)。Understanding How Decisions Happen in Organizations。Organization Decision Making。New York, NY。  new window
圖書論文
1.Noll, R. G.(1989)。Economic Perspectives on the Politics of Regulation。Handbook of Industrial Organization。Amsterdam：North-Holland。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：543（臺灣：518，外國：25） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1451226 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67259286
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上